The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Efficacy of Intrathecal Clonidine Versus Neostigmine as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine on Postoperative Maternal and Fetal Outcomes After Elective Cesarean Section

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05943613
Recruitment Status : Not yet recruiting
First Posted : July 13, 2023
Last Update Posted : July 13, 2023
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Yasser Mamdouh Hassan Badawy, Assiut University

Brief Summary:

The delivery of the infant into the arms of a conscious and pain free mother is one of the most exciting and rewarding moments in medicine. Neuraxial anesthesia is now the preferred technique for lower segment cesarean sections (LSCS). Although epidural, spinal, continuous spinal, and combined spinal-epidural techniques have all been advocated, most cesarean sections are performed under single-shot spinal anesthesia.

Even when a long acting local anesthetic like bupivacaine is used, the duration of spinal anesthesia (SA) is short and higher doses of analgesics are required in the postoperative period. Therefore, achieving a subarachnoid block that provides high quality postoperative analgesia of consistently prolonged duration is an attractive goal.


Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Postoperative Pain Drug: Clonidine Phase 1

Detailed Description:

Opioids such as morphine, fentanyl, and sufentanil have been administered intrathecally as adjuvants to increase the duration of postoperative analgesia. Although they ensure superior quality of analgesia, they are associated with many side effects such as pruritus, nausea, vomiting, urinary retention, and especially late and unpredictable respiratory depression.

This has directed the research toward the use of newer and better local anesthetic additives for SA such as neostigmine, ketamine, midazolam, and clonidine.

Neostigmine is an anticholinesterase agent which increases the acetylcholine (Ach) concentration at the cholinergic synapse by blocking the activity of true and pseudocholinesterase enzymes. In postoperative period descending noradrenergic or cholinergic antinociceptive spinal system is activated by ongoing pain causing an increase in the release of Ach, which in the presence of neostigmine results in augmented analgesia. It has no untoward side effects such as respiratory depression, pruritus, and drowsiness as experienced with intrathecal narcotics.Clonidine is an α2-receptor agonist which has gained popularity in recent times as an adjuvant in spinal anesthesia. Analgesic effect of clonidine mediated by α2-adrenoceptors situated in the dorsal horn of spinal cord. The antinociceptive properties of clonidine indicate that it might be useful as an alternative to intrathecal opioids for postoperative analgesia, thus also avoiding the adverse effect of opioids.

Neostigmine was used in different dose ranges from 5 µg to 750 µg intrathecally but a low dose of 5 µg is sufficient to cause early onset of sensory and motor block.

On the other hand, clonidine was used in different doses from 15 µg to 450 µg, and many previous studies concluded that minimum 30 µg dose of clonidine provide a significant increase in the duration of sensory block, motor block, and spinal analgesia without increasing the incidence of side effects.

Dextrose 5% is used to make the adjuvant solutions more hyperbaric because in some studies, when hyperbaric solution of neostigmine was used, the incidence of nausea and vomiting was reduced by preventing cephalic spread of the drug to the brain stem.

Stress responses to surgical trauma and postoperative pain elicit diffuse changes in hormonal secretion such as adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol and prolactin, with several deleterious metabolic and cardiovascular effects that can be prevented by effective postoperative analgesia.

Cortisol is a key player in the stress response and its secretion is facilitated by the ACTH which interacts with the sympathetic nervous system and the inhibitory control of endogenous opioid peptides, influencing pain processing.(12) Negative associations between cortisol levels and subsequent pain perception suggest the possibility that the hypothalamic-pituitary- adrenal (HPA) axis contributes to attenuating pain perception during acute stressful events, possibly mediated by increased cortisol.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 111 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Other
Official Title: Efficacy of Intrathecal Clonidine Versus Neostigmine as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine on Postoperative Maternal and Fetal Outcomes After Elective Cesarean Section: A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial
Estimated Study Start Date : December 1, 2023
Estimated Primary Completion Date : September 30, 2025
Estimated Study Completion Date : November 30, 2025

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Placebo Comparator: Group B
control group : will receive 2 ml (10 mg) of intrathecal hyperbaric Bupivacaine (0.5%) and another syringe containing 1 ml of Dextrose 5%.
Drug: Clonidine
compare the effect of intrathecal Clonidine and Neostigmine as adjuvants to Bupivacaine in elective cesarean section

Active Comparator: Group BC
will receive 2 ml (10 mg) of intrathecal hyperbaric Bupivacaine (0.5%) and another syringe containing Clonidine (30 µg) diluted in Dextrose 5% to a total volume of 1 ml.
Drug: Clonidine
compare the effect of intrathecal Clonidine and Neostigmine as adjuvants to Bupivacaine in elective cesarean section

Active Comparator: Group BN
will receive 2 ml (10 mg) of intrathecal hyperbaric Bupivacaine (0.5%) and another syringe containing Neostigmine (10 µg) diluted in Dextrose 5% to a total volume of 1 ml.
Drug: Clonidine
compare the effect of intrathecal Clonidine and Neostigmine as adjuvants to Bupivacaine in elective cesarean section




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. postoperative analgesic efficacy of intrathecal clonidine and neostigmine by use of numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score. [ Time Frame: 2 hours after time of sensory block ]
    using numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score that ranges from 0 indicating no pain up to 10 indicating the worst pain



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   20 Years to 35 Years   (Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age: ranges from 20 - 35 years old.
  2. ASA physical status II.
  3. Singleton fetus at term.
  4. Parturient scheduled for elective lower segment cesarian section under spinal anethesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient refusal.
  2. Contraindications to spinal blockade, such cardiorespiratory problems, coagulopathy, neurological disease, psychological troubles, and allergy to the used drugs.
  3. Morbid obesity.
  4. Failure of spinal blockade.
  5. Emergency CS.
  6. Complicated pregnancy.
  7. Intrauterine fetal compromise.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT05943613


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: yasser mamdouh hassan, assistant lecturer 01090433083 yassermamdouh486@aun.edu.eg
Contact: ahmed mohamed abbas, assistant professor 01003385183 ahmedabbas@aun.edu.eg

Sponsors and Collaborators
Assiut University
Additional Information:
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Yasser Mamdouh Hassan Badawy, Assistant lecturer of anesthesia and intensive care, Assiut University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05943613    
Other Study ID Numbers: Clonidine versus Neostigmine
First Posted: July 13, 2023    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: July 13, 2023
Last Verified: July 2023

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Pain, Postoperative
Postoperative Complications
Pathologic Processes
Pain
Neurologic Manifestations
Clonidine
Analgesics
Sensory System Agents
Peripheral Nervous System Agents
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Antihypertensive Agents
Sympatholytics
Autonomic Agents
Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists
Adrenergic alpha-Agonists
Adrenergic Agonists
Adrenergic Agents
Neurotransmitter Agents
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action