The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

High Intensity Functional Training for Individuals With Neurologic Diagnoses and Their Care Partners (SHIFT-AR)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05951985
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : July 19, 2023
Last Update Posted : September 11, 2023
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Reed Handlery, Arkansas Colleges of Health Education

Brief Summary:
Individuals with and without neurologic diagnoses greatly benefit from participation in regular exercise but the majority are physically inactive. This is an issue for both them and their care partners as their health is often linked. This study aims to examine the long-term physical and psychosocial effects of structured, group-based, high intensity functional training (HIFT) exercise for people with neurologic diagnoses and their care partners.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Neurologic Disorder Parkinson Disease Spinal Cord Injuries Spina Bifida Stroke Poliomyelitis Multiple Sclerosis Brain Injuries Behavioral: HIFT Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

Over the course of two years, this study will provide no-cost, twice weekly, group-based, HIFT exercise for people with neurologic diagnoses and their care partners. All participants will be required to have physician or advanced practice provider clearance to exercise. All participants will be evaluated by a physical therapist at no-cost prior to beginning the intervention to assess eligibility for the study. All eligible participants will complete a demographics questionnaire, questionnaires regarding physical and psychosocial health, and a battery of physical tests assessing mobility, strength, endurance, and balance. Participants' physical activity levels will also be monitored throughout the study through accelerometers.

Participants will participate in a maximum of twice weekly HIFT exercise for up to 2 years. All exercise programming will be led by licensed physical therapists with assistance from Doctor of Physical Therapy students. All exercise staff will be Cardiopulmonary resuscitation/basic life support certified and an automated external defibrillator will be available onsite. Exercise classes will utilize HIFT, which includes various exercises that are functional and to be performed at a high intensity. Exercises will include aerobic, resistance, and/or balance training and align with the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 100 participants
Allocation: N/A
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description: Longitudinal with assessments occurring quarterly over the course of two years
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: High Intensity Functional Training for Individuals With Neurologic Diagnoses and Their Care Partners: A 2-Year Longitudinal Study
Actual Study Start Date : August 15, 2023
Estimated Primary Completion Date : August 14, 2025
Estimated Study Completion Date : August 14, 2025

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: HIFT Exercise
In this single group design, all participants will be provided with up to two years of twice weekly supervised group exercise.
Behavioral: HIFT
Exercise sessions will be 60 to 75 minutes in duration and be a combination of resistance, aerobic, and balance exercise, with emphasis on functional movements performed at a high intensity. Exercises will be tailored/modified to meet the needs of each participant.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Participant Attendance at 24 months [ Time Frame: After 24 months of intervention ]
    The percentage of intervention sessions attended by participants.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change in lower extremity functional strength at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    Lower extremity strength will be measured via functional test (Five Times Sit to Stand). This test records the amount of time taken to rise and sit to and from a chair five consecutive times. Faster times indicate greater lower extremity strength.

  2. hange in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire - 39 (PDQ-39) at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    The PDQ-39 is a 39-item participant-reported questionnaire which assesses health-related quality of life across 8 domains (mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, bodily discomfort). Participants respond to each item using a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 4 (always). Items in each domain are scored by expressing summed item scores as a percentage (ranging from 0 to 100%). Lower scores indicate better quality of life.

  3. Change in fast-paced gait speed at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    Fast-paced walking speed will be measured via 10 meter walk test, which has individuals walk 10 meters with the middle 6 meters timed; two trials are performed and the average time is taken. Faster walking speeds indicate greater mobility with walking.

  4. Change in fast-paced wheelchair propulsion speed at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    Fast-paced propulsion speed will be measured via wheelchair propulsion test, which has individuals propel 10 meters and are timed; two trials are performed and the average time is taken. Faster propulsion speeds indicate greater mobility with wheelchair propulsion.

  5. Change in 6 Minute Walk Test at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    The 6 Minute Walk Test measures a participants ability to cover as much distance (measured in meters) as possible while walking for 6 minutes. Participants will walk along a pre-defined pathway for 6 minutes, resting as needed. The test is a measure of walking endurance with further distances indicating greater endurance.

  6. Change in 6 Minute Propulsion Test at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    The 6 Minute Propulsion Test measures a participants ability to cover as much distance (measured in meters) as possible while propelling a wheelchair for 6 minutes. The test is a measure of aerobic endurance with further distances indicating greater endurance.

  7. Change in Movement Disorder Sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    The MDS-UPDRS measures disability as a result of Parkinson's and allows tracking for progression of the disease. The scale has four parts (1, mentation, behavior and mood, 2, activities of daily living, 3, motor examination, and 4, complications of therapy. Each parkinsonian sign or symptom is ranked on a 5-point Likert scale (ranging from 0 to 4) with higher scores indicating greater impairments. The minimum score on the entire scale is 0 and the maximum is 199.

  8. Change in accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    Physical activity levels will be measured via thigh or wrist-worn accelerometer (activPAL or ActiGraph). These small devices will be worn on the less affected thigh or wrist (or non-dominant thigh or wrist for care partners). Through collecting acceleration data, different intensities of physical activity will be inferred (i.e light, moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity), with moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity being used as the primary outcome measure. At all time points, participants will wear the accelerometer for 7 consecutive days.

  9. Participant Retention at 24 months [ Time Frame: After 24 months of intervention ]
    The number and percentage of participants who remain in the study through the final measurement point at 24 months.

  10. Participant Recruitment Rates [ Time Frame: Throughout the 24 months study period ]
    The number of participants recruited will be reported as a percentage of total participants contacted for study participation.

  11. Change in four square step test at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    The four square step test measures stepping balance as the time taken to step clockwise and counterclockwise in a square pattern. Faster times indicate greater balance.

  12. YMCA Bench Press Test at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    The YMCA Bench Press Test measures muscular endurance of the upper body. The test requires participants to complete as many repetitions of barbell bench press as they can with good form. Greater number of repetitions indicates greater muscular endurance.

  13. 30 second peak power test at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    The 30 second peak power test measures anaerobic power produced (in watts) over 30 seconds on a ski ergometer. Greater wattage indicates greater anaerobic power.

  14. Change in self-reported exercise confidence at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    Change will be reported using a visual analogue scale where participants rate their confidence from not confident at all to completely confident.

  15. Change in self-reported pain at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    Change will be reported using a visual analogue scale where participants rate their pain from no pain to worst possible pain.

  16. Change in self-reported sleep quality at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    Change will be reported using a visual analogue scale where participants rate their sleep quality from poor to exceptional.

  17. Change in self-reported social support at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    Change will be reported using a visual analogue scale where participants rate their level of social support from people in the intervention and those outside the intervention. The scale goes from poor to exceptional social support.

  18. Change in self-reported physical ability at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    Change will be reported using a visual analogue scale where participants rate their level of ability from poor to exceptional on attributes of mobility, power, endurance/stamina, strength and balance.

  19. Self-reported safety with program at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    Using a visual analogue scale, participants rate their feelings of safety with the intervention at 24 months. Scores range from not safe at all to exceptionally safe.

  20. Self-reported satisfaction with coach supervision at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    Using a visual analogue scale, participants rate their feelings of satisfaction with coach supervision during the intervention at 24 months. Scores range from not satisfied at all to extremely satisfied.

  21. Self-reported feelings of inclusion at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    Using a visual analogue scale, participants rate their feelings of inclusion during the intervention at 24 months. Scores range from minimally included to maximally included.

  22. Self-reported feelings of exercise intensity at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    Using a visual analogue scale, participants rate their feelings of exercise intensity during the intervention at 24 months. Scores range from low intensity to high intensity exercise.

  23. Self-reported feelings of exercise variety at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    Using a visual analogue scale, participants rate their feelings on exercise variety during the intervention at 24 months. Scores range from low exercise variety to high exercise variety.

  24. Self-reported feelings of exercise applicability in real life at 24 months [ Time Frame: After, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of intervention ]
    Using a visual analogue scale, participants rate their feelings on applicability of exercises to real life during the intervention at 24 months. Scores range from not applicable at all to extremely applicable.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must be at least 18 years of age
  • Participants must be able to communicate and read in English
  • Participants must have physician and/or advanced practice provider clearance to exercise
  • Participants must have a neurologic diagnosis (e.g., spinal cord injury, Parkinson's, brain injury, stroke, poliomyelitis, multiple sclerosis, spina bifida, etc.) OR participants must be care partner of a person with neurologic diagnosis.
  • Participants must possess at least 4/5 elbow flexion strength bilaterally
  • Participants must be able to locomote independently (i.e., ambulate or propel a manual or power wheelchair independently).
  • Participants must provide their own transportation to/from the research study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants will be excluded if they fail to meet any of the inclusion requirements

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT05951985


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Reed Handlery, PhD 479-401-6016 reed.handlery@achehealth.edu
Contact: Kaci Handlery, DPT 479-401-6017 kaci.handlery@achehealth.edu

Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, Arkansas
Arkansas Colleges of Health Education Recruiting
Fort Smith, Arkansas, United States, 72916
Contact: Reed Handlery, PhD    479-401-6016    reed.handlery@achehealth.edu   
Contact: Kaci Handlery, DPT    479-401-6017    kaci.handlery@achehealth.edu   
Sponsors and Collaborators
Arkansas Colleges of Health Education
Publications:
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Reed Handlery, Assistant Professor, Arkansas Colleges of Health Education
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05951985    
Other Study ID Numbers: ACHE-2023-0114
First Posted: July 19, 2023    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: September 11, 2023
Last Verified: September 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Undecided
Plan Description: All non-identifiable data may be made available to other researchers upon request.

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Reed Handlery, Arkansas Colleges of Health Education:
hift
exercise
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Poliomyelitis
Parkinson Disease
Multiple Sclerosis
Brain Injuries
Spinal Cord Injuries
Spinal Dysraphism
Nervous System Diseases
Wounds and Injuries
Parkinsonian Disorders
Basal Ganglia Diseases
Brain Diseases
Central Nervous System Diseases
Movement Disorders
Synucleinopathies
Neurodegenerative Diseases
Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS
Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Demyelinating Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
Immune System Diseases
Craniocerebral Trauma
Trauma, Nervous System
Spinal Cord Diseases
Myelitis
Central Nervous System Infections
Infections
Enterovirus Infections
Picornaviridae Infections
RNA Virus Infections
Virus Diseases