The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Integrated Short-Term Palliative Rehabilitation in Incurable Cancer (INSPIRE)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05984797
Recruitment Status : Not yet recruiting
First Posted : August 9, 2023
Last Update Posted : August 9, 2023
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
Hospices Civils de Lyon
University of Bergen
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano
Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University
University of Edinburgh
EAPC
Azienda USL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
King's College London

Brief Summary:
The goal of this intervention trial is to determine if palliative rehabilitation in addition to usual care is more effective than usual care at improving health-related quality of life in patients with incurable solid cancer.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Cancer Other: Integrated Short-term Palliative Rehabilitation Not Applicable

Show Show detailed description

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 340 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description: Multinational, parallel group, randomised, controlled, assessor blind, superiority trial
Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description: Owing to the nature of the intervention, it is not possible to blind participants or intervention practitioners. Individual participants are allocated on a 1:1 basis to receive either palliative rehabilitation plus usual care or usual care. Treatment allocation will not be disclosed to the CTRU KCTU trial team or to other members of the research teams involved in data analysis to maintain blinding during outcome assessment and to minimise possible bias. Individual participants are allocated on a 1:1 basis to receive either palliative rehabilitation plus usual care or usual care. A computer-generated minimisation programme that incorporates a random element will be used to ensure that treatment groups are well balanced for: trial country ,baseline FACT-G score (<=64, 65-79, 80+), ECOG performance status (2, 3) in order to guard against chance bias in patient allocation for prognostic factors.
Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Official Title: Integrated Short-term Palliative Rehabilitation to Improve Quality of Life and Equitable Care Access in Incurable Cancer: A Multi-national Randomised Controlled Trial
Estimated Study Start Date : October 3, 2023
Estimated Primary Completion Date : October 2, 2025
Estimated Study Completion Date : August 31, 2026

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: intervention arm
Integrated Short-term Palliative Rehabilitation + usual care
Other: Integrated Short-term Palliative Rehabilitation

Participants will be offered up to 3 manualised sessions (face to face and/or remotely, via telephone or video-conference) delivered by an expert rehabilitation practitioner (physiotherapist, occupational therapist,).

Core components focus on (i) self-management of symptoms, (ii) physical activities and fitness, and (iii) social participation. Delivery of rehabilitation intervention components will include explicit use of behaviour change techniques including goal setting and action planning to focus on outcomes that are meaningful for the person, their family, and clinicians.


No Intervention: control arm
usual care



Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Health related quality of life [ Time Frame: Assessed at 8 weeks after enrollment to the study ]
    Assessed using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G) General scale, where high score indicates better functional well-being and quality of life for cancer patients. Lower scores may indicate a greater burden of symptoms, reduced ability to perform daily activities, and overall lower satisfaction with life during the cancer journey.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. FACT-G: Assessed using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General [ Time Frame: Assessed at 4 and 16 weeks after enrollment to the study ]
    Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) General scale at 4 and 16 weeks, where high score indicates better functional well-being and quality of life for cancer patients. Lower scores may indicate a greater burden of symptoms, reduced ability to perform daily activities, and overall lower satisfaction with life during the cancer journey.

  2. Disability - World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) [ Time Frame: Assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after enrollment to the study ]
    Higher scores reflect more significant disability, while lower scores indicate better functional status and less disability. It is used to measure and assess the impact of health conditions or disabilities on a participant's ability to function in their daily life.

  3. Symptoms - Palliative Outcomes Scale [ Time Frame: Assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after enrollment to the study ]
    Symptoms- Palliative Outcomes Scale - Symptoms (POS-S): designed to evaluate the severity and impact of various symptoms on the participant's quality of life. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and a greater impact on the patient's well-being, while lower scores indicate milder symptoms and less disruption in daily life.

  4. Goal attainment- Goal attainment scale (GAS-Light) [ Time Frame: Assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after enrollment to the study ]
    Goal attainment- Goal attainment scale (GAS-Light): is a tool used to measure the extent to which an participant has achieved specific goals or objectives.

  5. Client Service Receipt Inventory [ Time Frame: Assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after enrollment to the study ]
    Client Service Receipt Inventory at 8 and 16 weeks


Other Outcome Measures:
  1. Acceptability - Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) and bespoke questionnaire. *Participants randomised to the intervention arm only [ Time Frame: Assessed within first 2 weeks and then at week 8 after enrollment to the study ]
    Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) is a 4-item scale that measures the perception of satisfaction and agreeability of an intervention. Items are rated using a Likert-type semantic differential scale, ranging from 1 to 5. The AIM has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.85

  2. Appropriateness - Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) and bespoke questionnaire. *Participants randomised to the intervention arm only [ Time Frame: Assessed within first 2 weeks and then at week 8 after enrollment to the study ]
    The Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), a 4-item scale measuring the perceived relevance and compatibility of the intervention. Items are rated using a Likert-type semantic differential scale, ranging from 1 to 5. The IAM has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.91

  3. Access - semi-structured qualitative interviews [ Time Frame: Participants will be interviewed in their own language by a researcher at the inclusion site after completing the rehabilitations intervention and their consent obtained ]
    Qualitative interviews will be conducted to assess the acceptability and the appropriateness of the intervention from the patients' point of view. These will allow patients to offer their opinion and feelings about the intervention, to identify convergences and divergences between the quantitative and qualitative parts, and finally to deepen our implementation evaluation of the acceptability and appropriateness aspects.

  4. Bespoke Questionnaire. *Participants randomised to the intervention arm only [ Time Frame: Assessed within first 2 weeks and then at week 8 after enrollment to the study ]
    A bespoke quantitative questionnaire was designed using adapted items from our literature review of published implementation questionnaires (https://implementationoutcomerepository.org/), rated based on a semantic differential scale (Likert-type), to fit with the ratings used for AIM and IAM



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 years or older.
  • Diagnosis of incurable solid cancer: lung, colorectal, breast, prostate or other, irrespective of timing in relation to any oncology or palliative care treatments
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2-3
  • Able to provide informed consent and complete trial assessments in available languages.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Blood cancers: Leukaemia, Lymphoma, Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), Myeloproliferative Disorder (MPD), Multiple Myeloma.
  • Currently receiving specialist rehabilitation* for their cancer or co-morbidity-related dysfunction, or received within the two weeks prior to consent.
  • Clinician rated prognosis of less than 3 months.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT05984797


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: INSPIRE Research Team 02078480532 INSPIRE@kcl.ac.uk

Locations
Layout table for location information
United Kingdom
Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London
London, United Kingdom, SE5 9PJ
Contact: Matthew Maddocks       matthew.maddocks@kcl.ac.uk   
Sponsors and Collaborators
King's College London
Hospices Civils de Lyon
University of Bergen
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano
Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University
University of Edinburgh
EAPC
Azienda USL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Matthew Maddocks KCL
Additional Information:
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: King's College London
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05984797    
Other Study ID Numbers: INSPIRE
328722 ( Other Identifier: IRAS )
First Posted: August 9, 2023    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: August 9, 2023
Last Verified: July 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Undecided

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by King's College London:
cancer
Rehabilitation
palliative
support
disability