The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Assessment of the C8 Dermatomal Block With Photoplethysmographic Amplitude After Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06015204
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : August 29, 2023
Last Update Posted : September 14, 2023
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Research Institute of Medical Science, Daegu Catholic University
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
JongHae Kim, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center

Brief Summary:

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the effectiveness of photoplethysmographic amplitude in assessing the extent of anesthesia in the 8th cervical dermatome in patients undergoing interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB). The main question it aims to answer is

  • Is there any difference in the post-block changes in photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the ipsilateral 5th finger (supplied by the 8th cervical nerve root) between ISBPBs targeting the C5-to-C6 nerve roots and the C5-to-C8 nerve roots?
  • Do the changes in photoplethysmographic amplitude represent the extent of anesthesia in the 8th cervical dermatome? Participants will receive either ISBPB targeting the C5-to-C6 nerve roots or the C5-to-C8 nerve roots, and then the changes in photoplethysmographic amplitude will be measured from the 5th finger ipsilateral to ISBPB.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Brachial Plexus Block Oximetry Procedure: Interscalene brachial plexus block targeting the C5-to-C6 nerve roots Procedure: Interscalene brachial plexus block targeting the C5-to-C8 nerve roots Not Applicable

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 98 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
Official Title: Objective Assessment of Extent of Anesthesia in the 8th Cervical Dermatome Using Photoplethysmographic Amplitude in Patients Undergoing Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block
Actual Study Start Date : September 13, 2023
Estimated Primary Completion Date : August 2024
Estimated Study Completion Date : August 2024

Arm Intervention/treatment
Active Comparator: C5-C6 group
The C5-to-C6 nerve roots and supraclavicular nerves are blocked with 25 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine under ultrasound guidance.
Procedure: Interscalene brachial plexus block targeting the C5-to-C6 nerve roots
With the head rotated contralateral to interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB), the compactly arranged brachial plexus is visualized lateral to the pulsating subclavian artery under ultrasound guidance. The linear ultrasound transducer is moved cephalad until the C5-to-C8 nerve roots are visualized between the anterior and middle scalene muscles. A block needle is introduced from lateral to medial direction. A nerve root is blocked by placing at least 5 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine around it. The most caudal cervical nerve root (C6 nerve root) is blocked first, and the most cephalad one (C5 nerve root) is blocked last. Then, 3 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine is placed between the scalene and sternocleidomastoid muscles to block the supraclavicular nerves. An equivalent volume of a standard study drug is planned to be used (A total of 25 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine).

Experimental: C5-C8 group
The C5-to-C8 nerve roots and supraclavicular nerves are blocked with 25 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine under ultrasound guidance.
Procedure: Interscalene brachial plexus block targeting the C5-to-C8 nerve roots
With the head rotated contralateral to interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB), the compactly arranged brachial plexus is visualized lateral to the pulsating subclavian artery under ultrasound guidance. The linear ultrasound transducer is moved cephalad until the C5-to-C8 nerve roots are visualized between the anterior and middle scalene muscles. A block needle is introduced from lateral to medial direction. A nerve root is blocked by placing at least 5 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine around it. The most caudal cervical nerve root (C8 nerve root) is blocked first, and the most cephalad one (C5 nerve root) is blocked last. Then, 3 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine is placed between the scalene and sternocleidomastoid muscles to block the supraclavicular nerves. An equivalent volume of a standard study drug is planned to be used (A total of 25 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine).




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Time to achieve 50% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 5th finger [ Time Frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 50% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Time to achieve 5% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 5th finger [ Time Frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 5% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

  2. Time to achieve 10% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 5th finger [ Time Frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 10% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

  3. Time to achieve 90% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 5th finger [ Time Frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 90% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

  4. Time to achieve 95% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 5th finger [ Time Frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 95% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

  5. Time to achieve 99% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 5th finger [ Time Frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 99% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

  6. Time to achieve 5% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 1st finger [ Time Frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 5% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

  7. Time to achieve 10% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 1st finger [ Time Frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 10% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

  8. Time to achieve 50% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 1st finger [ Time Frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 50% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

  9. Time to achieve 90% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 1st finger [ Time Frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 90% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

  10. Time to achieve 95% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 1st finger [ Time Frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 95% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

  11. Time to achieve 99% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 1st finger [ Time Frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 99% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

  12. Baseline blood flow measured from the brachial artery ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block [ Time Frame: 15 minutes before the introduction of a block needle ]
    The linear ultrasound transducer is placed parallel with the brachial artery at the antecubital fossa. Using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound, time velocity integral per heartbeat is calculated. The cross-sectional diameter of the artery is measured with the transducer placed transversely to the artery. The blood flow of the artery (ml/min) is the product of the averaged time velocity integral (cm), cross-sectional area of the artery (cm2), and heart rate (beats/min).

  13. Baseline blood flow measured from the radial artery ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block [ Time Frame: 15 minutes before the introduction of a block needle ]
    The linear ultrasound transducer is placed parallel with the radial artery at the distal forearm area. Using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound, time velocity integral per heartbeat is calculated. The cross-sectional diameter of the artery is measured with the transducer placed transversely to the artery. The blood flow of the artery (ml/min) is the product of the averaged time velocity integral (cm), cross-sectional area of the artery (cm2), and heart rate (beats/min).

  14. Baseline blood flow measured from the ulnar artery ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block [ Time Frame: 15 minutes before the introduction of a block needle ]
    The linear ultrasound transducer is placed parallel with the ulnar artery at the distal forearm area. Using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound, time velocity integral per heartbeat is calculated. The cross-sectional diameter of the artery is measured with the transducer placed transversely to the artery. The blood flow of the artery (ml/min) is the product of the averaged time velocity integral (cm), cross-sectional area of the artery (cm2), and heart rate (beats/min).

  15. Post-block blood flow measured from the brachial artery ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block [ Time Frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    The linear ultrasound transducer is placed parallel with the brachial artery at the antecubital fossa. Using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound, time velocity integral per heartbeat is calculated. The cross-sectional diameter of the artery is measured with the transducer placed transversely to the artery. The blood flow of the artery (ml/min) is the product of the averaged time velocity integral (cm), cross-sectional area of the artery (cm2), and heart rate (beats/min).

  16. Post-block blood flow measured from the radial artery ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block [ Time Frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    The linear ultrasound transducer is placed parallel with the radial artery at the distal forearm area. Using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound, time velocity integral per heartbeat is calculated. The cross-sectional diameter of the artery is measured with the transducer placed transversely to the artery. The blood flow of the artery (ml/min) is the product of the averaged time velocity integral (cm), cross-sectional area of the artery (cm2), and heart rate (beats/min).

  17. Post-block blood flow measured from the ulnar artery ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block [ Time Frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    The linear ultrasound transducer is placed parallel with the ulnar artery at the distal forearm area. Using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound, time velocity integral per heartbeat is calculated. The cross-sectional diameter of the artery is measured with the transducer placed transversely to the artery. The blood flow of the artery (ml/min) is the product of the averaged time velocity integral (cm), cross-sectional area of the artery (cm2), and heart rate (beats/min).

  18. Sensory blockade of the C5 dermatome [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    Using an alcohol swab, the sensory blockade of each dermatome is graded as 0 (no cold sensation), 1 (reduced cold sensation), 2 (normal cold sensation).

  19. Sensory blockade of the C6 dermatome [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    Using an alcohol swab, the sensory blockade of each dermatome is graded as 0 (no cold sensation), 1 (reduced cold sensation), 2 (normal cold sensation).

  20. Sensory blockade of the C7 dermatome [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    Using an alcohol swab, the sensory blockade of each dermatome is graded as 0 (no cold sensation), 1 (reduced cold sensation), 2 (normal cold sensation).

  21. Sensory blockade of the C8 dermatome [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    Using an alcohol swab, the sensory blockade of each dermatome is graded as 0 (no cold sensation), 1 (reduced cold sensation), 2 (normal cold sensation).

  22. Sensory blockade of the T1 dermatome [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    Using an alcohol swab, the sensory blockade of each dermatome is graded as 0 (no cold sensation), 1 (reduced cold sensation), 2 (normal cold sensation).

  23. Motor blockade of shoulder abduction [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).

  24. Motor blockade of elbow flexion [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).

  25. Motor blockade of forearm supination [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).

  26. Motor blockade of forearm pronation [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).

  27. Motor blockade of finger abduction [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).

  28. Motor blockade of thumb abduction [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).

  29. Motor blockade of thumb adduction [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).

  30. Motor blockade of thumb opposition [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).

  31. Baseline pupil diameter ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block [ Time Frame: 5 minutes before the introduction of a block needle ]
    Three minutes after the adaptation in low mesopic conditions, the pupil diameter is measured for 2 seconds at 30 Hz using a portable pupillometer. The pupil diameter is obtained by averaging 60 measurement values.

  32. Baseline pupil diameter contralateral to interscalene brachial plexus block [ Time Frame: 5 minutes before the introduction of a block needle ]
    Three minutes after the adaptation in low mesopic conditions, the pupil diameter is measured for 2 seconds at 30 Hz using a portable pupillometer. The pupil diameter is obtained by averaging 60 measurement values.

  33. Post-block pupil diameter ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block [ Time Frame: 35 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    Three minutes after the adaptation in low mesopic conditions, the pupil diameter is measured for 2 seconds at 30 Hz using a portable pupillometer. The pupil diameter is obtained by averaging 60 measurement values.

  34. Post-block pupil diameter contralateral to interscalene brachial plexus block [ Time Frame: 35 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    Three minutes after the adaptation in low mesopic conditions, the pupil diameter is measured for 2 seconds at 30 Hz using a portable pupillometer. The pupil diameter is obtained by averaging 60 measurement values.

  35. Pain upon a pinch at the skin area for posterior portal placement (1.5-3 cm inferior and medial to the posterolateral tip of the acromion) [ Time Frame: 1 minute before the surgical incision ]
    The pain intensity is rated as 0 (no pain), 1 (mild pain), and 2 (severe pain).

  36. Pain upon surgical incision (1.5-3 cm inferior and medial to the posterolateral tip of the acromion) [ Time Frame: An average of 1 hour after the introduction of a block needle ]
    The pain intensity is rated as 0 (no pain), 1 (mild pain), and 2 (severe pain).

  37. Pain upon posterior portal placement (1.5-3 cm inferior and medial to the posterolateral tip of the acromion) [ Time Frame: 1 minute after surgical incision ]
    The pain intensity is rated as 0 (no pain), 1 (mild pain), and 2 (severe pain).


Other Outcome Measures:
  1. Complications related to interscalene brachial plexus block [ Time Frame: 35 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    Accidental puncture of the common carotid, subclavian, or vertebral artery, pneumo/hemothorax, epidural or intrathecal injection of local anesthetic, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, and other neurological complications

  2. Baseline systolic blood pressure [ Time Frame: 5 minutes before the introduction of a block needle ]
    Measured with a non-invasive blood pressure cuff

  3. Post-block systolic blood pressure [ Time Frame: 35 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    Measured with a non-invasive blood pressure cuff

  4. Baseline heart rate [ Time Frame: 5 minutes before the introduction of a block needle ]
    Measured from electrocardiogram

  5. Post-block heart rate [ Time Frame: 35 minutes after the introduction of a block needle ]
    Measured from electrocardiogram



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   20 Years to 65 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 or 2
  • Schedule to receive interscalene brachial plexus block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Coagulopathy
  • Peripheral vascular diseases
  • Arrhythmias
  • Cardiac conduction abnormalities
  • A history of medication affecting cardiac conduction
  • Ischemic heart disease
  • Hypertension
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Thyroid dysfunction
  • Other medical conditions affecting autonomic nervous activity
  • Infection at the skin area for interscalene brachial plexus block
  • Peripheral neuropathy or neurologic sequelae in the upper limb ipsilateral to the surgery
  • Allergy to local anesthetics or a history of allergic shock
  • Contralateral vocal cord palsy, hemidiaphragmatic paresis/paralysis or pneumo/hemo thorax
  • Severe restrictive pulmonary disorder
  • Electrolyte imbalance
  • Difficulty in communicating with medical personnel
  • Patients refusal

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT06015204


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Jonghae Kim, M.D. +82-10-3360-4885 usmed12@gmail.com

Locations
Layout table for location information
Korea, Republic of
Daegu Catholic University Medical Center Recruiting
Daegu, Korea, Republic of, 42472
Contact: Jonghae Kim, M.D.    +82-10-3360-4885    usmed12@gmail.com   
Sponsors and Collaborators
JongHae Kim
Research Institute of Medical Science, Daegu Catholic University
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Jonghae Kim, M.D. Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: JongHae Kim, Professor, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06015204    
Other Study ID Numbers: 2023-02
First Posted: August 29, 2023    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: September 14, 2023
Last Verified: September 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No
Plan Description: The data will be provided upon reasonable requests to the principal investigator.

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No