The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Pilot Evaluation of the Thriving Mamas Programme

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06040359
Recruitment Status : Not yet recruiting
First Posted : September 15, 2023
Last Update Posted : September 15, 2023
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
Aga Khan University
Centro Internacional para Saude Reprodutiva Mocambique
UK Research and Innovation
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
King's College London

Brief Summary:

The goal of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability of a mental health prevention intervention among adolescents during pregnancy and the year after birth (perinatal period) in Kenya and Mozambique. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is the intervention feasible, acceptable, appropriate, and delivered/received with high fidelity, to adolescent girls, their friends/family members and service providers?
  • Are the implementation strategies acceptable, appropriate, feasible to all relevant stakeholders?
  • What impact does the intervention have on adolescent mothers' mental health?
  • What impact does the intervention have on adolescent mothers' social, economic, and education outcomes?

Participants will:

  • Participate in nine individual and group sessions focused on improving mental and perinatal health literacy and increasing life skills
  • Receive standard perinatal care

Researchers will compare findings with girls receiving standard perinatal care only to see if the intervention has an impact on adolescents' mental health, social, economic and education outcomes.


Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Perinatal Mental Health Other: The Thriving Mamas programme Other: Usual care Not Applicable

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 156 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Prevention
Official Title: Pilot Evaluation of the Thriving Mamas Programme for Adolescent Perinatal Mental Health
Estimated Study Start Date : September 2023
Estimated Primary Completion Date : May 2024
Estimated Study Completion Date : May 2024

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Thriving Mama programme
Nine meetings delivered in either group (5 meetings), individual (1 meeting), or family group (2 meetings) formats over 10 weeks with an additional individual meeting 10-12 weeks postpartum by a trained mother in the community. Each meeting focuses on the girl's physical and mental health, taking care of a newborn, life skills, future-planning and social support and community-based services. Meetings will take place in a mixture of private settings in health facilities, community facilities, and participant homes. Adolescents will also receive usual perinatal care.
Other: The Thriving Mamas programme
Enhanced antenatal course plus usual perinatal care

Active Comparator: Usual perinatal care

Each visit includes care that is appropriate to the overall condition and stage of pregnancy and should include four main categories of care:

  1. Identification of pre-existing health conditions (e.g., check for weight and nutrition status, anemia, hypertension, syphilis, HIV status);
  2. Early detection of complications arising during pregnancy (e.g., check for pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes);
  3. Health promotion and disease prevention (e.g., tetanus vaccine, prevention and treatment of malaria, nutrition counseling, micronutrient supplements, family planning counseling); and
  4. Birth preparedness and complication planning (e.g., birth and emergency plan, breastfeeding counseling, antiretrovirals for HIV positive women and reducing mother-to- child transmission of HIV)
Other: Usual care
Usual perinatal care




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Intervention Feasibility [ Time Frame: 10-12 weeks post-partum ]
    Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM); Subjective report of feasibility of intervention; measures the extent to which a new treatment, or an innovation, can be successfully used or carried out within a given agency or setting. Minimum=5, Maximum=25; higher score is better

  2. Intervention Acceptability [ Time Frame: 10-12 weeks post-partum ]
    Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM); Subjective report of acceptability of intervention; A 5-item scale that measures the perception among implementation stakeholders that a given treatment, service, practice, or innovation is agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory. Minimum=5, Maximum=25; higher score is better

  3. Intervention Appropriateness [ Time Frame: 10-12 weeks post-partum ]
    Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM); Subjective report of appropriateness of intervention; A 5-item scale that measures the perceived fit, relevance, or compatibility of the innovation or evidence-based practice for a given practice setting, provider, or consumer, and/or perceived fit of the innovation to address a particular issue or problem. Minimum=5, Maximum=25; higher score is better

  4. Intervention Fidelity [ Time Frame: Through intervention delivery, an average of 24 weeks ]
    Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic Factors (ENACT); subjective report of provider fidelity and perception of care; Minimum=0; Maximum=13; higher score is better


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Training Feasibility [ Time Frame: Immediately after provider training ]
    Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM); Subjective report of feasibility of intervention; measures the extent to which a new treatment, or an innovation, can be successfully used or carried out within a given agency or setting. Minimum=5, Maximum=25; higher score is better

  2. Training Acceptability [ Time Frame: Immediately after provider training ]
    Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM); Subjective report of acceptability of intervention; A 5-item scale that measures the perception among implementation stakeholders that a given treatment, service, practice, or innovation is agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory. Minimum=5, Maximum=25; higher score is better

  3. Training Appropriateness [ Time Frame: Immediately after provider training ]
    Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM); Subjective report of appropriateness of intervention; A 5-item scale that measures the perceived fit, relevance, or compatibility of the innovation or evidence-based practice for a given practice setting, provider, or consumer, and/or perceived fit of the innovation to address a particular issue or problem. Minimum=5, Maximum=25; higher score is better

  4. Knowledge [ Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after provider training ]
    Study-specific measure of mentor mothers' knowledge of issues regarding pregnancy, childbirth, caregiving, mental health, and referral pathways will be assessed using a study-specific quiz based upon the intervention manual; Minimum=0, Maximum=16; higher score is better

  5. Change in mental health attitudes [ Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after provider training ]
    Social Distance Scale (SDS); The SDS measures the acceptability of different degrees of social distance and, by inference, the attitude of the respondent to the person with the condition; Minimum=1, Maximum=96; higher score is better

  6. Change in adolescent pregnancy attitudes [ Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after provider training ]
    Study-specific attitudes towards adolescent pregnancy survey; Minimum=4, Maximum=20; lower score is better

  7. Provider competency [ Time Frame: Immediately after provider training ]
    Study-specific single 10-point scale to assess provider ability to deliver the intervention; Minimum=0, Maximum=10; higher score is better

  8. Recruitment rate [ Time Frame: pre-intervention ]
    Proportion of adolescents providing consent to participate in the study

  9. Cost of intervention [ Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 24 weeks ]
    Total and average cost of the intervention per participant

  10. Change in adolescent depression [ Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 24 weeks ]
    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); Nine-item screening tool which assesses depression symptoms according to clinical criteria. Minimum=0, Maximum=27. A score ≥10 indicates moderate to severe depression.

  11. Change in adolescent anxiety [ Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 24 weeks ]
    Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7); Seven-item screening tool which assesses anxiety symptoms according to clinical criteria. Minimum=0, Maximum=21. A score ≥10 indicates moderate to severe anxiety.

  12. Change in adolescent quality of life [ Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 24 weeks ]
    WHO Quality of Life brief version (WHOQOL-BREF); 26-item scale assesses a respondent's perceived quality of life across four domains: physical health; psychological; social relationships; and environment. Total minimum=25, Total maximum=125. Higher scores indicate greater quality of life in a particular domain.

  13. Change in adolescent social support [ Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 24 weeks ]
    Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS); The MSPSS is a 12-item scale which measures social support from family, friends and significant others. Minimum=12, Maximum=84. Higher scores indicate greater social support.

  14. Adolescent parenting competency [ Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 24 weeks ]
    Parenting Sense of Competency Scale; 17-item scale to measure adolescents' perceived parenting abilities. Minimum=17, Maximum=102. Higher scores indicate greater perceived competence.

  15. Perinatal appointment attendance [ Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 24 weeks ]
    Number of participants attending antenatal appointments

  16. Referral uptake [ Time Frame: 10-12 weeks post-partum ]
    Proportion of adolescents attending referral appointments

  17. Change in infant vaccination [ Time Frame: Baseline and 10-12 weeks post-partum ]
    Number of participants intending to or having had their babies vaccinated

  18. Change in breastfeeding [ Time Frame: Baseline and 10-12 weeks post-partum ]
    Number of participants intendng to or are currently breastfeeding

  19. Change in intended time to next pregnancy [ Time Frame: Baseline and 10-12 weeks post-partum ]
    Study-specific health behaviours questionnaire to assess intended or actual contraceptive Nuimber of participants that want more children who intend to wait at least 15 months before next pregnancy

  20. Change in contraceptive use [ Time Frame: Baseline and 10-12 weeks post-partum ]
    Number of participants intending to or currently using contraceptives to delay pregnancy

  21. Change in perception of intervention [ Time Frame: Baseline and 10-12 weeks post-partum ]
    Study-specific five-item measure assessing knowledge gained, interest in intervention, and support recieved; Minimum=0; Maximum=5; higher score is better



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   15 Years and older   (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mentor mothers: (A) aged 20 years or older; (B) female; (C) experience of pregnancy and/or parenting; and (D) live within the study site
  • Adolescent girls: (A) up to 28 weeks pregnant; and (B) aged 15-19 years
  • Friends/family members: (A) identified by an adolescent or young woman participating in the study; (B) participation agreed by other participating girls; and (C) aged 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mentor mothers will be excluded from participating if they are unable to attend training or deliver the intervention sessions
  • Adolescent girls will be excluded from the study if they are unable to provide informed consent or are unable to participate in the intervention, due to existing health conditions
  • Friends/family members will not be excluded so long as they meet inclusion criteria

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT06040359


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Tatiana Salisbury +44(0)20 7848 85107 tatiana.salisbury@kcl.ac.uk

Locations
Layout table for location information
Kenya
Aga Khan University
Nairobi, Kenya
Contact: Marleen Temmerman       marleen.temmerman@aku.edu   
Contact: Margrette Hanselmann       margrette.hanselmann@aku.edu   
Mozambique
Centro Internacional para Saude Reprodutiva Mocambique
Maputo, Mozambique
Contact: Malica de Melo       m.demelo@icrhm.org.mz   
Contact: Fernando Chissale       f.chissale@icrhm.org.mz   
Sponsors and Collaborators
King's College London
Aga Khan University
Centro Internacional para Saude Reprodutiva Mocambique
UK Research and Innovation
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: King's College London
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06040359    
Other Study ID Numbers: HR/DP-22/23-39521
First Posted: September 15, 2023    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: September 15, 2023
Last Verified: August 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Yes

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by King's College London:
Adolescent mental health
Maternal mental health