The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Comparison of 3 in Vivo Microscopic Imaging Techniques for the Diagnosis of Pigmented Tumors (Micro3)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06046144
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : September 21, 2023
Last Update Posted : September 21, 2023
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne

Brief Summary:

Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is the reference in vivo imaging technique for identifying malignant melanocytic tumors prior to surgical excision. However, it is not widely used due to its high cost and highly technical and time-consuming nature.

In addition to RCM, we currently use 2 less expensive dermatoscopes that also allow in vivo diagnosis: super-high magnification dermoscopy (D400) and Fluorescence-Advanced videodermatoscopy (FAV).


Condition or disease Intervention/treatment
Basal Cell Carcinoma Lentigo Maligna Melanoma Nevus Seborrheic Keratosis Lentigo Diagnostic Test: Fluorescence-Advanced videodermatoscopy Diagnostic Test: Reflectance confocal microscopy Diagnostic Test: Super-high magnification dermoscopy

Detailed Description:

Several studies have demonstrated their interest in the in vivo diagnosis of melanocytic tumors, but without any comparison between these methods.

In our current practice, many patients have benefited from these 3 imaging modalities for benign and malignant lesions.

Therefore, our aim is to analyze these images and compare their performance in the diagnosis of benign and malignant pigmented lesions.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Observational
Actual Enrollment : 161 participants
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Retrospective
Official Title: Comparison of 3 in Vivo Microscopic Imaging Techniques for the Diagnosis of Pigmented Tumors. Monocentric Retrospective Study of 170 Tumors
Actual Study Start Date : November 2, 2022
Actual Primary Completion Date : May 1, 2023
Actual Study Completion Date : May 1, 2023

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus Genetics related topics: Melanoma

Group/Cohort Intervention/treatment
Patients with a pigmented skin lesion
Patients with a pigmented skin lesion of more than 3mm diameter which have benefited systematically of all 3 imaging techniques at the same time, followed by either a surgical excision or annual imaging monitoring.
Diagnostic Test: Fluorescence-Advanced videodermatoscopy

Datas collected : Presence or absence of atypical roundish cell, dendritic cell, atypical nests, points, folliculotropism, blue homogenous zone, regular honeycomb pattern.

Between 10 and 60 images taken by a hand-held camera set directly on the skin lesion, with an oily interface.


Diagnostic Test: Reflectance confocal microscopy

Datas collected : Presence or absence of atypical roundish cell, dendritic cell, atypical nests, points, folliculotropism, blue homogenous zone, regular honeycomb pattern.

Between 10 and 60 images taken by a hand-held camera set directly on the skin lesion, with an oily interface.


Diagnostic Test: Super-high magnification dermoscopy

Datas collected : Presence or absence of atypical roundish cell, dendritic cell, atypical nests, points, folliculotropism, blue homogenous zone, regular honeycomb pattern.

Between 10 and 60 images taken by a hand-held camera set directly on the skin lesion, with an oily interface.





Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. To analyse the picture to assess the relevance of each technique for the diagnostic of malignant and benign pigmented lesions. [ Time Frame: Day 1 ]

    The nature of the tumor is diagnosed by an imaging technique if we can find on the images the main characteristics belonging to a certain tumor.

    After this we can calculate the sensitivity, specificity of each technique.



Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Comparison of different imaging techniques [ Time Frame: Day 1 ]
    To compare the performance of combination of 2 techniques to assess if the performance is better than 1 technique alone.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   Child, Adult, Older Adult
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Sampling Method:   Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients with a pigmented skin lesion of more than 3mm diameter which have benefited systematically of all 3 imaging techniques at the same time, followed by either a surgical excision or annual imaging monitoring.
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a pigmented skin lesion of more than 3mm diameter which have benefited systematically of all 3 imaging techniques at the same time, followed by either a surgical excision or annual imaging monitoring.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bad quality images
  • Insufficient number of images
  • Uncertain diagnosis given by the pathologist
  • Refusal

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT06046144


Locations
Layout table for location information
France
Chu de Saint Etienne
Saint Etienne, France, 42000
Sponsors and Collaborators
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Jean-Luc PERROT, MD PhD CHU Saint-Etienne
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06046144    
Other Study ID Numbers: IRBN1142023/CHUSTE
First Posted: September 21, 2023    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: September 21, 2023
Last Verified: August 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne:
Melanoma diagnosis
Diagnosis Imaging
Fluorescence-Advanced videodermatoscopy
Reflectance confocal microscopy
Super-high magnification dermoscopy
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Melanoma
Carcinoma, Basal Cell
Hutchinson's Melanotic Freckle
Keratosis
Lentigo
Keratosis, Seborrheic
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Neuroectodermal Tumors
Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal
Neoplasms by Histologic Type
Neoplasms
Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue
Nevi and Melanomas
Skin Neoplasms
Neoplasms by Site
Skin Diseases
Carcinoma
Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
Neoplasms, Basal Cell
Melanosis
Hyperpigmentation
Pigmentation Disorders