The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

TrEatment Targets in Rheumatoid Arthritis: TETRA-study (TETRA)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06046950
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : September 21, 2023
Last Update Posted : February 26, 2024
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Sint Maartenskliniek

Brief Summary:
There is currently no cure for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but many treatment options are available. The central aim of RA treatment is lowering disease activity. The proactive treatment strategy called treat to target (T2T) includes measuring disease activity, setting a target and adjusting treatment accordingly until the goal is reached. T2T has proven to be superior to usual care, but there is much debate regarding the most optimal treatment measure and target. The Disease Activity Score with 28-joint counts and c-reactive protein (DAS28CRP) low-disease activity (LDA) target and the more stringent Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission target are the best validated targets. Especially the DAS28CRP is the most commonly used in research and practice, whereas the SDAI remission target is most recommended. The European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recommends to strive for remission, whereas the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommends to strive for LDA. In patients with new and established RA, the (cost)effectiveness of aiming for remission compared to LDA when starting and tapering antirheumatic drugs has not been directly compared. This study therefore aims to directly compare two T2T strategies, aiming at DAS28CRP-LDA and SDAI remission, in patients with established RA.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Rheumatoid Arthritis Other: Treatment target DAS28CRP-LDA Other: Treatment target SDAI-remission Not Applicable

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 340 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: TrEatment Targets in Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Randomized Multi-centre, Treat to Target Strategy Trial: TETRA Study
Actual Study Start Date : December 20, 2023
Estimated Primary Completion Date : December 2026
Estimated Study Completion Date : December 2026

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: DAS28CRP-LDA
Arm that is allocated to strive for DAS28CRP low disease activity (LDA)
Other: Treatment target DAS28CRP-LDA
Aiming for DAS28CRP-low disease activity

Experimental: SDAI-remission
Arm that is allocated to strive for SDAI-remission
Other: Treatment target SDAI-remission
Aiming for SDAI-remission




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Achievement of the composite clinical/radiological remission outcome [ Time Frame: 18 months follow-up time point ]
    Achievement of the composite clinical/radiological remission outcome (radiographic progression ≤1 simple erosion narrowing score (SENS), AND, ≤1 swollen joint count, and being in PASS) at 18 months.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. The proportion of patients having radiographic progression (defined as > 1 simple erosion narrowing score (SENS) point) in both treatment arms [ Time Frame: 18 months follow-up ]
  2. The number of swollen joints at 18 months follow-up [ Time Frame: 18 months follow-up ]
  3. The proportion of patients achieving 'patient acceptable symptom state' (PASS) [ Time Frame: 18 months follow-up ]
  4. The proportion of patients who reach the predefined target for each treatment arm (DAS28CRP-LDA or SDAI remission) [ Time Frame: 18 months follow-up ]
  5. Percentage of patients that reach LDA or remission, using DAS28CRP- and SDAI-based definitions, in each treatment arm [ Time Frame: 18 months follow-up ]
  6. Daily functioning, measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) [ Time Frame: 18 months follow-up ]
    The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) will be used to measure the impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on daily functioning. A minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 60 can be scored. A higher score means a higher impact on daily functioning.

  7. Quality of life (QoL) as defined by the 'EuroQol 5 Dimensions with 5 levels' (EQ5D-5L) questionnaire [ Time Frame: 18 months follow-up ]
    This questionnaire assesses five dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension can be answered on a 5-point scale, ranging from no problems to extreme problems/unable to. A higher score means a worse outcome.

  8. Incidence density rates of safety ((serious) adverse events, according to CTCAE criteria version 5.0) [ Time Frame: 18 months follow-up ]
  9. Drug use of the patients, consisting of the type and volume of antirheumatic drugs (glucocorticoids, DMARDS, NSAIDs) used over the 18 months period, and at 18 months visit [ Time Frame: 18 months follow-up ]
  10. Costs associated with medical consumption as assessed with the 'Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Medical Consumption Questionnaire' (iMCQ) [ Time Frame: 18 months follow-up ]
  11. Costs associated with loss of productivity as measured bij the 'Institute of Medical Technology Assessment Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iMTA PCQ) [ Time Frame: 18 months follow-up ]
    This is a short generic questionnaire that measures loss of productivity (e.g., both paid and unpaid work) due to illness or recovery.

  12. Proportion of patients of whom the rheumatologist adhered to the local guidelines to treat the patients [ Time Frame: 18 months follow-up ]
    Clinicians are encouraged to adhere to protocol upfront, and adherence is actively monitored, but treatment decisions are ultimately made using shared decision making between patients and physicians. After study completion, adherence will be assessed through a comparison of the target measurements and any changes in treatment regime made by the rheumatologists.

  13. The incidence density rate of flares [ Time Frame: 18 months follow-up ]


Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   16 Years and older   (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of RA (according to the 2010 or 1987 ACR/ EULAR classification criteria and/or clinical diagnosis)
  • (Starting) use of a DMARD
  • Aged 16 years or older
  • At most low disease activity, operationalised as DAS28-CRP <3.5 (DAS28 CRP 2.9 cut off for low disease activity with measurement error 0.6) or SDAI <19 (SDAI 11 cut off for low disease activity with measurement error of 8). A state of low disease activity is required at inclusion, as for RA patients in moderate or high disease activity there is no equipoise on the best course of action (treatment needs to be escalated).
  • Fluency of Dutch or English, both written and verbally; able to fill in questionnaires
  • Provided informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical deep remission, operationalised as SDAI <3.3 or DAS28-CRP <2.4, and an taper attempt in the past 2 years that was discontinued due to occurrence of flare.
  • Fewer than 3 DMARD treatment options left for this patient (severe difficult-to-treat or refractory RA)
  • Current severe comorbidity or other serious life-shortening conditions hampering trial participation
  • Inability to comply with the study protocol or to provide informed consent with regard to intervention control and measuring outcomes

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT06046950


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Pauline Groenen, MD, MSc 0031243272807 p.groenen@maartenskliniek.nl

Locations
Layout table for location information
Netherlands
Sint Maartenskliniek Recruiting
Ubbergen, Netherlands, 6574 NA
Contact: Pauline Groenen, MSc    +3124-3272807    p.groenen@maartenskliniek.nl   
Sponsors and Collaborators
Sint Maartenskliniek
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Alfons Den Broeder, MD, PhD Sint Maartenskliniek
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Sint Maartenskliniek
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06046950    
Other Study ID Numbers: TETRA
First Posted: September 21, 2023    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: February 26, 2024
Last Verified: December 2023

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Arthritis
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Joint Diseases
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Rheumatic Diseases
Connective Tissue Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
Immune System Diseases