Sub-type Specific Genomic Mutations in sBOTs
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03883542 |
Recruitment Status :
Recruiting
First Posted : March 21, 2019
Last Update Posted : May 16, 2023
|
Tracking Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date | February 26, 2019 | ||||
First Posted Date | March 21, 2019 | ||||
Last Update Posted Date | May 16, 2023 | ||||
Actual Study Start Date | January 2017 | ||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | December 31, 2023 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures |
genetic mutations [ Time Frame: 2020 ] amount and type of genetic mutations in different subgroups will be analyzed and compared between the different subgroups. Are the mutations suggestive for a type I or type II pathway differentiation?
|
||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures | Same as current | ||||
Change History | |||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Descriptive Information | |||||
Brief Title | Sub-type Specific Genomic Mutations in sBOTs | ||||
Official Title | Sub-type Specific Genomic Mutations in Serous Borderline Ovarian Tumors | ||||
Brief Summary | The aim of this study is to identify different origin in carcinogenesis between serous borderline ovarian tumors presenting a. without implants, b. with non-invasive implants, c. with invasive implants and d. with micropapillary pattern. The presence of specific mutations could suggest for a more aggressive primary treatment if a higher risk of recurrence can be expected. |
||||
Detailed Description | Introduction Borderline Ovarian Tumors (BOTs) behave indolently in the vast majority of cases and the prognosis is usually favorable. There is more evidence that two subtypes of BOTs represent a higher risk of recurrence or even progression to an invasive ovarian cancer. In case of a presentation with a micro-papillary grow pattern or when invasive implants are diagnosed the prognosis tend to be less favorable. Genome sequencing in ovarian cancer helped to differentiate two different pathways in the carcinogenesis. Low grade serous carcinomas evolving from adenofibromas or borderline tumors over non-invasive micropapillary serous borderline tumors to invasive micropapillary serous carcinoma, show frequent mutations in the Kirsten Rat Sarcoma gene (KRAS), B-Raf Kinase gene(BRAF), Erb-B2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 2 gene (ERBB2), Phosphatase and Tensin homolog gene (PTEN), Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha gene (PIK3CA) and Catenin Beta 1 gene (CTNNB1). This pathway is called Type I and is characterized by a slow step-wise process. These low-grade invasive tumors are indolent and are known with a better outcome than high-grade invasive tumors. In contrast the Type II pathway development of invasive tumors is rapid and vast majority of tumors show a Tumor Protein p53 (TP53) mutation and loss of Breast Cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1). The aim of this study is to identify different origin in carcinogenesis between serous borderline ovarian tumors presenting a. without implants, b. with non-invasive implants, c. with invasive implants and d. with micropapillary pattern. The presence of specific mutations could suggest for a more aggressive primary treatment if a higher risk of recurrence can be expected. |
||||
Study Type | Observational | ||||
Study Design | Observational Model: Case-Only Time Perspective: Retrospective |
||||
Target Follow-Up Duration | Not Provided | ||||
Biospecimen | Retention: Samples With DNA Description: Macrodissection of borderline ovarian tumor tissue. DNA extraction from paraffin embedded material for genetic analysis.
|
||||
Sampling Method | Probability Sample | ||||
Study Population | Patients with proven serous bordeline ovarian tumors. | ||||
Condition | Ovarian Neoplasm Epithelial | ||||
Intervention | Genetic: genomic mutations study
Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the subgroups
Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the serous BOT tissue with invasive implants will undergo a more comprehensive examination (large panel +- 1000 genes checked) |
||||
Study Groups/Cohorts |
|
||||
Publications * |
|
||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
Recruitment Information | |||||
Recruitment Status | Recruiting | ||||
Estimated Enrollment |
20 | ||||
Original Estimated Enrollment | Same as current | ||||
Estimated Study Completion Date | April 30, 2024 | ||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | December 31, 2023 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Eligibility Criteria | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
Sex/Gender |
|
||||
Ages | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
Contacts |
|
||||
Listed Location Countries | Belgium | ||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||
Administrative Information | |||||
NCT Number | NCT03883542 | ||||
Other Study ID Numbers | sBOT | ||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||
IPD Sharing Statement |
|
||||
Current Responsible Party | Stefan Cosyns, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel | ||||
Original Responsible Party | Same as current | ||||
Current Study Sponsor | Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel | ||||
Original Study Sponsor | Same as current | ||||
Collaborators | Not Provided | ||||
Investigators |
|
||||
PRS Account | Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel | ||||
Verification Date | May 2023 |