Atrial Fibrillation: Chronic Beta-blocker Use Versus As-needed Rate Control Guided by Implantable Cardiac Monitor
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05745337 |
Recruitment Status :
Recruiting
First Posted : February 27, 2023
Last Update Posted : March 3, 2023
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
The goal of this study is to test the feasibility of guiding as-needed pharmacological rate control of atrial fibrillation (AF) by implantable cardiac monitors and to assess the impact of continuous beta-blocker therapy versus as-needed rate control on the following outcomes:
(1) exercise capacity, (2) AF burden, (3) symptomatic heart failure, (4) biomarker assessment of cardiac filling pressures and cardio-metabolic health, and (5) quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation and stage II or III heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Atrial Fibrillation Diastolic Dysfunction HFpEF - Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction | Drug: As needed pharmacological rate control with beta-blocker (metoprolol tartrate, metoprolol succinate) or calcium channel blocker (diltiazem, verapamil) | Phase 1 |
Patients ≥ 18 years of age with paroxysmal or persistent AF who have an implantable cardiac monitor (either loop recorder or pacemaker) and who are receiving daily beta-blocker therapy will be screened for meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria.
Trial participants will then be randomized into the daily beta-blocker or as-needed pharmacological rate control.
At baseline and six months trial participants will undergo assessment of the following measures:
- Assessment of Quality of life using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire and the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of life Questionnaire.
- Blood draw
- Cardiopulmonary exercise test, 6 Minute Walk Test and average daily activity level via integrated accelerometer of the implantable cardiac monitor (if available).
- Assessment of AF burden
Study participants may opt into long-term follow up visits at 12, 18 and 24 months.
Chart review will continue for up to 4 years after enrollment for the purpose of monitoring clinical endpoints:
- Heart failure events (diuretic drug change, emergency room visit, hospitalization)
- AF events (hospitalization, emergency room visit, cardioversion, antiarrhythmic medication initiation)
- Stroke or transient ischemic attack
- Myocardial infarction
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Estimated Enrollment : | 20 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | None (Open Label) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | Improving Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Aided by Implantable Cardiac Monitor: Evaluation of Chronic Beta-blocker Use Versus As-needed Pharmacological Rate Control |
Actual Study Start Date : | February 6, 2023 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | December 31, 2023 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | December 31, 2025 |

Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Control
Patients randomized to the control arm will continue taking their daily beta-blocker for rate control of atrial fibrillation
|
|
Experimental: As needed rate control
Patients randomized to the experimental arm will stop their daily beta-blocker and take as needed rate control guided by their implantable cardiac monitor
|
Drug: As needed pharmacological rate control with beta-blocker (metoprolol tartrate, metoprolol succinate) or calcium channel blocker (diltiazem, verapamil)
Patients will stop their daily beta-blocker and take as-needed rate control (beta-blocker or calcium channel blocker) guided by their implantable cardiac monitor |
- Exercise capacity [ Time Frame: At time of randomization and 6 months afterwards. ]Change in peak oxygen consumption during cardiopulmonary exercise testing
- Number of participants with a composite of treatment related adverse events [ Time Frame: At 6 months, at 12 months, at 18 months, at 24 months ]Number of heart failure hospitalization, unplanned hospitalization for atrial fibrillation, stroke or transient ischemic attack, acute coronary syndrome in both treatment arms
- Number of participants with a composite of treatment related heart failure events [ Time Frame: At 6 months, at 12 months, at 18 months, at 24 months ]Heart failure events: diuretic drug change, emergency room visit
- Number of participants with a composite of treatment related atrial fibrillation events [ Time Frame: At 6 months, at 12 months, at 18 months, at 24 months ]Atrial fibrillation events: planned hospitalization, emergency room visit, cardioversion, antiarrhythmic medication initiation
- Change in quality of life by Minnesota Living with heart failure questionnaire score [ Time Frame: At time of randomization and 6 months afterwards. ]Score ranges from 0-105 with higher scores meaning worse quality of life
- Change in quality of life by Atrial fibrillation Effect on Quality of life questionnaire score [ Time Frame: At time of randomization and 6 months afterwards. ]Score ranges from 0-100 with higher scores meaning better quality of life
- Change in NTproBNP [ Time Frame: At time of randomization and 6 months afterwards. ]
- Change in hsTroponin [ Time Frame: At time of randomization and 6 months afterwards. ]
- Change in HbA1c [ Time Frame: At time of randomization and 6 months afterwards. ]
- Change in Fructosamine [ Time Frame: At time of randomization and 6 months afterwards. ]
- Change in Cystatin C [ Time Frame: At time of randomization and 6 months afterwards. ]
- Change in atrial fibrillation burden recorded by implantable cardiac monitor [ Time Frame: At time of randomization and 6 months afterwards. ]
- Change in 6 minute walk distance [ Time Frame: At time of randomization and 6 months afterwards. ]
- Change in device detected activity level [ Time Frame: At time of randomization and 6 months afterwards. ]

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Paroxysmal or persistent AF diagnosed in the past 4 weeks or longer
- Implantable cardiac monitor (either loop recorder or pacemaker)
- Current treatment with greater than minimum doses of beta-blockers OR any beta-blocker with resting sinus rhythm heart rate < 75 bpm (documented on EKG in the last 6 months OR at enrollment visit)
- Left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50% (reported on echocardiogram within the past 48 months)
- Echocardiographic evidence of structural changes consistent with HFpEF defined by (1) left ventricular hypertrophy (septal or posterior wall thickness > 10mm) OR (2) left atrial enlargement OR (3) diastolic dysfunction.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Long-standing persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation (Long-standing persistent AF is defined as continuous AF of > 12 months duration. Permanent AF is defined as AF accepted by the patient and physician and no further attempts to restore/maintain sinus rhythm will be undertaken).
- Echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular dilation (defined as left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) index ≥ 80ml/m2 as determined by echocardiogram within the past 48 months.
- Documentation in the electronic medical record suggesting a life expectancy less than 12 months
Minimum dosage of beta-blocker therapy to meet enrollment criterion:
Metoprolol tartrate 25mg twice daily, Metoprolol succinate 50mg daily, Carvedilol 12.5mg daily, Bisoprolol 5mg twice daily, Nebivolol 5mg daily, Atenolol 50mg daily, Labetalol 100mg twice daily, Propranolol 40mg twice daily

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT05745337
Contact: Nicole Habel, MD | 8028470000 | nicole.habel@uvmhealth.org | |
Contact: Amy Henderson | amy.henderson@uvmhealth.org |
United States, Vermont | |
University of Vermont Medical Center | Recruiting |
Burlington, Vermont, United States, 05405 | |
Contact: Nicole Habel, MD nicole.habel@uvmhealth.org |
Principal Investigator: | Nicole Habel, MD | University of Vermont |
Responsible Party: | Nicole Habel, MD, Principal Investigator, University of Vermont |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT05745337 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
00002271 |
First Posted: | February 27, 2023 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | March 3, 2023 |
Last Verified: | February 2023 |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
Plan to Share IPD: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | Yes |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: | Yes |
AF HFpEF Exercise capacity Peak oxygen consumption Beta Blocker |
Atrial Fibrillation Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Arrhythmias, Cardiac Pathologic Processes Metoprolol Verapamil Diltiazem Calcium Channel Blockers Calcium Adrenergic beta-Antagonists Calcium-Regulating Hormones and Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs |
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents Antihypertensive Agents Sympatholytics Autonomic Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists Adrenergic Antagonists Adrenergic Agents Neurotransmitter Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Membrane Transport Modulators Vasodilator Agents |