Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (OCTIVUS)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03394079

Recruitment Status : Active, not recruiting

First Posted : January 9, 2018

Last Update Posted : June 23, 2023

View this study on the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov

Sponsor:

Collaborator:

CardioVascular Research Foundation, Korea

Information provided by (Responsible Party):

Seung-Jung Park, Asan Medical Center

No Study Results Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for this Study

About Study Results Reporting on ClinicalTrials.gov

Recruitment Status :	Active, not recruiting
Actual Primary Completion Date :	February 17, 2023
Estimated Study Completion Date :	January 31, 2028

Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):

Kang DY, Ahn JM, Park H, Lee PH, Kang SJ, Lee SW, Kim YH, Park SW, Kim SW, Hur SH, Cho YK, Lee CH, Hong SJ, Hong YJ, Yoon YW, Kim SJ, Bae JH, Oh JH, Park DW, Park SJ. Comparison of optical coherence tomography-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of a randomized, controlled OCTIVUS trial. Am Heart J. 2020 Oct;228:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Aug 8.

To Top