ClinicalTrials.gov

History of Changes for Study: NCT01872962
Induction Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Latest version (submitted April 20, 2018) on ClinicalTrials.gov
  • A study version is represented by a row in the table.
  • Select two study versions to compare. One each from columns A and B.
  • Choose either the "Merged" or "Side-by-Side" comparison format to specify how the two study versions are to be displayed. The Side-by-Side format only applies to the Protocol section of the study.
  • Click "Compare" to do the comparison and show the differences.
  • Select a version's Submitted Date link to see a rendering of the study for that version.
  • The yellow A/B choices in the table indicate the study versions currently compared below. A yellow table row indicates the study version currently being viewed.
  • Hover over the "Recruitment Status" to see how the study's recruitment status changed.
  • Study edits or deletions are displayed in red.
  • Study additions are displayed in green.
Study Record Versions
Version A B Submitted Date Changes
1 June 6, 2013 None (earliest Version on record)
2 November 6, 2013 Study Status, Eligibility, Sponsor/Collaborators, Study Description, Arms and Interventions and Study Identification
3 March 16, 2014 Recruitment Status, Study Status and Contacts/Locations
4 February 19, 2017 Recruitment Status, Study Status, Contacts/Locations, Study Design and Sponsor/Collaborators
5 April 20, 2018 Recruitment Status and Study Status
Comparison Format:

Scroll up to access the controls

Study NCT01872962
Submitted Date:  June 6, 2013 (v1)

Open or close this module Study Identification
Unique Protocol ID: B2013-015-01
Brief Title: Induction Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Official Title: Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Induction Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Secondary IDs:
Open or close this module Study Status
Record Verification: June 2013
Overall Status: Not yet recruiting
Study Start: July 2013
Primary Completion: July 2018 [Anticipated]
Study Completion: July 2020 [Anticipated]
First Submitted: May 31, 2013
First Submitted that
Met QC Criteria:
June 6, 2013
First Posted: June 7, 2013 [Estimate]
Last Update Submitted that
Met QC Criteria:
June 6, 2013
Last Update Posted: June 7, 2013 [Estimate]
Open or close this module Sponsor/Collaborators
Sponsor: Sun Yat-sen University
Responsible Party: Principal Investigator
Investigator: Jun Ma
Official Title: Professor
Affiliation: Sun Yat-sen University
Collaborators: Fudan University
West China Hospital
Tongji Hospital
Peking University
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
First People's Hospital of Foshan
Guangxi Medical University
Jiangxi Provincial Cancer Hospital
Air Force Military Medical University, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
Cancer Hospital of Guizhou Province
Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College
Open or close this module Oversight
U.S. FDA-regulated Drug:
U.S. FDA-regulated Device:
Data Monitoring: Yes
Open or close this module Study Description
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to compare induction chemotherapy (gemcitabin+cisplatin) plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with CCRT alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC), in order to confirm the value of induction chemotherapy in NPC patients.
Detailed Description: Patients Patients with non-keratinizing NPC T3-4N1M0/TxN2-3M0 (UICC/AJCC 7th edition) are randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy plus CCRT or CCRT alone. Patients in both groups receive cisplatin 100 mg/m² every 3 weeks for 3 cycles, concurrently with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). IMRT is given as 2.0-2.27 Gy per fraction with five daily fractions per week for 6-7 weeks to a total dose of 66 Gy or greater to the primary tumor. The induction chemotherapy plus CCRT group receive gemcitabine (1000 mg/m² d1,8) and cisplatin (80mg/m² d1) every 3 weeks for three cycles before CCRT. Our primary endpoint is failure-free survival(FFS). Secondary end points include overall survival (OS), locoregional failure-free survival (LR-FFS), distant failure-free survival (D-FFS) rates and toxic effects. All efficacy analyses are conducted in the intention-to-treat population, and the safety population include only patients who receive their randomly assigned treatment.
Open or close this module Conditions
Conditions: Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Keywords: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Induction chemotherapy
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Clinical trial
Open or close this module Study Design
Study Type: Interventional
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Study Phase: Phase 3
Interventional Study Model: Parallel Assignment
Number of Arms: 2
Masking: None (Open Label)
Allocation: Randomized
Enrollment: 476 [Anticipated]
Open or close this module Arms and Interventions
Arms Assigned Interventions
Experimental: Induction chemotherapy+IMRT and concurrent cisplatin
Patients receive gemcitabine (1000 mg/m² d1,8) and cisplatin (80mg/m² d1) every 3 weeks for 3 cycles before radiotherapy, and then receive intensity modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT), concurrently with cisplatin 100 mg/m² every 3 weeks for 3 cycles.
Drug: gemcitabine and cisplatin (Induction chemotherapy)
Patients receive gemcitabine (1000 mg/m² d1,8) and cisplatin (80mg/m² d1) every 3 weeks for 3 cycles before concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Other Names:
  • gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP)
Radiation: IMRT and concurrent cisplatin
Intensity modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT) is given as 2.0-2.27 Gy per fraction with five daily fractions per week for 6-7 weeks to a total dose of 66 Gy or greater to the primary tumor, concurrently with cisplatin 100 mg/m² every 3 weeks for 3 cycles.
Active Comparator: IMRT and concurrent cisplatin
Patients receive intensity modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT), concurrently with cisplatin 100 mg/m² every 3 weeks for 3 cycles.
Radiation: IMRT and concurrent cisplatin
Intensity modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT) is given as 2.0-2.27 Gy per fraction with five daily fractions per week for 6-7 weeks to a total dose of 66 Gy or greater to the primary tumor, concurrently with cisplatin 100 mg/m² every 3 weeks for 3 cycles.
Open or close this module Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures:
1. Failure-free survival
[ Time Frame: 3-year ]

Failure-free survival rate is calculated from the date of randomization to the date of treatment failure or death from any cause, whichever is first.
Secondary Outcome Measures:
1. Overall survival
[ Time Frame: 3-year ]

Overall survival is calculated from randomization to death from any cause.
2. Locoregional failure-free survival
[ Time Frame: 3-year ]

Locoregional failure-free survival is calculated from randomization to the first locoregional failure.
3. Distant failure-free survival
[ Time Frame: 3-year ]

Distant failure-free survival is calculated from randomization to the first remote failure.
4. Number of participants with adverse events
[ Time Frame: up to 3 years ]

Incidence of acute and late toxicity
Open or close this module Eligibility
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 59 Years
Sex: All
Gender Based:
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
Criteria:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with newly histologically confirmed non-keratinizing (according to WHO histologically type).
  • Tumor staged as T3-4N1/N2-3 (according to the 7th AJCC edition).
  • No evidence of distant metastasis (M0).
  • Satisfactory performance status: Karnofsky scale (KPS) ≥ 70.
  • Adequate marrow: leucocyte count ≥ 4000/μL, neutrophil count ≥ 2000/μL, hemoglobin ≥ 90g/L and platelet count ≥ 100000/μL.
  • Normal liver function test: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) < 1.5×upper limit of normal (ULN) concomitant with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≤ 2.5×ULN, and bilirubin ≤ ULN.
  • Adequate renal function: creatinine clearance ≥ 60 ml/min.
  • Patients must be informed of the investigational nature of this study and give written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • WHO Type keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma or basaloid squamous cell carcinoma.
  • Age ≥ 60 or < 18.
  • Treatment with palliative intent.
  • Prior malignancy except adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer.
  • Pregnancy or lactation (consider pregnancy test in women of child-bearing age and emphasize effective contraception during the treatment period).
  • History of previous RT (except for non-melanomatous skin cancers outside intended RT treatment volume).
  • Prior chemotherapy or surgery (except diagnostic) to primary tumor or nodes.
  • Any severe intercurrent disease, which may bring unacceptable risk or affect the compliance of the trial, for example, unstable cardiac disease requiring treatment, renal disease, chronic hepatitis, diabetes with poor control (fasting plasma glucose > 1.5×ULN), and emotional disturbance.
Open or close this module Contacts/Locations
Central Contact Person: Jun Ma, M. D.
Telephone: +86-20-87343469
Email: majun2@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Study Officials: Jun Ma, M.D.
Study Chair
Sun Yat-sen University
Locations: China, Guangdong
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
Contact:Contact: Jun Ma, M.D. +86-20-87343469 majun2@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Open or close this module IPDSharing
Plan to Share IPD:
Open or close this module References
Citations: Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. Epub 2011 Feb 4. Erratum In: CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):134. PubMed 21296855
Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (ed 7th). New York, Springer, 2010
Lai SZ, Li WF, Chen L, Luo W, Chen YY, Liu LZ, Sun Y, Lin AH, Liu MZ, Ma J. How does intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy influence the treatment results in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jul 1;80(3):661-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.03.024. Epub 2010 Jul 17. PubMed 20643517
Baujat B, Audry H, Bourhis J, Chan AT, Onat H, Chua DT, Kwong DL, Al-Sarraf M, Chi KH, Hareyama M, Leung SF, Thephamongkhol K, Pignon JP; MAC-NPC Collaborative Group. Chemotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an individual patient data meta-analysis of eight randomized trials and 1753 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jan 1;64(1):47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.06.037. PubMed 16377415
Langendijk JA, Leemans CR, Buter J, Berkhof J, Slotman BJ. The additional value of chemotherapy to radiotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis of the published literature. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Nov 15;22(22):4604-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.10.074. PubMed 15542811
International Nasopharynx Cancer Study Group; VUMCA I Trial. Preliminary results of a randomized trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin, epirubicin, bleomycin) plus radiotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone in stage IV(> or = N2, M0) undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a positive effect on progression-free survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Jun 1;35(3):463-9. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)80007-1. PubMed 8655368
Chua DT, Sham JS, Choy D, Lorvidhaya V, Sumitsawan Y, Thongprasert S, Vootiprux V, Cheirsilpa A, Azhar T, Reksodiputro AH. Preliminary report of the Asian-Oceanian Clinical Oncology Association randomized trial comparing cisplatin and epirubicin followed by radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in the treatment of patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Asian-Oceanian Clinical Oncology Association Nasopharynx Cancer Study Group. Cancer. 1998 Dec 1;83(11):2270-83. PubMed 9840526
Ma J, Mai HQ, Hong MH, Min HQ, Mao ZD, Cui NJ, Lu TX, Mo HY. Results of a prospective randomized trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy with radiotherapy alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Mar 1;19(5):1350-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.5.1350. PubMed 11230478
Hareyama M, Sakata K, Shirato H, Nishioka T, Nishio M, Suzuki K, Saitoh A, Oouchi A, Fukuda S, Himi T. A prospective, randomized trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with radiotherapy alone in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 2002 Apr 15;94(8):2217-23. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10473. PubMed 12001120
Barton-Burke M. Gemcitabine: a pharmacologic and clinical overview. Cancer Nurs. 1999 Apr;22(2):176-83. doi: 10.1097/00002820-199904000-00011. PubMed 10217035
Foo KF, Tan EH, Leong SS, Wee JT, Tan T, Fong KW, Koh L, Tai BC, Lian LG, Machin D. Gemcitabine in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma of the undifferentiated type. Ann Oncol. 2002 Jan;13(1):150-6. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf002. PubMed 11865813
Ma BB, Tannock IF, Pond GR, Edmonds MR, Siu LL. Chemotherapy with gemcitabine-containing regimens for locally recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 2002 Dec 15;95(12):2516-23. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10995. PubMed 12467065
Zhang L, Zhang Y, Huang PY, Xu F, Peng PJ, Guan ZZ. Phase II clinical study of gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008 Jan;61(1):33-8. doi: 10.1007/s00280-007-0441-8. Epub 2007 Mar 20. PubMed 17909810
Ngan RK, Yiu HH, Lau WH, Yau S, Cheung FY, Chan TM, Kwok CH, Chiu CY, Au SK, Foo W, Law CK, Tse KC. Combination gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: report of a phase II study. Ann Oncol. 2002 Aug;13(8):1252-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf200. PubMed 12181249
Jiang Y, Wei YQ, Luo F, Zou LQ, Liu JY, Peng F, Huang MJ, He QM. Gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a pilot study. Cancer Invest. 2005;23(2):123-8. PubMed 15813504
Yau TK, Lee AW, Wong DH, Yeung RM, Chan EW, Ng WT, Tong M, Soong IS. Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine followed by accelerated radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin in patients with stage IV(A-B) nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck. 2006 Oct;28(10):880-7. doi: 10.1002/hed.20421. PubMed 16721741
He X, Ou D, Ying H, Zhu G, Hu C, Liu T. Experience with combination of cisplatin plus gemcitabine chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Mar;269(3):1027-33. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1669-9. Epub 2011 Jun 26. Erratum In: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Mar;269(3):1035. Xiayun, He [corrected to He, Xiayun]. PubMed 21706324
Freedman J, Furberg C, DeMets D: Fundamentals of clinical trials. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1998
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. PubMed 19097774
Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF. Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Mar 30;31(5):1341-6. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-C. No abstract available. PubMed 7713792
Chow SC, Shao J, Wang H: Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Research. New York, Marcel Dekker, 2003
Links:
Available IPD/Information:

Scroll up to access the controls Scroll to the Study top

U.S. National Library of Medicine | U.S. National Institutes of Health | U.S. Department of Health & Human Services