ClinicalTrials.gov

History of Changes for Study: NCT02551536
Montelukast and Fexofenadine Versus Montelukast and Levocetrizine Combination in Allergic Rhinitis
Latest version (submitted September 15, 2015) on ClinicalTrials.gov
  • A study version is represented by a row in the table.
  • Select two study versions to compare. One each from columns A and B.
  • Choose either the "Merged" or "Side-by-Side" comparison format to specify how the two study versions are to be displayed. The Side-by-Side format only applies to the Protocol section of the study.
  • Click "Compare" to do the comparison and show the differences.
  • Select a version's Submitted Date link to see a rendering of the study for that version.
  • The yellow A/B choices in the table indicate the study versions currently compared below. A yellow table row indicates the study version currently being viewed.
  • Hover over the "Recruitment Status" to see how the study's recruitment status changed.
  • Study edits or deletions are displayed in red.
  • Study additions are displayed in green.
Study Record Versions
Version A B Submitted Date Changes
1 September 15, 2015 None (earliest Version on record)
Comparison Format:

Scroll up to access the controls

Study NCT02551536
Submitted Date:  September 15, 2015 (v1)

Open or close this module Study Identification
Unique Protocol ID: IEC/425-26/13
Brief Title: Montelukast and Fexofenadine Versus Montelukast and Levocetrizine Combination in Allergic Rhinitis
Official Title: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Cost Effectiveness of Montelukast and Levocetirizine Versus Montelukast and Fexofenadine in Patients of Allergic Rhinitis: a Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial
Secondary IDs:
Open or close this module Study Status
Record Verification: September 2015
Overall Status: Completed
Study Start: April 2014
Primary Completion: April 2015 [Actual]
Study Completion: June 2015 [Actual]
First Submitted: August 12, 2015
First Submitted that
Met QC Criteria:
September 15, 2015
First Posted: September 16, 2015 [Estimate]
Last Update Submitted that
Met QC Criteria:
September 15, 2015
Last Update Posted: September 16, 2015 [Estimate]
Open or close this module Sponsor/Collaborators
Sponsor: Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla
Responsible Party: Principal Investigator
Investigator: DR.MOHINI MAHATME
Official Title: ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
Affiliation: Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla
Collaborators:
Open or close this module Oversight
U.S. FDA-regulated Drug:
U.S. FDA-regulated Device:
Data Monitoring: Yes
Open or close this module Study Description
Brief Summary: Objectives: Allergic Rhinitis (AR) is a global health problem. 10-25% of population worldwide is affected by AR. Oral/intranasal H1-antihistamine, decongestants, leukotriene receptor antagonists, intranasal corticosteroids are the pillars in the management of AR.Materials and methods: Seventy patients with allergic rhinitis participated in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel, active controlled, comparative 4 week trial. The patients between age group of 18-65 years of either gender having moderate-severe intermittent or mild persistent allergic rhinitis were included. The study inclusion criteria required the subjects with Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) of 5 or higher. The patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups with montelukast-levocetrizine (10 mg and 5 mg) in one group and montelukast-fexofenadine (10 mg and 120 mg) in another group. TNSS parameter was the main effectiveness parameter.
Detailed Description:

Allergic Rhinitis (AR) is a global health problem. It is the cause of major illness and disability worldwide. Estimates indicate that 10-25% of population worldwide is affected by AR. The main symptoms of AR include nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, itching, sneezing and non-nasal symptoms like burning, itching and watery eyes or itching ears and palate. These symptoms can have a considerable toll on patient's quality of life by interfering with cognitive and emotional functioning. The estimated annual cost attributable to AR in United States ranges from $1.4 billion to nearly $ 6 billion in direct cost annually. Today's antiallergic therapy is based on avoidance of the causative allergen, symptomatic pharmacotherapy, specific immunotherapy and education. Oral/intranasal H1-antihistaminics, decongestants, leukotrienes receptor antagonists, intranasal corticosteroids are the pillars in the management of allergic rhinitis. Second generation antihistamines have become increasingly popular because of their comparable efficacy and lower incidence of adverse effects relative to first generation counterparts. Levocetirizine, a potent second generation histamine (H1) receptor antagonist, is effective against persistent allergic rhinitis and thus improves quality of life and reduces co-morbidities and societal costs. Fexofenadine, is a selective, non sedating, second generation H1 receptor antagonist which have an additional impact on the inflammatory mediators. Monteleukast is a highly selective type I receptor antagonist of leukotriene D4. The leukotrienes modifiers have both anti-inflammatory and bronchodilator properties.

The literature search establishes that addition of an antihistamine to montelukast has added benefit. The combination therapy of montelukast with antihistamine provide enhancing and complimentary effects thereby reducing the symptoms effectively. The results with concomitant levocetirizine and montelukast treatment are better as compared to monotherapy with levocetirizine on symptoms and quality of life in allergic rhinitis. Fexofenadine along with montelukast is more effective than antihistaminic alone in control of allergic rhinitis symptoms. There is literature available for the comparisons of concomitant levocetirizine and montelukast with monotherapy or placebo and comparisons of concomitant fexofenadine and montelukast with monotherapy or placebo. But scanty data is available regarding comparisons of concomitant montelukast-levocetirizine with montelukast-fexofenadine.

Open or close this module Conditions
Conditions: Allergic Rhinitis
Keywords: Allergic rhinitis
montelukast
fexofenadine
levocetrizine
Open or close this module Study Design
Study Type: Interventional
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Study Phase: Phase 4
Interventional Study Model: Parallel Assignment
Number of Arms: 2
Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator)
Allocation: Randomized
Enrollment: 70 [Actual]
Open or close this module Arms and Interventions
Arms Assigned Interventions
Active Comparator: Group A
FDC tablet of montelukast 10 mg and levocetrizine 5 mg was given once daily for 4 weeks
Drug: MontelukastDrug: Levocetrizine
group A recieved FDC tablet of montelukast 10 mg and levocetrizine 5mg O.D
Experimental: Group B
FDC tablet of montelukast 10 mg and fexofenadine 120 mg was given once daily for 4 weeks
Drug: MontelukastDrug: Fexofenadine
group B received FDC tablet of montelukast 10mg and fexofenadine 120 mg O.D
Open or close this module Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures:
1. Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS)
[ Time Frame: 4 week ]

The TNSS was obtained from the sum of all four individual symptom scores, with a total possible score ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 12 (maximum symptom intensity).
2. adverse drug reaction
[ Time Frame: 4 week ]

General clinical safety was monitored by vigilant follow-up of patients for the treatment of emergent adverse events if any, and recorded in the case report form
Secondary Outcome Measures:
1. cost effectiveness ratio
[ Time Frame: 4 weeks ]

direct cost parameters were taken into consideration. Direct cost parameters were cost of medications used, medical procedures and hospitalization charges, if any. Cost-effectiveness ratio of both treatment groups were calculated based on formula as given below.

Cost-effectiveness ratio = cost / outcome Outcome was measured in terms of effectiveness. TNSS parameter was the main effectiveness parameter.

Open or close this module Eligibility
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 65 Years
Sex: All
Gender Based:
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
Criteria:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • either gender having moderate-severe intermittent or mild persistent allergic rhinitis according to original Aria classification.
  • subjects with Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) of 5 or higher.
  • not treated with antihistaminics in previous week.
  • Patients willing to sign written informed consent
  • free of any clinically significant disease
  • having normal E.C.G

Exclusion Criteria:

  • participation of children, pregnant female, nursing mothers,
  • patients with asthma requiring chronic use of inhaled or systemic corticosteroids
  • history of failure to improve symptoms with antihistaminic drug treatment in the past 4.history of allergies to study medication or tolerance to antihistamines, 5.use of study drug in the last 7 days. 6. subjects with significant hematopoietic, cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, neurologic, psychiatric or autoimmune disease
Open or close this module Contacts/Locations
Locations:
Open or close this module IPDSharing
Plan to Share IPD:
Open or close this module References
Citations:
Links:
Available IPD/Information:

Scroll up to access the controls Scroll to the Study top

U.S. National Library of Medicine | U.S. National Institutes of Health | U.S. Department of Health & Human Services