ClinicalTrials.gov

History of Changes for Study: NCT03280056
Safety and Efficacy of Repeated Administrations of NurOwn® in ALS Patients
Latest version (submitted February 5, 2024) on ClinicalTrials.gov
  • A study version is represented by a row in the table.
  • Select two study versions to compare. One each from columns A and B.
  • Choose either the "Merged" or "Side-by-Side" comparison format to specify how the two study versions are to be displayed. The Side-by-Side format only applies to the Protocol section of the study.
  • Click "Compare" to do the comparison and show the differences.
  • Select a version's Submitted Date link to see a rendering of the study for that version.
  • The yellow A/B choices in the table indicate the study versions currently compared below. A yellow table row indicates the study version currently being viewed.
  • Hover over the "Recruitment Status" to see how the study's recruitment status changed.
  • Study edits or deletions are displayed in red.
  • Study additions are displayed in green.
Study Record Versions
Version A B Submitted Date Changes
1 September 10, 2017 None (earliest Version on record)
2 September 15, 2017 Contacts/Locations and Study Status
3 December 5, 2017 Contacts/Locations, Eligibility and Study Status
4 March 6, 2018 Contacts/Locations and Study Status
5 March 7, 2018 Contacts/Locations and Study Status
6 May 24, 2018 Eligibility and Study Status
7 November 29, 2018 Contacts/Locations and Study Status
8 March 24, 2019 Study Status
9 July 4, 2019 Study Status
10 October 22, 2019 Recruitment Status, Study Status, Contacts/Locations and Study Design
11 January 25, 2021 Recruitment Status and Study Status
12 October 3, 2021 Study Status and Study Design
13 October 5, 2021 Arms and Interventions and Study Status
14 December 1, 2023
Quality Control Review has not concluded Returned: December 20, 2023
Study Status, Outcome Measures, Document Section, Adverse Events, Baseline Characteristics, Participant Flow, Arms and Interventions and Study Design
15 January 4, 2024
Quality Control Review has not concluded Returned: January 4, 2024
Study Status, Outcome Measures, Baseline Characteristics and Participant Flow
16 January 9, 2024
Quality Control Review has not concluded Returned: January 31, 2024
Outcome Measures and Study Status
17 February 5, 2024 Study Status, Outcome Measures and More Information
Comparison Format:

Scroll up to access the controls

Study NCT03280056
Submitted Date:  February 5, 2024 (v17)

Open or close this module Study Identification
Unique Protocol ID: BCT-002-US
Brief Title: Safety and Efficacy of Repeated Administrations of NurOwn® in ALS Patients
Official Title: A Phase 3, Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Repeated Administration of NurOwn® (Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells Secreting Neurotrophic Factors) in Participants With ALS
Secondary IDs:
Open or close this module Study Status
Record Verification: February 2024
Overall Status: Completed
Study Start: August 28, 2017
Primary Completion: September 29, 2020 [Actual]
Study Completion: September 29, 2020 [Actual]
First Submitted: August 29, 2017
First Submitted that
Met QC Criteria:
September 10, 2017
First Posted: September 12, 2017 [Actual]
Results First Submitted: December 1, 2023
Results First Submitted that
Met QC Criteria:
February 5, 2024
Results First Posted: February 29, 2024 [Actual]
Certification/Extension
First Submitted:
October 3, 2021
Certification/Extension
First Submitted that
Met QC Criteria:
Certification/Extension
First Posted:
February 29, 2024 [Actual]
Last Update Submitted that
Met QC Criteria:
February 5, 2024
Last Update Posted: February 29, 2024 [Actual]
Open or close this module Sponsor/Collaborators
Sponsor: Brainstorm-Cell Therapeutics
Responsible Party: Sponsor
Collaborators: California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM)
Open or close this module Oversight
U.S. FDA-regulated Drug: Yes
U.S. FDA-regulated Device: No
Data Monitoring: Yes
Open or close this module Study Description
Brief Summary:

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of repeated administration of NurOwn® (MSC-NTF cells) therapy, which is based on transplantation of autologous bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC), which are enriched from the patient's own bone marrow, propagated ex vivo and induced to secrete Neurotrophic factors (NTFs).

The autologous NurOwn® (MSC-NTF cells) are back-transplanted into the patient intrathecally by standard lumbar puncture where neurons and glial cells are expected to take up the neurotrophic factors secreted by the transplanted cells

Detailed Description:

Neurotrophic factors (NTFs) are potent survival factors for embryonic, neonatal, and adult neurons and are considered potential therapeutic candidates for ALS. Delivery of multiple NTFs to the immediate environment of afflicted neurons in ALS patients is expected to improve their survival and thus slow down disease progression and alleviate symptoms. NTF-secreting mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC-NTF cells) are a novel cell-therapeutic approach aimed at effectively delivering NTFs directly to the site of damage in ALS patients.

Participants meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized and will undergo bone-marrow aspiration. MSC of the participants randomized to the treatment group will be induced into MSC-NTF cells. Participants will undergo a total of three intrathecal (IT) transplantations with NurOwn® (MSC-NTF cells) or matching placebo at three bi-monthly intervals

Open or close this module Conditions
Conditions: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
Keywords: MSC
Autologous
Neurotrophic factors
Open or close this module Study Design
Study Type: Interventional
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Study Phase: Phase 3
Interventional Study Model: Parallel Assignment
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Study
Number of Arms: 2
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Allocation: Randomized
Enrollment: 196 [Actual]
Open or close this module Arms and Interventions
Arms Assigned Interventions
Active Comparator: NurOwn® (MSC-NTF cells)
Three Intrathecal administrations of NurOwn® (MSC-NTF cells) at bi-monthly intervals
Biological: NurOwn® (MSC-NTF cells)

NurOwn® (MSC-NTF): One course of treatment that includes three separate intrathecal injections of 100-125 x 10^6 cells every 8 weeks

NurOwn® (MSC-NTF): Autologous, bone marrow-derived, mesenchymal stem cells secreting neurotrophic factors

Bone Marrow aspiration
Bone Marrow aspiration
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Three Intrathecal administrations of Placebo at bi-monthly intervals
Placebo

One course of treatment that includes three separate intrathecal injections of Placebo every 8 weeks

Placebo: liquid solution in syringe for injection

Bone Marrow aspiration
Bone Marrow aspiration
Open or close this module Outcome Measures
[See Results Section.]
Primary Outcome Measures:
1. The Proportion of NurOwn® Treated Participants With a ≥1.25 Points/Month Improvement in Post-treatment Slope vs. Pre-treatment Slope in ALSFRS-R Score at 28 Weeks Following the First Treatment as Compared to Placebo
[ Time Frame: 28 weeks following the first intrathecal injection ]

The ALSFRS-R is a quickly administered (10 minutes) ordinal, validated rating scale (ratings 0-4) used to determine participants' assessment of their capability and independence in 12 functional activities. All 12 activities are relevant in ALS. Initial validity was established by documenting that in ALS patients, change in ALSFRS-R scores correlated with change in strength over time, as measured by quantitative neuromuscular strength testing, and with quality of life measures, and predicted survival. The total score of ALSFRS-R ranges from 0-48, with higher score being better.
Secondary Outcome Measures:
1. Number of Participants Whose Disease Progression is Halted or Improved as Measured by a 100% or Greater Improvement in Post-treatment Slope vs. Pre-treatment Slope in ALSFRS-R Score of NurOwn® Treatment vs. Placebo
[ Time Frame: 28 weeks following the first intrathecal injection ]

The ALSFRS-R is a quickly administered (10 minutes) ordinal, validated rating scale (ratings 0-4) used to determine participants' assessment of their capability and independence in 12 functional activities. All 12 activities are relevant in ALS. Initial validity was established by documenting that in ALS patients, change in ALSFRS-R scores correlated with change in strength over time, as measured by quantitative neuromuscular strength testing, and with quality of life measures, and predicted survival. The total score of ALSFRS-R ranges from 0-48, with higher score being better.
2. Score of NurOwn® (MSC-NTF Cells) Treated Patients vs. Placebo Treated Patients as Measured by Change From Baseline in ALSFRS-R Score at Week 28
[ Time Frame: 28 weeks following the first intrathecal injection ]

The ALSFRS-R is a quickly administered (10 minutes) ordinal, validated rating scale (ratings 0-4) used to determine participants' assessment of their capability and independence in 12 functional activities. All 12 activities are relevant in ALS. Initial validity was established by documenting that in ALS patients, change in ALSFRS-R scores correlated with change in strength over time, as measured by quantitative neuromuscular strength testing, and with quality of life measures, and predicted survival. The total score of ALSFRS-R ranges from 0-48, with higher score being better.
3. NurOwn® (MSC-NTF Cells) Treated Patients vs. Placebo Treated Patients as Measured by the Combined Assessment of Function and Survival at 28 Weeks
[ Time Frame: 28 weeks following the first intrathecal injection ]

The combined Assessment of Function and Survival (CAFS) is a composite endpoint based on (1) the change from baseline in ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) score and (2) time to death.

On the ALSFRS-R, 12 functions are rated on 5-point ordinal rating scales (from 0 to 4) with a total score range (minimum and maximum score) of 0-48 (sum of all 12 items). The higher the score the better functioning. For the survival endpoint, the longer time the better outcome.

A patient's CAFS score represents a patient's rank in the study based on comparing the patient's outcome for both the change in ALSFRS-R and the time to death to all other patients in the study in a pairwise fashion. The ranked scores range from 001 to 189 (the number of subjects in the mITT population) with larger rank score numbers associated with a better outcome. The reported values are the mean rank scores in each group for the composite endpoint.

Open or close this module Eligibility
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 60 Years
Sex: All
Gender Based:
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
Criteria:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ALS diagnosed as possible, laboratory-supported probable, probable, or definite as defined by revised El Escorial criteria.
  • Having onset of ALS disease symptoms, including limb weakness within 24 months at the Screening Visit.
  • ALSFRS-R ≥ 25 at the screening Visit.
  • Upright slow vital capacity (SVC) measure ≥ 65% of predicted for gender, height, and age at the screening Visit.
  • Rapid progressors
  • Participants taking a stable dose of Riluzole are permitted in the study
  • Citizen or permanent resident of the United States or Canadian citizen able to travel to a US site for all follow-up study visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior stem cell therapy of any kind
  • History of autoimmune or other serious disease (including malignancy and immune deficiency) that may confound study results
  • Current use of immunosuppressant medication or anticoagulants (per Investigator discretion)
  • Exposure to any other experimental agent or participation in an ALS clinical trial within 30 days prior to Screening Visit
  • Use of RADICAVA (edaravone injection) within 30 days of screening or intent to use edaravone at any time during the course of the study including the follow up period
  • Use of non-invasive ventilation (BIPAP), diaphragm pacing system or invasive ventilation (tracheostomy)
  • Feeding tube
  • Pregnant women or women currently breastfeeding
Open or close this module Contacts/Locations
Study Officials: Merit E. Cudkowicz, MD
Principal Investigator
Massachusetts General Hospital
Robert H. Brown, MD, PhD
Principal Investigator
UMass Medical School
Anthony J. Windebank, MD
Principal Investigator
Mayo Clinic
Namita A. Goyal, MD
Principal Investigator
UC Irvine
Robert G. Miller, MD
Principal Investigator
California Pacific Medical Center (CPM) Research Institute
Robert Baloh, MD, Ph.D.
Principal Investigator
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Locations: United States, California
University of California Irvine Alpha Stem Cell Clinic
Irvine, California, United States, 92697
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
California Pacific Medical Center
San Francisco, California, United States, 94115
United States, Massachusetts
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01655
United States, Minnesota
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
Open or close this module IPDSharing
Plan to Share IPD: No
Open or close this module References
Citations:
Links:
Available IPD/Information:
Open or close this module Document Section
Study Protocol
Document Date: March 1, 2020
Uploaded: 11/22/2023 11:43
File Name: Prot_000.pdf
Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Date: June 19, 2020
Uploaded: 12/01/2023 14:05
File Name: SAP_001.pdf
Study Results
Open or close this module Participant Flow
Recruitment Details The first participant in Study BCT-002-US signed informed consent on 28 August 2017 The last participant visit took place on 29 September 2020. The study was conducted at 6 clinical sites in the USA. A total of 263 participants were screened for the study, and 196 participants (74.5% of participants screened) were randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment with either NurOwn or placebo.
Pre-assignment Details The most common reasons that participants did not meet inclusion criteria were failure to meet the SVC inclusion criterion at the Screening Visit or the required pre-treatment decline in ALSFRSR total score at the randomization visit. From the ITT population, 3 participants in the NurOwn group and 4 participants in the placebo group discontinued prior to treatment.
 
Arm/Group Title NurOwn® (MSC-NTF Cells) Placebo
Arm/Group Description

NurOwn® (MSC-NTF): One course of treatment that includes three separate intrathecal injections of 100-125 x 10'6 cells every 8 weeks

NurOwn® (MSC-NTF): Autologous, bone marrow-derived, mesenchymal stem cells secreting neurotrophic factors

Bone marrow aspiration

One course of treatment that includes three separate intrathecal injections of Placebo every 8 weeks

Placebo: liquid solution in syringe for injection

Bone marrow aspiration

Period Title: Overall Study
Started 95 94
Completed 71 73
Not Completed 24 21
Reason Not Completed
Withdrawal by Subject 12 14
Death 9 2
Adverse Event 1 3
Lost to Follow-up 1 1
Physician Decision 0 1
Early Discontinuation 1 0
Open or close this module Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group TitleNurOwn® (MSC-NTF Cells)PlaceboTotal
Arm/Group Description

NurOwn® (MSC-NTF): One course of treatment that includes three separate intrathecal injections of 100-125 x 10'6 cells every 8 weeks

NurOwn® (MSC-NTF): Autologous, bone marrow-derived, mesenchymal stem cells secreting neurotrophic factors

Bone marrow aspiration

One course of treatment that includes three separate intrathecal injections of Placebo every 8 weeks

Placebo: liquid solution in syringe for injection

Bone marrow aspiration

Total of all reporting groups
Overall Number of Baseline Participants 95 94 189
Baseline Analysis Population Description
Age, Categorical
Measure Type: Count of Participants
Unit of measure: Participants
Number Analyzed95 Participants94 Participants189 Participants
<=18 years
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Between 18 and 65 years
95
100%
94
100%
189
100%
>=65 years
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Age, Continuous
Mean (Standard Deviation)
Unit of measure: years
Number Analyzed95 Participants94 Participants189 Participants
Mean
48.1(9.71)49.1(8.38)48.6(9.07)
Sex: Female, Male
Measure Type: Count of Participants
Unit of measure: Participants
Number Analyzed95 Participants94 Participants189 Participants
Female
27
28.42%
35
37.23%
62
32.8%
Male
68
71.58%
59
62.77%
127
67.2%
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Measure Type: Count of Participants
Unit of measure: Participants
Number Analyzed95 Participants94 Participants189 Participants
Hispanic or Latino
5
5.26%
3
3.19%
8
4.23%
Not Hispanic or Latino
90
94.74%
91
96.81%
181
95.77%
Unknown or Not Reported
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Race (NIH/OMB)
Measure Type: Count of Participants
Unit of measure: Participants
Number Analyzed95 Participants94 Participants189 Participants
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Asian
5
5.26%
7
7.45%
12
6.35%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0
0%
1
1.06%
1
0.53%
Black or African American
3
3.16%
3
3.19%
6
3.17%
White
87
91.58%
81
86.17%
168
88.89%
More than one race
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Unknown or Not Reported
0
0%
2
2.13%
2
1.06%
Region of Enrollment
Measure Type: Number
Unit of measure: participants
Number Analyzed95 Participants94 Participants189 Participants
United States
9594189
Baseline Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating ScaleScore [1]
Mean (Standard Deviation)
Unit of measure: units on a scale
Number Analyzed95 Participants94 Participants189 Participants
30.3(6.5)31.4(6.1)30.9(6.3)
 
[1]Measure Description: The ALSFRS-R is a quickly administered (10 minutes) ordinal, validated rating scale (ratings 0-4) used to determine participants' assessment of their capability and independence in 12 functional activities. All 12 activities are relevant in ALS. Initial validity was established by documenting that in ALS patients, change in ALSFRS-R scores correlated with change in strength over time, as measured by quantitative neuromuscular strength testing, and with quality of life measures, and predicted survival. The total score of ALSFRS-R ranges from 0-48, with higher score being better.
Open or close this module Outcome Measures
1. Primary Outcome:
Title The Proportion of NurOwn® Treated Participants With a ≥1.25 Points/Month Improvement in Post-treatment Slope vs. Pre-treatment Slope in ALSFRS-R Score at 28 Weeks Following the First Treatment as Compared to Placebo
Description The ALSFRS-R is a quickly administered (10 minutes) ordinal, validated rating scale (ratings 0-4) used to determine participants' assessment of their capability and independence in 12 functional activities. All 12 activities are relevant in ALS. Initial validity was established by documenting that in ALS patients, change in ALSFRS-R scores correlated with change in strength over time, as measured by quantitative neuromuscular strength testing, and with quality of life measures, and predicted survival. The total score of ALSFRS-R ranges from 0-48, with higher score being better.
Time Frame 28 weeks following the first intrathecal injection
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description
The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population was defined as all participants who were randomized, treated and had at least three ALSFRS-R assessments: one pre-treatment assessments of ALSFRS-R prior to the baseline assessment, a baseline assessment and one post-treatment assessment.
   
Arm/Group TitleNurOwn® (MSC-NTF Cells)Placebo
Arm/Group Description

NurOwn® (MSC-NTF): One course of treatment that includes three separate intrathecal injections of 100-125 x 10'6 cells every 8 weeks

NurOwn® (MSC-NTF): Autologous, bone marrow-derived, mesenchymal stem cells secreting neurotrophic factors

Bone marrow aspiration

One course of treatment that includes three separate intrathecal injections of Placebo every 8 weeks

Placebo: liquid solution in syringe for injection

Bone marrow aspiration

Overall Number of Participants Analyzed95 94
Measure Type: Count of Participants
Unit of Measure: Participants
YES (%)
31
32.6%
26
27.7%
NO (%)
64
67.4%
68
72.3%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis OverviewComparison Group SelectionNurOwn® (MSC-NTF Cells), Placebo
Comments[Not specified]
Type of Statistical TestSuperiority
Comments[Not specified]
Statistical Test of HypothesisP-Value0.453
Comments[Not specified]
MethodChi-squared
Comments[Not specified]
Method of EstimationEstimation ParameterOdds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value1.330
Confidence Interval(2-sided) 95%
0.632 to 2.798
Estimation Comments[Not specified]
2. Secondary Outcome:
Title Number of Participants Whose Disease Progression is Halted or Improved as Measured by a 100% or Greater Improvement in Post-treatment Slope vs. Pre-treatment Slope in ALSFRS-R Score of NurOwn® Treatment vs. Placebo
Description The ALSFRS-R is a quickly administered (10 minutes) ordinal, validated rating scale (ratings 0-4) used to determine participants' assessment of their capability and independence in 12 functional activities. All 12 activities are relevant in ALS. Initial validity was established by documenting that in ALS patients, change in ALSFRS-R scores correlated with change in strength over time, as measured by quantitative neuromuscular strength testing, and with quality of life measures, and predicted survival. The total score of ALSFRS-R ranges from 0-48, with higher score being better.
Time Frame 28 weeks following the first intrathecal injection
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description
The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population was defined as all participants who were randomized, treated and had at least three ALSFRS-R assessments: one pre-treatment assessments of ALSFRS-R prior to the baseline assessment, a baseline assessment and one post-treatment assessment.
   
Arm/Group TitleNurOwn® (MSC-NTF Cells)Placebo
Arm/Group Description

NurOwn® (MSC-NTF): One course of treatment that includes three separate intrathecal injections of 100-125 x 10'6 cells every 8 weeks

NurOwn® (MSC-NTF): Autologous, bone marrow-derived, mesenchymal stem cells secreting neurotrophic factors

Bone marrow aspiration

One course of treatment that includes three separate intrathecal injections of Placebo every 8 weeks

Placebo: liquid solution in syringe for injection

Bone marrow aspiration

Overall Number of Participants Analyzed95 94
Measure Type: Count of Participants
Unit of Measure: Participants
YES (%)
13
13.7%
13
13.8%
NO (%)
82
86.3%
81
86.2%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis OverviewComparison Group SelectionNurOwn® (MSC-NTF Cells), Placebo
Comments[Not specified]
Type of Statistical TestSuperiority
Comments[Not specified]
Statistical Test of HypothesisP-Value0.997
Comments[Not specified]
MethodChi-squared
Comments[Not specified]
Method of EstimationEstimation ParameterOdds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value0.998
Confidence Interval(2-sided) 95%
0.416 to 2.395
Estimation Comments[Not specified]
3. Secondary Outcome:
Title Score of NurOwn® (MSC-NTF Cells) Treated Patients vs. Placebo Treated Patients as Measured by Change From Baseline in ALSFRS-R Score at Week 28
Description The ALSFRS-R is a quickly administered (10 minutes) ordinal, validated rating scale (ratings 0-4) used to determine participants' assessment of their capability and independence in 12 functional activities. All 12 activities are relevant in ALS. Initial validity was established by documenting that in ALS patients, change in ALSFRS-R scores correlated with change in strength over time, as measured by quantitative neuromuscular strength testing, and with quality of life measures, and predicted survival. The total score of ALSFRS-R ranges from 0-48, with higher score being better.
Time Frame 28 weeks following the first intrathecal injection
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description
The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population was defined as all participants who were randomized, treated and had at least three ALSFRS-R assessments: one pre-treatment assessments of ALSFRS-R prior to the baseline assessment, a baseline assessment and one post-treatment assessment.
 
Arm/Group TitleNurOwn® (MSC-NTF Cells)Placebo
Arm/Group Description

NurOwn® (MSC-NTF): One course of treatment that includes three separate intrathecal injections of 100-125 x 10'6 cells every 8 weeks

NurOwn® (MSC-NTF): Autologous, bone marrow-derived, mesenchymal stem cells secreting neurotrophic factors

Bone marrow aspiration

One course of treatment that includes three separate intrathecal injections of Placebo every 8 weeks

Placebo: liquid solution in syringe for injection

Bone marrow aspiration

Overall Number of Participants Analyzed95 94
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error)
Unit of Measure: score on a scale
-5.52(0.670) -5.88(0.665)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis OverviewComparison Group SelectionNurOwn® (MSC-NTF Cells), Placebo
Comments[Not specified]
Type of Statistical TestSuperiority
Comments[Not specified]
Statistical Test of HypothesisP-Value0.693
Comments[Not specified]
MethodMixed Models Analysis
Comments[Not specified]
Method of EstimationEstimation ParameterMean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value0.37
Confidence Interval(2-sided) 95%
-1.47 to 2.20
Parameter Dispersion
Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.926
Estimation Comments[Not specified]
4. Secondary Outcome:
Title NurOwn® (MSC-NTF Cells) Treated Patients vs. Placebo Treated Patients as Measured by the Combined Assessment of Function and Survival at 28 Weeks
Description

The combined Assessment of Function and Survival (CAFS) is a composite endpoint based on (1) the change from baseline in ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) score and (2) time to death.

On the ALSFRS-R, 12 functions are rated on 5-point ordinal rating scales (from 0 to 4) with a total score range (minimum and maximum score) of 0-48 (sum of all 12 items). The higher the score the better functioning. For the survival endpoint, the longer time the better outcome.

A patient's CAFS score represents a patient's rank in the study based on comparing the patient's outcome for both the change in ALSFRS-R and the time to death to all other patients in the study in a pairwise fashion. The ranked scores range from 001 to 189 (the number of subjects in the mITT population) with larger rank score numbers associated with a better outcome. The reported values are the mean rank scores in each group for the composite endpoint.

Time Frame 28 weeks following the first intrathecal injection
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description
The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population was defined as all participants who were randomized, treated and had at least three ALSFRS-R assessments: one pre-treatment assessments of ALSFRS-R prior to the baseline assessment, a baseline assessment and one post-treatment assessment.
 
Arm/Group TitleNurOwn® (MSC-NTF Cells)Placebo
Arm/Group Description

NurOwn® (MSC-NTF): One course of treatment that includes three separate intrathecal injections of 100-125 x 10'6 cells every 8 weeks

NurOwn® (MSC-NTF): Autologous, bone marrow-derived, mesenchymal stem cells secreting neurotrophic factors

Bone marrow aspiration

One course of treatment that includes three separate intrathecal injections of Placebo every 8 weeks

Placebo: liquid solution in syringe for injection

Bone marrow aspiration

Overall Number of Participants Analyzed95 94
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error)
Unit of Measure: score on a scale
73.74(5.210) 72.21(4.890)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis OverviewComparison Group SelectionNurOwn® (MSC-NTF Cells), Placebo
Comments[Not specified]
Type of Statistical TestSuperiority
Comments[Not specified]
Statistical Test of HypothesisP-Value0.804
Comments[Not specified]
MethodANCOVA
Comments[Not specified]
Method of EstimationEstimation ParameterMean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value1.53
Confidence Interval(2-sided) 95%
-10.65 to 13.72
Parameter Dispersion
Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 6.176
Estimation Comments[Not specified]
Open or close this module Adverse Events
 
Time Frame from the screening visit through the end of the study period (28 weeks after first treatment)
Adverse Event Reporting Description AE means any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. An AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, without any judgment about causality.
 
Arm/Group Title NurOwn® (MSC-NTF Cells) Placebo
Arm/Group Description

NurOwn® (MSC-NTF): One course of treatment that includes three separate intrathecal injections of 100-125 x 10^6 cells every 8 weeks

NurOwn® (MSC-NTF): Autologous, bone marrow-derived, mesenchymal stem cells secreting neurotrophic factors

Bone marrow aspiration

One course of treatment that includes three separate intrathecal injections of Placebo every 8 weeks

Placebo: liquid solution in syringe for injection

Bone marrow aspiration

All-Cause Mortality
  NurOwn® (MSC-NTF Cells)Placebo
 Affected / At Risk (%)# Events Affected / At Risk (%)# Events
Total 10 / 95 (10.53%)4 / 94 (4.26%)
Serious Adverse Events
  NurOwn® (MSC-NTF Cells)Placebo
 Affected / At Risk (%)# Events Affected / At Risk (%)# Events
Total 23 / 95 (24.21%)17 / 94 (18.09%)
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest 0 / 95 (0%)01 / 94 (1.06%)1
Palpitations 1 / 95 (1.05%)10 / 94 (0%)0
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia 3 / 95 (3.16%)32 / 94 (2.13%)2
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage 1 / 95 (1.05%)10 / 94 (0%)0
General disorders
Asthenia 1 / 95 (1.05%)10 / 94 (0%)0
Disease progression 1 / 95 (1.05%)12 / 94 (2.13%)2
Euthanasia 1 / 95 (1.05%)10 / 94 (0%)0
Pain 1 / 95 (1.05%)10 / 94 (0%)0
Immune system disorders
Anaphylactic reaction 0 / 95 (0%)01 / 94 (1.06%)1
Infections and infestations
Clostridium difficile infection 0 / 95 (0%)01 / 94 (1.06%)1
Intervertebral discitis 1 / 95 (1.05%)10 / 94 (0%)0
Pneumonia 2 / 95 (2.11%)22 / 94 (2.13%)3
Sepsis 0 / 95 (0%)01 / 94 (1.06%)1
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Facial bones fracture 0 / 95 (0%)01 / 94 (1.06%)1
Fall 1 / 95 (1.05%)10 / 94 (0%)0
Procedural complication 1 / 95 (1.05%)10 / 94 (0%)0
Procedural headache 0 / 95 (0%)01 / 94 (1.06%)1
Procedural nausea 0 / 95 (0%)01 / 94 (1.06%)1
Procedural pain 1 / 95 (1.05%)10 / 94 (0%)0
Skull fracture 1 / 95 (1.05%)10 / 94 (0%)0
Subdural haematoma 1 / 95 (1.05%)10 / 94 (0%)0
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration 0 / 95 (0%)01 / 94 (1.06%)1
Malnutrition 1 / 95 (1.05%)10 / 94 (0%)0
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haemorrhage 0 / 95 (0%)01 / 94 (1.06%)1
Cerebrospinal fluid leakage 0 / 95 (0%)01 / 94 (1.06%)1
Dizziness 1 / 95 (1.05%)10 / 94 (0%)0
Loss of consciousness 1 / 95 (1.05%)11 / 94 (1.06%)1
Syncope 1 / 95 (1.05%)10 / 94 (0%)0
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal colic 0 / 95 (0%)01 / 94 (1.06%)1
Urinary retention 1 / 95 (1.05%)10 / 94 (0%)0
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure 0 / 95 (0%)01 / 94 (1.06%)1
Dyspnoea 1 / 95 (1.05%)10 / 94 (0%)0
Pneumonia aspiration 0 / 95 (0%)01 / 94 (1.06%)1
Pulmonary embolism 1 / 95 (1.05%)11 / 94 (1.06%)1
Respiratory arrest 1 / 95 (1.05%)10 / 94 (0%)0
Respiratory distress 2 / 95 (2.11%)20 / 94 (0%)0
Respiratory failure 5 / 95 (5.26%)63 / 94 (3.19%)3
Respiratory muscle weakness 1 / 95 (1.05%)10 / 94 (0%)0
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis 0 / 95 (0%)01 / 94 (1.06%)1
Haemorrhage 1 / 95 (1.05%)10 / 94 (0%)0
Indicates events were collected by non-systematic methods.
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Frequency Threshold for Reporting Other Adverse Events 5%
  NurOwn® (MSC-NTF Cells)Placebo
 Affected / At Risk (%)# Events Affected / At Risk (%)# Events
Total 93 / 95 (97.89%)92 / 94 (97.87%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation 7 / 95 (7.37%)76 / 94 (6.38%)6
Diarrhoea 5 / 95 (5.26%)67 / 94 (7.45%)9
Dysphagia 9 / 95 (9.47%)95 / 94 (5.32%)5
Nausea 16 / 95 (16.84%)2018 / 94 (19.15%)22
Vomiting 3 / 95 (3.16%)46 / 94 (6.38%)6
General disorders
Chills 2 / 95 (2.11%)35 / 94 (5.32%)5
Fatigue 0 / 95 (0%)08 / 94 (8.51%)8
Injection site pain 8 / 95 (8.42%)139 / 94 (9.57%)10
Pyrexia 9 / 95 (9.47%)109 / 94 (9.57%)9
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis 8 / 95 (8.42%)85 / 94 (5.32%)6
Upper respiratory tract infection 6 / 95 (6.32%)712 / 94 (12.77%)12
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion 9 / 95 (9.47%)99 / 94 (9.57%)16
Fall 28 / 95 (29.47%)6134 / 94 (36.17%)76
Laceration 7 / 95 (7.37%)711 / 94 (11.7%)12
Limb injury 6 / 95 (6.32%)71 / 94 (1.06%)2
Post lumbar puncture syndrome 22 / 95 (23.16%)3629 / 94 (30.85%)48
Post procedural complication 16 / 95 (16.84%)227 / 94 (7.45%)10
Postoperative fever 7 / 95 (7.37%)71 / 94 (1.06%)2
Procedural anxiety 5 / 95 (5.26%)71 / 94 (1.06%)1
Procedural headache 31 / 95 (32.63%)5830 / 94 (31.91%)51
Procedural pain 50 / 95 (52.63%)14534 / 94 (36.17%)52
Skin abrasion 3 / 95 (3.16%)35 / 94 (5.32%)8
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia 10 / 95 (10.53%)117 / 94 (7.45%)7
Back pain 42 / 95 (44.21%)7824 / 94 (25.53%)33
Coccydynia 11 / 95 (11.58%)141 / 94 (1.06%)1
Muscle spasms 9 / 95 (9.47%)146 / 94 (6.38%)6
Muscle tightness 7 / 95 (7.37%)71 / 94 (1.06%)1
Muscular weakness 11 / 95 (11.58%)1512 / 94 (12.77%)16
Musculoskeletal pain 15 / 95 (15.79%)168 / 94 (8.51%)9
Musculoskeletal stiffness 3 / 95 (3.16%)45 / 94 (5.32%)5
Myalgia 7 / 95 (7.37%)82 / 94 (2.13%)2
Neck pain 7 / 95 (7.37%)98 / 94 (8.51%)8
Pain in extremity 16 / 95 (16.84%)2911 / 94 (11.7%)15
Nervous system disorders
Balance disorder 1 / 95 (1.05%)15 / 94 (5.32%)5
Dizziness 5 / 95 (5.26%)65 / 94 (5.32%)5
Dysarthria 2 / 95 (2.11%)35 / 94 (5.32%)6
Headache 45 / 95 (47.37%)8532 / 94 (34.04%)57
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety 5 / 95 (5.26%)55 / 94 (5.32%)5
Insomnia 5 / 95 (5.26%)53 / 94 (3.19%)3
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough 4 / 95 (4.21%)57 / 94 (7.45%)7
Dyspnoea 4 / 95 (4.21%)46 / 94 (6.38%)8
Indicates events were collected by non-systematic methods.
Open or close this module Limitations and Caveats
This trial had a unique and atypical trial population that included more participants than anticipated with advanced ALS, who had a low ALSFRS-R score. As compared with recent large ALS clinical trials, this study population is an outlier, with a mean overall ALSFRS-R score at baseline lower than other studies, and this impacted the power of this study.
Open or close this module More Information
Certain Agreements:
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between the Principal Investigator and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Official Title:
Chief Medical Officer
Organization:
Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics
Phone:
+1-201-488-0460
Email:
ClinicalTrial@brainstorm-cell.com

Scroll up to access the controls Scroll to the Study top

U.S. National Library of Medicine | U.S. National Institutes of Health | U.S. Department of Health & Human Services