ClinicalTrials.gov

History of Changes for Study: NCT04830540
Impact of 'Recovery' Footwear on Lower Extremity Comfort and Biomechanics
Latest version (submitted April 1, 2021) on ClinicalTrials.gov
  • A study version is represented by a row in the table.
  • Select two study versions to compare. One each from columns A and B.
  • Choose either the "Merged" or "Side-by-Side" comparison format to specify how the two study versions are to be displayed. The Side-by-Side format only applies to the Protocol section of the study.
  • Click "Compare" to do the comparison and show the differences.
  • Select a version's Submitted Date link to see a rendering of the study for that version.
  • The yellow A/B choices in the table indicate the study versions currently compared below. A yellow table row indicates the study version currently being viewed.
  • Hover over the "Recruitment Status" to see how the study's recruitment status changed.
  • Study edits or deletions are displayed in red.
  • Study additions are displayed in green.
Study Record Versions
Version A B Submitted Date Changes
1 April 1, 2021 None (earliest Version on record)
Comparison Format:

Scroll up to access the controls

Study NCT04830540
Submitted Date:  April 1, 2021 (v1)

Open or close this module Study Identification
Unique Protocol ID: 1826
Brief Title: Impact of 'Recovery' Footwear on Lower Extremity Comfort and Biomechanics
Official Title: Impact of 'Recovery' Footwear on Lower Extremity Comfort and Biomechanics
Secondary IDs:
Open or close this module Study Status
Record Verification: February 2021
Overall Status: Unknown status [Previously: Recruiting]
Study Start: February 8, 2021
Primary Completion: January 31, 2022 [Anticipated]
Study Completion: January 31, 2022 [Anticipated]
First Submitted: March 5, 2021
First Submitted that
Met QC Criteria:
April 1, 2021
First Posted: April 5, 2021 [Actual]
Last Update Submitted that
Met QC Criteria:
April 1, 2021
Last Update Posted: April 5, 2021 [Actual]
Open or close this module Sponsor/Collaborators
Sponsor: University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Responsible Party: Sponsor
Collaborators:
Open or close this module Oversight
U.S. FDA-regulated Drug: No
U.S. FDA-regulated Device: No
Data Monitoring: No
Open or close this module Study Description
Brief Summary:

The goal of this study is to understand the impact of wearing shoes with a compliant, energy absorbing midsole material, outside of athletic training sessions on the mechanics of movement, performance, and perceived joint pain and stiffness. Advances in material science have led to a wider range of cushioning system material properties and mid and outsole geometries in footwear. While there are many marketing claims about the potential health benefits of this new class of footwear these have not yet been investigated in well-designed scientific studies.

It is hypothesized that the intervention shoe as compared to the control will reduce self-reported joint pain and stiffness, improve ankle plantarflexion function and increase intersegmental foot motion during walking.

Detailed Description:

Participants will be asked to make 2 visits, 6 weeks apart, to the Umass Biomechanics Lab in the Totman Building at UMass Amherst for gait analysis and biomechanical performance testing.

At the first study visit, participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Participants assigned to the control group will be asked to continue wearing their typical shoes and to complete every two weeks the footwear and injury log provided. Individuals assigned to the intervention group will be provided with 2 styles of the OOFOS recovery shoes, and will be asked to wear the OOFOS slide, sandal and/or closed toe shoes as their primary footwear outside training and competition for the 6 weeks between study visits. Intervention participants will also be asked to complete a daily shoe wear log and a shoe comfort assessment survey every other week.

At each study visit, subjects will be asked to read and sign an Informed Consent Form, and will also be asked questions about their health, exercise, and injury history. To prepare for the data collection, participants will be asked to change into a pair of shorts and tight shirt that will be provided. Anatomic measurements will then be made with a measuring tape, and ankle flexibility will be assessed by manually moving the participant's ankle into the most flexed and most extended position.

Reflective markers will then be placed on subject's feet/shoes, legs, thighs, hips, shoulders, and arms to record 3-D limb kinematics. To place the markers, we will put little circles of double-sided tape on skin or clothing, with reflective balls on the outer side. The position of the reflective markers will be recorded by high-speed infrared cameras surrounding the data collection space. Subjects will also be instrumented with electromyography (EMG) sensors on the skin over muscles of the leg, to measure the activity of those muscles. Before placing the EMG sensors, a small patch of skin will be shaved to ensure the sensor stays in place and captures the signals needed.

Once markers have been placed, subjects will stand in the data collection space to record a standing calibration trial of the markers. The standing calibration trial will be used to create a computer model on which data analysis will be performed. Subjects will then walk on a long walkway with the cameras surrounding it at a both self-selected and a set speed of 1.4 m/s. This will be repeated several times until at least 5 successful trials have been recorded. A successful trial means that the walking speed varies by no more than 5 % from the previous trial. Subjects will perform the walking trials barefoot and in the OOFOS sandal and closed toe shoes.

Following the gait analysis described above, calf muscle strength will be assessed using a dynamometer. The subject will sit with the leg, hips, and torso securely strapped to prevent unwanted movement. Subjects will then preform isometric and dynamic contractions; enough repetitions will be allowed to facilitate learning of the technique required.

The final test will be a maximum vertical jump height test. Subjects will stand in the middle of the motion capture area and jump as high as they can from a standing position.

When the above procedures are completed, the research staff will open the intervention assignment envelope that will determine if you are assigned to the intervention or control group.

Open or close this module Conditions
Conditions: Arthralgia
Joint Stiffness
Gait Mechanics
Keywords:
Open or close this module Study Design
Study Type: Interventional
Primary Purpose: Basic Science
Study Phase: Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model: Parallel Assignment
Number of Arms: 2
Masking: None (Open Label)
Allocation: Randomized
Enrollment: 60 [Anticipated]
Open or close this module Arms and Interventions
Arms Assigned Interventions
No Intervention: Control
Participants assigned to the control group will be asked to continue wearing their typical shoes and to complete every two weeks the footwear and injury log provided
Experimental: Intervention
Individuals assigned to the intervention group will be provided with 2 styles of the OOFOS recovery shoes, and will be asked to wear the OOFOS slide, sandal and/or closed toe shoes as their primary footwear outside training and competition for the 6 weeks between study visits. Intervention participants will also be asked to complete a daily shoe wear log and a shoe comfort assessment survey every other week.
Device: OOFOS Recovery Footwear
The OOFOS shoes/ sandals are a commercially available footwear with a compliant, energy absorbing midsole material.
Open or close this module Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures:
1. Calf Muscles Strength
[ Time Frame: 2 - 3 hours on week 1 ]

Unilateral isometric and isokinetic strength based on maximal contractions performed on a dynamometer.
2. Calf Muscles Strength
[ Time Frame: 2 - 3 hours on week 6. ]

Unilateral isometric and isokinetic strength based on maximal contractions performed on a dynamometer.
3. Gait Mechanics
[ Time Frame: Gait analysis test at week 1 with 5 trials of overground walking at a speed of 1.4 m/s ]

Gait kinematics during overground walk at preferred speed, and 1.4m/s, evaluated with a motion capture system.
4. Gait Mechanics
[ Time Frame: Gait analysis test at week 6 with 5 trials of overground walking at a speed of 1.4 m/s ]

Gait kinematics during overground walk at preferred speed, and 1.4m/s, evaluated with a motion capture system.
5. Muscle EMG activity
[ Time Frame: Gait analysis test at week 1 with 5 trials of overground walking at a speed of 1.4 m/s ]

Unilateral Surface Electromyography of Medial Gastrocnemius, Lateral Gastrocnemius, Vastus Medialis, Vastus Lateralis, Tibialis Anterior, Peroneus Longus, Soleus, Biceps Femoris, and Semitendinosus, during overground walk.
6. Muscle EMG activity
[ Time Frame: Gait analysis test at week 6 with 5 trials of overground walking at a speed of 1.4 m/s ]

Unilateral Surface Electromyography of Medial Gastrocnemius, Lateral Gastrocnemius, Vastus Medialis, Vastus Lateralis, Tibialis Anterior, Peroneus Longus, Soleus, Biceps Femoris, and Semitendinosus, during overground walk.
7. Maximum Vertical Jump
[ Time Frame: 2 - 3 hours on week 1 ]

Height (m) of center of mass above ground measured by markers place on posterior superior iliac spine.
8. Maximum Vertical Jump
[ Time Frame: 2 - 3 hours on week 6 ]

Height (m) of center of mass above ground measured by markers place on posterior superior iliac spine.
9. Self-reported shoe comfort
[ Time Frame: Week 0, 5 minutes ]

Shoe wear and comfort log
10. Self-reported pain, and injury.
[ Time Frame: Week 0, 5 minutes ]

Injury and pain log
11. Self-reported shoe comfort
[ Time Frame: Week 2, 5 minutes ]

Shoe wear and comfort log
12. Self-reported pain, and injury.
[ Time Frame: Week 2, 5 minutes ]

Injury and pain log
13. Self-reported shoe comfort
[ Time Frame: Week 4, 5 minutes ]

Shoe wear and comfort log
14. Self-reported pain, and injury.
[ Time Frame: Week 4, 5 minutes ]

Injury and pain log
15. Self-reported shoe comfort
[ Time Frame: Week 6, 5 minutes ]

Shoe wear and comfort log
16. Self-reported pain, and injury.
[ Time Frame: Week 6, 5 minutes ]

Injury and pain log
Open or close this module Eligibility
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 30 Years
Sex: All
Gender Based:
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
Criteria:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • BMI 18 - 35 kg/m2.
  • Stiff or cleated footwear athlete on a competitive team.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current injury that required absence from one or more practices in the last 3 weeks of regular team practice.
  • Orthotic or other shoe insert used outside of athletic training times.
Open or close this module Contacts/Locations
Locations: United States, Massachusetts
Musculoskeletal & Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory/ University of Massachusetts Amherst
Amherst, Massachusetts, United States, 01002
Contact:Contact: Katherine A Boyer, PhD 413-545-1717 boyer@umass.edu
Contact:Principal Investigator: Katherine A Boyer, PhD
Contact:Sub-Investigator: Ericber Jimenez Francisco, PhD
Contact:Sub-Investigator: Skylar C Holmes, MS
Contact:Sub-Investigator: Kali E Shamaly, BS
Contact:Sub-Investigator: Ramzi M Majaj, MS
Open or close this module IPDSharing
Plan to Share IPD: No
Open or close this module References
Citations:
Links:
Available IPD/Information:

Scroll up to access the controls Scroll to the Study top

U.S. National Library of Medicine | U.S. National Institutes of Health | U.S. Department of Health & Human Services