There are two parts to this study:

1. The investigators will study if the benefit from eating a healthy, balanced diet depends on the types of food processing in the diet. The investigators will do this by providing participants with two diets that follow the Eatwell Guide (referred to in this study as Diet A and Diet B to avoid unblinding), but containing foods with different types of food processing, for 8 weeks each. The investigators will collect data on blood pressure, body composition, physical activity and fitness, questions regarding quality of life, mental health and wellbeing, and blood samples at the start of each diet and at 4 and 8 weeks into each diet.
2. The investigators will then study whether participants are able to switch from their usual unhealthy diet to a healthy, balanced diet, and the benefits of doing so. The investigators will do this by providing participants with 6 months of personal support. The investigators will also look at what helps participants to maintain a healthy diet, and what makes it difficult. The investigators will also support participants to be more physically active.

Eating a healthy, balanced diet is important for health. A healthy, balanced diet involves eating a variety of foods in the right proportions. In the UK, the Eatwell Guide gives recommendations on what people should eat more of, and what people should eat less of. Unhealthy diets contain lots of foods high in saturated fat, added sugar and salt, which increases the risk of developing obesity, cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. Advice for a healthy, balanced diet includes consuming five portions of fruit and vegetables per day and eating more high fibre foods. Following the healthy, balanced diet advice given in the Eatwell Guide can reduce the risk of poor health.

However, there are other parts of the diet that are not covered in the Eatwell Guide that may also be important for health. For example, research suggests that different types of food processing might influence health, but these types of food processing are not included within the recommendations.

It is unknown if the benefits of following the healthy diet advice in the Eatwell Guide depend on the types of food processing in the diet. It is important to find out if these types of food processing matter, in order to give people the best advice possible. It also means that the government and other health organisations may need to change the regulations around the food that people eat.

To answer this, the investigators will compare the effects of two healthy, balanced diets following the advice in the UK Eatwell Guide, but each based on a different type of food processing (referred to in this study as Diet A and Diet B to avoid unblinding). Participants will receive the first diet for 8 weeks, return to their normal diet for 4 weeks, and then receive the second diet for a further 8 weeks. Participants will have 6 months of support to help improve their diet and be more physically active. Participants will work with a behavioural scientist to create a personal plan to eat a healthier diet and be more physically active, using behaviour change techniques based on capability, opportunity, motivation - behaviour (COM-B) theory of behaviour change. This support will last for 6 months, with ongoing monthly telephone/video calls with the research team. The results from this study will be used to help inform UK dietary guidance and food policy.

There are two parts to this study:

1. The investigators will study if the benefit from eating a healthy, balanced diet depends on the types of food processing in the diet. The investigators will do this by providing participants with two diets (Diet A and Diet B) that follow the Eatwell Guide, but containing foods with different types of processing, for 8 weeks each.
2. The investigators will then study whether participants are able to switch from their usual unhealthy diet to a healthy, balanced diet, and the benefits of doing so. The investigators will do this by providing participants with 6 months of personal support. The investigators will also look at what helps participants to maintain a healthy diet, and what makes it difficult. The investigators will also support participants to be more physically active.

Change in subjectively reported sleep assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index is a validated 19-item measure, which will be used to determine sleep quality in the past month, to distinguish between good and poor sleepers. A higher score indicates poorer sleep quality.

Change in subjectively reported sleep assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index is a validated 19-item measure, which will be used to determine sleep quality in the past month, to distinguish between good and poor sleepers. A higher score indicates poorer sleep quality.

Change in subjectively reported physical activity levels (sedentary, light (LPA), moderate (MPA), vigorous (VPA)) assessed using the short form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF).

The short-form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF) is a standardised questionnaire consisting of 7 questions that ask about physical activity in the past 7 days. IPAQ-SF will be used to subjectively assess time spent in light, moderate and vigorous physical activity levels, and time spent sitting. The questionnaire takes a few minutes to complete. Higher physical activity values indicate greater physical activity levels, higher time spent sitting indicates greater sedentary behaviour.

Change in subjectively reported physical activity levels (sedentary, light (LPA), moderate (MPA), vigorous (VPA)) assessed using the short form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF).

The short-form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF) is a standardised questionnaire consisting of 7 questions that ask about physical activity in the past 7 days. IPAQ-SF will be used to subjectively assess time spent in light, moderate and vigorous physical activity levels, and time spent sitting. The questionnaire takes a few minutes to complete. Higher physical activity values indicate greater physical activity levels, higher time spent sitting indicates greater sedentary behaviour.

Assessed using EuroQoL 5 dimensions 3 levels (EQ-5D-3L)

EQ-5D-3L is a 6-item self-reported questionnaire that consists of a descriptive system to assess the following 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression using 3 levels (e.g. mobility: I have no problems walking about, I have some problems walking about, or I am confined to bed, higher score indicates worse quality of life) and a visual analogue scale, which records self-rated health on a 0 to 100 scale (100 = best health).

Assessed using EuroQoL 5 dimensions 3 levels (EQ-5D-3L)

EQ-5D-3L is a 6-item self-reported questionnaire that consists of a descriptive system to assess the following 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression using 3 levels (e.g. mobility: I have no problems walking about, I have some problems walking about, or I am confined to bed, higher score indicates worse quality of life) and a visual analogue scale, which records self-rated health on a 0 to 100 scale (100 = best health).

Assessed using Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite)

Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) is a 31-item, self-reported, obesity and overweight-specific measure of health-related quality of life. This tool consists of a total score, scoring on five aspects - physical function, self-esteem, sexual life, public distress, and work. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life.

Assessed using Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite)

Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) is a 31-item, self-reported, obesity and overweight-specific measure of health-related quality of life. This tool consists of a total score, scoring on five aspects - physical function, self-esteem, sexual life, public distress, and work. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life.

Assessed using Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS)

The Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) is a 14-item, positively worded, validated measure of mental wellbeing, with 5 responses, which are summed to produce a single measure of wellbeing. Scores range from 14 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater positive mental wellbeing.

Assessed using Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS)

The Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) is a 14-item, positively worded, validated measure of mental wellbeing, with 5 responses, which are summed to produce a single measure of wellbeing. Scores range from 14 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater positive mental wellbeing.

Assessed using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a 9-item validated measure, which will be used to assess the severity of depression. Each item is rated from 0 to 3, for a total score out of 27. A score of 15-19 indicates moderately severe depression, and 20-27 indicates severe depression.

Assessed using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a 9-item validated measure, which will be used to assess the severity of depression. Each item is rated from 0 to 3, for a total score out of 27. A score of 15-19 indicates moderately severe depression, and 20-27 indicates severe depression.

Assessed using Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment-7 (GAD-7)

The Generalised Anxiety Disorder assessment (GAD-7) is a 7-item anxiety scale, which will be used to screen and measure the severity of generalised anxiety disorder. Each item is rated from 0 to 3, for a total score out of 21. A score of 11-15 indicates moderately severe anxiety, and 16-21 of severe anxiety.

Assessed using Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment-7 (GAD-7)

The Generalised Anxiety Disorder assessment (GAD-7) is a 7-item anxiety scale, which will be used to screen and measure the severity of generalised anxiety disorder. Each item is rated from 0 to 3, for a total score out of 21. A score of 11-15 indicates moderately severe anxiety, and 16-21 of severe anxiety.

Assessed using Power of Food scale

The Power of Food (PoF) scale is a 15-item validated measure, which will be used to assess the psychological impact of living in food-abundant environments. Higher scores indicate greater psychological impact of living in a food-abundant environment

Assessed using Power of Food scale

The Power of Food (PoF) scale is a 15-item validated measure, which will be used to assess the psychological impact of living in food-abundant environments. Higher scores indicate greater psychological impact of living in a food-abundant environment

Assessed using Control of Eating Questionnaire

The Control of Eating Questionnaire (CoEQ) is a 21-item validated measure, which will be used to measure the severity and type of food cravings. Higher scores indicate greater agreement with the statement (severity and type of food cravings)

Assessed using Control of Eating Questionnaire

The Control of Eating Questionnaire (CoEQ) is a 21-item validated measure, which will be used to measure the severity and type of food cravings. Higher scores indicate greater agreement with the statement (severity and type of food cravings)

(a) Barriers and facilitators to healthy eating and physical activity, assessed using a capability, opportunity, motivation - behaviour (COM-B) questionnaire

Participants will complete one questionnaire investigating the barriers and facilitators to physical activity and healthy eating, based on the COM-B model of behaviour change. The survey contains 257 items; the physical activity component contains 137 items, and the eating component contains 120 items.This survey is expected to take 30 minutes. The survey uses a range of items (Likert scale, yes/no, agree/disagree, true/false) with levels of agreement yes/no indicating barriers or facilitators to behaviour.

Assessed using a one to one semi-structured telephone/video call interview at 6-months follow-up

The aim of the qualitative interviews is to gain an in-depth understanding of the barriers and facilitators to adherence to a minimally processed diet, and to map these onto an intervention development framework. Interviews will follow a simple topic guide designed to explore motivations for participating and experiences of the trial, with a particular focus on barriers and facilitators to adhering to a minimally processed diet.

The qualitative process will use Framework Analysis and other methods of thematic analysis designed to explore experiences of a behaviour change trials.

(a) Changes in food and nutrient intake, assessed using 24-hour recall (Intake24)

24-hour recalls will be conducted using Intake24, a validated, online, self-reported dietary recall system, based on a multiple-pass 24-hour recall that is suitable for the general population (https://intake24.co.uk). The recall takes on average 12 minutes to complete58. The system is self-completed and will guide the participant through the recall process. Firstly, the user will list all food and drink consumed, followed by probing questions about quantity consumed and further information on food and drink reported.

(a) Changes in food and nutrient intake, assessed using food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) (European Prospective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk FFQ)

Food frequency questionnaires can be used to determine average food intakes over longer durations of time. Average food intakes will be assessed using the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Norfolk FFQ, a validated, semi-quantitative measure of average dietary intake over the past year.

The EPIC-Norfolk FFQ is split into two sections, part 1 contains a 130-item food list. Each item contains an individual food, combination of individual foods or a food type. Participants tick the most appropriate frequency of consumption of that food item from nine options (from never or less than once per month, to 6+ per day). Part 2 asks more detailed questions relating to the food items in part 1, including types of fats used in cooking, types of milks consumed and choice of cereals.

Assessed using 24-hour recall (Intake24)

24-hour recalls will be conducted using Intake24, a validated, online, self-reported dietary recall system, based on a multiple-pass 24-hour recall that is suitable for the general population (https://intake24.co.uk). The recall takes on average 12 minutes to complete58. The system is self-completed and will guide the participant through the recall process. Firstly, the user will list all food and drink consumed, followed by probing questions about quantity consumed and further information on food and drink reported.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Staff at University College London Hospitals (UCLH)
• Adults aged between [18 and 65] years old.
• BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (living with overweight or obesity)
• Weight stable for the past 3 months (≤5 % variation in body weight over preceding 3 months)
• Have a habitual dietary intake high in unhealthy food
• Able to read and write in English.
• Medically safe to participate in a dietary intervention programme.
• Willing and able to give written informed consent.
• Able to attend the relevant in person and online sessions.
• Able to comply with the study protocol (including dietary recommendations for each intervention and reporting adherence).
• Females of childbearing potential and males agree to use an effective method of contraception from the time consent is signed until the end of the intervention period and final follow-up assessment. Effective methods of contraception acceptable for this trial are outlined in Appendix 2.
• Females of childbearing potential must be on highly effective contraception and have a negative pregnancy test within 7 days of being randomised. NOTE: Participants are considered not of childbearing potential if they have undergone a hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy) or they are postmenopausal.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Contraindication for dietary intervention
• Participation in another clinical intervention trial
• Concomitant usage of medications that cause weight gain or weight loss
• Cardiometabolic comorbidities (e.g. diabetes, on insulin)
• Coeliac disease
• Inflammatory bowel disease
• A diagnosed eating disorder
• Planning a weight management programme in the next 3 months
• Any diagnosed food allergy, or other allergies which limit the ability to adhere to the intervention diet
• Dietary restrictions (e.g. vegan or vegetarian) which limit the ability to adhere to the interventions
• BMI >40 kg/m2 or basal metabolic rate ≥2300/kcal/day (to ensure intervention diets are at least 300kcal/day greater than maintenance energy needs).
• Females who are pregnant, breast-feeding, or intends to become pregnant.
• A history of drug or alcohol abuse
• Any other factor making the participant unsuitable in the view of investigator.