ClinicalTrials.gov

History of Changes for Study: NCT06019377
Intervention to Enhance Coping and Help-seeking Among Youth in Foster Care
Latest version (submitted April 8, 2024) on ClinicalTrials.gov
  • A study version is represented by a row in the table.
  • Select two study versions to compare. One each from columns A and B.
  • Choose either the "Merged" or "Side-by-Side" comparison format to specify how the two study versions are to be displayed. The Side-by-Side format only applies to the Protocol section of the study.
  • Click "Compare" to do the comparison and show the differences.
  • Select a version's Submitted Date link to see a rendering of the study for that version.
  • The yellow A/B choices in the table indicate the study versions currently compared below. A yellow table row indicates the study version currently being viewed.
  • Hover over the "Recruitment Status" to see how the study's recruitment status changed.
  • Study edits or deletions are displayed in red.
  • Study additions are displayed in green.
Study Record Versions
Version A B Submitted Date Changes
1 August 24, 2023 None (earliest Version on record)
2 February 22, 2024 Study Status
3 April 8, 2024 Recruitment Status, Study Status and Contacts/Locations
Comparison Format:

Scroll up to access the controls

Study NCT06019377
Submitted Date:  August 24, 2023 (v1)

Open or close this module Study Identification
Unique Protocol ID: 227953-18
Brief Title: Intervention to Enhance Coping and Help-seeking Among Youth in Foster Care
Official Title: Pilot Testing an Intervention to Enhance Coping and Increase Mental Health Help-seeking Among Transition-age Youth in Foster Care
Secondary IDs: 1R34MH127141-01A1 [U.S. NIH Grant/Contract]
Open or close this module Study Status
Record Verification: August 2023
Overall Status: Not yet recruiting
Study Start: January 2024
Primary Completion: December 2025 [Anticipated]
Study Completion: March 2026 [Anticipated]
First Submitted: August 18, 2023
First Submitted that
Met QC Criteria:
August 24, 2023
First Posted: August 31, 2023 [Actual]
Last Update Submitted that
Met QC Criteria:
August 24, 2023
Last Update Posted: August 31, 2023 [Actual]
Open or close this module Sponsor/Collaborators
Sponsor: Portland State University
Responsible Party: Principal Investigator
Investigator: Jennifer Blakeslee
Official Title: Research Associate Professor
Affiliation: Portland State University
Collaborators: National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Open or close this module Oversight
U.S. FDA-regulated Drug: No
U.S. FDA-regulated Device: No
Data Monitoring: No
Open or close this module Study Description
Brief Summary: This study will deploy a scalable secondary prevention program that leverages existing foster youth transition services to improve mental health functioning and service use before and after exiting foster care. Our short-term objective is to remotely test a group intervention called Stronger Youth Networks and Coping (SYNC) that targets cognitive schemas influencing stress responses, including mental health help-seeking and service engagement, among foster youth with behavioral health risk. SYNC aims to increase youth capacity to appraise stress and regulate emotional responses, to flexibly select adaptive coping strategies, and to promote informal and formal help-seeking as an effective coping strategy. The proposed aims will establish whether the 10-module program engages the targeted proximal mechanisms with a signal of efficacy on clinically-relevant outcomes, and whether a fully-powered randomized control trial (RCT) of SYNC is feasible in the intended service context. Our first aim is to refine our SYNC curriculum and training materials, prior to testing SYNC in a remote single-arm trial with two cohorts of 8-10 Oregon foster youth aged 16-20 (N=16). Our second aim is to conduct a remote two-arm individually-randomized group treatment trial with Oregon foster youth aged 16-20 with indicated behavioral health risk (N=80) to examine: (a) intervention group change on proximal mechanisms of coping self-efficacy and help-seeking attitudes, compared to services-as-usual at post-intervention and 6-month follow-up: and (b) association between the mechanisms and targeted outcomes, including emotional regulation, coping behaviors, mental health service use, and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and PTSD. Our third aim is to refine and standardize the intervention and research protocol for an effectiveness trial, including confirming transferability with national stakeholders.
Detailed Description: Young people transitioning from the foster care system have elevated risk for a range of mental health diagnoses that for many are exacerbated by psychosocial coping difficulties, sparse support networks, and service disengagement. This population is less prepared to cope with mental health challenges and more likely to have negative perspectives on help- seeking, increasing the risk of unmet treatment needs as service use rapidly declines following the exit from foster care. Our long-term goal is to deploy a scalable secondary prevention program that leverages existing foster youth transition services to improve mental health functioning and service use before and after exiting foster care. Our short-term objective is to remotely test a group intervention called Stronger Youth Networks and Coping (SYNC) that targets cognitive schemas influencing stress responses, including mental health help-seeking and service engagement, among foster youth with behavioral health risk. SYNC aims to increase youth capacity to appraise stress and regulate emotional responses, to flexibly select adaptive coping strategies, and to promote informal and formal help-seeking as an effective coping strategy. SYNC results from intervention development to design a novel program using evidence- based cognitive change methods, including adapting the Coping Effectiveness Training (CET) curriculum for foster youth. SYNC is designed for delivery by service providers in federally-funded Independent Living Programs (ILPs) accessed by most foster youth in the US. Initial feedback from foster youth, service providers, and our advisory panel confirmed the acceptability of SYNC curriculum topics (e.g., stress and coping, navigating services) and program strategy (e.g., groups co-facilitated by "near-peer" young adults with foster care and mental health care experience). The proposed aims will establish whether the 10-module program engages the targeted proximal mechanisms with a signal of efficacy on clinically-relevant outcomes, and whether a fully-powered RCT of SYNC is feasible in the intended service context. Our first specific aim is to refine our SYNC curriculum and training materials, prior to testing SYNC in a remote single-arm trial with two cohorts of 8-10 Oregon foster youth aged 16-20 (N=16). Our second aim is to conduct a remote two-arm individually-randomized group treatment trial with Oregon foster youth aged 16-20 with indicated behavioral health risk (N=80) to examine: (a) intervention group change on proximal mechanisms of coping self-efficacy and help-seeking attitudes, compared to services-as-usual at post-intervention and 6-month follow-up: and (b) association between the mechanisms and targeted outcomes, including emotional regulation, coping behaviors, mental health service use, and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and PTSD. Our third aim is to refine and standardize the intervention and research protocol for an effectiveness trial, including confirming transferability with national stakeholders. The demonstration of target engagement with initial evidence of efficacy, plus standardized intervention materials and a feasible research protocol, will prepare us for an effectiveness trial (R01) of a model that is expected to be widely transferable for implementation across the country, and one that can ultimately be adapted for other youth service settings (e.g., juvenile justice) and subgroups (e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer [LGBTQ], youth of color), expanding long-term public health impact.
Open or close this module Conditions
Conditions: Adolescent Behavior
Psychosocial Functioning
Coping Behavior
Help-Seeking Behavior
Utilization, Health Care
Depression
Anxiety
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
Emotion Regulation
Child Welfare
Keywords: Mental health
Help-seeking
Coping
Youth
Foster care
Near-peer
Independent living
Open or close this module Study Design
Study Type: Interventional
Primary Purpose: Prevention
Study Phase: Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model: Parallel Assignment
10-module group psychoeducational curriculum model
Number of Arms: 2
Masking: None (Open Label)
Allocation: Randomized
Enrollment: 96 [Anticipated]
Open or close this module Arms and Interventions
Arms Assigned Interventions
Experimental: Intervention
The Intervention group receives the SYNC intervention in addition to typical child welfare services (i.e., services as usual). The SYNC intervention includes 10 weekly remote (videoconference) 90-minute sessions delivered by a facilitator and a near-peer young adult aged 20-26, both with lived experience in child welfare.
Behavioral: Stronger Youth Networks and Coping (SYNC)
SYNC is a 10-module online curriculum adapted from evidence-based cognitive change methods, including Coping Effectiveness Training (CET), co-facilitated by service providers in Independent Living Programs (ILPs; federally-funded transition skill-building services accessed by most foster youth in the US) and near-peers (have lived experience in foster care). SYNC aims to increase youth capacity to appraise stress and regulate emotional responses, to flexibly select adaptive coping strategies, and to specifically promote informal and formal help-seeking as an effective coping strategy.
No Intervention: Services-as-usual
The Services-as-usual (SAU) group receives typical child welfare services, which include ILP, or federally funded transition planning (e.g., identifying and supporting youth education and employment goals) and life skills (e.g., budgeting, renting an apartment, insurance) services typically delivered through a mix of classes, group activities, and/or individual skill-building with a paraprofessional service provider.
Open or close this module Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures:
1. Cognitive control and coping flexibility
[ Time Frame: immediately after program completion, 6 months after program completion ]

Cognitive Control and Flexibility Questionnaire (CCFQ; 18 items with 7-pt Likert-type response scale ranging from 1 'strongly disagree' to 7 'strongly agree', youth report) assesses cognitive control over emotion; and appraisal and coping flexibility. Average scores can range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating more (better) control and flexibility.
2. Help-seeking intentions
[ Time Frame: immediately after program completion, 6 months after program completion ]

General Help Seeking Questionnaire (22 items with 7-pt response scale ranging from 1 'Extremely unlikely' to 7 'Extremely likely', youth report) assesses intentions to seek help in the event of a personal or emotional problem and if having suicidal thoughts. Average scores can range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating more (better) help-seeking intentions.
Secondary Outcome Measures:
1. Barriers to seeking help
[ Time Frame: immediately after program completion, 6 months after program completion ]

Barriers to Adolescent Seeking Help - Brief (BASH-B; 11 items with 7-pt response scale ranging from 1 'strongly disagree' to 7 'strongly agree agree', youth report) assesses perceived autonomy and fears related to seeking help for mental health issues. Average scores can range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating more (worse) barriers.
2. Self-efficacy and empowerment specific to mental health
[ Time Frame: immediately after program completion, 6 months after program completion ]

Youth Efficacy/Empowerment Scale-Mental Health (MH) (23 items with 5-pt response scale ranging from 1 'Always or almost always' to 5 'Never or almost never', youth report) assesses extent to which youth manages mental health and directs their own mental health services. Average scores can range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating more (better) efficacy and empowerment around mental health services.
3. Coping self-efficacy
[ Time Frame: immediately after program completion, 6 months after program completion ]

Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (26 items with response scale ranging from 0 'I cannot do this at all' to 10 'Certain I can do this', youth report) assesses use of problem-focused, support-seeking, & positive reframing coping strategies. Average scores can range from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating more (better) coping self-efficacy.
Other Outcome Measures:
1. Domains for psychiatric diagnoses
[ Time Frame: immediately after program completion, 6 months after program completion ]

Diagnosis and Statistican Manual, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) Self-Rated Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure (25 items with yes/no responses, youth report) assesses mental health domains (past 2 weeks) that are important across psychiatric diagnoses including depression, substance use, anxiety, somatic symptoms, sleep problems). Total scores can range from 0 to 25, with higher scores indicating more (worse) psychiatric symptoms.
2. Mental health service use
[ Time Frame: immediately after program completion, 6 months after program completion ]

Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents (4 items with yes/no responses, youth report) assesses service use in past 3 months: Outpatient (counseling, therapy, support group), residential treatment, inpatient hospitalization, psychotropic medication. Total scores can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more (better) service usage.
3. Depression and anxiety
[ Time Frame: immediately after program completion, 6 months after program completion ]

Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS; 25 items with 4-pt response scale ranging from 1 'Never' to 4 'Always', youth report) assesses recent anxiety and depression symptoms. Average scores can range from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating more (worse) symptoms of anxiety and depression.
4. Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms
[ Time Frame: immediately after program completion, 6 months after program completion ]

The Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5; 17 items with 5-pt response scale ranging from 0 'Not at all' to 4 'Extremely', youth report) assess the prevalence of various post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (e.g., difficulty concentrating, loss of interest in activities, trouble falling or staying asleep). Average scores can range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating more (worse) PTSD symptoms.
Open or close this module Eligibility
Minimum Age: 16 Years
Maximum Age: 20 Years
Sex: All
Gender Based:
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
Criteria:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eligible to receive federally-funded transition-related services in Oregon (ages 16-20 and in foster care at least 90 days after they turned age 14),
  • Indicated behavioral health risk. Behavioral health risk is indicated by child welfare administrative indicators of lifetime behavioral health need or service involvement (DSM diagnoses, psychotropic medication, emotional-behavioral disability, congregate care/residential placement)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to actively participate in the intervention, including you who are: non-English speaking, significantly developmentally disabled, or where participation is otherwise contraindicated (e.g., youth is in crisis, youth is in a placement that will not allow for participation)
Open or close this module Contacts/Locations
Central Contact Person: Jennifer Blakeslee, PhD,MSW,BS
Telephone: 5037258389
Email: jblakes@pdx.edu
Study Officials: Rebecca A Miller, M.Ed, BA
Study Director
Portland State University
Locations: United States, Oregon
Portland State University
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97201
Contact:Contact: Jennifer Blakeslee, PhD,MSW,BS 503-725-8389 jblakes@pdx.edu
Contact:Sub-Investigator: Brianne H Kothari, PhD,MA,BA
Contact:Sub-Investigator: Carrie J Furrer, PhD,MS,BA
Open or close this module IPDSharing
Plan to Share IPD: No
Open or close this module References
Citations:
Links:
Available IPD/Information:

Scroll up to access the controls Scroll to the Study top

U.S. National Library of Medicine | U.S. National Institutes of Health | U.S. Department of Health & Human Services