The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

A Study To Assess The Safety And Efficacy Of SU11248 In Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor(GIST)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00075218
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : January 8, 2004
Results First Posted : September 28, 2009
Last Update Posted : September 28, 2009
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Pfizer

Brief Summary:
A study to assess the safety and efficacy of SU11248 in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) whose disease has failed imatinib therapy or who were intolerant to imatinib treatment.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Drug: Placebo Drug: SU011248 Phase 3

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 361 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Of SU011248 In The Treatment Of Patients With Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec Tm, Glivec)-Resistant Or Intolerant Malignant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor
Study Start Date : December 2003
Actual Primary Completion Date : May 2008
Actual Study Completion Date : May 2008


Arm Intervention/treatment
Placebo Comparator: B Drug: Placebo
50 mg taken orally once a day. 6 week treatment cycle (Schedule 4/2) 4 weeks on study drug/2 weeks off study drug.

Active Comparator: A Drug: SU011248
50 mg taken orally once a day. 6 week treatment cycle (Schedule 4/2) 4 weeks on study drug/2 weeks off study drug.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Time to Tumor Progression (TTP) as Assessed by Imaging Studies at End of Double-blind Treatment Phase [ Time Frame: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle : duration of double-blind treatment phase ]
    Time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression based on the assessment of an independent, third-party imaging laboratory using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors).

  2. Time to Tumor Progression (TTP) as Assessed in the Double-blind Treatment Phase at End of Study [ Time Frame: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle : duration of double-blind treatment phase after Last Subject Last Visit (LSLV) ]
    Time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression based on the assessment of an independent, third-party imaging laboratory using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors).


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Progression Free Survival (PFS) [ Time Frame: Day 28 of each cycle : duration of double-blind treatment phase ]
    Time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause (on treatment or within 28 days of last dose).

  2. Overall Survival Status of Subjects [ Time Frame: clinic visit or telephone contact every 2 months for up to 3 years from the last dose of study drug ]
    Number of subjects alive at end of study.

  3. Overall Survival [ Time Frame: clinic visit or telephone contact every 2 months for up to 3 years from the last dose of study drug ]
    Time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause.

  4. Overall Survival Based on the Rank Preserving Structural Failure Time Method [ Time Frame: clinic visit or telephone contact every 2 months for up to 3 years from the last dose of study drug ]
    time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause (rank preserving structural failure time method).

  5. Best Overall Tumor Response During Double-blind Treatment Phase [ Time Frame: Day 28 of each cycle : duration of double-blind treatment phase ]
    Tumor response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).

  6. Confirmed Objective Response (CR or PR) in Subjects [ Time Frame: Day 28 of each cycle : duration of double-blind treatment phase ]
    Overall confirmed objective response = confirmed Complete Response (CR) OR confirmed Partial Response (PR) according to RECIST. Confirmed responses were those that persisted on repeat imaging study ≥ 4 weeks after initial documentation of response.

  7. Time to Tumor Response (TTR) [ Time Frame: Day 28 of each cycle : duration of double-blind treatment phase ]
    Time from date of randomization to first documentation of objective tumor response that was subsequently confirmed. TTR was only calculated for the subgroup of subjects with a confirmed objective tumor response.

  8. Duration of Performance Status Maintenance [ Time Frame: Day 28 of each cycle : duration of double-blind treatment phase ]
    Time from randomization until the last time the performance status was no worse than at baseline or to death due to cancer in the absence of previous documentation of performance status worsening.

  9. Time to Pain Progression Using McGill Pain Questionnaire-present Pain Intensity (MPQ-PPI) [ Time Frame: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle : duration of double-blind treatment phase ]
    25th Quartile: Time to Progression. Progression: a) No change (NC) in MPQ-PPI score (0=no pain to 5=excruciating pain) with increase total analgesic use >= 50% over baseline OR b) Increase score >= 1 point with either NC in total analgesic use or increase total analgesic use >= 50% over baseline. (50th Quartile not achieved.)

  10. Subjects With Pain Relief Response Using McGill Pain Questionnaire-present Pain Intensity (MPQ-PPI) [ Time Frame: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle : duration of double-blind treatment phase ]
    MPQ-PPI: 0=no pain to 5= excruciating pain. Pain Relief Response= 1) Decrease by >= 1 points in MPQ-PPI score with either Decrease or No Change in total analgesic use >= 50% over baseline OR 2) No change in MPQ-PPI score with Decrease total analgesic use >= 50% over baseline.

  11. Change From Baseline Score in EuroQoL Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) [ Time Frame: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle : duration of double-blind treatment phase ]
    Change: median score at observation minus median score at baseline. EQ-VAS score on the self-rated "thermometer," indicating the patient's own assessment of their health status from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) imaginable health state.

  12. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Health State Profile Index [ Time Frame: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle : duration of double-blind treatment phase ]
    Change: median index score at observation minus median index score at baseline. EQ-5D is a generic instrument that describes health status in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression, usual activities) with a weighted health Index based on general population values where where 0.0 = death and 1.0 = perfect health.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically-proven diagnosis of malignant GIST not amenable to surgery, radiation or combined modality treatment with curative intent
  • Failed Gleevec treatment or intolerant to Gleevec therapy

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with any chemotherapy, chemoembolization therapy, immunotherapy, or investigational agent since the last dose of Gleevec

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00075218


Locations
Show Show 61 study locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
Pfizer
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center Pfizer
Additional Information:
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Director, Clinical Trial Disclosure Group, Pfizer Inc
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00075218    
Obsolete Identifiers: NCT00085618
Other Study ID Numbers: A6181004
First Posted: January 8, 2004    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: September 28, 2009
Last Update Posted: September 28, 2009
Last Verified: August 2009
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
Neoplasms, Connective Tissue
Neoplasms, Connective and Soft Tissue
Neoplasms by Histologic Type
Neoplasms
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
Digestive System Neoplasms
Digestive System Diseases
Gastrointestinal Diseases
Sunitinib
Antineoplastic Agents
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
Angiogenesis Modulating Agents
Growth Substances
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Growth Inhibitors
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
Enzyme Inhibitors
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action