This is the classic website, which will be retired eventually. Please visit the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov instead.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

A Trial of Three Types of Enemas Used to Treat Functional Constipation in Children

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01823848
Recruitment Status : Terminated
First Posted : April 4, 2013
Last Update Posted : November 1, 2023
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Ara Festekjian, Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Brief Summary:
Functional constipation is extremely common in children and is defined as painful, hard stools or firm stools for twice or less per week. Functional constipation accounts for 3% of general pediatric visits and up to 25% of pediatric gastroenterology visits. Constipation and fecal impaction can lead to a range of symptoms including decreased appetite, vomiting, and abdominal pain frequently resulting in Emergency Department (ED) presentation. In contrast to the outpatient setting where diet and oral medications work well to relieve symptoms related to functional constipation, ED management requires an approach with quicker results. For immediate relief of symptoms, disimpaction via enema use may be better than polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 for children. However, the type of enema to be used is not well studied. Currently, any patient presenting to the ED with a presumed diagnosis of abdominal pain due to functional constipation receives an oral dose of PEG and one of the following three types of enemas (based on the ED treating attending's discretion): phosphate or Fleets enema, normal saline enema, or mineral oil enema. There is no evidence in the literature that demonstrates any difference in the effectiveness of each of these enemas. The investigators propose a randomized control trial of the three types of pediatric enemas readily used in our ED to determine the best approach. There will be three arms within this study: a) PEG plus phosphate enema b) PEG plus normal saline enema and c) PEG plus mineral oil enema. The physicians enrolling patients will not be the treating physicians. The four principal investigators (blinded to the type of enema being used), following appropriate informed consent, will obtain pain scores (Faces Pain Scale - Revised) pre- and post-administration of each of the three treatments listed above in order to determine the best enema to use in children 4-12 years of age. Other outcomes to be analyzed will include the patient's weight pre- and post-administration of the enema, satisfaction ratings on a visual analog scale from the treating physician (who will also be blinded), and parental surveys on the day of administration and 3-5 days following discharge. Data analysis for pain scores will be completed with repeated measures anova. Categorical values will be compared using Chi Square analysis and continuous variables will be compared using parametric statistics.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Functional Constipation Drug: Sodium phosphate enema Drug: Normal saline enema Drug: Mineral oil enema Not Applicable

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 40 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Triple (Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Three Types of Enemas Used to Treat Functional Constipation in Children
Study Start Date : April 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date : December 2017
Actual Study Completion Date : December 2017

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Active Comparator: Sodium phosphate enema
Administration of sodium phosphate (fleets) enema for functional constipation in children ages 4-12 years Age 4-5: 33ml per rectum Age 5-12: 66ml per rectum
Drug: Sodium phosphate enema
Rectally administered medication to treat constipation
Other Name: Fleets enema

Drug: Normal saline enema
Rectally administered medication to treat constipation

Drug: Mineral oil enema
Mineral oil enema administered to treat constipation. 66ml per rectum

Active Comparator: Normal saline enema
Administration of normal saline enema for functional constipation in children ages 4-12 years Admininstered as 10ml/kg with maximum of 700ml
Drug: Sodium phosphate enema
Rectally administered medication to treat constipation
Other Name: Fleets enema

Drug: Normal saline enema
Rectally administered medication to treat constipation

Drug: Mineral oil enema
Mineral oil enema administered to treat constipation. 66ml per rectum

Experimental: Mineral oil enema
Administration of mineral oil enema for functional constipation in children ages 4-12 years Administered as 66ml per rectum
Drug: Sodium phosphate enema
Rectally administered medication to treat constipation
Other Name: Fleets enema

Drug: Normal saline enema
Rectally administered medication to treat constipation

Drug: Mineral oil enema
Mineral oil enema administered to treat constipation. 66ml per rectum




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change in pain scores following administration of enema [ Time Frame: 1-2 hours ]


Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   4 Years to 12 Years   (Child)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 4-12 years
  • Receiving enema in ED for presumed constipation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Critically ill patient
  • Any history of renal insufficiency, renal disease, or elevated creatinine
  • Any history of intestinal anatomic abnormality (i.e. anal stenosis, anal surgery, bowel obstruction, hirschprung's disease)
  • An inability to self-report pain
  • Presence of gastrostomy or jejunostomy tube
  • Any history of gastrointestinal dysmotility
  • Inability to read or speak English or Spanish

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01823848


Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, California
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90027
Sponsors and Collaborators
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Ara Festekjian, MD CHLA Division of Emergency Medicine
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Ara Festekjian, Assistant Professor of Clinical Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01823848    
Other Study ID Numbers: CCI-12-00295
First Posted: April 4, 2013    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: November 1, 2023
Last Verified: October 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Ara Festekjian, Children's Hospital Los Angeles:
constipation
enema
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Constipation
Signs and Symptoms, Digestive
Mineral Oil
Emollients
Dermatologic Agents