A Study of Guselkumab in the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis (VOYAGE 1)

• ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02207231
• Recruitment Status: Completed
• First Posted: August 4, 2014
• Results First Posted: October 19, 2017
• Last Update Posted: July 23, 2021
• Sponsor: Janssen Research & Development, LLC
• Information provided by (Responsible Party): Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Study Description

Brief Summary:

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of guselkumab (CNTO 1959) in the treatment of participants with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis.

Condition or disease	Intervention/treatment	Phase
Psoriasis	Drug: Guselkumab 100 mg; Drug: Placebo for guselkumab; Drug: Adalimumab; Drug: Placebo for adalimumab	Phase 3

Detailed Description:

This is a randomized (assignment of study drug by chance), double-blind (neither the participant or study staff will know the identity of study drugs), placebo- (inactive substance identical in appearance to study drug) and active-comparator-controlled (use of an approved drug to compare with study drug) study of guselkumab in participants with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis (scaly skin rash). The active comparator study drug is adalimumab, an approved drug for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Participants who satisfy all inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomly assigned in a 2:1:2 ratio to one of three treatment groups (arms): Group I (guselkumab 100 mg dose regimen), Group II (placebo then crossover to guselkumab at Week 16), or Group III (adalimumab at standard psoriasis dosing). All participants will receive guselkumab every 8 weeks (q8w) from Week 52 through Week 252 (open label treatment period).The end of the study is defined as the time the last participant completes the Week 264 visit. Participants will primarily be assessed for Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16. The total duration of the study will be approximately 268 weeks (includes a 4-week screening period). Participants will be monitored for safety throughout the study.

Study Design

• Study Type: Interventional (Clinical Trial)
• Actual Enrollment: 837 participants
• Allocation: Randomized
• Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Official Title: Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active Comparator-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in the Treatment of Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque-type Psoriasis
• Actual Study Start Date: November 26, 2014
• Actual Primary Completion Date: September 29, 2015
• Actual Study Completion Date: June 17, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm	Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Group I; Participants received Guselkumab 100 milligram (mg) at Weeks 0, 4, and 12 and every 8 weeks (q8w) thereafter through Week 252, placebo for guselkumab at Week 16, and placebo for adalimumab (two 0.8 milliliter [mL] injections) at Week 0 followed by one 0.8 mL injection at Weeks 1, 3, and 5, and every 2 weeks (q2w) thereafter through Week 47.	Drug: Guselkumab 100 mg; 100 mg by subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 4 and q8w thereafter through Week 252 (Group 1). 100 mg by subcutaneous injection at Weeks 16, 20 and q8w thereafter through Week 252 (Group II). 100 mg by subcutaneous injection at Week 52 and q8w thereafter through Week 252 (Group III).; Other Name: CNTO 1959; Drug: Placebo for guselkumab; Subcutaneous injections to maintain the blind.; Drug: Placebo for adalimumab; Subcutaneous injections to maintain the blind.
Placebo Comparator: Group II; Participants received Placebo for guselkumab at Weeks 0, 4, and 12, and placebo for adalimumab (two 0.8 mL injections) at Week 0, followed by one 0.8 mL injection at Weeks 1, 3, and 5, and q2w through Week 15. At Week 16, placebo participants will cross over to receive guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16 and 20 and q8w thereafter through Week 252, as well as placebo for adalimumab at Weeks 17, 19, 21, and 23, and q2w thereafter through Week 47.	Drug: Guselkumab 100 mg; 100 mg by subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 4 and q8w thereafter through Week 252 (Group 1). 100 mg by subcutaneous injection at Weeks 16, 20 and q8w thereafter through Week 252 (Group II). 100 mg by subcutaneous injection at Week 52 and q8w thereafter through Week 252 (Group III).; Other Name: CNTO 1959; Drug: Placebo for guselkumab; Subcutaneous injections to maintain the blind.; Drug: Placebo for adalimumab; Subcutaneous injections to maintain the blind.
Active Comparator: Group III; Participants received Adalimumab 80 mg at Week 0 (two 40 mg [0.8 mL] injections) and 40 mg at Weeks 1, 3, 5, and q2w thereafter through Week 47, placebo for guselkumab at Weeks 0, 4, 12, 16, and 20, and q8w thereafter through Week 44 and guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 52, 60, and q8w thereafter through Week 252.	Drug: Guselkumab 100 mg; 100 mg by subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 4 and q8w thereafter through Week 252 (Group 1). 100 mg by subcutaneous injection at Weeks 16, 20 and q8w thereafter through Week 252 (Group II). 100 mg by subcutaneous injection at Week 52 and q8w thereafter through Week 252 (Group III).; Other Name: CNTO 1959; Drug: Placebo for guselkumab; Subcutaneous injections to maintain the blind.; Drug: Adalimumab; 80 mg by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, then 40 mg at Week 1 and every 2 weeks (q2w) thereafter through Week 47.; Other Name: HUMIRA®

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures :

1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Placebo Group at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Week 16 ]
   The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants' psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participants' psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Placebo Group at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Week 16 ]
   The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score.

Secondary Outcome Measures :

1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Adalimumab Group at Week 24 and 48 [ Time Frame: Week 24 and 48 ]
   The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants' psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participants' psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Adalimumab Group at Week 24 and 48 [ Time Frame: Week 24 and 48 ]
   The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants' psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participants' psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
3. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Adalimumab Group at Week 24 and 48 [ Time Frame: Week 24 and 48 ]
   The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score.
4. Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 16 in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Placebo Group [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16 ]
   The DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on participant's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. The DLQI total score ranges from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much): 0-1 = no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-6 = small effect on the participant's life; 7-12 = moderate effect on the participant's life; 13-18 = very large effect on the participant's life; 19-30 = extremely large effect on the participant's life. Higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life of participants. This secondary outcome measure was planned to include only the placebo and guselkumab arms.
5. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Adalimumab Group at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Week 16 ]
   The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants' psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participants' psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
6. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Adalimumab Group at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Week 16 ]
   The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score.
7. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 Response in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Adalimumab Group at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Week 16 ]
   The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 75 response represents participants who achieved at least a 75 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score.
8. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Scalp-specific Investigator's Global Assessment (Ss-IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Placebo Group [ Time Frame: Week 16 ]
   The ss-IGA instrument is used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions were assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness, which are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 = absence of disease, 1 = very mild disease, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, and 4 = severe disease. This secondary outcome measure was planned to include only the placebo and guselkumab arms.
9. Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptom and Sign Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score at Week 16 in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Placebo Group [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]
   The PSSD (24-hour version) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire designed and validated to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. It consisted of 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily symptom score and sign score when at least 3 items (>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value is converted into 0-100 scoring, such that Symptom [or Sign] score = average value*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe and higher score indicates more severe disease. This secondary outcome measure was planned to include only the placebo and guselkumab arms.
10. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Symptom and Sign Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score of 0 in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Adalimumab Group at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Week 24 ]
    The PSSD (24-hour version) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire designed and validated to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. It consisted of 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily symptom score and sign score when at least 3 items (>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value is converted into 0-100 scoring, such that Symptom [or Sign] score = average value*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe and higher score indicates more severe disease.
11. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 Response at Week 252 [ Time Frame: Week 252 ]
    The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score. As per planned analysis, participants from the baseline guselkumab group and the placebo crossover group were combined into a single guselkumab group for assessment of this outcome measure.
12. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Week 252 [ Time Frame: Week 252 ]
    The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 75 response represents participants who achieved at least a 75 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score. As per planned analysis, participants from the baseline guselkumab group and the placebo crossover group were combined into a single guselkumab group for assessment of this outcome measure.
13. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 252 [ Time Frame: Week 252 ]
    The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants' psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participants' psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). As per planned analysis, participants from the baseline guselkumab group and the placebo crossover group were combined into a single guselkumab group for assessment of this outcome measure.
14. Percentage of Participants With a DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Week 252 [ Time Frame: Week 252 ]
    The DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on participant's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. The DLQI total score ranges from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much): 0-1 = no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-6 = small effect on the participant's life; 7-12 = moderate effect on the participant's life; 13-18 = very large effect on the participant's life; 19-30 = extremely large effect on the participant's life. Higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life of participants. As per planned analysis, participants from the baseline guselkumab group and the placebo crossover group were combined into a single guselkumab group for assessment of this outcome measure.
15. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PSSD Symptom Score of 0 at Week 252 [ Time Frame: Week 252 ]
    The PSSD (24-hour version) is a PRO questionnaire designed and validated to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. It consisted of 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily symptom score and sign score when at least 3 items (>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value is converted into 0-100 scoring, such that Symptom score = average value*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe and higher score indicates more severe disease. As per planned analysis, participants from the baseline guselkumab group and the placebo crossover group were combined into a single guselkumab group for assessment of this outcome measure.
16. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PSSD Sign Score of 0 at Week 252 [ Time Frame: Week 252 ]
    The PSSD (24-hour version) is a PRO questionnaire designed and validated to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. It consisted of 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily symptom score and sign score when at least 3 items (>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value is converted into 0-100 scoring, such that Sign score = average value*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe and higher score indicates more severe disease. As per planned analysis, participants from the baseline guselkumab group and the placebo crossover group were combined into a single guselkumab group for assessment of this outcome measure.

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 Years to 99 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Sexes Eligible for Study: All
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

• Have a diagnosis of plaque-type psoriasis (with or without psoriatic arthritis) at least 6 months before the first administration of study agent
• Have a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) greater than or equal to (>=) 12 at Screening and at Baseline
• Have an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score >=3 at Screening and at Baseline
• Have an involved body surface area (BSA) >=10 percent (%) at Screening and at Baseline
• Must be a candidate for either systemic therapy or phototherapy for psoriasis

Exclusion Criteria:

• Participants with nonplaque forms of psoriasis (for example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular) or with current drug-induced psoriasis (for example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
• Participants who have ever received guselkumab or adalimumab
• History or current signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
• Has any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make participation not be in the best interest (for example, compromise the well-being) of the participant or that could prevent, limit, or confound the protocol-specified assessments
• Is pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy (both men and women) within 5 months following the last administration of study drug

Contacts and Locations

Locations

United States, California

Los Angeles, California, United States

San Diego, California, United States

San Francisco, California, United States

United States, Colorado

Aurora, Colorado, United States

United States, Connecticut

Farmington, Connecticut, United States

United States, Florida

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Ocala, Florida, United States

United States, Georgia

Alpharetta, Georgia, United States

United States, Illinois

Rolling Meadows, Illinois, United States

United States, Indiana

Plainfield, Indiana, United States

United States, Massachusetts

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

United States, Michigan

Troy, Michigan, United States

United States, Minnesota

New Brighton, Minnesota, United States

United States, Missouri

Saint Louis, Missouri, United States

United States, New Jersey

East Windsor, New Jersey, United States

United States, New Mexico

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

United States, Oregon

Portland, Oregon, United States

United States, Pennsylvania

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

United States, Rhode Island

Johnston, Rhode Island, United States

United States, Texas

Arlington, Texas, United States

Austin, Texas, United States

Dallas, Texas, United States

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Webster, Texas, United States

United States, Virginia

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Australia

Darlinghurst, Australia

East Melbourne, Australia

Hectorville, Australia

Liverpool, Australia

Melbourne, Australia

Westmead, Australia

Woden, Australia

Woolloongabba, Australia

Canada, Alberta

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Canada, British Columbia

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Canada, Newfoundland and Labrador

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Canada, Nova Scotia

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Canada, Ontario

Ajax, Ontario, Canada

London, Ontario, Canada

North Bay, Ontario, Canada

Peterborough, Ontario, Canada

Canada, Quebec

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Germany

Berlin, Germany

Bonn, Germany

Dresden, Germany

Essen, Germany

Frankfurt/ Main, Germany

Gera, Germany

Hamburg, Germany

Kiel, Germany

Lubeck, Germany

Mahlow, Germany

Munster, Germany

Tübingen, Germany

Hungary

Budapest, Hungary

Debrecen, Hungary

Kaposvar, Hungary

Kecskemet, Hungary

Pecs, Hungary

Szeged, Hungary

Korea, Republic of

Bundang, Korea, Republic of

Busan, Korea, Republic of

Daejeon, Korea, Republic of

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Suwon, Korea, Republic of

Poland

Bialystok, Poland

Bydgoszcz, Poland

Lodz, Poland

Olsztyn, Poland

Warszawa, Poland

Wroclaw, Poland

Russian Federation

Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation

Kirov, Russian Federation

Krasnodar, Russian Federation

Lipetsk, Russian Federation

Moscow, Russian Federation

Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation

Ryazan, Russian Federation

St. Petersburg, Russian Federation

Stavropol, Russian Federation

Ulyanovsk, Russian Federation

Spain

Baracaldo, Spain

Barcelona, Spain

Cordoba, Spain

Madrid, Spain

Manises, Spain

Palma de Mallorca, Spain

Salamanca, Spain

San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain

Valencia, Spain

Taiwan

Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Taichung City, Taiwan

Tainan, Taiwan

Taipei City, Taiwan

Taipei, Taiwan

Taoyuan, Taiwan

Sponsors and Collaborators

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Investigators

• Study Director: Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial; Janssen Research & Development, LLC

More Information

Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):

Reich K, Gordon KB, Strober BE, Armstrong AW, Miller M, Shen YK, You Y, Han C, Yang YW, Foley P, Griffiths CEM. Five-year maintenance of clinical response and health-related quality of life improvements in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with guselkumab: results from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2. Br J Dermatol. 2021 Dec;185(6):1146-1159. doi: 10.1111/bjd.20568. Epub 2021 Sep 8.

Armstrong AW, Reich K, Foley P, Han C, Song M, Shen YK, You Y, Papp KA. Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes (Dermatology Life Quality Index and the Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary) with Guselkumab in Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Results from the Phase III VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2019 Feb;20(1):155-164. doi: 10.1007/s40257-018-0396-z.

Foley P, Gordon K, Griffiths CEM, Wasfi Y, Randazzo B, Song M, Li S, Shen YK, Blauvelt A. Efficacy of Guselkumab Compared With Adalimumab and Placebo for Psoriasis in Specific Body Regions: A Secondary Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Jun 1;154(6):676-683. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.0793.

• Responsible Party: Janssen Research & Development, LLC
• ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02207231
• Other Study ID Numbers: CR105047; CNTO1959PSO3001 ( Other Identifier: Janssen Research & Development, LLC ); 2014-000719-15 ( EudraCT Number )
• First Posted: August 4, 2014
• Results First Posted: October 19, 2017
• Last Update Posted: July 23, 2021
• Last Verified: July 2021

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No

Keywords provided by Janssen Research & Development, LLC:

Psoriasis; Plaque-type psoriasis; Guselkumab; Adalimumab; CNTO 1959; Monoclonal antibody

Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Psoriasis; Skin Diseases, Papulosquamous; Skin Diseases; Adalimumab; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antirheumatic Agents; Immunologic Factors; Physiological Effects of Drugs