The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Efficacy of Ultra-micronized Palmitoylethanolamide (Um-PEA) in Geriatric Patients With Chronic Pain

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02699281
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : March 4, 2016
Last Update Posted : September 11, 2019
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Maura Marcucci, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

Brief Summary:
Investigators planned to adopt the N-of-1 trial approach to objectively test the effectiveness of ultra-micronized PEA at an individual level in our older outpatients. 65 years old or older persons referring to the Geriatric Unit of the Fondazione IRCSS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico of Milan complaining of noncancer chronic pain of any origin will be eligible. Each trial will be a placebo-controlled randomized crossover trial including two um-PEA (600 mg twice a day) and placebo treatment pairs. Investigators will secondarily meta-analyse the performed N-of-1 trials to obtain an estimate of the average effect of um-PEA compared with placebo using a frequentist and Bayesian approach.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Chronic Pain Drug: ultra-micronized palmitoylethanolamide Drug: Placebo Phase 4

Detailed Description:

Background: Chronic pain in the elderly is highly prevalent, often underestimated, and associated with adverse outcomes. Most available analgesic drugs are often either ineffective or not tolerated, and burdened with many side effects. Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) is an endogenous widely distributed N-acylethanolamina involved in neuroinflammation and pain generating processes. Formulations containing ultra-micronized Palmitoylethanolamide (um-PEA) are available on the market but their effectiveness on chronic pain in highly heterogeneous geriatric patients is not clear and likely not generalizable. Investigators planned to adopt the N-of-1 trial approach to objectively test the effectiveness of ultra-micronized PEA at an individual level in our older outpatients.

Methods/Design: 65 years old or older persons referring to the Geriatric Unit of the Fondazione IRCSS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico of Milan complaining of noncancer chronic pain of any origin will be eligible. Each trial will be a placebo-controlled randomized crossover trial including two um-PEA (600 mg twice a day) and placebo treatment pairs. um-PEA or placebo 3-week periods will be separated by 2-week washout intervals to overcome the possible carryover effect. Pain intensity, need for on-demand analgesic medications, and impact on daily activities will be evaluated. Also, cognitively impaired patients will be eligible as long as the expression of pain can be recognized and its frequency assessed by a caregiver. Trial results will be then discussed with the patient/caregiver and the treating physician to decide whether to continue the treatment. The impact of the N-of-1 approach on the physician's management plan and confidence will be assessed. Investigators will secondarily meta-analyse the performed N-of-1 trials to obtain an estimate of the average effect of um-PEA compared with placebo using a frequentist and Bayesian approach.

Discussion: While pursuing an ultimate clinical objective, i.e. to empirically and objectively decide the best treatment choice for an individual older patient with chronic pain, these series of geriatric N-of-1 trials on PEA will bring the Evidence Based Medicine principles into the care of patients not usually represented in conventional randomized controlled trials, and realize a patient-centered outcome approach necessary to improve appropriate prescribing in elderly patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 11 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: N-of-1 Randomised Trials to Assess the Efficacy of Ultra-micronized Palmitoylethanolamide (Um-PEA) in Geriatric Patients With Chronic Pain
Study Start Date : October 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date : July 2016
Actual Study Completion Date : July 2016

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Chronic Pain

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Ultra-micronized Palmitoylethanolamide
Ultra-micronized Palmitoylethanolamide 600 mg twice a day
Drug: ultra-micronized palmitoylethanolamide
ultra-micronized palmitoylethanolamide 600 mg twice a day
Other Names:
  • um-PEA
  • Normast

Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo tab twice a day
Drug: Placebo
um-PEA like placebo twice a day
Other Name: um-PEA like placebo




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. daily intensity of pain assessed using a 11-point visual numeric scale, accompanied with labels and pictures, modified from Faces Pain Scale. [ Time Frame: 126 days ]

Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. daily need of on-demand analgesic medications [ Time Frame: 126 days ]
  2. impact of pain on daily activities (short questionnaire modified from the back pain functional scale) [ Time Frame: 126 days ]
    The short questionnaire modified from the back pain functional scale consists of 12 items (but it can be modified to better fit to the patients). A score from 1 to 5 is assigned to each item.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   65 Years and older   (Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pain is located at the back (any level) and/or at the joints and/or at the limbs.
  • The pain is chronic, i.e. it has been present for at least 6 months, even if with fluctuations.
  • The pain is attributable to one or more of the following conditions: osteoarthritis/osteoarthrosis; spondylosis; radiculopathy; diabetic peripheral neuropathy; post-herpetic neuralgia; chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy; fibromyalgia; or pain of uncertain origin or idiopathic, as long as it has had and it is expected to have a chronic nature, even if with spontaneous fluctuations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cancer-related pain
  • clear ischemic pathogenesis for pain (e.g. claudicatio intermittens or critical limb ischemia)

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02699281


Locations
Layout table for location information
Italy
Geriatric Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Milano, Italy, 20122
Sponsors and Collaborators
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Maura Marcucci, MD, MSc Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Maura Marcucci, MD, MSc, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02699281    
Other Study ID Numbers: Nof1-PEA
First Posted: March 4, 2016    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: September 11, 2019
Last Verified: September 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Undecided
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Chronic Pain
Pain
Neurologic Manifestations
Palmidrol
Analgesics
Sensory System Agents
Peripheral Nervous System Agents
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
Anti-Inflammatory Agents
Antirheumatic Agents
Antiviral Agents
Anti-Infective Agents
Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists
Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators
Neurotransmitter Agents
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Hormones
Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists