The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Comparison of Hepatectomy and Local Ablation for Resectable Synchronous and Metachronous Colorectal Liver Metastasis (HELARC)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02886104
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : September 1, 2016
Last Update Posted : September 1, 2016
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Second Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

Brief Summary:
The surgical and local ablation strategy for the treatment of resectable synchronous and metachronous colorectal liver metastases(CRLM) has not still been defined. The purpose of this study is to compare two treatment strategies in which simultaneous resection of both primary and secondary tumor of synchronous CRLM(SCRLM) and resection of metachronous CRLM(MCRLM) is compared with resection of primary tumor and ablation of secondary tumor in SCRLM and ablation of MCRLM. Endpoints include the rate of severe complications and survival.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Liver Procedure: CRLM resection group Device: CRLM ablation group Not Applicable

Detailed Description:
Colorectal cancer(CRC) kills more than 700,000 patients every year, which is nowadays the world's 3rd common and the 4th deadly tumor. About 50% CRC patients will finally develop colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Among the CRLM patients, 20-25% of CRC are found with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCRLM) at the first visit. Meanwhile, about 20-30% CRC patients suffer by metachronous colorectal liver metastasis (MCRLM) even after radical resection of primary tumor. It is nowadays admitted that the R0 resection of both primary and secondary tumors in SCRLM and R0 resection of MCRLM represents a feasible and potential curative treatment in patients with resectable CRLM(RCRLM). However, the treatment strategy for some RCRLM (tumor number≤3 and tumor size≤3.0cm), such as whether to choose hepatectomy or local ablation, still remains in debate. In primary hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC), local ablation has been proved to has similar curative effect to that of hepatectomy. Compared to hepatectomy, local ablation has less trauma and more rapid recovery and possible lower hospitalization cost. The curative effect of local ablation is mainly influenced by tumor site and tumor size. On the other side, some RCRLM might develop repeat recurrences even after "R0" resection due to the imaging undetectable micro metastasis. Thus, local ablation might be more suitable for some repeat recurrent CRLM. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy/safety of local ablation with hepatectomy for RCRLM (tumor number≤3, tumor size≤3.0cm), including both SCRLM and MCRLM. Patients are randomized to CRLM resection group and local ablation group. The primary endpoint is overall survival. Secondary endpoints evaluate the rate of patients with at least one severe complication within 30 days after surgery/ablation and long-term clinical outcomes, in particular disease-free survival.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 548 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Comparison of Hepatectomy and Local Ablation for Resectable Synchronous and Metachronous Colorectal Liver Metastasis (HELARC) ------ a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Clinical Study
Study Start Date : August 2016
Estimated Primary Completion Date : July 2021
Estimated Study Completion Date : July 2026

Arm Intervention/treatment
Active Comparator: CRLM resection group
Resection of both primary and secondary tumors in SCRLM and resection of MCRLM. Interventions: Simultaneous resection of both primary and secondary tumors in SCRLM and resection of MCRLM.
Procedure: CRLM resection group
Simultaneous resection of both primary and secondary tumors in synchronous CRLM or resection of metachronous CRLM.
Other Name: Hepatectomy

Experimental: CRLM ablation group

Ablation of CRLM after resection of primary tumor in SCRLM and ablation of MCRLM.

Interventions: Ablation of liver metastasis within 30 days after resection of primary tumor in SCRLM and ablation of MCRLM.

Device: CRLM ablation group
Microwave ablation of CRLM with a 2.15-gigahertz(GHz) microwave generator and a 14 gauge diameter transcutaneous antenna within 30 days after resection of primary tumor in synchronous CRLM or ablation of metachronous CRLM.
Other Name: Microwave ablation




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Overall survival [ Time Frame: 3 years ]

Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. R0 resection rate in both primary and secondary tumor in CRLM [ Time Frame: Day of surgery ]
  2. Death rate during hospitalization or within 30 days after surgery/ablation [ Time Frame: 30 days after surgery/ablation ]
  3. Rate of patients with at least one postoperative severe complication within 30 days after surgery/ablation [ Time Frame: 30 days after surgery/ablation ]
  4. Disease-free survival and 1, 2 and 3-years disease-free survival rate [ Time Frame: 1, 2 and 3-years ]
  5. Complete ablation rate in CRLM [ Time Frame: Day of ablation ]


Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 80 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. At least one metastatic adenocarcinoma of liver, histologically proven.
  2. At least one adenocarcinoma of colon and/or rectum, histologically proven.
  3. No local complication at the time of surgery (no occlusion, no sub-occlusion, no massive hemorrhage, no abscesses or local invasion).
  4. No extra-hepatic metastasis.
  5. Extra-hepatic disease (EHD) suitable for hepatectomy, liver ablation and anesthesia as long as all sites of EHD disease are radically treated.
  6. All the primary and secondary tumors which R0 resections are technically possible. (SCRLM: synchronous resection for both primary and secondary tumors, MCRLM: no local recurrence within 6 months after resection of primary tumor)
  7. Residual hepatic volume>30%-40%.
  8. At least 2-3 hepatic segments remained after hepatectomy (except S1), residual liver with normal portal vein, hepatic artery and biliary duct, at least 1 of hepatic veins (left, middle and right) not invaded.
  9. Tumor size ≤3 cm.
  10. Tumor number≤ 3.
  11. Tumors located ≥1.0 cm of vulnerable structures, e.g. colon, main trunk of portal vein, hepatic artery, hepatic vein and intrahepatic biliary duct.
  12. suitable for both hepatectomy and local ablation after multiple disciplinary team(MDT) discussion.
  13. Informed written consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Other malignant tumors history.
  2. Complications need emergency surgery (occlusion, sub-occlusion, massive hemorrhage and abscesses, et al.).
  3. Colorectal or hepatic tumor extension towards abdominal wall and/or adjacent organ making liver R0 resection impossible immediately.
  4. Hepatic lesions diagnosed with ultrasound and MRI making complete ablation impossible immediately.
  5. ≤ 2 hepatic segments remained after hepatectomy or residual hepatic volume﹤30%-40%
  6. Non resectable lymph node metastasis.
  7. American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) grading≥ IV and/or Eastern cooperative oncology group(ECOG) score≥ 2. (see appendix)
  8. EHD is not recommended.
  9. Physical or psychological dependence.
  10. Pregnant or breast feeding women.
  11. Not controlled preoperational infection.
  12. Enrolled in other clinical trials within 4 weeks. Other clinical or laboratorial condition not recommended by investigators.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02886104


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Meijin Huang, MD,PHD +8613924073322 maymay0129@139.com
Contact: Jun Huang, MD,PHD +8613926451242 huangj97@mail.sysu.edu.cn

Locations
Layout table for location information
China, Guangdong
The 6th Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University Recruiting
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510655
Contact: Meijin Huang, MD,PHD    +8613924073322    maymay0129@139.com   
Contact: Jun Huang, MD,PHD    +8613926451242    huangj97@mail.sysu.edu.cn   
Sponsors and Collaborators
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Second Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Meijin Huang, MD,PHD The 6th Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
Publications:
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02886104    
Other Study ID Numbers: E2016026
First Posted: September 1, 2016    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: September 1, 2016
Last Verified: August 2016
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Undecided
Keywords provided by Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University:
synchronous
metachronous
colorectal liver metastasis
resection
ablation
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplasms
Liver Neoplasms
Neoplastic Processes
Pathologic Processes
Digestive System Neoplasms
Neoplasms by Site
Digestive System Diseases
Liver Diseases