The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

A Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Combination With Etoposide/Platinum (Cisplatin or Carboplatin) for Participants With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (MK-3475-604/KEYNOTE-604)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03066778
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : February 28, 2017
Results First Posted : December 22, 2020
Last Update Posted : October 3, 2022
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Brief Summary:

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab plus standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy (etoposide/platinum [EP]) in participants with newly diagnosed extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) who have not previously received systemic therapy for this malignancy.

The primary study hypotheses are that pembrolizumab+EP prolongs Progression-free Survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) and Overall Survival (OS) compared with placebo+EP in adult participants with ES-SCLC. In this study, RECIST 1.1 has been modified to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ.

With protocol Amendment 07 (03-Oct-2018), the outcome measure of "Change from Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale" was replaced with a single time point analysis at Week 18.


Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) Biological: Pembrolizumab Drug: Normal saline solution Drug: Carboplatin Drug: Cisplatin Drug: Etoposide Phase 3

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 453 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475/SCH900475) in Combination With Etoposide/Platinum (Cisplatin or Carboplatin) for the First-line Treatment of Subjects With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (KEYNOTE-604)
Actual Study Start Date : May 2, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date : December 2, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date : September 21, 2021


Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Pembrolizumab+EP
During each 21-day cycle, participants receive pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously (IV) on Day 1 PLUS etoposide 100 mg/m^2 IV on Days 1, 2 and 3 PLUS investigator's choice of platinum therapy (carboplatin titrated to an area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve [AUC] 5 IV on Day 1 OR cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 IV on Day 1). Participants who stop pembrolizumab as a result of obtaining a response of stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), complete response (CR) or those who stop after receiving pembrolizumab for 24 months for reasons other than disease progression or intolerability, are eligible for up to an additional 1 year of treatment after progressive disease if they meet the criteria for retreatment.
Biological: Pembrolizumab
IV infusion on Day 1 of each cycle prior to chemotherapy
Other Names:
  • MK-3475
  • KEYTRUDA®

Drug: Carboplatin
IV infusion on Day 1 of each cycle
Other Name: PARAPLATIN®

Drug: Cisplatin
IV infusion on Day 1 of each cycle
Other Name: PLATINOL®

Drug: Etoposide
IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each cycle
Other Name: TOPOSAR™

Active Comparator: Placebo+EP
During each 21-day cycle, participants receive placebo (normal saline solution) IV on Day 1 PLUS etoposide 100 mg/m^2 IV on Days 1, 2 and 3 PLUS investigator's choice of platinum therapy (carboplatin titrated to an AUC 5 IV on Day 1 OR cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 IV on Day 1).
Drug: Normal saline solution
IV infusion on Day 1 of each cycle prior to chemotherapy

Drug: Carboplatin
IV infusion on Day 1 of each cycle
Other Name: PARAPLATIN®

Drug: Cisplatin
IV infusion on Day 1 of each cycle
Other Name: PLATINOL®

Drug: Etoposide
IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each cycle
Other Name: TOPOSAR™




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) [ Time Frame: Up to approximately 30.5 months ]
    PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD, as determined by RECIST 1.1, was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. For this study, RECIST 1.1 was modified to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ. The PFS was calculated using the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method for censored data and presented for the first course of study treatment per protocol.

  2. Overall Survival (OS) [ Time Frame: Up to approximately 30.5 months ]
    OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date of the last follow up. The OS was calculated using the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method for censored data and presented for the first course of study treatment per protocol.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) [ Time Frame: Up to approximately 30.5 months ]
    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieve a best objective response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters. In this study, RECIST 1.1 was modified to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ. The ORR was calculated using the Miettinen & Nurminen method stratified by type of platinum therapy (carboplatin or cisplatin), baseline ECOG performance status (0 or 1), and baseline LDH (≤ or > upper limit of normal) and presented for the first course of study treatment per protocol.

  2. Duration of Response (DOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) [ Time Frame: Up to approximately 30.5 months ]
    DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) per RECIST 1.1 until progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters. PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of ≥1 new lesions was also considered PD. In this study, RECIST 1.1 was modified to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ. The DOR was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data and is presented for the first course of study treatment per protocol.

  3. Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE) [ Time Frame: Up to approximately 30.5 months ]
    An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have had a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that was temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, was also an adverse event. The number of participants who experienced an AE was reported for each arm according to the treatment received and is presented for the first course of study treatment per protocol.

  4. Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event (AE) [ Time Frame: Up to approximately 26 months ]
    An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have had a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that was temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, was also an adverse event. The number of participants who discontinued due to an AE was reported for each arm according to the treatment received and is presented for the first course of study treatment per protocol.

  5. Number of Participants Experiencing Any Grade 3 to 5 Adverse Events (AE) as Assessed by National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (CTCAE 4.03) [ Time Frame: Up to approximately 30.5 months ]
    The CTCAE uses Grades 1 through 5 correlating to AE severity criteria. Grade 1=mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2=moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care ADL. Grade 4=life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5=death related to AE. The number of participants who experienced any Grade 3 to 5 AE was reported for each arm according to the treatment received and is presented for the first course of study treatment per protocol.

  6. Change From Baseline at Week 18 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale [ Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study treatment in Cycle 1 [cycle length = 21 days]) and Week 18 ]
    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire that rates the overall quality of life in cancer participants. The first 28 questions use a 4-point scale (1=not at all to 4=very much) for evaluating function (physical, role, social, cognitive, emotional), symptoms (diarrhea, fatigue, dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, nausea/vomiting, constipation, and pain) and financial difficulties. The last 2 questions use a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent) to evaluate overall health and quality of life. Scores are transformed to a range of 0 to 100 using a standard EORTC algorithm. Change from baseline scores were calculated using a constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) model. Negative change from baseline values indicated deterioration in health status or functioning and positive changes indicated improvement. Data are presented for the first course of study treatment per protocol.

  7. Change From Baseline at Week 12 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale [ Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study treatment in Cycle 1 [cycle length = 21 days]) and Week 12 ]
    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire that rates the overall quality of life in cancer participants. The first 28 questions use a 4-point scale (1=not at all to 4=very much) for evaluating function (physical, role, social, cognitive, emotional), symptoms (diarrhea, fatigue, dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, nausea/vomiting, constipation, and pain) and financial difficulties. The last 2 questions use a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent) to evaluate overall health and quality of life. Scores were transformed to a range of 0 to 100 using a standard EORTC algorithm. Negative change from baseline values indicated deterioration in health status or functioning and positive changes indicated improvement. Per protocol, data were to be presented for the first course of study treatment.

  8. Change From Baseline at Week 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale [ Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study treatment in Cycle 1 [cycle length = 21 days]) and Week 24 ]
    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire that rates the overall quality of life in cancer participants. The first 28 questions use a 4-point scale (1=not at all to 4=very much) for evaluating function (physical, role, social, cognitive, emotional), symptoms (diarrhea, fatigue, dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, nausea/vomiting, constipation, and pain) and financial difficulties. The last 2 questions use a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent) to evaluate overall health and quality of life. Scores were transformed to a range of 0 to 100 using a standard EORTC algorithm. Negative change from baseline values indicated deterioration in health status or functioning and positive changes indicated improvement. Per protocol, data were to be presented for the first course of study treatment.

  9. Time to True Deterioration (TTD) in the Composite Endpoint of Cough, Chest Pain, and Dyspnea Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) [ Time Frame: Day 1 of Cycles 1-9, Day 1 of every other cycle for Cycles 10-17 and 30 days after last dose of study treatment (Up to approximately 27 months) ]
    TTD in patient-reported lung cancer symptoms of cough (QLQ-LC-13 Item 1), chest pain (QLQ-LC-13 Item 10), and dyspnea (QLQ-C30 Item 8) was a composite endpoint defined as the time to first onset of ≥10 point deterioration from baseline in an item confirmed by a second adjacent ≥10 point deterioration. The QLQ-LC13 consists of 13 measures of lung cancer symptoms and side effects from chemotherapy and radiation. It is scored on a 4-point scale (1=none, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Scores were transformed to a range of 0 to 100 using a standard algorithm. Higher scores represented increasing symptom severity. TTD was calculated using the product-limit Kaplan-Meier method for censored data and is presented for the first course of study treatment per protocol.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Has a documented new diagnosis of SCLC by histology or cytology from brushing, washing, or needle aspiration of a defined lesion. Participants who do not have histology samples (defined as core or excisional biopsy, or resections) will need to undergo a new biopsy to provide a tissue sample.
  • Has extensive-stage disease defined as Stage IV (T any, N any, M 1a/b) by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), Seventh Edition
  • Has ≥1 lesion that meets the criteria for measurable, as defined by RECIST 1.1, and is appropriate for selection as a target lesion, as determined by local site investigator/radiology assessment
  • Has provided archival tumor tissue sample or newly obtained core or excisional biopsy of a tumor lesion not previously irradiated
  • Has Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1
  • Has a life expectancy of ≥3 months
  • Has adequate organ function
  • Female and male participants of childbearing potential must be willing to use an adequate method of contraception, starting with the first dose of study treatment through 120 days after the last dose of study treatment and up to 180 days after last dose of chemotherapeutic agents

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has received prior systemic therapy for the treatment of SCLC
  • Is currently participating and receiving study treatment or has participated in a study of an investigational agent and received study treatment or used an investigational device within 4 weeks of the first dose of treatment for another health-related problem
  • Is expected to require any other form of antineoplastic therapy for SCLC, including radiation therapy, while on study. (Prophylactic cranial irradiation will be possible for those participants with stable disease or better at the completion of the 4 cycles of chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab.)
  • Has known central nervous system (ie, brain and/or spinal cord) metastases and/or carcinomatous meningitis. Participants with brain metastases may participate only if they satisfy all of the following:
  • Has completed treatment (eg, whole brain radiation treatment [WBRT], stereotactic radiosurgery, or equivalent) ≥14 days prior to the first dose of study treatment,
  • Has no evidence of new or enlarging brain metastases confirmed by post-treatment repeat brain imaging performed ≥3 weeks after pre-treatment brain imaging, and
  • Is neurologically stable without the need for steroids for ≥7 days before first dose of study treatment.
  • Has had major surgery within 3 weeks prior to receiving the first dose of study treatment or has not recovered adequately from toxicity and/or complications from an intervention prior to receiving the first dose of study treatment.
  • Has a history of (non-infectious) pneumonitis that required steroids or has current pneumonitis
  • Has a known history of interstitial lung disease
  • Has a known additional malignancy that is progressing or requires active treatment. Exceptions include early stage cancers (carcinoma in situ or Stage 1) treated with curative intent, basal cell carcinoma of the skin, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, in situ cervical cancer, or in situ breast cancer that has undergone potentially curative therapy.
  • Has active autoimmune disease that has required systemic treatment in the past 2 years. Replacement therapy is not considered a form of systemic treatment.
  • Has a known history of, or active, neurologic paraneoplastic syndrome
  • Has clinically active diverticulitis, intra-abdominal abscess, gastrointestinal obstruction, and/or abdominal carcinomatosis
  • Has a history of a severe hypersensitivity reaction to treatment with another monoclonal antibody
  • Is taking chronic systemic steroids (in doses exceeding 10 mg daily of prednisone equivalent) within 7 days prior to the first dose of study treatment
  • Has a diagnosis of immunodeficiency or is receiving any form of immunosuppressive therapy within 7 days prior to the first dose of study treatment
  • Has received a live vaccine within 30 days prior to the first dose of study treatment
  • Has received prior therapy with an anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD-1), anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1), or anti-programmed cell death-ligand 2 (anti-PD-L2) agent or with an agent directed to another co-inhibitory T-cell receptor (i.e., cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 [CTLA-4], tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 9 [TNFRSF9, OX-40, CD137]) or has previously participated in a Merck pembrolizumab (MK-3475) clinical trial
  • Has severe hypersensitivity (Grade ≥3) to pembrolizumab and/or any of its excipients
  • Has an active infection requiring systemic therapy
  • Has a known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
  • Has a known history of Hepatitis B or known active Hepatitis C virus infection
  • Has a known history of active TB (Bacillus Tuberculosis)
  • Has symptomatic ascites or pleural effusion. A participant who is clinically stable following treatment for these conditions (including therapeutic thoraco- or paracentesis) is eligible.
  • Is pregnant or breastfeeding, or expecting to conceive or father children within the projected duration of the study starting with the screening visit through 120 days after the last dose of study treatment through and up to 180 days after last dose of chemotherapeutic agents

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03066778


Locations
Show Show 148 study locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Director: Medical Director Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
  Study Documents (Full-Text)

Documents provided by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC:
Additional Information:
Publications of Results:
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03066778    
Other Study ID Numbers: 3475-604
173744 ( Registry Identifier: JAPIC-CTI )
MK-3475-604 ( Other Identifier: Merck )
KEYNOTE-604 ( Other Identifier: Merck )
2016-004309-15 ( EudraCT Number )
First Posted: February 28, 2017    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: December 22, 2020
Last Update Posted: October 3, 2022
Last Verified: August 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Yes
Plan Description: http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf
URL: http://engagezone.msd.com/ds_documentation.php

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC:
Extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC)
Programmed Cell Death-1 (PD1, PD-1)
Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PDL1, PD-L1)
Programmed Cell Death Ligand 2 (PDL2, PD-L2)
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Lung Neoplasms
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
Respiratory Tract Neoplasms
Thoracic Neoplasms
Neoplasms by Site
Neoplasms
Lung Diseases
Respiratory Tract Diseases
Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Bronchial Neoplasms
Carboplatin
Pembrolizumab
Etoposide
Antineoplastic Agents
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic
Topoisomerase II Inhibitors
Topoisomerase Inhibitors
Enzyme Inhibitors