The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept (ACE-536) Versus Epoetin Alfa for the Treatment of Anemia Due to IPSS-R Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Participants Who Require Red Blood Cell Transfusions and Are ESA Naïve (COMMANDS)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03682536
Recruitment Status : Active, not recruiting
First Posted : September 24, 2018
Last Update Posted : December 1, 2023
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Acceleron Pharma, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ USA
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Celgene

Study Description
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of luspatercept (ACE-536) compared to epoetin alfa on red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence (for at least 12 weeks) with a concurrent hemoglobin increase of at least 1.5 g/dL in participants with anemia due to revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) very low, low, or intermediate risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) who require RBC transfusions and have never been exposed to erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA).

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Myelodysplastic Syndromes Drug: Luspatercept Drug: Epoetin alfa Phase 3

Study Design
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 363 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Phase 3, Open-label, Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept (ACE-536) Versus Epoetin Alpha for the Treatment of Anemia Due to IPSS-R Very Low, Low or Intermediate Risk Due to Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) ESA in Native Subjects Who Require Red Blood Cell Transfusions
Actual Study Start Date : January 2, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date : March 31, 2023
Estimated Study Completion Date : September 28, 2027

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arms and Interventions
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Luspatercept Drug: Luspatercept
Specified dose on specified days
Other Name: ACE-536
Active Comparator: Epoetin alfa Drug: Epoetin alfa
Specified dose on specified days
Other Names:
  • EPREX®
  • ERYPO®
  • PROCRIT®


Outcome Measures
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Red blood cell transfusion independence (RBC-TI) for 12 weeks (84 days) with a mean hemoglobin increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL [ Time Frame: Week 1 through Week 24 ]

Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. RBC-TI for 24 weeks [ Time Frame: Week 1 through Week 24 ]
  2. Mean hemoglobin change over 24 weeks [ Time Frame: Week 1 through Week 24 ]
  3. Hematologic improvement - erythroid response (HI-E) per International Working Group (IWG) [ Time Frame: Week 1 through Week 24 ]
  4. Time to HI-E [ Time Frame: Week 1 through Week 24 ]
  5. RBC-TI for ≥ 12 weeks (84 days) [ Time Frame: Week 1 through Week 24 ]
  6. Duration of RBC-TI ≥ 12 weeks (84 days) [ Time Frame: Week 1 through End of Treatment (EOT), up to approximately 60 months ]
  7. Time to RBC-TI ≥ 12 weeks (84 days) [ Time Frame: Week 1 through Week 24 ]
  8. Time to first red blood cell (RBC) transfusion [ Time Frame: Week 1 through EOT, up to approximately 60 months ]
  9. RBC transfusion burden on treatment [ Time Frame: Week 1 through Week 24 ]
  10. RBC-TI for ≥ 56 days (8 weeks) [ Time Frame: Week 1 through Week 24 ]
  11. RBC-TI for a consecutive 24-week period [ Time Frame: Week 1 through Week 48 ]
  12. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) [ Time Frame: Screening through Week 24 ]
  13. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Version 4 (FACT-An) questionnaire [ Time Frame: Screening through Week 24 ]
  14. Number of participants with Adverse Events (AEs) [ Time Frame: Week 1 through 42 days post last dose ]
  15. Pharmacokinetic - area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) [ Time Frame: Randomization through 1-year post first dose ]
  16. Pharmacokinetic - maximum plasma concentration of drug (Cmax) [ Time Frame: Randomization through 1-year post first dose ]
  17. Frequency of antidrug antibodies (ADA) [ Time Frame: Randomization through 1-year post first dose ]
  18. Number of participants progressing to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [ Time Frame: Randomization through up to 60 months ]
  19. Percentage of participants progressing to AML [ Time Frame: Randomization through up to 60 months ]
  20. Time to AML progression [ Time Frame: Randomization through up to 60 months ]
  21. Overall survival [ Time Frame: Randomization through up to 60 months ]

Eligibility Criteria
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented diagnosis of Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) according to WHO 2016 classification that meets revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) classification of very low, low, or intermediate risk disease, and have < 5% blasts in bone marrow
  • Endogenous serum erythropoietin (sEPO) level of < 500 U/L
  • Requires Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, as documented by the criteria: Average transfusion requirement of 2 - 6 units/8 weeks of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) confirmed for a minimum of 8 weeks immediately preceding randomization
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0, 1, or 2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically significant anemia due to iron, vitamin B12, or folate deficiencies, or autoimmune or hereditary hemolytic anemia, or hypothyroidism, or any type of known clinically significant bleeding or sequestration or drug induced anemia
  • Known history of diagnosis of Acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
  • Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as repeated elevations of systolic blood pressure (SBP) of ≥ 150 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 100 mmHg despite adequate treatment

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply

Contacts and Locations
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03682536


Locations
Show Show 226 study locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
Celgene
Acceleron Pharma, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ USA
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Director: Bristol-Myers Squibb Bristol-Myers Squibb
More Information
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Additional Information:

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Celgene
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03682536    
Other Study ID Numbers: ACE-536-MDS-002
U1111-1218-1810 ( Registry Identifier: WHO )
2022-501485-22-00 ( Other Identifier: EU CTR )
First Posted: September 24, 2018    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: December 1, 2023
Last Verified: November 2023

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Celgene:
Luspatercept
ACE-536
Anemia
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Blood Transfusion
 RBC Transfusion
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents
Erythropoietin
Myelodysplasia
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Preleukemia
Anemia
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Syndrome
Disease
Pathologic Processes
Hematologic Diseases
 Bone Marrow Diseases
Precancerous Conditions
Neoplasms
Epoetin Alfa
Luspatercept
Hematinics