This is the classic website, which will be retired eventually. Please visit the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov instead.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Two Regimens of Crisaborole Ointment 2% in Japanese Participants Aged ≥2 Years With Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03954158
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : May 17, 2019
Results First Posted : July 14, 2020
Last Update Posted : July 14, 2020
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Pfizer

Brief Summary:
This is a Phase 2b, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, intraparticipant study to evaluate efficacy and safety of two regimens of crisaborole ointment 2% in Japanese pediatric and adult participants (cohort 1: 12 years and older, cohort 2: 2 to under 12 years old) with mild to moderate Atopic Dermatitis (AD).

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Atopic Dermatitis Drug: Crisaborole ointment 2% Drug: Vehicle Phase 2

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 81 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Phase 2b, Multi Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Intra-Participant Study, to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Two Regimens of Crisaborole Ointment 2% in Japanese Pediatric and Adult Participants (2 Years and Older) With Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis
Actual Study Start Date : June 15, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date : December 16, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date : December 16, 2019

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Eczema
Drug Information available for: Crisaborole

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Crisaborole ointment 2% once daily (QD) vs vehicle QD
intra-participant comparison, treatment will be randomly assigned to target lesion 1 and lesion 2.
Drug: Crisaborole ointment 2%
QD regimen

Drug: Vehicle
QD regimen

Experimental: Crisaborole ointment 2% twice daily (BID) vs vehicle BID
Intra-participant comparison, treatment will be randomly assigned to target lesion 1 and lesion 2.
Drug: Crisaborole ointment 2%
BID regimen

Drug: Vehicle
BID regimen




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change From Baseline in Total Sign Score (TSS) in Target Lesions at Day 15: Crisaborole Ointment 2% Versus Vehicle [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15 ]
    Lesion TSS was an assessment of the target lesion severity, which was based on severity of 4 clinical signs erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification. All of these 4 signs were rated on a scale of 0 to 3 (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe). These ratings were added to create a total TSS score; ranging from 0 (none) to 12 (most severe), with higher score representing greater severity.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change From Baseline in Total Sign Score in Target Lesions at Day 15: Crisaborole Ointment 2% BID Versus Crisaborole Ointment 2% QD [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15 ]
    Lesion TSS was an assessment of the target lesion severity, which was based on severity of 4 clinical signs erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification. All of these 4 signs were rated on a scale of 0 to 3 (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe). These ratings were added to create a total TSS score; ranging from 0 (none) to 12 (most severe), with higher score representing greater severity.

  2. Change From Baseline in Total Sign Score in Target Lesions at Day 8: Crisaborole Ointment 2% Versus Vehicle [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 8 ]
    Lesion TSS was an assessment of the target lesion severity, which was based on severity of 4 clinical signs erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification. All of these 4 signs were rated on a scale of 0 to 3 (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe). These ratings were added to create a total TSS score; ranging from 0 (none) to 12 (most severe), with higher score representing greater severity.

  3. Change From Baseline in Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score in Target Lesions at Day 8 and Day 15 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 8, Day 15 ]
    ISGA assessed the severity of AD on a 5-point scale ranged from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe), where higher scores indicated higher degree of AD. Grades for classification of severity: 0= clear (minor residual hypo/hyper pigmentation, no erythema or induration or papulation, no oozing or crusting), 1= almost clear (trace faint pink erythema, with barely perceptible induration or papulation and no oozing or crusting), 2= mild (faint pink erythema with mild induration or papulation and no oozing or crusting), 3= moderate (pink-red erythema with moderate induration or papulation with or without oozing or crusting) and 4= severe (deep or bright red erythema with severe induration or papulation and with oozing or crusting).

  4. Change From Baseline in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) in Target Lesions up to Day 15 in Participants Aged 12 Years or More [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ]
    The severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD at the target lesion was assessed using the peak pruritus NRS. Participants aged 12 years or more, were asked to rate their itch severity at the worst moment during the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable); higher scores represented more severe itch.

  5. Change From Baseline in Itch Severity Scale in Target Lesions up to Day 15 in Participants Aged Between 6 to 11 Years [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ]
    The itch severity scale was used for participants >=6 to 11 years of age to assess severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD at the target lesion. In this assessment, participants were asked to choose a unit that showed how itchy their skin had been on day of assessment on a 5-point scale ranging from 1= not itchy to 5= very itchy, where higher scores represented more severe itch.

  6. Change From Baseline in Observer Reported Itch Severity Numerical Rating Scale in Target Lesions up to Day 15 in Participants Aged Between 2 to 11 Years [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ]
    Observer reported itch severity NRS was used for participants >=2 and < 12 years of age to assess severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD at the target lesion. Parents/caregivers (of participants) were asked to rate participants' itch (i.e. scratching, rubbing) at the worst moment during past 24 hours on a scale of 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable); higher scores represented more severe itch.

  7. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) in the Target Lesions Per Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Preferred Term [ Time Frame: Day 1 up to 35 days after end of treatment (maximum up to Day 50) ]
    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to end of study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. For this outcome measure, treatment-emergent AEs occurred at each treated target lesion were summarized. MedDRA version 22.1 coding dictionary was used.

  8. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) by Treatment Regimen [ Time Frame: Day 1 up to 35 days after end of treatment (maximum up to Day 50) ]
    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; Initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to end of study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   2 Years and older   (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female participants ages; Cohort 1: 12 years and older at the time of consent. Cohort 2: 2 years to under 12 years old at the time of consent.
  • Has confrimed clinical diagnosis of active AD according to Hanifin and Rajka criteria and has at least 6 months history prior to screening and has been clinically stable for more than 1 month
  • Has at least 1% and no more than 30% BSA at baseline/Day1, excluding scalp, genitals and groin area
  • Has a Investigator's static global assessment (ISGA) score of Mild (2) or Moderate (3) on Day 1.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has other acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition including recent (within the past year) or active suicidal ideation or behavior or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or investigational product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the participant inappropriate for entry into this study.
  • Participants had previous treatment with any topical or systemic PDE-4 inhibitor.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03954158


Locations
Layout table for location information
Japan
Medical Corporation Heishinkai OPHAC Hospital
Osaka-shi, Osaka, Japan, 532-0003
Fukuwa Clinic
Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 103-0027
Sekino Hospital
Toshima-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 171-0014
Sponsors and Collaborators
Pfizer
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center Pfizer
  Study Documents (Full-Text)

Documents provided by Pfizer:
Statistical Analysis Plan  [PDF] December 19, 2019
Study Protocol  [PDF] February 22, 2019

Additional Information:
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Pfizer
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03954158    
Other Study ID Numbers: C3291028
First Posted: May 17, 2019    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: July 14, 2020
Last Update Posted: July 14, 2020
Last Verified: July 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Yes
Plan Description: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
URL: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Dermatitis, Atopic
Dermatitis
Eczema
Skin Diseases
Skin Diseases, Genetic
Genetic Diseases, Inborn
Skin Diseases, Eczematous
Hypersensitivity, Immediate
Hypersensitivity
Immune System Diseases