This is the classic website, which will be retired eventually. Please visit the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov instead.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Use of ReDS Technology in Patients With Acute Heart Failure

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04305717
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : March 12, 2020
Last Update Posted : February 21, 2021
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Donna Mancini, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Brief Summary:

Background: Fluid overload, especially pulmonary congestion, is one of the main contributors into heart failure (HF) readmission risk and it is a clinical challenge for clinicians. The Remote dielectric sensing (ReDS) system is a novel electromagnetic energy-based technology that can accurately quantify changes in lung fluid concentration noninvasively. Previous non-randomized studies suggest that ReDS-guided management has the potential to reduce readmissions in HF patients recently discharged from the hospital.

Aims: To test whether a ReDS-guided strategy during HF admission is superior to the standard of care during a 1-month follow up.

Methods: The ReDS-SAFE HF trial is an investigator-initiated, single center, single blind, 2-arm randomized clinical trial, in which ~240 inpatients with acutely decompensated HF at Mount Sinai Hospital will be randomized to a) standard of care strategy, with a discharge scheme based on current clinical practice, or b) ReDS-guided strategy, with a discharge scheme based on specific target value given by the device on top of the current clinical practice. ReDS tests will be performed for all study patients, but results will be blinded for treating physicians in the "standard of care" arm. The primary outcome will be a composite of unplanned visit for HF that lead to the use of intravenous diuretics, hospitalization for worsening HF, or death from any cause at 30 days after discharge. Secondary outcomes including the components of the primary outcome alone, length of stay, quality of life, time-averaged proportional change in the natriuretic peptides plasma levels, and safety events as symptomatic hypotension, diselectrolytemias or worsening of renal function.

Conclusions: The ReDS-SAFE HF trial will help to clarify the efficacy of a ReDS-guided strategy during HF-admission to improve the short-term prognosis of patients after a HF admission.


Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Heart Failure Lung Congestion Device: ReDS-guided strategy Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

Heart failure (HF) is an increasing epidemic and a major public health priority, affecting more than 6 million patients in the United States of America (1). Specially, acutely decompensated HF (ADHF) is the most common cause of hospitalization in adults older than 65 years, and is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in pharmacological treatment and early follow-up programs in HF patients, readmission rates remain unacceptably high (2).

Fluid overload is a key feature in the pathophysiology of ADHF and residual congestion at the time of hospital discharge is one of the main contributors into readmission risk (3-5). Typically, fluid overload has been assessed through symptoms and signs, as well as other tools such as chest X-ray, plasma biomarkers, and echocardiography (6). However, these methods are subject to significant inter-observer variability and can be unreliable for various reasons. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that overt signs of clinical congestion correlate poorly with hemodynamic congestion assessed by invasive means. In recent years, invasive hemodynamic measurements to inform medical management of congestion facilitated by implantable pulmonary artery pressure sensors have been shown to reduce HF readmissions (7). Unfortunately, due to its invasive nature as well as reimbursement and insurance coverage issues, its widespread adoption has been limited.

Thus, the use of a non-invasive assessment of volume status to guide HF management and identify a state of "euvolemia" is an attractive tool, particularly during admission and early phase after discharge, which is a vulnerable period for recurrent congestion (8). The Remote dielectric sensing (ReDS) system is a novel electromagnetic energy-based technology that can accurately quantify changes in lung fluid concentration noninvasively (9). Though limited experience from non-randomized studies suggest that ReDS-guided management has the potential to reduce readmissions in ADHF patients recently discharged from the hospital (10, 11), nevertheless data to substantiate the employment of such as strategy is lacking. The study team hypothesizes that a ReDS-guided strategy to measure the percent of lung water volume as a surrogate of congestion during HF hospitalization will help to determine the appropriate timing of discharge and will accordingly be associated with a better short-term prognosis.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 240 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:

The ReDS-SAFE HF trial is a 2-arm randomized clinical trial, in which inpatients with ADHF will be randomized to:

  1. Standard of care strategy, with a discharge scheme based on current clinical practice, or
  2. ReDS-guided strategy, with a discharge scheme based on specific target value given by the device.
Masking: Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:

Participant masking: Patients will be blinded to the treatment groups. ReDS tests will be performed for all study patients, but due to the inherent characteristics of this design, only the treating physicians will be blinded in the "standard of care" arm.

Outcome assessor masking: Two independent cardiologist will assess the outcomes blinded to the intervention arm.

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Remote Dielectric Sensing (ReDS) for a SAFE Discharge in Patients With Acutely Decompensated Heart Failure: The ReDS-SAFE HF Study
Actual Study Start Date : August 14, 2020
Estimated Primary Completion Date : December 2021
Estimated Study Completion Date : December 2021

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Heart Failure

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: ReDS-guided strategy
For patients in this arm, daily measurements from the device will be revealed to the treating physician. Discharge can be planned when the clinical stability is achieved and the ReDS value is ≤35%. In case of a ReDS value >35%, treating physicians will follow a predefined algorithm before discharge to improve the results of ReDS test.
Device: ReDS-guided strategy
A discharge scheme based on specific target value given by the device

No Intervention: Standard of care strategy
The drugs dosage, especially diuretics, will be selected according to the presence of symptoms and signs of systemic congestion and according to current recommendations. All the daily ReDS measurements will be blinded to the treating physician.



Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Composite outcome [ Time Frame: 30 days after discharge ]
    A composite of unplanned visit for ADHF that lead to the use of intravenous diuretics, hospitalization for worsening HF, or death from any cause at 30 days after discharge.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Number of unplanned visits [ Time Frame: 30 days after discharge ]
    Unplanned visits for worsening HF will be defined as visits to the emergency department or unscheduled visits to the HF unit as a result of signs and/or symptoms of worsening HF that required iv diuretic treatment or diuretic increase with a hospital stay of <24 h.

  2. Number of unplanned hospitalizations [ Time Frame: 30 days after discharge ]
    Hospitalization for worsening HF will be defined as a stay in hospital for >24 h mainly as a result of signs and/or symptoms of worsening HF.

  3. Length of stay [ Time Frame: average of 7 days ]
    Length of stay of index hospitalization

  4. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) [ Time Frame: 7 days after discharge ]
    QoL evaluated by the KCCQ test which is a 23-item, self-administered instrument. Full scale range from 0-100, with higher scores reflecting better health status

  5. New York Heart Association functional class [ Time Frame: 7 days after discharge ]
    New York Heart Association functional classification from Class 1 (no symptom or limitation to Class IV (severe symptoms or severe limitation).

  6. Orthodema Scale [ Time Frame: 7 days after discharge ]
    Signs of systemic congestion by Orthodema scale. Full scale from 0 to 4, with higher score indicating worse health outcomes.

  7. Breathlessness Visual Analog Scale [ Time Frame: 7 days after discharge ]
    Signs of resolution of the breathlessness by visual analog scale. Full scale from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating better health outcomes.

  8. Change in NT-proBNP/BNP plasma levels [ Time Frame: baseline and 7 days after discharge ]
    Time-averaged proportional change in the NT-proBNP/BNP plasma levels at 7 days after discharge as compared from baseline

  9. Serum Potassium [ Time Frame: 7 days after discharge ]
    Serum potassium level to assess dyskalemia

  10. Change in Creatinine level [ Time Frame: baseline and 7 days after discharge ]
    Change in creatinine from at 7 days after discharge as compared to baseline

  11. Systolic arterial pressure [ Time Frame: 7 days after discharge ]
    Systolic arterial pressure to assess hypotension



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Currently hospitalized for a primary diagnosis of HF, including symptoms and signs of fluid overload, regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and a NT-proBNP concentration of ≥ 400 pg/L or a BNP concentration of ≥ 100 pg/L

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient characteristics excluded from approved use of ReDS system: height <155cm or >190cm, BMI <22 or >39
  • Patients discharged on inotropes, or with a left ventricular assist device or cardiac transplantation
  • Congenital heart malformations or intra-thoracic mass that would affect right-lung anatomy
  • End stage renal disease on hemodialysis
  • Life expectancy <12 months due to non-cardiac comorbidities
  • Participating in another randomized study

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04305717


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Donna M Mancini 212-241-7673 ext x47673 donna.mancini@mountsinai.org
Contact: Danielle Brunjes 212-241-9886 danielle.brunjes@mountsinai.org

Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, New York
Mount Sinai Hospital Recruiting
New York, New York, United States, 10029
Contact: Danielle Brunjes    212-241-9886    danielle.brunjes@mountsinai.org   
Principal Investigator: Donna M Mancini         
Sponsors and Collaborators
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Donna M Mancini Icahn School of Medicine
Publications:
Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, Das SR, Delling FN, Djousse L, Elkind MSV, Ferguson JF, Fornage M, Jordan LC, Khan SS, Kissela BM, Knutson KL, Kwan TW, Lackland DT, Lewis TT, Lichtman JH, Longenecker CT, Loop MS, Lutsey PL, Martin SS, Matsushita K, Moran AE, Mussolino ME, O'Flaherty M, Pandey A, Perak AM, Rosamond WD, Roth GA, Sampson UKA, Satou GM, Schroeder EB, Shah SH, Spartano NL, Stokes A, Tirschwell DL, Tsao CW, Turakhia MP, VanWagner LB, Wilkins JT, Wong SS, Virani SS; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):e56-e528. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659. No abstract available. Erratum In: Circulation. 2020 Jan 14;141(2):e33.
Barghash MH, Lala A, Giustino G, Parikh A, Ullman J, Mitter SS, et al. Use of Remote Dielectric Sensing (ReDS) as Point-of-Care Testing Following Heart Failure Hospitalization and Risk of 30-Day Readmission. J Hear Lung Transplant. 2019;38(4):S140-1

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Donna Mancini, Professor, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04305717    
Other Study ID Numbers: GCO 19-2678
First Posted: March 12, 2020    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: February 21, 2021
Last Verified: February 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: Yes
Keywords provided by Donna Mancini, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai:
Clinical trial
Lung congestion
Heart failure
Diuretics
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Heart Failure
Heart Diseases
Cardiovascular Diseases