This is the classic website, which will be retired eventually. Please visit the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov instead.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

A Study of Guselkumab in Participants With Active Lupus Nephritis (ORCHID-LN)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04376827
Recruitment Status : Terminated (Due to enrollment challenges, J&J Innovative Medicine decided to stop screening and terminate the study early. This decision was not based on a safety concern.)
First Posted : May 6, 2020
Results First Posted : April 16, 2024
Last Update Posted : April 16, 2024
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab in participants with active lupus nephritis (LN).

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Lupus Nephritis Drug: Guselkumab Dose 1 Drug: Placebo Drug: Guselkumab Dose 2 Drug: Standard-of-care treatment Phase 2

Detailed Description:
Guselkumab is a monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds to human interleukin (IL)-23 with high affinity and blocks binding of extracellular IL-23 to cell surface IL-23 receptor, inhibiting IL 23 specific intracellular signaling and subsequent activation and cytokine production. It is used in treatment of plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, generalized pustular psoriasis, erythrodermic psoriasis. Lupus is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease with lesions confined to skin (cutaneous lupus erythematosus [CLE]) to others that involve 1 or more vital internal organs (systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE]). Renal involvement due to SLE is termed lupus nephritis (LN). There is a high unmet need for new treatment options in LN that are safe and effective, especially new therapies that can provide improved long-term efficacy over currently available therapies. This study will evaluate safety and efficacy of guselkumab added to standard-of-care compared to placebo added to standard-of-care. Total duration of study is up to 68 weeks: a less than or equal to 8 week screening period, a 48 week double-blind treatment period, a 12 week safety follow-up period after last dose. Participants who complete the assessments at Week 52 and have achieved complete renal response (CRR) may have the option to participate in the long-term extension (LTE) of study through Week 152 and the 12-week safety follow-up visit. Hypothesis of this study is that guselkumab plus standard-of-care is superior to placebo plus standard-of-care in participants with active LN as measured by the proportion of participants inducing at least a 50 percentage reduction of proteinuria with protocol specified steroid tapering regimen at Week 24. Safety assessments include Adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory tests (hematology and chemistry), systolic and diastolic blood pressures over time, monitoring for hypersensitivity reactions, AEs temporally associated with infusion, injection-site reactions, suicidality assessment, and early detection of active tuberculosis (TB).

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 33 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study of Guselkumab in Subjects With Active Lupus Nephritis
Actual Study Start Date : September 15, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date : February 1, 2023
Actual Study Completion Date : February 1, 2023

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

Drug Information available for: Guselkumab

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Guselkumab+Standard of Care
Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 1 intravenously (IV) at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and guselkumab Dose 2 subcutaneous (SC) every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52 and have completed the Week 52 assessment may have the option to participate in the long-term extension (LTE).
Drug: Guselkumab Dose 1
Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 1 via IV administration.
Other Name: CNTO 1959

Drug: Guselkumab Dose 2
Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 2 via SC route.
Other Name: CNTO1959

Drug: Standard-of-care treatment
Participants will receive standard of care treatment including MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids from Week 12 through Week 48.

Placebo Comparator: Placebo+Standard of Care
Participants will receive placebo IV at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo SC q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52 and have completed the Week 52 assessment may have the option to participate in the LTE of the study.
Drug: Placebo
Participants will receive placebo IV at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 (that is, 3 IV doses) and placebo SC q4w from Week 12 through Week 48.

Drug: Standard-of-care treatment
Participants will receive standard of care treatment including MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids from Week 12 through Week 48.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50 Percent (%) Decrease From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Week 24 ]
    Percentage of participants achieving at least 50% decrease in proteinuria from baseline at Week 24 was reported. Proteinuria analysis was based on urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) and was defined as the presence of an excess of serum proteins in the urine, which may be an early sign of kidney disease.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Renal Response (CRR) at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Week 24 ]
    Percentage of participants who achieved CRR at Week 24 were reported. CRR was defined as UPCR less than (<) 0.5 milligrams per milligrams (mg/mg), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) greater than or equal to (>=) 60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square (mL/min/1.73m^2) or no confirmed decrease >=20% from baseline and prednisone dose less than or equal to (<=) 10 milligrams per day (mg/d). Participant was considered as achieved CRR who did not discontinue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to LN or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure (OM) time point (Week 24) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the endpoint time point (Week 24).

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CRR at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Week 52 ]
    Percentage of participants who achieved CRR at Week 52 were reported. CRR was defined as UPCR less than (<) 0.5 mg/mg, eGFR >= 60 mL/min/1.73m^2 or no confirmed decrease >=20% from baseline and prednisone dose <= 10 mg/d. Participant was considered as achieved CRR who did not discontinue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to LN or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52).

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Sustained Reduction in Steroid Dose <=10 mg/d of Prednisone or Equivalent From Week 16 Through Week 24 [ Time Frame: From Week 16 through Week 24 ]
    Percentage of participants achieving a sustained reduction in steroid dose less than or equal to (<=) 10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent from week 16 through Week 24were reported.

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50% Decrease in Proteinuria From Baseline at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Week 52 ]
    Percentage of participants achieving at least 50% decrease in proteinuria from baseline at Week 52 were reported. Proteinuria analysis was based on urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) and was defined as the presence of an excess of serum proteins in the urine, which may be an early sign of kidney disease.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) < 0.5 mg/mg at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Week 24 ]
    Percentage of participants with UPCR <0.5 mg/mg at Week 24 were reported.

  6. Percentage of Participants With UPCR < 0.75 mg/mg at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Week 24 ]
    Percentage of participants with UPCR less than 0.75 mg/mg at Week 24 were reported.

  7. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CRR Through Week 24 [ Time Frame: Up to Week 24 ]
    Percentage of participants who achieved CRR through Week 24 was reported. CRR was defined as UPCR<0.5 mg/mg, eGFR >= 60 mL/min/1.73m^2 or no confirmed decrease>=20% from baseline and prednisone dose <= 10 mg/d. Participant was considered as achieved CRR who did not discontinue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to lupus nephritis (LN) or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 24) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 24).

  8. Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure (TF) Through Week 52 [ Time Frame: Up to Week 52 ]
    Percentage of participants with TF through Week 52 was reported. TF was defined as time to the first occurrence of TF from baseline. Participant was considered to have treatment failure, who did not continue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to LN or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52).

  9. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) [ Time Frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96) ]
    Number of participants with AEs were reported. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product.

  10. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [ Time Frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96) ]
    Number of Participants with SAEs were reported. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product. A SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product, or was medically important.

  11. Number of Participants With Related AEs [ Time Frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96) ]
    Number of participants with related AEs were reported. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product. Related AE was defined as the AE assessed by the investigator related to study agent.

  12. Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study Intervention [ Time Frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96) ]
    Number of participants with AEs leading to discontinuation of study intervention were reported.

  13. Number of Participants With Infections [ Time Frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96) ]
    Number of participants with infections as assessed by the investigator were reported.

  14. Number of Participants With Serious Infections [ Time Frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96) ]
    Number of participants with serious infections as assessed by the investigator were reported.

  15. Number of Participants With Infections Requiring Oral or Parenteral Antimicrobial Treatment [ Time Frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96) ]
    Number of participants with infections requiring oral or parenteral antimicrobial treatment planned to be were reported.

  16. Number of Participants With AEs Temporally Associated With an Infusion [ Time Frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96) ]
    Number of participants with AEs temporally (a reaction that occurred during or within 1 hour after infusion) associated with an infusion were reported. AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product.

  17. Number of Participants With AEs With Injection-site Reactions [ Time Frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96) ]
    Number of participants with injection-site reactions as assessed by the investigator were reported. An injection-site reaction is any adverse reaction at a SC study intervention injection-site.

  18. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: activated partial thromboplastin time was reported.

  19. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Basophils [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: basophils was reported.

  20. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Eosinophils [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: eosinophils was reported.

  21. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular hemoglobin was reported.

  22. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume was reported.

  23. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: erythrocytes was reported.

  24. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hematocrit [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical Laboratory parameter: hematocrit was reported.

  25. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hemoglobin [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: hemoglobin was reported.

  26. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter Leukocytes [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: leukocytes was reported.

  27. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Lymphocytes [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: lymphocytes was reported.

  28. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Monocytes [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: monocytes was reported.

  29. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hematology Parameter: Segmented Neutrophils [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: segmented neutrophils was reported.

  30. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Platelets [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: platelets was reported.

  31. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: prothrombin international normalized ratio was reported.

  32. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin Time [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: prothrombin time was reported.

  33. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory hematology parameter:reticulocytes/erythrocytes was reported.

  34. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alanine Aminotransferase [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: alanine aminotransferase was reported.

  35. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Albumin [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: albumin was reported.

  36. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alkaline Phosphatase [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: alkaline phosphatase was reported.

  37. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Aspartate Aminotransferase [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: aspartate aminotransferase was reported.

  38. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Bicarbonate [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: bicarbonate was reported.

  39. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Bilirubin [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: bilirubin was reported.

  40. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Calcium [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: calcium was reported.

  41. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Chloride [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: chloride was reported.

  42. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Cholesterol [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: cholesterol was reported.

  43. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Creatine Kinase [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: creatine kinase was reported.

  44. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Creatinine [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: creatinine was reported.

  45. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Protein [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: protein was reported.

  46. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Phosphate [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: phosphate was reported.

  47. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Sodium [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: sodium was reported.

  48. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Potassium [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: potassium was reported.

  49. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Urea Nitrogen [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: urea nitrogen was reported.

  50. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) From Creatinine Adjusted for Body Surface Area (BSA) [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: GFR from Creatinine Adjusted for BSA was reported.

  51. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Gamma Glutamyl and Transferase Lactate Dehydrogenase [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: gamma glutamyl transferase and lactate dehydrogenase were reported.

  52. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glucose and Magnesium [ Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24, 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: glucose and magnesium were reported.

  53. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Protein [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: protein was reported.

  54. Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Protein/Creatinine [ Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52 ]
    Change from baseline in chemistry parameter: protein/creatinine was reported.

  55. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Urate [ Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24, 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: urate was reported.

  56. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Urine Protein [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52 ]
    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: urine protein was reported.

  57. Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry [ Time Frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96) ]
    Number of participants with maximum US NCI-CTCAE toxicity grade (Grade 4) in clinical laboratory parameters: hematology and chemistry were reported. Toxicity were graded as Grade 1: Mild, Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe. Grade 4: Life-threatening and Grade 5: Death.

  58. Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure [ Time Frame: Up to Week 60 ]
    Percentage of participants with abnormal vital signs: Systolic and Diastolic blood pressure were reported.

  59. Serum Concentration of Guselkumab [ Time Frame: Predose: Weeks 0,4,8,12,16,20,24, 36; Post-dose: Week 0 (1 hour after intravenous administration), Day 2, Week 52 and 60 ]
    Serum Concentration of guselkumab were reported.

  60. Number of Participants With Treatment-boosted Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response [ Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 0) through Week 24 and Week 60 ]
    Treatment-boosted ADA positive participants: participants who were positive at baseline and whose titers increased 2-fold at any time after treatment. Titer values were categorized as<=1:10, 10 to 100, 100 to 1000, >1000.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 75 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At screening and randomization, must be receiving oral glucocorticoids at minimum prednisone equivalent dose of 10 milligrams per day (mg/day) and maximum 1 mg/kg/day or less than or equal to (<=) 60 mg/day, whichever is lower. Treated for greater than or equal to (>=) 6 weeks with stable dosing >=2 weeks before randomization
  • If receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), a stable dose for at least 2 weeks prior to randomization
  • Positive antinuclear antibody (ANA; >= 1:80 titer by central laboratory test) or anti-double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (dsDNA) antibodies (>=30 international units per milliliter ([U/mL] by central laboratory test) detected at screening
  • Kidney biopsy documentation of active International Society of Nephrology (ISN)/Renal Pathology Society (RPS) proliferative nephritis: Class III-IV (with or without class V membranous nephritis) within the last 6 months prior to screening or performed during screening
  • Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) >= 1.0 milligram/milligram (mg/mg) assessed on 2 first morning urine void specimens during screening. These 2 specimens do not need to be on consecutive days, however, 2 samples must be tested with UPCR >= 1.0 mg/mg in a row. The UPCR requirement must be met after at least 8 weeks of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) treatment, and after stable glucocorticoid dosing is achieved at the dose intended at time of randomization

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Comorbidities (other than lupus nephritis [LN], example, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) which have required 3 or more courses of systemic glucocorticoids within the previous 12 months
  • Has other inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of efficacy, including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), RA/lupus overlap, psoriasis, Crohn's disease, or active Lyme disease
  • Received PO (orally) or intravenously (IV) cyclophosphamide within 3 months prior to randomization
  • History of latent or active granulomatous infection, including histoplasmosis or coccidioidomycosis, before screening
  • History of being human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody-positive, or tests positive for HIV at screening

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04376827


Locations
Show Show 60 study locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Director: Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial Janssen Research & Development, LLC
  Study Documents (Full-Text)

Documents provided by Janssen Research & Development, LLC:
Study Protocol  [PDF] May 24, 2022
Statistical Analysis Plan  [PDF] August 16, 2022

Additional Information:
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Janssen Research & Development, LLC
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04376827    
Other Study ID Numbers: CR108766
2018-003155-38 ( EudraCT Number )
CNTO1959LUN2001 ( Other Identifier: Janssen Research & Development, LLC )
First Posted: May 6, 2020    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: April 16, 2024
Last Update Posted: April 16, 2024
Last Verified: March 2024
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Yes
Plan Description: The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu
URL: https://www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: Yes
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Nephritis
Lupus Nephritis
Kidney Diseases
Urologic Diseases
Female Urogenital Diseases
Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Urogenital Diseases
Male Urogenital Diseases
Glomerulonephritis
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Connective Tissue Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
Immune System Diseases
Antibodies, Monoclonal
Immunologic Factors
Physiological Effects of Drugs