This is the classic website, which will be retired eventually. Please visit the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov instead.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

A Study of Atezolizumab and Tiragolumab Compared With Durvalumab in Participants With Locally Advanced, Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) (SKYSCRAPER-03)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04513925
Recruitment Status : Active, not recruiting
First Posted : August 14, 2020
Last Update Posted : February 28, 2024
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Hoffmann-La Roche

Study Description
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab in combination with tiragolumab compared with durvalumab in participants with locally advanced, unresectable Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have received at least two cycles of concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and have not had radiographic disease progression.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Drug: Atezolizumab Drug: Tiragolumab Drug: Durvalumab Phase 3

Study Design
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 829 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized Study of Atezolizumab and Tiragolumab Compared With Durvalumab in Patients With Locally Advanced, Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Not Progressed After Concurrent Platinum-Based Chemoradiation
Actual Study Start Date : August 24, 2020
Estimated Primary Completion Date : October 30, 2024
Estimated Study Completion Date : December 30, 2027

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Lung Cancer

Arms and Interventions
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab
Participants will receive atezolizumab administered intravenously (IV) on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle followed by tiragolumab administered IV on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle for a maximum of 13 cycles.
 Drug: Atezolizumab
Atezolizumab 1680 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) will be administered IV on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle.
Other Name: Tecentriq; RO5541267

Drug: Tiragolumab
Tiragolumab 840 mg Q4W will be administered IV on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle.
Other Name: MTIG7192A; RO7092284
Active Comparator: Durvalumab
Participants will receive durvalumab administered IV during each 28-day cycle for a maximum of 13 cycles.
 Drug: Durvalumab
Durvalumab will be administered based on weight at 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks (Q2W) on Days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle, or will be administered at a fixed dose of 1500 mg IV every 4 weeks (Q4W) (for participants whose weight >/= 30 kg) on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle.


Outcome Measures
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Independent Review Facility (IRF)-assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS) in the PD-L1-positive Analysis Set (PPAS) [ Time Frame: From randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 114 months) ]
  2. IRF-assessed PFS in the Full Analysis Set (FAS) [ Time Frame: From randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 114 months) ]

Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Overall Survival (OS) in the PPAS [ Time Frame: From randomization to death from any cause (up to approximately 114 months) ]
  2. Investigator-assessed PFS in the PPAS [ Time Frame: Time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first first (up to approximately 114 months) ]
  3. IRF-assessed Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the PPAS [ Time Frame: From randomization up to approximately 114 months ]
  4. Investigator-assessed Confirmed ORR in the PPAS [ Time Frame: From randomization up to approximately 114 months ]
  5. IRF-assessed Duration of Response (DOR) in the PPAS [ Time Frame: From first occurrence of a documented objective response to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 114 months) ]
  6. Investigator-assessed DOR in the PPAS [ Time Frame: From first occurrence of a documented objective response to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 114 months) ]
  7. Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core (QLQ-C30) Score in the PPAS [ Time Frame: Up to approximately 114 months ]
    TTCD using EORTC QLQ-C30 is an initial 10-point decrease in global health status (GHS) and physical functioning from baseline that must be held for all subsequent assessment timepoints or followed by death attributable to cancer progression. EORTC QLQ-C30: a self-reported measure, consisting of 30 questions that assess 5 aspects of participants functioning (physical, emotional, role, cognitive and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting and pain), GHS and quality of life (QoL), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties) with a recall period of the previous week. Functioning items are scored on a 4-point scale: 1=Not at all to 4=Very much, with higher score indicating worse outcome. Symptom items (GHS and QoL) are scored on a 7-point scale: 1=Very poor to 7=Excellent. Scores will be linearly transformed with a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.

  8. OS in the FAS [ Time Frame: From randomization to death from any cause (up to approximately 114 months) ]
  9. Investigator-assessed PFS in the FAS [ Time Frame: Time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first first (up to approximately 114 months) ]
  10. IRF-assessed Confirmed ORR in the FAS [ Time Frame: From randomization up to approximately 114 months ]
  11. Investigator-assessed Confirmed ORR in the FAS [ Time Frame: From randomization up to approximately 114 months ]
  12. IRF-assessed DOR in the FAS [ Time Frame: From first occurrence of a documented objective response to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 114 months) ]
  13. Investigator-assessed DOR in the FAS [ Time Frame: From first occurrence of a documented objective response to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 114 months) ]
  14. TTCD Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-C30 Score in the FAS [ Time Frame: Up to approximately 114 months ]
    TTCD using EORTC QLQ-C30 is an initial 10-point decrease in global health status (GHS) and physical functioning from baseline that must be held for all subsequent assessment timepoints or followed by death attributable to cancer progression. EORTC QLQ-C30: a self-reported measure, consisting of 30 questions that assess 5 aspects of participants functioning (physical, emotional, role, cognitive and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting and pain), GHS and quality of life (QoL), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties) with a recall period of the previous week. Functioning items are scored on a 4-point scale: 1=Not at all to 4=Very much, with higher score indicating worse outcome. Symptom items (GHS and QoL) are scored on a 7-point scale: 1=Very poor to 7=Excellent. Scores will be linearly transformed with a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.

  15. IRF-assessed PFS Rates at 12 Months, 18 Months and 24 Months in the PPAS [ Time Frame: 12, 18 and 24 months ]
  16. IRF-assessed PFS Rates at 12 Months, 18 Months and 24 Months in the FAS [ Time Frame: 12, 18 and 24 months ]
  17. Investigator-assessed PFS Rates at 12 Months, 18 Months and 24 Months in the PPAS [ Time Frame: 12, 18 and 24 months ]
  18. Investigator-assessed PFS Rates at 12 Months, 18 Months and 24 Months in the FAS [ Time Frame: 12, 18 and 24 months ]
  19. OS Rates at 12 Months, 24 Months, 36 Months and 48 Months in the PPAS [ Time Frame: 12, 24, 36 and 48 months ]
  20. OS Rates at 12 Months, 24 Months, 36 Months and 48 Months in the FAS [ Time Frame: 12, 24, 36 and 48 months ]
  21. Investigator-assessed Time to Death or Distant Metastasis (TTDM) in the PPAS [ Time Frame: From randomization until the first date of distant metastasis or death in the absence of distant metastasis (up to approximately 114 months) ]
  22. Investigator-assessed TTDM in the FAS [ Time Frame: From randomization until the first date of distant metastasis or death in the absence of distant metastasis (up to approximately 114 months) ]
  23. Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events [ Time Frame: Up to approximately 114 months ]

Eligibility Criteria
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1
  • Histologically or cytologically documented NSCLC with locally advanced, unresectable Stage III NSCLC of either squamous or non-squamous histology
  • Whole-body Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) scan, performed prior and within 42 days of the first dose of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT)
  • At least two prior cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy administered concurrently with radiotherapy (RT), which must be completed within 1 to 42 days prior to randomization in the study (one cycle of cCRT is defined as 21 or 28 days)
  • The radiotherapy (RT) component in the cCRT must have been at a total dose of radiation of 60 (±10 percent [%]) gray (Gy) (54 Gy to 66 Gy) administered by intensity modulated RT (preferred) or 3D-conforming technique
  • No progression during or following concurrent platinum-based CRT
  • A known PD-L1 result
  • Life expectancy >/= 12 weeks
  • Adequate hematologic and end-organ function
  • Female participants must be willing to avoid pregnancy for 90 days after the final dose of tiragolumab and 5 months after the final dose of atezolizumab, or for 3 months after the final dose of durvalumab
  • Male participants must remain abstinent or use a condom during the treatment period and for 90 days after the final dose of tiragolumab
  • Male participants must not donate sperm during the treatment period and for 90 days after the final dose of tiragolumab

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any history of prior NSCLC and/or any history of prior treatment for NSCLC (participants must be newly diagnosed with unresectable Stage III disease)
  • NSCLC known to have a mutation in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene or an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion oncogene
  • Any evidence of Stage IV disease
  • Treatment with sequential CRT for locally advanced NSCLC
  • Participants with locally advanced NSCLC who have progressed during or after the definitive cCRT prior to randomization
  • Any Grade >2 unresolved toxicity from previous CRT
  • Grade >= 2 pneumonitis from prior CRT
  • Active or history of autoimmune disease or immune deficiency
  • History of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, organizing pneumonia, drug-induced pneumonitis, or idiopathic pneumonitis or evidence of active pneumonitis
  • History of malignancy other than NSCLC within 5 years prior to screening with the exception of malignancies with a negligible risk of metastasis or death
  • Prior allogeneic stem cell or solid organ transplantation
  • Active Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection or known or suspected chronic active EBV infection at screening
  • Treatment with investigational therapy within 28 days prior to initiation of study treatment
  • Prior treatment with CD137 agonists or immune checkpoint blockade therapies, including anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4, anti-T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (anti-TIGIT), anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1
  • Any prior Grade >/= 3 immune-mediated adverse event or any unresolved Grade > 1 immune-mediated adverse event while receiving any previous immunotherapy agent other than immune checkpoint blockade agents
  • Treatment with systemic immunosuppressive medication
  • Women who are pregnant, or breastfeeding
Contacts and Locations
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04513925


Locations
Show Show 202 study locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
Hoffmann-La Roche
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Director: Clinical Trials Hoffmann-La Roche
More Information
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Hoffmann-La Roche
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04513925    
Other Study ID Numbers: GO41854
2019-004773-29 ( EudraCT Number )
First Posted: August 14, 2020    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: February 28, 2024
Last Verified: February 2024
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Yes
Plan Description: Qualified researchers may request access to individual patient level data through the clinical study data request platform (www.vivli.org). Further details on Roche's criteria for eligible studies are available here (https://vivli.org/members/ourmembers/). For further details on Roche's Global Policy on the Sharing of Clinical Information and how to request access to related clinical study documents, see here (https://www.roche.com/research_and_development/who_we_are_how_we_work/clinical_trials/our_commitment_to_data_sharing.htm).

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Lung Neoplasms
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Respiratory Tract Neoplasms
Thoracic Neoplasms
Neoplasms by Site
Neoplasms
Lung Diseases
Respiratory Tract Diseases
 Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Bronchial Neoplasms
Atezolizumab
Durvalumab
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
Antineoplastic Agents