Effects of Postural Education or Corrective Exercise on Forward Head Posture
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05321654 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : April 11, 2022
Last Update Posted : April 11, 2022
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Postural; Defect | Behavioral: Education for Behavior Modification Behavioral: Corrective Exercise Program | Not Applicable |
A total of 94 participants responded to invitations to voluntarily participate and completed the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q+), followed by a questionnaire to rate their current stage of change (SOC) from the Transtheoretical Model adapted to assess exercise/postural modification behavior change (this will be discussed further in eligibility section). On this questionnaire, participants also responded to a yes/no question regarding if they have had a recent injury to their head, shoulders, or spine; or have ever been diagnosed with a pathology related to their cervical/thoracic spine or extremities, as part of exclusion criteria for the study. Participants then underwent a head posture screening performed by the primary investigator who is a licensed physical therapist in the Liberty University Biomechanics & Motion Analysis Laboratory with the use of photogrammetry (use of a digital camera and software to measure posture) as described below.
Participants were asked to arrive at the lab wearing either a tank top or t-shirt, as well as to have their hair tied back if necessary. Height and weight were measured using a digital scale (Health-o-meter Professional, model 500KL, McCook, IL). Participants were instructed to sit comfortably on a stool with hands resting approximately two-thirds down their thighs with palms supinated and feet flat on the ground with hips and knees at 90 degrees; and to look straight ahead at an opposite wall in the laboratory. A digital camera (Canon Powershot, model SX540, Tokyo, Japan) was mounted and leveled on a tripod (Manfrotto, model 055, Cassola, IT) and placed three meters away from the subject. Two photographs were taken of participant's posture. Immediately after data capture, image files were uploaded into Kinovea video analysis software (version 8.15) for CVA assessment. CVA assessment will be discussed further in outcome measures section.
Seventy-nine participants met inclusion criteria (discussed in detail in future section) and were enrolled in the study. Randomization of participant group assignments was completed by the PI using a block randomization generator. Utilizing a sequence created by the block randomizer, the PI placed participants who met inclusion criteria into one of four groups: postural education (PE; n = 20), self-myofascial release + stretching (SMRS; n = 20), self-myofascial release + stretching + strengthening (SMRSS; n = 19), and control group (CG; n = 20). Details of these groups will be provided in future sections. A hard-copy of the sequence generator report was kept concealed in a manila folder and was only opened by the PI during group delegation.
Intervention duration was 4 weeks. Two weeks into the study, participants in intervention groups completed a mid-study questionnaire to assess intervention compliance. At the end of the study (after the completion of 4 weeks) participants in intervention groups completed a post-study questionnaire to assess intervention compliance. All study participants were asked to return back to the Biomechanics laboratory after the completion of the 4 week intervention period to undergo follow-up posture screening, which followed the same posture assessment procedures as described above.
Declarations of interest: This study was part of the requirements for completion of a Ph.D. dissertation (Concordia University Chicago) by David Titcomb, DPT.
Conflicts of interest: none.
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 79 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Intervention Model Description: | A prospective parallel randomized controlled trial with repeated measures |
| Masking: | None (Open Label) |
| Primary Purpose: | Prevention |
| Official Title: | The Effects of Postural Education or Corrective Exercise Intervention on the Craniovertebral Angle in Young Adults With Forward Head Posture: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| Actual Study Start Date : | August 26, 2021 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | November 4, 2021 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | November 4, 2021 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Posture Education (PE) Group
PE group members received a 20-minute in-person one-on-one standardized educational session by a research team member in the laboratory on the following topics: health risks associated with forward head posture; postural guidelines for using mobile electronic devices, desktop computers, and laptop computers; as well as rest break guidelines. Participants were asked to adhere to the postural guidelines provided in the educational session for the next 4 weeks.
|
Behavioral: Education for Behavior Modification
Please see arm description for a detailed description of the intervention |
|
Experimental: Self-Myofascial Release + Stretching (SMRS) Group
This group applied self-myofascial release (SMR) to their thoracic spine with a myofascial roller for 30 sec., then 6 repetitions of myofascial rolling for 90 sec. They applied SMR for 30 sec. to their neck flexors and extensors using their fingertips. They applied SMR to the upper trapezius and pectoralis for 30 sec using a soft tissue mobilization tool. For the first 2 weeks, they performed SMR 3x/wk. During wks. 3 and 4, they progressed SMR to 5 days/wk. Group members also performed stretching to these same muscles after SMR 3 days/wk for the first 2 weeks of the study, progressing to 5 days/wk during weeks 3 and 4.
|
Behavioral: Corrective Exercise Program
Please see arm description for a detailed description of the intervention |
|
Experimental: Self-Myofascial Release + Stretching + Strengthening (SMRSS) Group
This group performed the same protocol as SMRS group, as well as include the following strengthening exercises: the supine chin tuck (SCT), upper thoracic-lower cervical extension (UTLCE) using an exercise band that provided 5.5 pounds of resistance, and a single-arm row with trunk rotation (SARTR) using exercise tubing that provided 20 pounds of resistance. The SCT was progressed in 3 phases: Week 1: chin tuck held 2 sec., 5 reps. Week 2: same as week 1, but included us of a towel roll placed under the head. Wks. 3 and 4: chin tuck with head lift 1 in., 2 sec. hold. UTLCE: neck extension with exercise band, held 2 sec. SARTR: single arm row with trunk rotation was performed in a controlled and fluid manner using a self-selected speed. The UTLCE and SARTR were performed with 1 X 10 reps for wks 1-2 and progressed to 2 X10 reps in wks 3-4. Strengthening exercises were performed 3x/wk. for 4 wks.
|
Behavioral: Corrective Exercise Program
Please see arm description for a detailed description of the intervention |
|
No Intervention: Control Group (CG)
Participants in the CG did not receive an intervention.
|
- Change in Craniovertebral Angle after 4 weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline: On day 1 of study enrollment; Post-Intervention: Within 5 days after the end of the 4 week intervention period ]The angle between the intersection of two lines drawn on the photograph: the first line drawn from the tragus of the ear to the spinous process of C7 vertebrae and the second line drawn horizontally through C7 spinous process. In this study, a second researcher directly observed the primary investigator performing each CVA assessment, as well as provided verbal agreement with the accuracy of angle measurement. For each participant, the CVA was derived by taking the mean of two CVA measurements that were assessed on the captured photographs.
- Midpoint Intervention Compliance [ Time Frame: Assessed at the start of week 3 ]On a questionnaire, participants were asked to rate their compliance with their assigned intervention guidelines. Consistent. 75% adherence to guidelines; Moderately Consistent. 50 to 75% adherence to guidelines; Inconsistent. Less than 50% adherence to guidelines.
- Endpoint Intervention Compliance [ Time Frame: Within 5 days after the end of the 4 week intervention period. ]On a questionnaire, participants were asked to rate their compliance with their assigned intervention guidelines. Consistent. 75% adherence to guidelines; Moderately Consistent. 50 to 75% adherence to guidelines; Inconsistent. Less than 50% adherence to guidelines.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 29 Years (Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Completion of informed consent
- Craniovertebral angle ≤ 53 degrees
- Self-rating of Transtheoretical Model stage of change stage ≥ 3/5
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any musculoskeletal injury to the head, shoulders, or spine within the last six months
- Diagnosis of pathology related to the cervical spine, thoracic spine, or upper extremities
- Non-clearance for physical activity based on results of the 2020 PAR-Q+ questionnaire
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT05321654
| United States, Virginia | |
| Liberty University | |
| Lynchburg, Virginia, United States, 24515 | |
| Principal Investigator: | David A Titcomb, DPT | Liberty University | |
| Study Chair: | Bridget F Melton, EdD | Concordia University Chicago | |
| Study Director: | Theresa Miyashita, PhD | Concordia University Chicago | |
| Study Director: | Helen W Bland, PhD | Concordia University Chicago |
Documents provided by Dr. David Titcomb, Liberty University:
| Responsible Party: | Dr. David Titcomb, Professor of Health Sciences, Liberty University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT05321654 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
IRB-FY20-21-1073 UR2201 ( Other Grant/Funding Number: Liberty University Center for Research & Scholarship ) |
| First Posted: | April 11, 2022 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | April 11, 2022 |
| Last Verified: | April 2022 |
| Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
| Plan to Share IPD: | Yes |
| Plan Description: | All collected IPD that underlie results in a publication. |
| Supporting Materials: |
Study Protocol Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) Informed Consent Form (ICF) Clinical Study Report (CSR) Analytic Code |
| Time Frame: | Starting immediately after publication. No end date. |
| Access Criteria: | The primary investigator will review requests received by email. Requests granted to researchers and/or research institutions for the purpose of future research studies. The Liberty University Institutional Review Board will also be notified prior to releasing IPD and/or supporting information. Rather than a URL, individuals interested in IPD and/or supporting information will contact the primary investigator by email, which will be provided in the publication along with a statement about the plan to share IPD. |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
|
Forward Head Posture Craniovertebral Angle Corrective Exercise Program Postural Education |