Mesh Removal Versus No Mesh Removal for Chronic Groin Pain After Inguinal Hernia Repair
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05484635 |
Recruitment Status :
Recruiting
First Posted : August 2, 2022
Last Update Posted : August 25, 2023
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
This study is evaluating the management of chronic post-operative inguinal hernia pain and the impact of hernia mesh removal after previous minimally invasive inguinal hernia repairs.
The study aims are to evaluate the change in chronic (>6 months), nociceptive, postoperative inguinal pain after mesh removal compared to no mesh removal in patients who have previously undergone minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair with pre-peritoneal mesh.
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Chronic Groin Pain Hernia, Inguinal | Procedure: Diagnostic laparoscopy and inguinal mesh removal Procedure: Diagnostic laparoscopy | Not Applicable |
This is a double-blinded, parallel (1:1) group, randomized-controlled, superiority trial. Patients will be blinded to their treatment allocation and will understand that by entering the study, they may receive diagnostic laparoscopy only in which case their mesh will not be removed. However, they will be allowed to consider crossing over to the mesh removal group 6 months or later after surgery if they do not have adequate pain relief. Patients will receive written and oral descriptions of the trial and will be provided time to review written documentation in private. Written and oral consent will be obtained, and patients will understand that their participation is voluntary and refusal to participate will not affect future medical care. Patients may also withdraw from the trial at any point throughout the study period.
The Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, a center within the Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute (DDSI), at Cleveland Clinic Foundation Main Campus in Cleveland, Ohio is the hosting department for this study. Cleveland Clinic - Hillcrest Hospital in Mayfield Heights, Ohio will also be a participating center in this study. Fellowship-trained surgeons with expertise in complex abdominal wall reconstruction and mesh removal will perform the operations. If enrollment fails to meet necessary accrual size within the study timeframe, additional centers may be invited to participate.
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Estimated Enrollment : | 70 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Crossover Assignment |
Masking: | Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | Mesh Removal Versus No Mesh Removal for Chronic Groin Pain After Minimally Invasive Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
Actual Study Start Date : | July 25, 2022 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | July 1, 2024 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | January 1, 2025 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Diagnostic laparoscopy
Minimally invasive incisions will be made, and a diagnostic laparoscopy will be performed. The surgeon will evaluate the mesh configuration, ensuring proper positioning, perform adhesiolysis if indicated for bowel involvement with the mesh and assess the abdomen for alternative sources of chronic pain.
|
Procedure: Diagnostic laparoscopy
Surgical examination through laparoscopy without removal of mesh |
Experimental: Laparoscopic mesh removal
Minimally invasive incisions will be made, and a diagnostic laparoscopy will be performed. The surgeon will evaluate the mesh configuration, ensuring proper positioning, perform adhesiolysis if indicated for bowel involvement with the mesh and assess the abdomen for alternative sources of chronic pain. If randomized to mesh removal, laparoscopic or robotic preperitoneal mesh removal.
|
Procedure: Diagnostic laparoscopy and inguinal mesh removal
Surgical examination and treatment of groin pain following inguinal hernia surgery by surgical exploration with a laparoscope or removal of mesh laparoscopically |
- Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) [ Time Frame: Change in NRS-11 scores will be measured from baseline to 6 months after surgery for both groups. ]NRS-11 is a validated, 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) and is commonly used to measure Chronic Post-operative Inguinal Pain (CPIP). NRS-11 categorizes pain as none [0], mild [1-3], moderate [4-6], and severe [7-10]. Patients will be asked to select the single number that best represents their groin pain intensity when moving from a supine to standing position.
- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-months and 6-months ]VAS is validated and consists of a 100 mm horizontal line anchored by two descriptors indicating the extremes: 0 (no pain) and 100 (worst pain imaginable).
- Activities Assessment Scale (AAS) [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-months and 6-months ]AAS is a 13-item, validated tool measuring physical impairment due to chronic groin pain. AAS scores are converted to a range of 0-100, with higher values indicating better functional ability.
- EuroQOL (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-months and 6-months ]EQ-5D-5L is a validated tool evaluating 5 dimensions of health using 5 severity descriptors and includes a visual analog scale labeled from 0 to 100 to quantitatively measure overall health status. The larger the number the better the outcome.
- Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) [ Time Frame: Baseline NRS-11 scores will be measured and compared to scores at 3 months after surgery for both groups. ]NRS-11 is a validated, 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) and is commonly used to measure Chronic Post-operative Inguinal Pain (CPIP). NRS-11 categorizes pain as none [0], mild [1-3], moderate [4-6], and severe [7-10]. Patients will be asked to select the single number that best represents their groin pain intensity when moving from a supine to standing position.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- > 18 years of age
- CPIP lasting > 6 months after laparoscopic or robotic inguinal hernia repair with pre-peritoneal mesh
- Must exhibit 1 or more of the following characteristics of nociceptive pain:
History:
- Pain while sitting in a chair for prolonged periods of time with relief when extending the hip or lying supine to straighten the leg
- Severe pain when crossing the affected leg over the contralateral leg
- "Foreign body sensation" or "tightness" in the groin
Exam:
-Diffuse tenderness with deep palpation along the inguinal ligament (over the mesh)
Somatosensory mapping:
- Does not have a maximum trigger point for pain
-
Lacks characteristics of neuropathic pain (sharp, burning, shooting, paresthesias, allodynia, hyperalgesia, etc.)
- Moderate to severe pain [4-10] when moving from supine to standing on NRS
Exclusion Criteria:
- No characteristics of nociceptive groin pain
- Zero or mild pain [0-3] when moving from supine to standing on NRS
- Recurrent inguinal hernia detected on clinical exam
- Large, femoral, direct or indirect inguinal hernia (F2-3, M2-3, L2-3) on diagnostic laparoscopy as defined by European Hernia Society (EHS) classification
- Prior open (anterior) approach to inguinal hernia repair (i.e. Lichtenstein)
- Prior mesh plugs or Prolene Hernia Systems
- History of prostatectomy or vascular procedures in the pelvis or groin
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT05484635
Contact: David Krpata, MD | 216-445-9989 | krpatad@ccf.org | |
Contact: Adele Costanzo | 216-445-3851 | constana@ccf.org |
United States, Ohio | |
Cleveland Clinic | Recruiting |
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195 | |
Contact: David Krpata, MD 216-445-9989 krpatad@ccf.org |
Principal Investigator: | David Krpata, MD | The Cleveland Clinic |
Responsible Party: | David Krpata, Staff Physician, The Cleveland Clinic |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT05484635 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
22-411 |
First Posted: | August 2, 2022 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | August 25, 2023 |
Last Verified: | August 2023 |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
Plan to Share IPD: | Undecided |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
Chronic groin pain Hernia, Inguinal Chronic pain groin |
Hernia Hernia, Inguinal Pathological Conditions, Anatomical Hernia, Abdominal |