The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty Versus Open Surgical Hemorrhoidectomy in Second and Third Degree Piles

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05770141
Recruitment Status : Not yet recruiting
First Posted : March 15, 2023
Last Update Posted : March 15, 2023
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Ebram Nasser Hakim Boules, Assiut University

Brief Summary:
The study aims to compare the pain , duration of intervention and long term outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus open surgical hemorrhoidectomy

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Hemorrhoids Procedure: laser hemorrhoidoplasty Procedure: open surgical hemorrhoidectomy Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

Hemorrhoidal disease is ranked first among diseases of the rectum and large intestine, and the estimated worldwide prevalence ranges from 2.9% to 27.9%, of which more than 4% are symptomatic .

Age distribution demonstrates a Gaussian distribution with a peak incidence between 45 and 65 years with subsequent decline after 65 years .Men are more frequently affected than women .

The anorectal vascular cushions along with the internal anal sphincter are essential in the maintenance of continence by providing soft tissue support and keeping the anal canal closed tightly. Hemorrhoids are considered to be due to the downward displacement of suspensory (Treitz) muscle .

There are many treatments of hemorrhoids varying from medications and band ligation to stapled hemorrhoidopexy, laser photocoagulation, sclerotherapy, Doppler-guided artery ligation, and finally surgery .

The indications for the surgical treatment include the presence of a significant external component, hypertrophied papillae, associated fissure, extensive thrombosis or recurrence of symptoms after repeated RBL. The technique employed may be open (Milligan-Morgan) or closed (Ferguson) .

Post hemorrhoidectomy pain is the commonest problem associated with the surgical techniques. The other early complications are urinary retention (20.1%), bleeding (secondary or reactionary) (2.4%-6%) and subcutaneous abscess (0.5%). The long-term complications include anal fissure (1% -2.6%), anal stenosis (1%), incontinence (0.4%), fistula (0.5%) and recurrence of hemorrhoids .

The study aims to compare the pain , duration time of intervention and long term outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus open surgical hemorrhoidectomy

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 40 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty Procedure Versus Open Surgical Hemorrhoidectomy
Estimated Study Start Date : April 1, 2023
Estimated Primary Completion Date : February 1, 2025
Estimated Study Completion Date : March 1, 2025

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Hemorrhoids

Arm Intervention/treatment
LHP GROUP
patients received Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty procedure
Procedure: laser hemorrhoidoplasty
A skin incision of 3 mm was made about 1 to 1.5 cm of distance from the anal verge at the base of each hemorrhoidal node. The probe was driven through the incision in the submucosal tissue until reaching the area underneath the distal rectal mucosa. Then, ten to twelve effective pulses (adjusted to respective node dimensions) were fired. Half of them were fired in the submucosal tissue, the others in the intra-nodal compartment determining the shrinkage of the hemorrhoidal piles. The anal wounds were left open. At the end of the procedure an anal tampon was positioned.

MM GROUP
patients received conventional open surgical hemorrhoidectomy
Procedure: open surgical hemorrhoidectomy
The anodermal wedge was incised, eventually removing external fibrosis and/or skin tags when present. Upward dissection started at this level with en-bloc excision of mucosal and submucosal layers from the underlying internal anal sphincter up to the anorectal ring. A compressive haemostatic sponge was left in place for 12-24 hours.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Pain evaluation [ Time Frame: 30 postoperative days ]
    postoperative pain assessment with Visual Analogue Scale Score, The VAS consists of a 10cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 10 ('pain as bad as it could possibly be').

  2. bleeding [ Time Frame: 30 postoperative days ]
    The timing of bleeding after hemorrhoidectomy varies, and can be generally divided into immediate and delayed.5 Immediate bleeding occurs within 24 to 48 hours of a procedure and is likely related to loss of control of the vascular pedicle. Delayed bleeding is defined as bleeding reported up to 2 weeks postprocedure, and is more often related to infection or local trauma , patients often report frequent passing of small to moderate amounts of clot and bright red blood starting after bowel movement.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Presence of recurrence [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    Patients were considered to have recurrent hemorrhoidal symptoms when any of the following were recorded: bleeding, itching, pain or discomfort affecting patient's perception of quality of life, which could either be associated or not to prolapse recurrence.


Other Outcome Measures:
  1. anal stenosis [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    Patients who experience anal stenosis describe constipation, bleeding, pain, and incomplete evacuation.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   16 Years and older   (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • II-III hemorrhoidal disease
  • failure of conservative treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • grade IV
  • acutely thrombosed haemorrhoids
  • patients affected by IBD involving rectum or anus
  • patients previously surgically treated for hemorrhoidal disease and the inability to complete study protocol

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT05770141


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Ebram Hakim, doctor +201090079495 anabebonaser@gmail.com

Sponsors and Collaborators
Assiut University
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Ebram Nasser Hakim Boules, Doctor, Assiut University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05770141    
Other Study ID Numbers: laser hemorrhoidoplasty
First Posted: March 15, 2023    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: March 15, 2023
Last Verified: March 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Undecided

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Hemorrhoids
Rectal Diseases
Intestinal Diseases
Gastrointestinal Diseases
Digestive System Diseases
Vascular Diseases
Cardiovascular Diseases