The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
Trial record 1 of 1 for:    NCT05956678
Previous Study | Return to List | Next Study

Implementing and Sustaining a Sleep Treatment to Improve Community Mental Health Part 3: Sustainment

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05956678
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : July 21, 2023
Last Update Posted : May 10, 2024
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
University of California, Berkeley

Brief Summary:
Research on the sustainment of implemented evidence-based psychological treatments in routine practice settings, such as community mental health centers, is limited. The goal of this study is to test sustainment predictors, mechanisms, and outcomes of the Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction (TranS-C) in community mental health centers after implementation efforts have ended. CMHC providers have been trained to deliver a "Standard" or "Adapted" version of TranS-C. Researchers will compare these two groups to evaluate differences--and possible mechanisms--with respect to sustainment outcomes.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Sleep Wake Disorders Circadian Rhythm Disorders Behavioral: Standard Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction (TranS-C) Behavioral: Adapted Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction (TranS-C) Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

More research on the sustainment of implemented evidence-based treatments in routine practice settings, such as community mental health centers (CMHCs), is needed. This study is the third and final phase-i.e., the Sustainment Phase-of a cluster-randomized controlled trial and focuses on CMHC providers' sustainment of the Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction (TranS-C). The Sustainment Phase seeks to build on the two earlier phases of the trial-the Implementation Phase (NCT04154631) and Train-the-Trainer Phase (NCT05805657)-during which TranS-C was adapted to fit the CMHC context, and ten CMHCs were cluster-randomized to implement Standard TranS-C or Adapted TranS-C via facilitation and train-the-trainer. Data collection for the Sustainment Phase will commence at least three months after implementation efforts in partnering CMHCs have ended. Note that in this study, sustainment is operationalized per Shediac-Rizkallah and Bone's framework (1998) and defined as continued (a) activities, (b) benefits, and (c) capacity of an intervention after implementation efforts have ended.

Aim 1: Report the sustainment outcomes of TranS-C after implementation support has ended.

Aim 2: Evaluate whether manipulating fit to context predicts sustainment outcomes. It is hypothesized that providers in Adapted TranS-C will report better sustainment outcomes (i.e., activities, benefits, and capacity) relative to Standard TranS-C.

Aim 3: Test whether provider perceptions of fit-operationalized as acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility-mediate the relation between treatment condition (Standard versus Adapted TranS-C) and sustainment outcomes. It is hypothesized that Adapted TranS-C, compared to Standard TranS-C, will predict better sustainment outcomes (i.e., activities, benefits, and capacity) indirectly through better provider perceptions of fit.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 130 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description: CMHC providers are cluster-randomized to either Standard TranS-C or Adapted TranS-C by their CMHC of employment.
Masking: Single (Participant)
Masking Description: CMHC providers (i.e., the study participants) are blind to group allocation.
Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
Official Title: Implementing and Sustaining a Sleep Treatment to Improve Community Mental Health Part 3: Sustainment
Actual Study Start Date : April 1, 2023
Actual Primary Completion Date : April 1, 2024
Actual Study Completion Date : April 1, 2024

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Standard TranS-C
Standard TranS-C is modularized and delivered across eight 50-minute, weekly, individual sessions. It is comprised of 4 cross-cutting interventions featured in every session; 4 core modules that apply to the vast majority of patients; and 7 optional modules used less commonly, depending on the presentation.
Behavioral: Standard Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction (TranS-C)
TranS-C is a psychosocial treatment designed to improve sleep and circadian functioning. It is a modular, psychosocial, skills-based approach. In this study, two version of TranS-C will be tested: Standard and Adapted.

Experimental: Adapted TranS-C
The process for developing Adapted TranS-C has been iterative and grounded in theory, data and stakeholder feedback. The core elements of the evidence-based theory of change underpinning TranS-C have been retained. Adapted TranS-C is delivered in four 20-minute, weekly, individual sessions and is comprised of 4 cross-cutting interventions featured in every session, 5 modules that apply to the vast majority of patients, and 1 optional module used less commonly, depending on the presentation.
Behavioral: Adapted Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction (TranS-C)
The Adapted version was derived from Standard TranS-C. It was developed to improve the fit of the treatment with the CMHC context.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Provider Report of Sustainment Scale [ Time Frame: Once during the Sustainment Phase, at least 3 months after implementation efforts have ended. ]
    Assesses providers' continued delivery of TranS-C via three self-report items that are rated on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (to a very great extent) such that higher scores indicate more sustainment.

  2. Adaptations to Evidence-Based Practices Scale [ Time Frame: Once during the Sustainment Phase, at least 3 months after implementation efforts have ended. ]
    Assesses provider adaptations to TranS-C via six self-report items that are rated on scale from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very great extent) such that higher scores indicate greater use of adaptations.

  3. Penetration of TranS-C in Provider Caseload [ Time Frame: Once during the Sustainment Phase, at least 3 months after implementation efforts have ended. ]
    Two self-report items are used to derive the proportion of eligible patients with whom the provider has used TranS-C (i.e., number of eligible patients with whom provider has used TranS-C / the number of providers' patients with sleep problems), with higher scores indicating more penetration.

  4. Outcomes and Effectiveness Scale [ Time Frame: Once during the Sustainment Phase, at least 3 months after implementation efforts have ended. ]
    Assesses providers' perceptions of TranS-C's health benefits using five self-report items rated on a scale from 0 (to little or no extent) to 7 (to a very great extent) such that higher scores indicate more perceived benefits.

  5. Skills Subscale from the Determinants of Implementation Behavior Questionnaire [ Time Frame: Once during the Sustainment Phase, at least 3 months after implementation efforts have ended. ]
    Assesses providers perceptions of their skills to deliver TranS-C using three self-report items rated on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree), where higher scores indicate perceptions of greater skills.

  6. Organizational Resources Subscale from the Implementation Potential Scales [ Time Frame: Once during the Sustainment Phase, at least 3 months after implementation efforts have ended. ]
    Assesses providers' perceptions of whether they have the resources, support, and time needed to deliver TranS-C. Three items are rated on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree), where higher ratings indicate more perceived resources, support, and time.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. TranS-C Delivery Relative to Pre-Sustainment [ Time Frame: Once during the Sustainment Phase, at least 3 months after implementation efforts have ended. ]
    Uses one self-report item to assess whether providers are using TranS-C "more" (scored as 2), "about the same" (scored as 1), or "less" (scored as 0), relative to before the Sustainment Phase.

  2. TranS-C Provider Checklist [ Time Frame: Once during the Sustainment Phase, at least 3 months after implementation efforts have ended. ]
    Assesses which TranS-C modules were delivered by providers during the Sustainment Phase using a self-report checklist containing all the modules for each condition. For each module, the checklist is scored such that 0 indicates that the provider did not deliver the module and 1 indicates that the provider delivered the module.

  3. Adaptations Checklist from the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modification - Expanded [ Time Frame: Once during the Sustainment Phase, at least 3 months after implementation efforts have ended. ]
    Assesses whether providers made any adaptations to TranS-C based on patient characteristics using a self-report checklist. Each patient characteristic on the checklist is scored such that 0 indicates that the provider did not make adaptations based on the characteristic and 1 indicates that the provider did make adaptations based on the characteristic.

  4. Use of Provider Manual and Patient Workbook [ Time Frame: Once during the Sustainment Phase, at least 3 months after implementation efforts have ended. ]
    Assesses the extent to which providers follow the TranS-C provider manual and patient workbook via one self-report item with the following scale: 0% (not at all) to 100% (always/completely).

  5. Percentage of TranS-C Strategies Used [ Time Frame: Once during the Sustainment Phase, at least 3 months after implementation efforts have ended. ]
    Assesses the percentage of TranS-C strategies used by providers on average when delivering TranS-C to patients via one self-report item with the following scale: 0% (no strategies) to 100% (all the strategies).

  6. TranS-C as Integrated or Standalone Treatment [ Time Frame: Once during the Sustainment Phase, at least 3 months after implementation efforts have ended. ]
    Assesses whether providers deliver TranS-C as a standalone intervention using one self-report item with the following 4 categorically-coded response options: I always deliver the sleep treatment as a stand-alone intervention; I sometimes integrate the sleep treatment with other interventions or topics; I always integrate the sleep treatment with other interventions or topics; not applicable.

  7. Number of Sessions with TranS-C [ Time Frame: Once during the Sustainment Phase, at least 3 months after implementation efforts have ended. ]
    Assesses the number of sessions in which providers use TranS-C concepts for each patient, on average, via one self-report item that ranges from 0 (no sessions) to 50 (50 sessions).

  8. Creation of Sleep Treatment Materials [ Time Frame: Once during the Sustainment Phase, at least 3 months after implementation efforts have ended. ]
    Assesses whether providers have created their own sleep treatment materials via one self-report item with the following categorically-coded response options: no, not relevant, yes with option to describe materials.

  9. Administrator Support Subscale from the Implementation Potential Scales [ Time Frame: Once during the Sustainment Phase, at least 3 months after implementation efforts have ended. ]
    Assesses the extent to which providers perceive they have support from leadership and supervisors to deliver TranS-C. Three items are rated on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree), where higher scores indicate more support.

  10. Knowledge of TranS-C [ Time Frame: Once during the Sustainment Phase, at least 3 months after implementation efforts have ended. ]
    Assesses the extent to which providers (1) understand the theory and concepts behind TranS-C and (2) have the knowledge to conduct TranS-C. Two items are rated on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 7 (extremely), where higher scores indicate more knowledge.


Other Outcome Measures:
  1. Acceptability of Intervention Measure [ Time Frame: Once during the Sustainment Phase, at least 3 months after implementation efforts have ended. ]
    Assesses provider perceptions of TranS-C's acceptability via four self-report items rated on a scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree), with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.

  2. Intervention Appropriateness Measure [ Time Frame: Once during the Sustainment Phase, at least 3 months after implementation efforts have ended. ]
    Assesses provider perceptions of TranS-C's appropriateness via four self-report items rated on a scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree), with higher scores indicating greater appropriateness.

  3. Feasibility of Intervention Measure [ Time Frame: Once during the Sustainment Phase, at least 3 months after implementation efforts have ended. ]
    Assesses provider perceptions of TranS-C's feasibility via four self-report items rated on a scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree), with higher scores indicating greater feasibility.

  4. Semi-structured interview with providers [ Time Frame: Once during the Sustainment Phase, at least 3 months after implementation efforts have ended. ]
    Assesses providers' perceptions of TranS-C.

  5. Adaptations in Response to Cultural Backgrounds of Patients [ Time Frame: Once during the Sustainment Phase, at least 3 months after implementation efforts have ended. ]
    Assesses providers' adaptations to TranS-C based on cultural backgrounds of clients. Eight items are rated on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very great extent), with higher numbers indicating greater use of adaptations.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

The inclusion criteria for CMHCs are:

  • Publicly funded adult mental health outpatient services
  • Support from CMHC leadership

The inclusion criteria for CMHC providers are:

  • Employed, able to deliver, or have delivered patient-facing services to patients within a CMHC
  • Have attended a TranS-C training
  • CMHC site of employment has been in a period of sustainment (i.e., implementation activities have ended) for at least three months
  • volunteer to participate and formally consent to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • N/A

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT05956678


Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, California
Contra Costa Health, Housing, and Homeless Services Division
Concord, California, United States, 94520
Solano County Department of Health & Social Services, Behavioral Health Services
Fairfield, California, United States, 94533
Santa Barbara County Department of Behavioral Wellness
Goleta, California, United States, 93110
Kings County Behavioral Health
Hanford, California, United States, 93230
Lake County Behavioral Health Services
Lucerne, California, United States, 95458
Alameda County Behavioral Health Care Services
Oakland, California, United States, 94606
Placer County Health and Human Services, Adult System of Care
Roseville, California, United States, 95678
Monterey County Behavioral Health
Salinas, California, United States, 93906
Bay Area Community Health
San Jose, California, United States, 95148
County of Santa Cruz Behavioral Health Services for Children and Adults
Santa Cruz, California, United States, 95060
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of California, Berkeley
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Allison Harvey, PhD University of California, Berkeley
Principal Investigator: Laurel Sarfan, PhD University of California, Berkeley
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: University of California, Berkeley
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05956678    
Other Study ID Numbers: R01MH120147_P3
R01MH120147 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract )
First Posted: July 21, 2023    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: May 10, 2024
Last Verified: May 2024

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by University of California, Berkeley:
Implementation
Sustainment
Evidence-based treatment
Community mental health
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Chronobiology Disorders
Sleep Wake Disorders
Nervous System Diseases
Neurologic Manifestations
Mental Disorders