Phase 2 Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of ESK-001 in Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (LUMUS)
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05966480 |
Recruitment Status :
Recruiting
First Posted : July 28, 2023
Last Update Posted : April 30, 2024
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
SLE | Drug: ESK-001 Drug: Placebo | Phase 2 |
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Estimated Enrollment : | 388 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | A Phase 2, Multicenter, Multinational, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Multiple Dose Levels of ESK-001 in Adult Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus |
Actual Study Start Date : | June 26, 2023 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | May 1, 2025 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | December 1, 2025 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: ESK-001 Dose Level 1
ESK-001 administered as an oral tablet
|
Drug: ESK-001
Oral tablet |
Experimental: ESK-001 Dose Level 2
ESK-001 administered as an oral tablet
|
Drug: ESK-001
Oral tablet |
Experimental: ESK-001 Dose Level 3
ESK-001 administered as an oral tablet
|
Drug: ESK-001
Oral tablet |
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo administered as an oral tablet
|
Drug: Placebo
Oral tablet |
- To compare the effect on disease activity measured by the proportion of patients achieving British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) response at Week 48 between doses of ESK-001 and placebo [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]
- To assess the safety and tolerability of multiple dose levels of ESK-001 [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]Safety and Tolerability will be assessed with clinical and laboratory assessments including blood tests for liver and kidney function, ECGs, hematological measures and physical examinations throughout the time of the study and safety follow up. The number and proportion of TEAEs, SAEs, AEs of greater than grade 3 severity and AEs of Clinical Interest will be recorded.
- To compare the effect on disease activity measured by the proportion of patients achieving an SLE Responder Index of ≥4 (SRI[4]) response at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]
- To compare corticosteroid use in patients at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]To compare the number and percentage of patients using corticosteroids and continuous summaries of dose used will be assessed as well as the frequency and percentage of patients able to taper corticosteroids and maintain low doses following taper.
- To compare the effect on cutaneous disease activity measured by the proportion of patients with a CLASI activity score of ≥8 at baseline achieving ≥ 50% reduction in the CLASI activity score at Week 48 between doses of ESK-001 and placebo [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]
- To compare the effect on disease activity measured by the proportion of patients achieving BICLA responses at Week 48 between doses of ESK-001 and placebo by stratification groups [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]
- To compare the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) response between doses of ESK-001 and placebo at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]
- To compare the annualized flare rate through Week 48 [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]
- To use the SF-36 (Short Form-36 item QoL measure) to compare the effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between doses of ESK-001 and placebo [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]Efficacy: Comparing the effects of Esk-001 doses vs Placebo on Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as it relates to Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) as measured by self-reporting using the SF-36 (Short Form-36 item QoL measure) Questionnaire which uses a scale of 0 to 100. The higher numbers mean better health.
- To use the SLE-specific Lupus Quality of Life (LQoL) questionnaire to compare the effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between doses of ESK-001 and placebo [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]Efficacy: Comparing the effects of Esk-001 doses vs Placebo on Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as it relates to Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) as measured by self-reporting using the SLE-specific Lupus Quality of Life (LQoL) questionnaire which uses a scale of 0 to 100. The higher numbers mean better health.
- To compare disease-specific QoL between doses of ESK-001 and placebo [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]Efficacy: To compare disease-specific QoL between doses of ESK-001 and placebo using the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI2K) measured on a scale of 0 to 105 where the higher numbers mean more disease activity.
- To compare disease-specific QoL between doses of ESK-001 and placebo [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]Efficacy: To compare disease-specific QoL between doses of ESK-001 and placebo using the British Isle Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004) with a scale of A to E (A meaning very active disease and E no current or previous disease).
- To compare disease-specific QoL between doses of ESK-001 and placebo [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]Efficacy: To compare disease-specific QoL between doses of ESK-001 and placebo using the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) evaluating disease response using the 4-point VAS (Visual Analog Scale) of 0 to 3 (0 means no flares and 3 means severe flare in disease).
- To compare Fatigue measured by FACIT-F between doses of ESK-001 and placebo [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]To compare patient-reported fatigue as measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) questionnaire between doses of ESK-001 and placebo, where the score range is 0 to 52 and a lower score indicates greater fatigue/worse outcome.
- To compare patient global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) between doses of ESK-001 and placebo [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]Efficacy: To compare disease-specific QoL between doses of ESK-001 and placebo using the PtGA (Patient Global Assessment) instrument. Patients record on a visual analog scale (VAS) how well or badly they feel as a result of the disease in their own estimation over the course of the study.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with 6 or more months of SLE according to the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria, have positive autoantibodies or low complement at screening, and have active SLE as measured by SLEDAI-2K of 6 or more, or 4 or more if joint involvement is present.
Patients need to be on treatment which can be:
- A stable dose of oral corticosteroid (≤40 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) for a minimum of 2 weeks prior to signing of the informed consent form (ICF) at the Screening Visit. The dose of oral corticosteroid the patient is taking should not increase between screening and Week 0 (Day 1).
- And/or antimalarial treatment (e.g., hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, quinacrine),
-
And/or no more than 1 of the following conventional DMARDS:
- Azathioprine ≤200 mg/day
- Mycophenolate mofetil ≤2 g/day or mycophenolic acid ≤1.44 g/day
- Oral, subcutaneous, or intramuscular (IM) methotrexate ≤20 mg/week.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Drug-induced SLE or other autoimmune diseases that, in the opinion of the Investigator, are likely to confound efficacy assessments
- Active, proliferative lupus nephritis that in the Investigator's opinion may require treatment not allowed by the protocol
- Current disease other than SLE that, in the opinion of the Investigator, is likely to interfere with SLE disease activity assessments. Examples include severe fibromyalgia, severe osteoarthritis and severe cardiorespiratory diseases.
-
Active severe or unstable neuropsychiatric SLE including, but not limited to the following: aseptic meningitis; cerebral vasculitis; myelopathy; demyelination syndromes (ascending or transverse myelitis, acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculopathy); acute confusional state; impaired level of consciousness; psychosis; acute stroke or stroke syndrome; cranial neuropathy; new seizures; cerebellar ataxia; and mononeuritis multiplex.
- That would make the patient unable to fully understand the ICF, or
- Where, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, protocol-specified SOC is insufficient and utilization of a more aggressive therapeutic approach not permitted in the protocol, is indicated
- Known history of a primary immunodeficiency or an underlying condition such as HIV infection or splenectomy that predisposes the patient to infection
- Currently active, clinically significant infection of any kind
- Clinically significant chronic infection (eg, osteomyelitis, bronchiectasis) within 8 weeks prior to signing the ICF (chronic fungal nail infections are allowed)
- Any infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with IV anti-infectives not completed at least 4 weeks prior to signing the ICF
- Any infection requiring oral anti-infectives (including antivirals) within 2 weeks prior to Day 1
-
Any severe herpes infection at any time prior to Week 0 (Day 1), including, but not limited to, disseminated herpes (ever), herpes encephalitis (ever), recurrent herpes zoster (defined as 2 episodes within 2 years), or ophthalmic herpes (ever)
- Active herpes zoster infection within 12 weeks of prior to signing the ICF
- Active herpes simplex virus within 4 weeks of Day 1
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT05966480
Contact: Central Recruiting | (+1) 650-538-2502 | clinicaltrials@alumis.com |
Responsible Party: | Alumis Inc |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT05966480 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
ESK-001-010 |
First Posted: | July 28, 2023 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | April 30, 2024 |
Last Verified: | April 2024 |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
Plan to Share IPD: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | Yes |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
Autoimmune Diseases Immune System Diseases Connective Tissue Diseases Immune-mediated Diseases Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus |
SLE Lupus LUMUS Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic |
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic Connective Tissue Diseases Autoimmune Diseases Immune System Diseases |