This is the classic website, which will be retired eventually. Please visit the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov instead.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Use of the Unstable Shoes in Lower Limb Lymphedema.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05996939
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : August 18, 2023
Last Update Posted : August 18, 2023
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Vanesa Abuín, Universidad Europea de Madrid

Brief Summary:
Lymphedema is an external manifestation of lymphatic system insufficiency and deranged lymph transport. It is defined as accumulation in the extracellular space of protein-rich fluid, due to a mechanical failure of the lymphatic system. Lymphedema directly affects the quality of life of the patient, not only in the physical aspect, but also in the psychological, sexual and social aspects. Muscle and joint pumps are important external mechanisms of lymphatic and venous fluid return improvement. The unstable shoes demands, especially during standing, increased muscle activity in the lower extremities. A clinical trial was carried out comparing both kinds of footwear, the objective being to evaluate possible differences in the evolution of lymphedema. Unstable shoes (MBT®) were compared with conventional sports shoes. During a clinical trial lasting eight weeks, we assessed quality of life, limb volume, and symptoms derived from lymphedema. The results suggested that the use of unstable shoes is recommendable for walking and for long periods of standing, since it decreases leg cramping and paraesthesia of affected limbs.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Lower Limb Lymphedema Other: To compare the efficacy of unstable shoes with that of conventional sports shoes in people with lower-limb primary and secondary lymphedema. Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

Participants Subjects were recruited amongst the members of a Spanish association of people affected with lymphedema. Inclusion criteria were a) Subjects affected with lower limb lymphedema -primary, secondary, unilateral or bilateral-, b) Daily use of a compression stocking. Exclusion criteria were a) Subjects with acute infection of the affected limb b) that did not had any treatment for lymphedema one year prior to the study, c) Weight <40kg, d) shoe size <EU35 or >EU47 e)that have previously used unstable shoes f) vestibular alterations, vertigo, hypoacusis c) visual compromise that affects balance.

Procedure Written informed consent was obtained from the participants before the intervention. Random allocation to experimental and control group, was performed using Excel built-in function RAND ().. The generated sequence was employed to allocate the participants to one of the trial groups (e.g., intervention or control). Participants followed an 8 week intervention. Experimental group (EG) were provided with unstable sole shoes (MBT®, Masai Barefoot Technology Spain SL,08021 Spain.) and asked to wear them following a standardized protocol: 1 hour on day 1, increasing 1h each 2 days until 4h of daily use are achieved, during standing position and walking in the context of daily live activities, excluding sport activities. Control group (CG) was provided with a conventional sole sports footwear, following the same protocol that EG.

Outcome measures Circumferencial measure. Circumferencial measure was evaluated using a tape measure to measure the circumference of the foot at different points. Distal (4 cm from the base of the nail towards proximal) and Proximal (4 cm from the previous measurement).

Volume. Kuhnke's formula was used to calculate the estimated volume of the affected limb(241) V=(C12 + C22 +… Cn2)/π, Where V represents the volume and C refers to the different diameters of the limb, measured in centimeters.

Perception of the participants' clinical manifestations (243): measured through a questionnaire on perception of the state of the person's vascular alteration referred to the affected limb. In this survey, the subject is asked to value their symptoms (included heaviness, spider veins, swelling, pain, appearance of varicose veins, cramps, paresthesia and venous ulcers) with a 4-point scale: 0=absent, 1=mild/moderate, 2=important, 3=severe. In addition to lower limb swelling, other important symptoms experienced are heaviness, tightness, and pain. As there is no validated scale or survey to measure these symptoms characteristic of lymphedema, we used as a reference a previous study [10], where the symptoms or clinical manifestations compatible with chronic venous insufficiency that can be extrapolated to lymphedema are described.

In addition, a Change of habits survey was conducted at the end of the intervention period

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 26 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Official Title: Effectiveness of Unstable Shoes on Volume and Quality of Life in Lower Limb Lymphedema.
Actual Study Start Date : November 1, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date : June 30, 2016
Actual Study Completion Date : June 30, 2017

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Lymphedema

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Unstable shoes
Use of unstable shoes for 8 weeks
Other: To compare the efficacy of unstable shoes with that of conventional sports shoes in people with lower-limb primary and secondary lymphedema.
Unstable shoes were compared with conventional sports shoes, the objective being to evaluate possible differences in the evolution of lymphedema. During a clinical trial lasting eight weeks, we assessed quality of life, limb volume, and symptoms derived from lymphedema.

No Intervention: Usual sports footwear
Use of conventional shoes for 8 weeks



Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Volume of the lower limb [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ]
    Volume of the lower limb


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Circumference measure of the foot [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ]
    Circumference measure of the foot

  2. Changes in lymphedema symptoms [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ]
    Changes in lymphedema symptoms



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

-Subjects affected with lower limb lymphedema -primary, secondary, unilateral or bilateral-, -Daily use of a compression stocking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with acute infection of the affected limb
  • that did not had any treatment for lymphedema one year prior to the study,
  • Weight <40kg,
  • shoe size <EU35 or >EU47
  • that have previously used unstable shoes
  • vestibular alterations, vertigo, hypoacusis
  • visual compromise that affects balanc
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Vanesa Abuín, Doctor, Universidad Europea de Madrid
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05996939    
Other Study ID Numbers: UEM_LIN_2011_01
First Posted: August 18, 2023    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: August 18, 2023
Last Verified: August 2023

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Lymphedema
Lymphatic Diseases