Intervention to Enhance Coping and Help-seeking Among Youth in Foster Care

• ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06019377
• Recruitment Status: Recruiting
• First Posted: August 31, 2023
• Last Update Posted: April 9, 2024
• Sponsor: Portland State University
• Collaborator: National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
• Information provided by (Responsible Party): Jennifer Blakeslee, Portland State University

Study Description

Brief Summary:

This study will deploy a scalable secondary prevention program that leverages existing foster youth transition services to improve mental health functioning and service use before and after exiting foster care. Our short-term objective is to remotely test a group intervention called Stronger Youth Networks and Coping (SYNC) that targets cognitive schemas influencing stress responses, including mental health help-seeking and service engagement, among foster youth with behavioral health risk. SYNC aims to increase youth capacity to appraise stress and regulate emotional responses, to flexibly select adaptive coping strategies, and to promote informal and formal help-seeking as an effective coping strategy. The proposed aims will establish whether the 10-module program engages the targeted proximal mechanisms with a signal of efficacy on clinically-relevant outcomes, and whether a fully-powered randomized control trial (RCT) of SYNC is feasible in the intended service context. Our first aim is to refine our SYNC curriculum and training materials, prior to testing SYNC in a remote single-arm trial with two cohorts of 8-10 Oregon foster youth aged 16-20 (N=16). Our second aim is to conduct a remote two-arm individually-randomized group treatment trial with Oregon foster youth aged 16-20 with indicated behavioral health risk (N=80) to examine: (a) intervention group change on proximal mechanisms of coping self-efficacy and help-seeking attitudes, compared to services-as-usual at post-intervention and 6-month follow-up: and (b) association between the mechanisms and targeted outcomes, including emotional regulation, coping behaviors, mental health service use, and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and PTSD. Our third aim is to refine and standardize the intervention and research protocol for an effectiveness trial, including confirming transferability with national stakeholders.

Condition or disease	Intervention/treatment	Phase
Adolescent Behavior; Psychosocial Functioning; Coping Behavior; Help-Seeking Behavior; Utilization, Health Care; Depression; Anxiety; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; Emotion Regulation; Child Welfare	Behavioral: Stronger Youth Networks and Coping (SYNC)	Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

Young people transitioning from the foster care system have elevated risk for a range of mental health diagnoses that for many are exacerbated by psychosocial coping difficulties, sparse support networks, and service disengagement. This population is less prepared to cope with mental health challenges and more likely to have negative perspectives on help- seeking, increasing the risk of unmet treatment needs as service use rapidly declines following the exit from foster care. Our long-term goal is to deploy a scalable secondary prevention program that leverages existing foster youth transition services to improve mental health functioning and service use before and after exiting foster care. Our short-term objective is to remotely test a group intervention called Stronger Youth Networks and Coping (SYNC) that targets cognitive schemas influencing stress responses, including mental health help-seeking and service engagement, among foster youth with behavioral health risk. SYNC aims to increase youth capacity to appraise stress and regulate emotional responses, to flexibly select adaptive coping strategies, and to promote informal and formal help-seeking as an effective coping strategy. SYNC results from intervention development to design a novel program using evidence- based cognitive change methods, including adapting the Coping Effectiveness Training (CET) curriculum for foster youth. SYNC is designed for delivery by service providers in federally-funded Independent Living Programs (ILPs) accessed by most foster youth in the US. Initial feedback from foster youth, service providers, and our advisory panel confirmed the acceptability of SYNC curriculum topics (e.g., stress and coping, navigating services) and program strategy (e.g., groups co-facilitated by "near-peer" young adults with foster care and mental health care experience). The proposed aims will establish whether the 10-module program engages the targeted proximal mechanisms with a signal of efficacy on clinically-relevant outcomes, and whether a fully-powered RCT of SYNC is feasible in the intended service context. Our first specific aim is to refine our SYNC curriculum and training materials, prior to testing SYNC in a remote single-arm trial with two cohorts of 8-10 Oregon foster youth aged 16-20 (N=16). Our second aim is to conduct a remote two-arm individually-randomized group treatment trial with Oregon foster youth aged 16-20 with indicated behavioral health risk (N=80) to examine: (a) intervention group change on proximal mechanisms of coping self-efficacy and help-seeking attitudes, compared to services-as-usual at post-intervention and 6-month follow-up: and (b) association between the mechanisms and targeted outcomes, including emotional regulation, coping behaviors, mental health service use, and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and PTSD. Our third aim is to refine and standardize the intervention and research protocol for an effectiveness trial, including confirming transferability with national stakeholders. The demonstration of target engagement with initial evidence of efficacy, plus standardized intervention materials and a feasible research protocol, will prepare us for an effectiveness trial (R01) of a model that is expected to be widely transferable for implementation across the country, and one that can ultimately be adapted for other youth service settings (e.g., juvenile justice) and subgroups (e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer [LGBTQ], youth of color), expanding long-term public health impact.

Study Design

• Study Type: Interventional (Clinical Trial)
• Estimated Enrollment: 96 participants
• Allocation: Randomized
• Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
• Intervention Model Description: 10-module group psychoeducational curriculum model
• Masking: None (Open Label)
• Primary Purpose: Prevention
• Official Title: Pilot Testing an Intervention to Enhance Coping and Increase Mental Health Help-seeking Among Transition-age Youth in Foster Care
• Estimated Study Start Date: April 15, 2024
• Estimated Primary Completion Date: March 2026
• Estimated Study Completion Date: August 2026

Arms and Interventions

Arm	Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Intervention; The Intervention group receives the SYNC intervention in addition to typical child welfare services (i.e., services as usual). The SYNC intervention includes 10 weekly remote (videoconference) 90-minute sessions delivered by a facilitator and a near-peer young adult aged 20-26, both with lived experience in child welfare.	Behavioral: Stronger Youth Networks and Coping (SYNC); SYNC is a 10-module online curriculum adapted from evidence-based cognitive change methods, including Coping Effectiveness Training (CET), co-facilitated by service providers in Independent Living Programs (ILPs; federally-funded transition skill-building services accessed by most foster youth in the US) and near-peers (have lived experience in foster care). SYNC aims to increase youth capacity to appraise stress and regulate emotional responses, to flexibly select adaptive coping strategies, and to specifically promote informal and formal help-seeking as an effective coping strategy.
No Intervention: Services-as-usual; The Services-as-usual (SAU) group receives typical child welfare services, which include ILP, or federally funded transition planning (e.g., identifying and supporting youth education and employment goals) and life skills (e.g., budgeting, renting an apartment, insurance) services typically delivered through a mix of classes, group activities, and/or individual skill-building with a paraprofessional service provider.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures :

1. Cognitive control and coping flexibility [ Time Frame: immediately after program completion, 6 months after program completion ]
   Cognitive Control and Flexibility Questionnaire (CCFQ; 18 items with 7-pt Likert-type response scale ranging from 1 'strongly disagree' to 7 'strongly agree', youth report) assesses cognitive control over emotion; and appraisal and coping flexibility. Average scores can range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating more (better) control and flexibility.
2. Help-seeking intentions [ Time Frame: immediately after program completion, 6 months after program completion ]
   General Help Seeking Questionnaire (22 items with 7-pt response scale ranging from 1 'Extremely unlikely' to 7 'Extremely likely', youth report) assesses intentions to seek help in the event of a personal or emotional problem and if having suicidal thoughts. Average scores can range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating more (better) help-seeking intentions.

Secondary Outcome Measures :

1. Barriers to seeking help [ Time Frame: immediately after program completion, 6 months after program completion ]
   Barriers to Adolescent Seeking Help - Brief (BASH-B; 11 items with 7-pt response scale ranging from 1 'strongly disagree' to 7 'strongly agree agree', youth report) assesses perceived autonomy and fears related to seeking help for mental health issues. Average scores can range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating more (worse) barriers.
2. Self-efficacy and empowerment specific to mental health [ Time Frame: immediately after program completion, 6 months after program completion ]
   Youth Efficacy/Empowerment Scale-Mental Health (MH) (23 items with 5-pt response scale ranging from 1 'Always or almost always' to 5 'Never or almost never', youth report) assesses extent to which youth manages mental health and directs their own mental health services. Average scores can range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating more (better) efficacy and empowerment around mental health services.
3. Coping self-efficacy [ Time Frame: immediately after program completion, 6 months after program completion ]
   Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (26 items with response scale ranging from 0 'I cannot do this at all' to 10 'Certain I can do this', youth report) assesses use of problem-focused, support-seeking, & positive reframing coping strategies. Average scores can range from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating more (better) coping self-efficacy.

Other Outcome Measures:

1. Domains for psychiatric diagnoses [ Time Frame: immediately after program completion, 6 months after program completion ]
   Diagnosis and Statistican Manual, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) Self-Rated Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure (25 items with yes/no responses, youth report) assesses mental health domains (past 2 weeks) that are important across psychiatric diagnoses including depression, substance use, anxiety, somatic symptoms, sleep problems). Total scores can range from 0 to 25, with higher scores indicating more (worse) psychiatric symptoms.
2. Mental health service use [ Time Frame: immediately after program completion, 6 months after program completion ]
   Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents (4 items with yes/no responses, youth report) assesses service use in past 3 months: Outpatient (counseling, therapy, support group), residential treatment, inpatient hospitalization, psychotropic medication. Total scores can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more (better) service usage.
3. Depression and anxiety [ Time Frame: immediately after program completion, 6 months after program completion ]
   Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS; 25 items with 4-pt response scale ranging from 1 'Never' to 4 'Always', youth report) assesses recent anxiety and depression symptoms. Average scores can range from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating more (worse) symptoms of anxiety and depression.
4. Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms [ Time Frame: immediately after program completion, 6 months after program completion ]
   The Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5; 17 items with 5-pt response scale ranging from 0 'Not at all' to 4 'Extremely', youth report) assess the prevalence of various post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (e.g., difficulty concentrating, loss of interest in activities, trouble falling or staying asleep). Average scores can range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating more (worse) PTSD symptoms.

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 16 Years to 20 Years (Child, Adult)
• Sexes Eligible for Study: All
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

• Eligible to receive federally-funded transition-related services in Oregon (ages 16-20 and in foster care at least 90 days after they turned age 14),
• Indicated behavioral health risk. Behavioral health risk is indicated by child welfare administrative indicators of lifetime behavioral health need or service involvement (DSM diagnoses, psychotropic medication, emotional-behavioral disability, congregate care/residential placement)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Inability to actively participate in the intervention, including you who are: non-English speaking, significantly developmentally disabled, or where participation is otherwise contraindicated (e.g., youth is in crisis, youth is in a placement that will not allow for participation)

Contacts and Locations

Contacts

Contact: Jennifer Blakeslee, PhD,MSW,BS; 5037258389; jblakes@pdx.edu

Contact: Rebecca A Miller, M.Ed, BA; ramiller@pdx.edu

Locations

United States, Oregon

Portland State University; Recruiting

Portland, Oregon, United States, 97201

Contact: Jennifer Blakeslee, PhD,MSW,BS 503-725-8389 jblakes@pdx.edu

Sub-Investigator: Brianne H Kothari, PhD,MA,BA

Sub-Investigator: Carrie J Furrer, PhD,MS,BA

Sponsors and Collaborators

Portland State University

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Investigators

• Principal Investigator: Jennifer Blakeslee, PhD,MSW,BS; Portland State University

More Information

• Responsible Party: Jennifer Blakeslee, Research Associate Professor, Portland State University
• ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06019377
• Other Study ID Numbers: 227953-18; 1R34MH127141-01A1 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract )
• First Posted: August 31, 2023
• Last Update Posted: April 9, 2024
• Last Verified: April 2024

Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:

• Plan to Share IPD: No

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No

Keywords provided by Jennifer Blakeslee, Portland State University:

Mental health; Help-seeking; Coping; Youth; Foster care; Near-peer; Independent living

Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; Stress Disorders, Traumatic; Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders; Mental Disorders