This is the classic website, which will be retired eventually. Please visit the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov instead.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

HIV/STD Risk and PrEP Implementation Messaging Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men (MIC-DROP)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06183502
Recruitment Status : Not yet recruiting
First Posted : December 27, 2023
Last Update Posted : January 31, 2024
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
San Diego State University
University of Chicago
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Patrick S Sullivan, Emory University

Brief Summary:

The goal of this observational study is to learn about awareness around PrEP use and adherence, condom use, sexual risk-taking behavior, and substance-using behaviors in men having sex with men. The main objective is to study a prospective cohort of MSM in Atlanta, Chicago, and San Diego to understand men's strategies to prevent HIV/Sexually Transmissible Infections (STIs), including PrEP use and adherence, condom use, sexual risk-taking behavior, and substance-using behaviors

Participants will complete:

  • Quantitative surveys quarterly
  • HIV/ STI testing every 6 months
  • Qualitative assessments: focus group discussions and in-depth interviews

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment
Sexually Transmitted Infections Gay Pre Exposure Prophylaxis Behavioral: Quantitative survey Diagnostic Test: HIV & STI testing Behavioral: Qualitative Assessment

Detailed Description:

The prevention of HIV in the United States is in a transformational era. In just a decade since the first finding of efficacy for daily oral PrEP, there has been a proliferation of new PrEP agents, including long-acting injectable PrEP, and regimens, including "event-driven" (also called "on demand" or 2-1-1 dosing) PrEP. There has also been new knowledge about the impact of antiretrovirals (ARVs) on the treatment of HIV, and an emergent understanding that people living with HIV who take ARVs and maintain a suppressed viral load are incapable of transmitting HIV to their sexual partners. In this context, the idea of "protected" sex - which historically meant sex protected by condoms - has become much more complex.6 Men who have sex with men (MSM) and others at risk for acquiring HIV are now making decisions about how to reduce their risks of HIV infection in a world where there are many more options to reduce risks of infection, and where those options also interact with the HIV status and viral suppression status of their sex partners. Understanding men's preferences for prevention products and strategies and what choices are being made by men with varying risk profiles is critical to public health responses and programs to reduce new HIV infections.

MSM are the most highly impacted groups by HIV in the US, with transmission largely driven by high per-act risk MSM. Among MSM, Black/African American (Black) and Hispanic/Latino (Hispanic) men experience nested health inequities: in 2020 Black men comprised 13% of US men and 38% of MSM diagnosed with HIV, and Hispanic men comprised 19% of US men and 33% of MSM diagnosed with HIV. Uptake of daily oral PrEP use by Black and Hispanic MSM has been slow and the extent of PrEP use among these men has not been equitable in light of their disproportionate impact in the HIV epidemic. Similarly, HIV incidence is concentrated in young MSM of all races. Thus, research to increase our understanding of men's awareness of, attitudes for and use of new prevention options must prioritize the equitable engagement of Black, Hispanic, and younger MSM.

The next 5 years will be a period of rapid changes in the fallout of new PrEP options and will likely see the introduction of new PrEP modalities (e.g., long-acting injectable PrEP, lower frequency oral dosing). Understanding the choices and patterns of PrEP use and the reasons and motivations for those choices among geographically, racially, and ethnically diverse groups of MSM will be a critical part of monitoring the public health response and informing public health programs and messaging. Ideally, public health messaging will be driven by up-to-date information about the perceptions, preferences, and practices of those MSM at the highest risk of HIV acquisition. During this era of rapid change in the available PrEP options, it is critical to have a robust system of real-time monitoring for PrEP preferences, what prevention options men are choosing, and what messages might be most impactful to support the appropriate uptake of PrEP and persistence on PrEP. Because the investigators expect numerous changes in the availability of PrEP products and treatment guidelines, it is also critical to be able to process and interpret these data in a timely way, to best support nimble decisions in prevention messaging and programs in response to a changing landscape of prevention options

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Observational
Estimated Enrollment : 1275 participants
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Official Title: Understanding HIV/STD Risk and Enhancing PrEP Implementation Messaging in a Diverse Community-Based Sample of Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men in a Transformational Era (MIC-DROP)
Estimated Study Start Date : March 2024
Estimated Primary Completion Date : March 2026
Estimated Study Completion Date : November 2026

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: HIV LGBTQIA+ Health

Group/Cohort Intervention/treatment
MSM using or not using Pre-exposure prophylaxis

60% of MSM using PrEP at baseline in Atlanta, Chicago, and San Diego to develop knowledge around PrEP use and adherence, condom use, sexual risk-taking behavior, and substance-using behaviors.

40% of MSM not using PrEP at baseline in Atlanta, Chicago, and San Diego to develop knowledge around PrEP use and adherence, condom use, sexual risk-taking behavior, and substance-using behaviors.

Behavioral: Quantitative survey
Quantitative surveys will be conducted through Alchemer, a HIPPA-compliant online survey system previously used by our group in collaborative research with CDC and supported by the Emory University Center for AIDS Research (CFAR). Surveys will be optimized for participants to take them through a personal computer, mobile phone, tablet, or the SMART study app. For participants who do not have any of these devices or prefer to not take the survey from their device, each city will have a research space where participants can schedule a convenient time to take the survey on a computer or tablet that the study will provide for that purpose.

Diagnostic Test: HIV & STI testing
The research team has developed and validated procedures for self-collection of specimens for testing for STIs (syphilis, urethral, rectal, and pharyngeal gonorrhea/chlamydia) and HIV self-testing. All participants will be mailed self-collection kits to provide samples for STIs (urine, rectal swab, and pharyngeal swab for gonorrhea/chlamydia; dried blood spot (DBS) for syphilis testing) and HIV (HIV 4th generation testing on DBS specimens in a CLIA-certified laboratory). Participants will be asked to collect specimens for their STI and HIV testing (every 6 months) and return them to Molecular Testing Labs. For participants who prefer in-person procedures, they will meet study staff who will provide them with the STI and HIV self-collection kit and instructions and provide a room for participants to collect their specimens.

Behavioral: Qualitative Assessment
Focus group discussions (n=up to 48 men for 3 qualitative assessments; total n=up to 144 men) as a part of the study consisting of 9 to 12 focus group discussions (FGD) with an average of 8 (range 3-10) participants in each (3 per city). These focus groups will be conducted once during the first year of the study. FGD will be conducted by a trained moderator using a semi-structured interview guide developed in collaboration with CDC scientists. For the FGD, in each city, there will be one FGD with men who have never used PrEP, one with men who are using PrEP and report no adherence issues, and one with men who are currently using PrEP or used PrEP previously and report sub-optimal adherence. In-Depth Interviews (IDIs) A series of 90 in-depth interviews (same n=up to 45 men for each of 3 qualitative assessments) will be conducted over 18 months: up to 45 IDIs each 6 months apart, with up to 15 IDIs per city each wave.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Monitoring Measure: Survey reports [ Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months,12 months,15 months,18 months ]
    As a prospective observation cohort study, a primary purpose of this study is to monitor real-world, community- (non-clinic) -based HIV prevention behavior (PrEP use/adherence, condom use/adherence), including uptake and transitions among prevention modality (condom, daily oral, episodic oral, long-acting injectable) in an effort to identify patterns and gaps in HIV protection in order to develop more effective messaging to close those gaps. Rapid reports to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) after each wave of data collection will summarize gaps in prevention and recommend the most advantageous messages to address gaps.

  2. Change in condom and PrEP use and adherence based on messages for current PrEP users [ Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months,12 months,15 months,18 months ]
    The purpose of Qualitative assessments; Focus Group Discussion is to understand men's awareness of PrEP messages, preferences for PrEP messages, and perceived impact/efficacy of HIV prevention and PrEP messages

  3. Change in condom and PrEP use and adherence based on messages for current non adherent PrEP users [ Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months,12 months,15 months,18 months ]
    The purpose of Qualitative assessments; Focus Group Discussion is to understand men's awareness of PrEP messages, preferences for PrEP messages, and perceived impact/efficacy of HIV prevention and PrEP messages

  4. Change in condom and PrEP use and adherence based on messages for people who never used PrEP [ Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months,12 months,15 months,18 months ]
    The purpose of Qualitative assessments; Focus Group Discussion is to understand men's awareness of PrEP messages, preferences for PrEP messages, and perceived impact/efficacy of HIV prevention and PrEP messages


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change in number of HIV diagnoses [ Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months ]
    All participants will have a known HIV-negative status at enrollment and will be provided with HIV and STI tests at baseline and every 6 months thereafter. Men who have a new HIV diagnosis or during the study will be helped with accessing HIV care and treatment services and will not proceed in the study

  2. Change in number of STI diagnoses [ Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months ]
    All participants will be provided with HIV and STI tests at baseline and every 6 months thereafter. Men who have a new STI diagnosis during the study will be helped with accessing STI care and treatment services



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   Male
Gender Based Eligibility:   Yes
Gender Eligibility Description:   Male sex assigned at birth, currently identify as male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Sampling Method:   Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Primary recruitment sources will be through online targeted advertisements to adult men in the three metropolitan areas (Atlanta, Detroit, and San Diego), including social media channels, such as Facebook, Instagram or Snapchat, Grindr, and other dating apps. Additionally, recruitment will be done through referrals from local clinics and community-based organizations. These organizations may provide palm cards or QR codes for interested participants to reach the eligibility screening survey.
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male at birth
  • Self-identify as Cis-gender Male
  • Ages 18 or older
  • ≥1 Male anal sex partner in the 6 months before the baseline screener
  • Live in or near Atlanta, Chicago, or San Diego
  • Owns cell phone with data service
  • Willing to download a health-related app to their cell phone as part of the research study
  • Willing to participate in a 2-year cohort study with quarterly surveys and HIV and mailed STI self-testing
  • Able to provide ≥ 2 means of contact
  • Not currently enrolled in another HIV prevention clinical trial
  • Not currently living with HIV

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female at birth
  • Do not self-identify as Cis-gender Male
  • Individuals < 18 years of age
  • HIV positive status
  • No male anal sex partner in the 6 months before the baseline interview
  • Does not own a mobile phone with data service
  • Not willing to download a health-related app to their cell phone as part of the research study
  • Live outside the metro Atlanta Metropolitan Statistical Area and/or planning to move from the Atlanta area in the next 2 years
  • Currently enrolled in an HIV prevention or treatment clinical trial

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT06183502


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Patrick Sullivan, DVM 404-727-8737 pssulli@emory.edu
Contact: Rebecca Moges rebecca.moges-banks@emory.edu

Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, California
San Diego State University
San Diego, California, United States, 92182
Contact: Keith J Horvath, PhD         
United States, Illinois
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
Contact: John Schneider, MD         
Sponsors and Collaborators
Emory University
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
San Diego State University
University of Chicago
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Patrick Sullivan, DVM Rollins School of Public Health
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Patrick S Sullivan, Professor, Emory University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06183502    
Other Study ID Numbers: STUDY00005355
U01PS005244 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract )
First Posted: December 27, 2023    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: January 31, 2024
Last Verified: January 2024
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Yes
Plan Description: The investigators plan to share individual de-identified participant data (including data dictionaries). Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the primary publication, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be shared.
Supporting Materials: Study Protocol
Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
Analytic Code
Time Frame: Beginning 3 months and ending 6 years following primary publication
Access Criteria: Investigators will share data with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Proposals should be directed to the PI. In order to gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Patrick S Sullivan, Emory University:
MSM
Gay
Pre exposure Prophylaxis
STI
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Communicable Diseases
Infections
Genital Diseases
Urogenital Diseases
Disease Attributes
Pathologic Processes