Maximizing Lymph Node Dissection on Fresh and Fixed Lung Cancer Resection Specimens
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06252129 |
Recruitment Status :
Not yet recruiting
First Posted : February 9, 2024
Last Update Posted : February 9, 2024
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Lung Cancer Lymph Node Metastasis Pathologic Processes | Other: Subjects undergoing a lung specimen lymph node dissection Other: Control group | Not Applicable |
Anatomic lung resection with systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection is the standard of care for patients with clinical stage I or II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While the best type of resection may sometimes be debated, it is clear that mediastinal, hilar, and lobar lymph nodes (LNs) should be routinely retrieved to achieve a complete lung cancer resection. According to major international guidelines, at least 3 hilar/intrapulmonary stations and 3 mediastinal stations should be assessed during resection. Although there is still a debate over whether the ideal number of LN stations sampled or the total number of LNs removed per station provides a better analysis, radical systematic LN dissection seems to offer the best oncological outcomes. In fact, in patients with tumors ≤4 cm in diameter completely resected, the quality of the mediastinal lymph node dissection and the thoroughness of the examination of the surgical specimen will select candidates for adjuvant treatment and define oncologic prognosis. The consequences of an incorrect lymph node classification can be substantial: while patients with N0 NSCLC have approximately 75% 5-year overall survival (OS), patients with NSCLC classified as N1 have a 5-year OS of 49%, and patients with NSCLC classified as N2 a 5-year OS of 36%. Therefore, the burden of determining the correct prognosis lies on the surgeon to perform a rigorous and thorough oncological resection, and on the pathologist to fully assess enough intrapulmonary LNs. Inaccuracy by either specialist leads to pathologic understage and suboptimal clinical management, which will lead to poor patient outcomes.
Developing a standardized technique to dissect the lobectomy specimen has the potential of maximizing the retrieval of all N1 stations lymph nodes. The investigators believe that the adoption of such technique will improve lung cancer staging and identify a higher number of patients that qualify for adjuvant therapies.
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Estimated Enrollment : | 160 participants |
Allocation: | Non-Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | None (Open Label) |
Primary Purpose: | Diagnostic |
Official Title: | Maximizing Lymph Node Dissection on Fresh and Fixed Lung Cancer Resection Specimens |
Estimated Study Start Date : | February 2024 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | April 2025 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | December 2027 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: 1. Interventional group
subjects who are being consented to this study and undergoing lymph node dissection as outlined in this protocol
|
Other: Subjects undergoing a lung specimen lymph node dissection
A lobectomy specimen's resection will undergo systematic lymph node dissection either by the patient's treating thoracic surgeon and/or by a member of the pathology team. The protocol for a standardized lymph node dissection consists of a series of blunt peribronchial dissections starting from the hilum to the periphery, with particular attention to points of airway bifurcation where intrapulmonary lymph nodes aggregate. By emphasizing the intrapulmonary lymph node map and a standardized dissection, the team will remove more lymph nodes from the lobectomy specimen, resulting in an accurate N staging. |
No Intervention: Concurrent non-interventional group | |
Retrospective cohort from 2021-2020 |
Other: Control group
Control group |
- Number of lymph nodes sampled [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ]To compare the number of stations and lymph nodes sampled when adopting a standardized technique compared to the conventional (prior) technique.
- Nodal upstage rate [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ]Determine the number of cases upstaged to N1 with the intrapulmonary lymph node dissection compared to the conventional technique.
- 3y RFS [ Time Frame: 3 years ]Three years recurrence-free survival rate of patients undergoing standardize dissection versus conventional technique.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects with a lung nodule or mass who are eligible to undergo a lobectomy.
- Subject without any metastasis present.
- Subjects who have peripheral lung nodule location
- Subjects must be 18 years of age or older.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects who received preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
- Subjects who have a lung nodule located in a central location. Central tumors are defined by those infiltrating the lobar airway.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT06252129
Contact: Paula Ugalde Figueroa, M.D. | (617) 732-7696 | pugaldefigueroa@bwh.harvard.edu |
Responsible Party: | Paula Antonia Ugalde Figueroa, Associate Surgeon, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Principal Investigator., Brigham and Women's Hospital |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT06252129 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
DFCI IRB protocol #23-576 |
First Posted: | February 9, 2024 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | February 9, 2024 |
Last Verified: | February 2024 |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
NSCLC Lymph node dissection Lung cancer staging |
Lung Neoplasms Lymphatic Metastasis Pathologic Processes Respiratory Tract Neoplasms Thoracic Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site |
Neoplasms Lung Diseases Respiratory Tract Diseases Neoplasm Metastasis Neoplastic Processes |