The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Radiation Therapy With or Without Bicalutamide for Recurrent pT3N0 Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00002874
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : January 27, 2003
Results First Posted : August 18, 2017
Last Update Posted : June 15, 2022
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
SWOG Cancer Research Network
NRG Oncology
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

Tracking Information
First Submitted Date  ICMJE November 1, 1999
First Posted Date  ICMJE January 27, 2003
Results First Submitted Date  ICMJE June 6, 2017
Results First Posted Date  ICMJE August 18, 2017
Last Update Posted Date June 15, 2022
Study Start Date  ICMJE February 1998
Actual Primary Completion Date August 2015   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: July 18, 2017)
Overall Survival (12-year Rates Reported) [ Time Frame: From date of randomization to 12 years. ]
Overall survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, with failure defined as death by any cause. Four-year follow-up was required of all patients, twelve-year rates are reported. Four-year follow-up was required of all patients, but twelve-year rates were reported. Patients are followed until death.
Original Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE Not Provided
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: July 18, 2017)
  • Non-Prostate Cancer Death (12-year Rates Reported) [ Time Frame: From date of randomization to 12 years. ]
    Non-prostate cancer death rates were estimated by the cumulative incidence method, with failure defined as any death that does not fall into the following categories: death due to prostate cancer or complications of protocol treatment (centrally reviewed), death with known progressive metastatic disease while on salvage hormone therapy, or death with a known rising PSA while on salvage hormone therapy. All other deaths are considered competing risks. Patients alive at time of analysis were censored. Any other death was treated as a competing risk. Four-year follow-up was required of all patients, but twelve-year rates were reported. Patients are followed until death. "Non-Prostate cancer death" is a more accurate wording for the protocol endpoint of "non-disease-specific survival", and matches the protocol definition.
  • Second PSA Recurrence (12-year Rates Reported) [ Time Frame: From date of randomization to 12 years. ]
    Second PSA recurrence (SPSAR) rates (i.e. first PSA failure on study) were estimated by the cumulative incidence method, with failure defined as the first occurrence of one of the following events: 1. Increase in PSA following protocol treatment according to the following criteria met during protocol treatment: If PSA dropped to undetectable level (<0.2 ng/ml) during protocol treatment (PT) then failure = increase after PT to >= 0.5 ng/ml ; If PSA decreased to a detectable level (≥ 0.2 ng/ml) during PT, then failure = increase PT of >= 0.3 ng/ml above the lowest detectable level; If PSA did not decrease during PT then failure = increase in PSA after PT of >= 0.5 ng/ml above entry PSA level. 2. The start of salvage hormone therapy. Patients alive without SPSAR at time of analysis were censored. Death without SPSAR was treated as a competing risk. Four-year follow-up was required of all patients, but twelve-year rates were reported. Patients are followed until death.
  • Third PSA Recurrence (12-year Rates Reported) [ Time Frame: From start of salvage hormone therapy to 12 years. ]
    Third PSA recurrence rates (i.e. second PSA failure on study) were estimated by the cumulative incidence method, with failure defined as PSA value of 0.5ng/ml or higher or any disease progression after starting salvage hormone therapy. Patients alive without third PSA recurrence at time of analysis were censored. Death without third PSA recurrence was treated as a competing risk. Four-year follow-up was required of all patients, but twelve-year rates were reported. Patients are followed until death.
  • PSA Complete Response at End of Protocol Treatment [ Time Frame: End of protocol treatment, which is planned to last for two years ]
    Complete response is defined as a drop in PSA on protocol treatment to less than 0.2 ng/ml. Note that when the study opened many institutions could not detect PSA < 05 ng/ml.
  • Distant Failure (12-year Rates Reported) [ Time Frame: From date of randomization to 12 years. ]
    Distant failure rates were estimated by the cumulative incidence method, with failure defined as the first occurrence of distant failure. Patients alive without distant metastases at time of analysis were censored. Death without distant metastasis was treated as a competing risk. Four-year follow-up was required of all patients, but twelve-year rates were reported. Patients are followed until death.
  • Prostate Cancer Death (12-year Rates Reported) [ Time Frame: From date of randomization to 12 years. ]
    Prostate cancer death rates were estimated by the cumulative incidence method, with failure defined as death due to prostate cancer or complications of protocol treatment (centrally reviewed), death with known progressive metastatic disease while on salvage hormone therapy, or death with a known rising PSA while on salvage hormone therapy. Patients alive at time of analysis were censored. Any other death was treated as a competing risk. Four-year follow-up was required of all patients, but twelve-year rates were reported. Patients are followed until death. "Prostate cancer death" is a more accurate wording for the protocol endpoint of "disease-specific survival", and matches the protocol definition.
  • Progression-free Survival (12-year Rates Reported) [ Time Frame: From date of randomization to 12 years. ]
    Progress-free survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, with failure defined as the first occurrence of PSA failure, local, regional or distant failure, or death from any cause. Patients alive without progression at time of analysis were censored. Four-year follow-up was required of all patients, but twelve-year rates were reported. Patients are followed until death. "Progression-free Survival" is more accurate wording for the protocol endpoint of "Freedom from Progression", and matches the protocol definition.
  • Grade 3+ Toxicity [ Time Frame: From date of randomization to four years. ]
    Adverse events are graded using the Cooperative Group Common Toxicity Criteria and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Radiation Morbidity Scoring. Grade refers to severity, assigning Grades 1 through 5 based on this general guideline: Grade 0 None, Grade 1 Mild, Grade 2 Moderate, Grade 3 Severe, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling, Grade 5 Death related toxicity. Toxicities reported to have occurred within 90 days from the start of radiotherapy are reported as "Acute Radiotherapy", all later toxicities are reported as "Hormone therapy and late radiotherapy toxicity". The highest grade toxicity event per subject is counted within each of these time periods. Four-year follow-up was required of all patients; patients are followed until death.
Original Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE Not Provided
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title  ICMJE Radiation Therapy With or Without Bicalutamide for Recurrent pT3N0 Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
Official Title  ICMJE A PHASE III TRIAL OF RADIATION THERAPY WITH OR WITHOUT CASODEX IN PATIENTS WITH PSA ELEVATION FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR pT3N0 CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE
Brief Summary

RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Androgens can stimulate the growth of prostate cancer cells. Hormone therapy using bicalutamide may fight prostate cancer by reducing the production of androgens. It is not yet known if radiation therapy is more effective with or without bicalutamide for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of radiation therapy with or without bicalutamide in treating patients who have stage II or stage III prostate cancer and elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels following radical prostatectomy.

Detailed Description Not Provided
Study Type  ICMJE Interventional
Study Phase  ICMJE Phase 3
Study Design  ICMJE Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition  ICMJE Prostate Cancer
Intervention  ICMJE
  • Drug: bicalutamide
    One (150 mg) tablet by mouth daily for two years beginning immediately upon, or just prior to, the initiation of irradiation.
    Other Name: Casodex
  • Radiation: radiation therapy
    64.8 Gy in 36 fractions (1.8 Gy in 5 daily sessions per week) to the original prostate volume, the tumor resection bed, and the proximal membranous urethra.
  • Drug: placebo
    One tablet by mouth daily for two years beginning immediately upon, or just prior to, the initiation of irradiation.
Study Arms  ICMJE
  • Experimental: Bicalutamide
    Radiation therapy + bicalutamide
    Interventions:
    • Drug: bicalutamide
    • Radiation: radiation therapy
  • Placebo Comparator: Placebo
    Radiation therapy + placebo
    Interventions:
    • Radiation: radiation therapy
    • Drug: placebo
Publications *

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status  ICMJE Completed
Actual Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: June 3, 2013)
840
Original Enrollment  ICMJE Not Provided
Actual Study Completion Date  ICMJE May 20, 2022
Actual Primary Completion Date August 2015   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria  ICMJE

Conditions for Patient Eligibility:

  • The patient on entry will have no clinical evidence of disease by physical exam or by imaging studies. A positive ProstaScint scan alone without a confirmatory biopsy must not be used to exclude a patient. Eligible patients will be those who have undergone a radical prostatectomy (either retropubic or perineal) and pelvic lymphadenectomy (either open or laparoscopic) for carcinoma of the prostate, pathologic stage T3N0, or pT2 pN0 with positive inked resection margin, at least 12 weeks prior to study entry.
  • Pathological T2 patients without positive margins, who are also pathologic N0 with prostatic fossa/anastamosis biopsy at the time of rising PSA documenting recurrent cancer, are eligible.
  • At entry, the PSA must be between 0.2 and 4.0ng/ml, inclusive.
  • A post-prostatectomy radioisotopic bone scan which was done within 16 weeks prior to entry must reveal no evidence of metastatic disease.
  • Patient must be evaluated by both the radiation oncologist and the urologist prior to entry and judged to be a suitable candidate for radiation and hormonal therapy.
  • Patient must have Karnofsky performance status >= 80.
  • Patients must have a life expectancy in excess of 10 years.
  • Patients must have, within 6 weeks prior to entry, a hemoglobin (Hgb) of >=10 gm, a white blood cell (WBC) count of >= 4000 cells/ml3, a platelet count of >= 100,000 cells/ml3, a serum bilirubin <= the institutional upper limit of normal, a serum serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) or serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) of <= 2.5 times the institutional upper limit of normal, and a serum creatinine of <= 2.0 times the institutional upper limit of normal.
  • A post-prostatectomy pelvic computerized tomography (CT) scan, within 16 weeks prior to randomization, must reveal no evidence of metastatic disease.
  • Patients must sign a study-specific informed consent form.
  • Patients with prior invasive cancers are eligible if disease free for at least 5 years; prior or concurrent basal or squamous cell skin cancer is eligible.

Conditions for Patient Ineligibility:

  • Pathologic stage T2 (without positive inked resection margin) or less except as stated in Section 3.1.1.1.
  • Pathologic lymph node stage of pN1 or greater.
  • An entry serum PSA of > 4.0ng/ml.
  • Patients with persistant urinary extravasation after prostatectomy.
  • Patients who have been previously treated with any hormonal therapy after prostatectomy.
  • Patients who have previously been treated with radiation therapy or biologic therapy for prostate cancer.
  • Karnofsky performance status < 80.
  • Treatment start > 4 weeks after randomization.
  • Prior chemotherapy for any reason.
Sex/Gender  ICMJE
Sexes Eligible for Study: Male
Ages  ICMJE Child, Adult, Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers  ICMJE No
Contacts  ICMJE Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Listed Location Countries  ICMJE Canada,   United States
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number  ICMJE NCT00002874
Other Study ID Numbers  ICMJE RTOG-9601
CDR0000065158
RTOG-R9601
Has Data Monitoring Committee Yes
U.S. FDA-regulated Product Not Provided
IPD Sharing Statement  ICMJE Not Provided
Current Responsible Party Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
Original Responsible Party Not Provided
Current Study Sponsor  ICMJE Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
Original Study Sponsor  ICMJE Same as current
Collaborators  ICMJE
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)
  • SWOG Cancer Research Network
  • NRG Oncology
Investigators  ICMJE
Principal Investigator: William U. Shipley, MD Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
Study Chair: Himanshu R Lukka, MD Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON
Study Chair: Pierre P Major, MD Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON
Study Chair: Niall M Heney, MD Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
Study Chair: David J Grignon, MD Indiana University, Indianapolis
PRS Account Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
Verification Date May 2022

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP