The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Maintenance Treatment Versus Observation After Induction in Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma (CAIRO3)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00442637
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified December 2013 by Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group.
Recruitment status was:  Active, not recruiting
First Posted : March 2, 2007
Last Update Posted : December 12, 2013
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds
Sanofi
Hoffmann-La Roche
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group

Tracking Information
First Submitted Date  ICMJE February 28, 2007
First Posted Date  ICMJE March 2, 2007
Last Update Posted Date December 12, 2013
Study Start Date  ICMJE January 2007
Actual Primary Completion Date September 2013   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: September 5, 2008)
Progression-free survival after re-introduction of MTD chemotherapy and bevacizumab (PFS2) [ Time Frame: study duration ]
Original Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: February 28, 2007)
Progression-free survival after re-introduction of MTD chemotherapy and bevacizumab (PFS2)
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: September 5, 2008)
  • Progression-free survival between observation versus maintenance therapy (PFS1) [ Time Frame: study duration ]
  • Response rate during re-introduction of MTD chemotherapy and bevacizumab [ Time Frame: study duration ]
  • Toxicity [ Time Frame: study duration ]
  • Quality of life [ Time Frame: study duration ]
  • Overall survival [ Time Frame: study duration ]
  • Translational research [ Time Frame: study duration ]
Original Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: February 28, 2007)
  • Progression-free survival between observation versus maintenance therapy (PFS1);
  • response rate during re-introduction of MTD chemotherapy and bevacizumab;
  • toxicity;
  • quality of life;
  • overall survival;
  • translational research.
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title  ICMJE Maintenance Treatment Versus Observation After Induction in Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma
Official Title  ICMJE Maintenance Treatment With Capecitabine and Bevacizumab Versus Observation After Induction Treatment With Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma
Brief Summary

The optimal duration of systemic treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer is unknown.

In this study the effects of bevacizumab and low-dose continuous chemotherapy with capecitabine is investigated in patients who have responded to 6 courses of oxaliplatin, capecitabine and bevacizumab ("induction treatment", at standard doses). This treatment is continued until progression or severe toxicity. This regimen is compared to the effects a observation without treatment after the induction treatment.

In case of disease progression, induction treatment will be reintroduced.

Detailed Description

Standard 1st-line treatment for patients with advanced colorectal cancer currently consists of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. With this approach the median overall survival is approximately 20 months, and progression-free survival in first-line approximately 9-11 months. The optimal duration of treatment is unknown. Current data suggest that the efficacy of bevacizumab is dependent on concomitant use of chemotherapy. However, oxaliplatin almost invariably gives rise to neuropathy after 6-8 cycles. Prolonged use of capecitabine is associated with e.g. hand-foot syndrome. Lastly, the prolonged use of these agents is associated with considerable costs.

Evidence, mainly preclinical, suggests that continuous dosing metronomic chemotherapy may be more efficacious than interval-chemotherapy given at MTD. In this study the concept of metronomic chemotherapy is explored by administering a continuous daily instead of the usual 2 weeks-on/1 week-off oral dosing regimen of low-dose capecitabine plus bevacizumab as maintenance therapy after induction combination chemotherapy given at MTD plus bevacizumab.

Study Type  ICMJE Interventional
Study Phase  ICMJE Phase 3
Study Design  ICMJE Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition  ICMJE Colorectal Cancer Metastatic
Intervention  ICMJE
  • Drug: capecitabine + bevacizumab
    Ca 1250 mg/m2 daily orally continuously, B 7.5 mg/kg i.v. q 3 w
  • Other: observation
    observation after induction treatment
Study Arms  ICMJE
  • Experimental: 1
    observation
    Intervention: Other: observation
  • Active Comparator: 2
    capecitabine plus bevacizumab
    Intervention: Drug: capecitabine + bevacizumab
Publications *

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status  ICMJE Unknown status
Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: February 28, 2007)
635
Original Enrollment  ICMJE Same as current
Estimated Study Completion Date  ICMJE December 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date September 2013   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria  ICMJE

Before the start of induction therapy:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histological proof of colorectal cancer (in case of a single metastasis, histological or cytological proof of this lesion should be obtained);
  • Distant metastases (patients with only local recurrence are not eligible);
  • Unidimensionally measurable disease (> 1 cm on spiral CT scan or > 2 cm on chest X-ray; liver ultrasound is not allowed). Serum CEA may not be used as a parameter for disease evaluation;
  • In case of previous radiotherapy, at least one measurable lesion should be located outside the irradiated field.
  • Ongoing or planned first line treatment with 6 cycles of Xeloda, Eloxatin, and Avastin.

Exclusion criteria

  • Prior adjuvant treatment for stage II/III colorectal cancer ending within 6 months before the start of induction treatment
  • Any prior adjuvant treatment after resection of distant metastases
  • Previous systemic treatment for advanced disease

At randomisation:

Inclusion criteria:

  • WHO performance status 0-1 (Karnofsky PS > 70%);
  • Disease evaluation with proven SD, PR or CR according to RECIST after 6 cycles of MTD chemotherapy performed in week 3-4 of the 6th cycle induction therapy, and randomisation performed in week 3-5 of the 6th cycle (see time table);
  • Laboratory values obtained ≤ 2 weeks prior to randomisation: adequate bone marrow function (Hb > 6.0 mmol/L, absolute neutrophil count > 1.5 x 109/L, platelets > 100 x 109/L), renal function (serum creatinine ≤ 1.5x ULN and creatinine clearance, Cockroft formula, > 30 ml/min), liver function (serum bilirubin ≤ 2 x ULN, serum transaminases ≤ 3 x ULN without presence of liver metastases or ≤ 5x ULN with presence of liver metastases);
  • Life expectancy > 12 weeks;
  • Age >= 18 yrs;
  • Negative pregnancy test in women with childbearing potential;
  • Expected adequacy of follow-up;
  • Institutional Review Board approval;
  • Written informed consent Exclusion criteria
  • History or clinical signs/symptoms of CNS metastases;
  • History of a second malignancy ≤ 5 years with the exception of adequately treated carcinoma of cervix or basal/squamous cell carcinoma of skin;
  • Previous intolerance of XelodaR, EloxatinR, and/or AvastinR for which any of these drugs have been permanently discontinued; patients with previous dose reductions or delays are eligible; patients with grade 2 neurotoxicity after the 6th cycle are eligible, and retreatment with EloxatinR after PFS1 should depend on the grade of neurotoxicity at that moment;
  • Known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency;
  • (Planned) radical resection of all metastatic disease;
  • Uncontrolled hypertension, i.e. consistently > 150/100 mmHg;
  • Use of more than 3 antihypertensive drugs;
  • Significant cardiovascular disease < 1 yr before randomisation (symptomatic congestive heart failure, myocardial ischemia or infarction, unstable angina pectoris, serious uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, arterial thrombosis, cerebrovascular event, pulmonary embolism);
  • Any of these significant cardiovascular events during previous fluoropyrimidine therapy;
  • Chronic active infection;
  • Any other concurrent severe or uncontrolled disease preventing the safe administration of study drugs;
  • Any impairment of gastrointestinal function or -disease that may significantly impair the absorption of oral drugs (i.e. uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea (defined as >CTC grade 2), malabsorption syndrome, bowel obstruction, or inability to swallow tablets);
  • Concomitant treatments: concomitant (or within 4 weeks before randomisation) administration of any other experimental drug under investigation; concurrent treatment with any other anti-cancer therapy; full-dose anticoagulation (is allowed if started during induction therapy);
  • Continuous use of immunosuppressive agents (except the use of corticosteroids as anti-emetic prophylaxis/treatment).
Sex/Gender  ICMJE
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages  ICMJE 18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers  ICMJE No
Contacts  ICMJE Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Listed Location Countries  ICMJE Netherlands
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number  ICMJE NCT00442637
Other Study ID Numbers  ICMJE CAIRO3
Has Data Monitoring Committee Yes
U.S. FDA-regulated Product Not Provided
IPD Sharing Statement  ICMJE Not Provided
Current Responsible Party Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group
Original Responsible Party Not Provided
Current Study Sponsor  ICMJE Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group
Original Study Sponsor  ICMJE Same as current
Collaborators  ICMJE
  • Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds
  • Sanofi
  • Hoffmann-La Roche
Investigators  ICMJE
Principal Investigator: C. JA Punt, MD PhD Amsterdam Medical Centre, Amsterdam Netherlands
PRS Account Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group
Verification Date December 2013

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP