The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

A Study of Bevacizumab (Avastin) in Combination With Capecitabine (Xeloda) in Elderly Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00484939
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : June 12, 2007
Results First Posted : June 10, 2014
Last Update Posted : January 8, 2015
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Hoffmann-La Roche

Tracking Information
First Submitted Date  ICMJE June 11, 2007
First Posted Date  ICMJE June 12, 2007
Results First Submitted Date  ICMJE March 7, 2014
Results First Posted Date  ICMJE June 10, 2014
Last Update Posted Date January 8, 2015
Study Start Date  ICMJE July 2007
Actual Primary Completion Date March 2013   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: May 28, 2014)
Progression-free Survival [ Time Frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months) ]
Progression-free survival was defined as the time in months from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. All measurable lesions (maximum of 5 per organ and 10 in total, those with the longest diameter and suitability for accurate repeated measurements) were identified as target lesions (TL). A sum of the longest diameter for all TLs was calculated and reported as the baseline sum longest diameter (SLD). All other lesions were identified as non-TLs and recorded at baseline. PD was defined as ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started, the unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
Original Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: June 11, 2007)
Progression-free survival
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: January 7, 2015)
  • Best Overall Response (BOR) [ Time Frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months) ]
    BOR was defined as the best response (complete response [CR], partial response [PR], stable disease [SD], progressive disease [PD], not evaluable [NE], or not assessed [NA]) recorded from the start of study treatment until disease progression (PD) or death. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target (TL) and non-target lesions (non-TL). PR was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline SLD, or the persistence of 1 or more non-TLs. For TLs, SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest SLD since treatment started. For non-TLs, SD was defined as the persistence of 1 or more lesions. PD was defined as ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started, the unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
  • Duration of Response [ Time Frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months) ]
    Duration of response was defined as the time in months from the first confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) until disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target (TL) and non-target lesions (non-TL). PR was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline SLD, or the persistence of 1 or more non-TLs.
  • Time to Response [ Time Frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months) ]
    Time to response was defined as the time in months from the date of first study treatment to the date of the first documentation of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), whichever occurred first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target (TL) and non-target lesions (non-TL). PR was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline SLD, or the persistence of 1 or more non-TLs. Participants who did not have a confirmed response were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment, or if that was unavailable, at the date of the first dose of study medication.
  • Overall Survival [ Time Frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months) ]
    Overall survival was defined as the time in months from randomization to death from any cause.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status [ Time Frame: Baseline to the Safety Follow-up which occurred 28 days after the last dose of treatment (up to 5 years 8 months). ]
    The ECOG performance status is a scale used to quantify cancer patients' general well-being and activities of daily life. The scale ranges from 0 to 5, with 0 denoting perfect health and 5 indicating death. The 6 categories are 0=Asymptomatic (Fully active, able to carry on all predisease activities without restriction), 1=Symptomatic but completely ambulatory (Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature), 2=Symptomatic, < 50% in bed during the day (Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours), 3=Symptomatic, > 50% in bed, but not bedbound (Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair 50% or more of waking hours), 4=Bedbound (Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair), 5=Death. Reported is the percentage of participants in each of the 6 ECOG performance status categories.
  • Percentage of Participants Requiring Additional Treatment for Malignancy [ Time Frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months) ]
    Reported is the percentage of participants requiring additional treatment for malignancy in the survival follow-up period.
  • Duration of Follow-up [ Time Frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months) ]
    Duration of follow-up is defined as the time in days from randomization until disease progression or death, or time to censoring for overall survival.
  • AEs, Laboratory Parameters, Vital Signs [ Time Frame: Throughout study ]
Original Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: June 11, 2007)
Efficacy: Best overall response, duration of response, time to response, overall survival. Safety: Adverse events, laboratory parameters, vital signs.
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title  ICMJE A Study of Bevacizumab (Avastin) in Combination With Capecitabine (Xeloda) in Elderly Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Official Title  ICMJE A Randomised, Open-label Phase III Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab in Combination With Capecitabine as First-line Treatment for Elderly Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Brief Summary

This 2-arm study assessed the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (Avastin) in combination with capecitabine (Xeloda), compared with capecitabine alone, in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients were randomized to receive either bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle) in combination with capecitabine (1000 mg/m^2 orally twice a day on Days 1-14 of each 3-week cycle) or capecitabine (1000 mg/m^2 orally twice a day on Days 1-14 of each 3-week cycle) alone.

No notable trends or interactions in laboratory values, electrocardiogram, or vital signs suggesting an effect in either direction for capecitabine/bevacizumab combination therapy or capecitabine monotherapy were observed during the study.

Detailed Description Not Provided
Study Type  ICMJE Interventional
Study Phase  ICMJE Phase 3
Study Design  ICMJE Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition  ICMJE Colorectal Cancer
Intervention  ICMJE
  • Drug: Bevacizumab
    Treatment continued until unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or a decision to terminate at the discretion of the Investigator if medically indicated. Bevacizumab was supplied in single-use vials.
    Other Name: Avastin
  • Drug: Capecitabine
    Treatment continued until unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or a decision to terminate at the discretion of the Investigator if medically indicated. Capecitabine was supplied as tablets.
    Other Name: Xeloda
Study Arms  ICMJE
  • Experimental: Bevacizumab + capecitabine
    Participants received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. In addition, participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
    Interventions:
    • Drug: Bevacizumab
    • Drug: Capecitabine
  • Active Comparator: Capecitabine
    Participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
    Intervention: Drug: Capecitabine
Publications * Cunningham D, Lang I, Marcuello E, Lorusso V, Ocvirk J, Shin DB, Jonker D, Osborne S, Andre N, Waterkamp D, Saunders MP; AVEX study investigators. Bevacizumab plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (AVEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Oct;14(11):1077-1085. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70154-2. Epub 2013 Sep 10.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status  ICMJE Completed
Actual Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: May 28, 2014)
280
Original Enrollment  ICMJE Not Provided
Actual Study Completion Date  ICMJE March 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date March 2013   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria  ICMJE

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients, ≥ 70 years of age.
  • Cancer of the colon or rectum.
  • Metastatic disease diagnosed ≤ 6 months before enrollment.
  • ≥ 1 measurable metastatic lesion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adjuvant anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment.
  • Prior chemotherapeutic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.
  • Past or current history of other malignancies (with the exception of basal and squamous cell cancer of the skin, or in situ cancer of the cervix).
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular disease.
  • Current or recent daily use of aspirin (> 325 mg/day) or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), or full dose anticoagulants.
Sex/Gender  ICMJE
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages  ICMJE 70 Years and older   (Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers  ICMJE No
Contacts  ICMJE Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Listed Location Countries  ICMJE Austria,   Canada,   Greece,   Hungary,   Italy,   Korea, Republic of,   Mexico,   Netherlands,   Poland,   Slovenia,   Spain,   United Kingdom
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number  ICMJE NCT00484939
Other Study ID Numbers  ICMJE MO19286
Has Data Monitoring Committee Not Provided
U.S. FDA-regulated Product Not Provided
IPD Sharing Statement  ICMJE Not Provided
Current Responsible Party Hoffmann-La Roche
Original Responsible Party Not Provided
Current Study Sponsor  ICMJE Hoffmann-La Roche
Original Study Sponsor  ICMJE Same as current
Collaborators  ICMJE Not Provided
Investigators  ICMJE
Study Director: Clinical Trials Hoffmann-La Roche
PRS Account Hoffmann-La Roche
Verification Date January 2015

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP