Pazopanib Versus Sunitinib in the Treatment of Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (COMPARZ)

• ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00720941
• Recruitment Status: Completed
• First Posted: July 23, 2008
• Results First Posted: June 17, 2013
• Last Update Posted: May 13, 2021
• Sponsor: Novartis Pharmaceuticals
• Information provided by (Responsible Party): Novartis ( Novartis Pharmaceuticals )

Tracking Information

• First Submitted Date: July 22, 2008
• First Posted Date: July 23, 2008
• Results First Submitted Date: January 4, 2013
• Results First Posted Date: June 17, 2013
• Last Update Posted Date: May 13, 2021
• Actual Study Start Date: August 14, 2008
• Actual Primary Completion Date: May 21, 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Current Primary Outcome Measures (submitted: May 9, 2013)

Progression-free Survival (PFS) [ Time Frame: From randomization until the earliest date of disease progression or death (up to Study Week 191) ]

PFS is defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the earliest date of progressive disease (PD), as defined by the Independent Review Committee (IRC), or death due to any cause. The IRC defined PD per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), Version 1. Per RECIST, PD is defined as a >=20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of >=1 new lesion. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for PFS estimates.

• Original Primary Outcome Measures (submitted: July 22, 2008): Progression free survival

Current Secondary Outcome Measures (submitted: June 19, 2014)

• Overall Survival [ Time Frame: From randomization until death (up to Study Week 268) ]
  Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization until death due to any cause.
• Number of Participants in the Indicated Categories for Overall Response as Assessed by Independent Review [ Time Frame: From randomization until the time of a confirmed best response of CR or PR (up to Study Week 167) ]
  The number of participants with evidence of CR (the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions), PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters [LD] of target lesions, taking as a reference the Baseline sum LD), Stable Disease (small changes that do not meet previously given criteria), or Progressive Disease (a >=20% increase in target lesions within the first 12 weeks of treatment) was evaluated by an independent review per RECIST, Version 1.
• Time to Response [ Time Frame: From randomization until the time of the first documented confirmed complete or partial response (up to Study Week 167) ]
  Time to response is defined as the time from the start of treatment until the first documented evidence of CR (the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the Baseline sum LD), whichever comes first. CR and PR were evaluated by an independent review per RECIST, Version 1.
• Duration of Response (DOR) [ Time Frame: From the time of the first documented confirmed complete or partial response until disease progression or death, if sooner (up to Study Week 167) ]
  DOR is defined as the time from the first documented evidence of response (CR or PR) until the first documented sign of disease progression (a >=20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of >=1 new lesion) or death, if sooner. CR=the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR=at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the Baseline sum LD.
• Number of Participants (Par.) With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)/Non-serious Adverse Events (Any Untoward Medical Occurrence in a Par. Administered a Pharmaceutical Product and Which Does Not Necessarily Have a Causal Relationship With This Treatment) [ Time Frame: From the time of the first dose of study drug to approximately one month after the discontinuation of study drug (up to Study Week 268) ]
  See the SAE/AE module for a list of all SAEs/AEs. SAE=any event occurring at any dose that results in any of the following: death, a life-threatening adverse drug experience (ADE; at immediate risk of death from the experience as it occurred), inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent/significant disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or a Grade 4 laboratory abnormality. Events that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or require hospitalization may be considered to be a serious ADEs when based upon appropriate medical judgment.
• Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scale Scores at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively) [ Time Frame: Baseline (predose); Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22 ]
  The FACIT-F scale measures the severity and impact of fatigue on functioning and health related quality of life (HRQoL) experienced in the past seven days. The level of fatigue is measured by 13 questions assessed on a four-point scale (0=not at all fatigued; 1=a little bit fatigued; 2=somewhat fatigued; 3=quite a bit fatigued; 4=very much fatigued; possible total score of 0 to 52). A negative change from Baseline represents a worsening condition. Change from Baseline was calculated as the assessment week value minus the Baseline value.
• Change From Baseline in the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Scale Disease-related Symptoms-physical (DRS-P) Domain Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively) [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22 ]
  The FKSI-19 is a disease-specific instrument that measures disease and treatment-related symptoms specifically in renal cancer patients in 4 domains. The DRS-P domain assesses symptoms experienced in the past 7 days. Participants are asked to respond to 12 questions ("I have a lack of energy," "I feel pain," for example) by using a 5-point scale (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much; possible total domain score of 0 to 48). Higher scores represent better health. A negative change from Baseline represents a worsening of condition.
• Change From Baseline in the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Scale Disease Related Symptoms-emotional (DRS-E) Domain Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively) [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22 ]
  The FKSI-19 is a disease-specific instrument measuring disease and treatment-related symptoms specifically in renal cancer patients in 4 domains. The DRS-E domain assesses symptoms experienced in the past 7 days. Participants are asked to respond to the question of "I worry that my condition will get worse" by using a 5-point scale (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much; possible total domain score of 0 to 4). A negative change from Baseline (BL) represents a worsening of condition. Change from BL was calculated as the assessment week value minus the BL value.
• Change From Baseline in the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Scale Treatment Side Effects (TSE) Domain Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively) [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22 ]
  The FKSI-19 is a disease-specific instrument that measures disease and treatment-related symptoms specifically in renal cancer patients in 4 domains. The TSE domain assesses side effects experienced in the past 7 days. Participants are asked to respond to 3 questions ("I have nausea," "I have diarrhea," and "I am bothered by side effects of treatment") by using a 5-point scale (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much; possible total domain score of 0 to 12).Higher scores represent better health. A negative change from Baseline represents a worsening of condition.
• Change From Baseline in the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Scale Functional Well Being (FWB) Domain Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively) [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22 ]
  The FKSI-19 is a disease-specific instrument that measures disease and treatment-related symptoms specifically in renal cancer patients in 4 domains. The FWB domain assesses well being in the past 7 days. Participants are asked to respond to 3 questions ("I am able to work," "I am able to enjoy life," and "I am content with the quality of my life now") by using a 5-point scale (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much; possible total domain score of 0 to 12). Higher scores represent better health. A negative change from Baseline represents a worsening of condition.
• Change From Baseline in the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Scale Total Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively) [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22 ]
  The FKSI-19 is a disease-specific instrument that measures disease and treatment-related symptoms specifically in renal cancer patients in 4 domains (DRS-P, DRS-E, TSE, and FWB). Participants are asked to respond to a total of 19 questions regarding symptoms, side effects, and well being by using a 5-point scale (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much; possible total score of 0 to 76). Higher scores represent better health. A negative change from Baseline represents a worsening of condition.
• Change From Baseline in the Supplementary Quality of Life Questions (SQLQ) Scale Worst Soreness Scores at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively) [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22 ]
  The SQLQ scale consists of 5 items that assess the worst mouth and throat, hand, and foot soreness, as well as limitations due to mouth/throat and foot soreness. Participants were asked to assess their worst mouth/throat, hand, and foot soreness by answering the question of " In the past 4 weeks, what was your worst mouth/throat, hand, and foot soreness?" by using the following 4-point scale: 0, I never had any soreness; 1, I had a little bit of soreness; 2, I had quite a lot of soreness; 3, I had severe soreness. A positive mean change from Baseline represents a worsening of condition.
• Change From Baseline in the Supplementary Quality of Life Questions (SQLQ) Limitations Due to Mouth and Throat Soreness Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively) [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22 ]
  The SQLQ consists of 5 items assessing the worst mouth/throat, hand, and foot soreness, and limitations due to mouth/throat and foot soreness. Participants (par.) assessed the limitations caused by their mouth/throat soreness by answering the question of "In the past 4 weeks, how much did your worst mouth/throat soreness limit you in the following activities: swallowing/eating/drinking/talking/sleeping" by using the following 4-point scale: 0, not limited; 1, limited a little; 2, limited a lot; 3, unable to do. The overall limitation score (15=best; 0=worst), based on the individual scores for the 5 activities, is derived as follows: the actual scores were rescored by subtracting the actual score from "3" for each of the 5 categories. A high score indicates less limitation. Change from Baseline was calculated as the assessment week value minus the Baseline value. A negative mean change from Baseline represents a worsening of condition.
• Change From Baseline in the Supplementary Quality of Life Questions (SQLQ) Limitations Due to Foot Soreness Scores at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively) [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22 ]
  The SQLQ consists of 5 items assessing the worst mouth/throat, hand, and foot soreness, and limitations due to mouth/throat and foot soreness. Par. assessed the limitations caused by their foot soreness by answering the question of "In the past 4 weeks, how much did your worst foot soreness limit you in each of the following activities: standing/walking/climbing stairs/sleeping/ability to do usual activities" by using the following 4-point scale: 0, not limited; 1, limited a little; 2, limited a lot; 3, unable to do. The overall limitation score (15=best; 0=worst), based on the individual scores for the 5 activities, is derived as follows: the actual scores were rescored by subtracting the actual score from "3" for each of the 5 categories. A high score indicates less limitation. Change from Baseline was calculated as the assessment week value minus the Baseline value. A negative mean change from Baseline represents a worsening of condition.
• Summary of Analysis for the Cancer Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ) Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively) [ Time Frame: Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22 ]
  The CTSQ assesses 3 domains related to the participant's satisfaction with cancer therapy: Expectations of Therapy (ET), Feelings about Side Effects (FSE), and Satisfaction with Therapy (SWT). Participants shared their thoughts on their cancer therapy (9 questions), their satisfaction with their most recently administered cancer therapy (6 questions), and if they would take the same cancer therapy if given the choice to do so again. All questions were assessed on a 5-point scale; 1, never; 5, always. Scores were averaged and transformed to a 0-100 scale; higher scores represent better health.
• Medical Resource Utilization (MRU): Assessed as the Mean Number of Non-study Medical Visits, Telephone Consultations, Hospital Days, and Emergency Room (ER) Visits Per 30 Days Through Week 24 [ Time Frame: From Day 1 up to Week 24 ]
  Non-study medical visits were defined as the sum of primary care physician visits, nurse practitioner/physician's assistant/nurse visits, and medical or surgical specialist visits. Days hospitalized were defined as the sum of days in the general ward and days in intensive care. The number of telephone consultations and ER visits was assessed via individual questions on the electronic Case Report Form. The endpoint was totaled through Week 24, divided by the number of days on treatment for each participant, then multiplied by 30 days to get the number of visits per 30 days.
• MRU: The Mean Number of Laboratory Visits, Radiology Visits, Home Healthcare Visits, and Medical Procedures for Cycles 1-4. MRU Data Collected at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively) [ Time Frame: Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22 ]
  The number of non-study laboratory visits (NSLVs), non-study radiology visits (NSRVs), and home healthcare visits (HHVs) were each collected as a single question on the eCRF. The number of non-study medical or surgical procedures (MSPs) was defined as the sum of procedures performed at outpatient or physician clinics, as well as those performed during any inpatient hospitalization.

• Original Secondary Outcome Measures (submitted: July 22, 2008): Overall Survival Objective response rate Time to response Duration of response Safety Quality of life
• Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures: Not Provided
• Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures: Not Provided

Descriptive Information

• Brief Title: Pazopanib Versus Sunitinib in the Treatment of Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
• Official Title: Study VEG108844, A Study of Pazopanib Versus Sunitinib in the Treatment of Subjects With Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
• Brief Summary: This study is being conducted to provide a direct comparison of the efficacy, safety and tolerability for pazopanib and sunitinib (SUTENT)
• Detailed Description: This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of pazopanib compared to sunitinib in subjects with advanced RCC who have received no prior systemic therapy for advanced or metastatic RCC. Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 800mg pazopanib to be administered once daily orally continuous dosing or 50mg sunitinib to be administered in 6-week cycles: 50mg orally daily for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off treatment. Subjects are permitted to receive supportive care throughout the study including transfusion of blood and blood products, treatment with antibiotics, anti-emetics, anti-diarrheal agents, analgesics, erythropoietin, or bisphosphonates, when appropriate. The study treatment will continue until subjects experience disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdraw consent, or death.
• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Phase: Phase 3
• Study Design: Allocation: Randomized; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: None (Open Label); Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Condition: Carcinoma, Renal Cell

Intervention

• Drug: Pazopanib
  800 mg administered once daily orally continuous dosing
• Drug: Sunitinib
  50 mg sunitinib to be administered in 6-week cycles: 50mg orally daily for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off treatment

Study Arms

• Active Comparator: Sunitinib
  Control arm
  Intervention: Drug: Sunitinib
• Experimental: Pazopanib
  Experimental arm
  Intervention: Drug: Pazopanib

Publications *

• Sheng X, Jin J, He Z, Huang Y, Zhou A, Wang J, Ren X, Ye D, Zhang X, Qin S, Zhou F, Wang B, Guo J. Pazopanib versus sunitinib in Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: pooled subgroup analysis from the randomized, COMPARZ studies. BMC Cancer. 2020 Mar 14;20(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6708-8.
• Sternberg CN, Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Choueiri TK, Kollmannsberger C, Bjarnason GA, Paul Nathan, Porta C, Grunwald V, Dezzani L, Han J, Tannir NM. COMPARZ Post Hoc Analysis: Characterizing Pazopanib Responders With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Dec;17(6):425-435.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
• Guo J, Jin J, Oya M, Uemura H, Takahashi S, Tatsugami K, Rha SY, Lee JL, Chung J, Lim HY, Wu HC, Chang YH, Azad A, Davis ID, Carrasco-Alfonso MJ, Nanua B, Han J, Ahmad Q, Motzer R. Safety of pazopanib and sunitinib in treatment-naive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Asian versus non-Asian subgroup analysis of the COMPARZ trial. J Hematol Oncol. 2018 May 22;11(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0617-1.
• Grunwald V, Dietrich M, Pond GR. Early tumor shrinkage is independently associated with improved overall survival among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a validation study using the COMPARZ cohort. World J Urol. 2018 Sep;36(9):1423-1429. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2297-4. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
• Beaumont JL, Salsman JM, Diaz J, Deen KC, McCann L, Powles T, Hackshaw MD, Motzer RJ, Cella D. Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity analysis of pazopanib versus sunitinib in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2016 Apr 1;122(7):1108-15. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29888. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
• Goldstein D, Rosenberg JE, Figlin RA, Townsend RR, McCann L, Carpenter C, Pandite L. Is change in blood pressure a biomarker of pazopanib and sunitinib efficacy in advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma? Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jan;53:96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
• Sorich MJ, Kichenadasse G, Rowland A, Woodman RJ, Mangoni AA. Angiotensin system inhibitors and survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with VEGF-targeted therapy: A pooled secondary analysis of clinical trials. Int J Cancer. 2016 May 1;138(9):2293-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29972. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
• Lai JS, Beaumont JL, Diaz J, Khan S, Cella D. Validation of a short questionnaire to measure symptoms and functional limitations associated with hand-foot syndrome and mucositis in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2016 Jan 15;122(2):287-95. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29655. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
• Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Cella D, Reeves J, Hawkins R, Guo J, Nathan P, Staehler M, de Souza P, Merchan JR, Boleti E, Fife K, Jin J, Jones R, Uemura H, De Giorgi U, Harmenberg U, Wang J, Sternberg CN, Deen K, McCann L, Hackshaw MD, Crescenzo R, Pandite LN, Choueiri TK. Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 22;369(8):722-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1303989.

Recruitment Information

• Recruitment Status: Completed
• Actual Enrollment (submitted: December 21, 2011): 927
• Original Estimated Enrollment (submitted: July 22, 2008): 876
• Actual Study Completion Date: March 24, 2021
• Actual Primary Completion Date: May 21, 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

• Written informed consent
• Diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma with clear-cell component histology.
• Received no prior systemic therapy (interleukin-2, interferon-alpha, chemotherapy, bevacizumab, mTOR inhibitor, sunitinib, sorafenib or other VEGF TKI) for advanced or metastatic RCC
• Locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma
• Measurable disease by CT or MRI
• Karnofsky performance scale status of >=70
• Age >=18 years
• A female is eligible to enter and participate in this study if she is of: non-childbearing or agrees to use adequate contraception.
• Adequate organ system function
• Total serum calcium concentration <12.0mg/dL
• Left ventricular ejection fraction >= lower limit of institutional normal.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Pregnant or lactating female (unless agrees to refrain from nursing throughout the treatment period and for 14 days following the last dose of study)
• History of another malignancy (unless have been disease-free for 3 years)
• History or clinical evidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases (unless have previously-treated CNS metastases and meet all 3 of the following criteria are: are asymptomatic, have had no evidence of active CNS metastases for >=6 months prior to enrolment, and have no requirement for steroids or enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants)
• Clinically significant gastrointestinal abnormalities including, but not limited to: malabsorption syndrome, major resection of the stomach or small bowel that could affect the absorption of study drug, active peptic ulcer disease, known intraluminal metastatic lesion/s with suspected bleeding, Inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis, or other gastrointestinal conditions with increased risk of perforation, history of abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation, or intra abdominal abscess within 28 days prior to beginning study treatment.
• Presence of uncontrolled infection.
• Prolongation of corrected QT interval (QTc) > 480 milliseconds
• History of any one or more of the following cardiovascular conditions within the past 12 months: cardiac angioplasty or stenting, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, coronary artery by-pass graft surgery, symptomatic peripheral vascular disease, Class III or IV congestive heart failure, as defined by the New York Heart Association
• History of cerebrovascular accident including transient ischemic attack within the past 12 months
• History of pulmonary embolism or untreated deep venous thrombosis (DVT) within the past 6 months (unless had recent DVT and have been treated with therapeutic anti-coagulating agents for at least 6 weeks)
• Poorly controlled hypertension (defined as systolic blood pressure of >=150mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of >=90mmHg). Initiation or adjustment of antihypertensive medication(s) is permitted prior to study entry
• Prior major surgery or trauma within 28 days prior to first dose of study drug and/or presence of any non-healing wound, fracture, or ulcer.
• Evidence of active bleeding or bleeding susceptibility
• Spitting/coughing up blood within 6 weeks of first dose of study drug
• Known endobronchial lesions and/or lesions infiltrating major pulmonary vessels
• Any serious and/or unstable pre-existing medical, psychiatric, or other conditions that could interfere with patient's safety, obtaining informed consent or compliance to the study.
• Use any prohibited medications within 14 days of the first dose of study medication.
• Use of an investigational agent, including an investigational anti-cancer agent, within 28 days or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to the first dose of study drug.
• Prior use of an investigational or licensed drug that targets VEGF or VEGF receptors (eg. bevacizumab, sunitinib, sorafenib, etc), or are mTOR inhibitors (eg. temsirolimus, everolimus, etc).
• Is now undergoing and/or has undergone in the 14 days immediately prior to first dose of study drug, any cancer therapy (surgery, tumor embolization, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, biological therapy, or hormonal therapy)
• Any ongoing toxicity from prior anti-cancer therapy that is >Grade 1 and/or that is progressing in severity.
• Known immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reaction or idiosyncrasy to drugs chemically related to pazopanib or sunitinib.

Sex/Gender

• Sexes Eligible for Study: All

• Ages: 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Contacts: Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
• Listed Location Countries: Australia, Canada, China, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Republic of, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Administrative Information

• NCT Number: NCT00720941
• Other Study ID Numbers: 108844; 2008-002102-19 ( EudraCT Number ); CPZP034A2301 ( Other Identifier: Novartis )
• Has Data Monitoring Committee: Yes

U.S. FDA-regulated Product

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No

IPD Sharing Statement

• Plan to Share IPD: Yes

Plan Description

Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.

This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

• Current Responsible Party: Novartis ( Novartis Pharmaceuticals )
• Original Responsible Party: Not Provided
• Current Study Sponsor: Novartis Pharmaceuticals
• Original Study Sponsor: GlaxoSmithKline
• Collaborators: Not Provided

Investigators

• Study Director: Novartis Pharmaceuticals; Novartis Pharmaceuticals

• PRS Account: Novartis
• Verification Date: April 2021