A Study Of Oral CP-690,550 As A Maintenance Therapy For Ulcerative Colitis (OCTAVE)

• ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01458574
• Recruitment Status: Completed
• First Posted: October 25, 2011
• Results First Posted: May 18, 2017
• Last Update Posted: May 18, 2017
• Sponsor: Pfizer
• Information provided by (Responsible Party): Pfizer

Tracking Information

• First Submitted Date: October 21, 2011
• First Posted Date: October 25, 2011
• Results First Submitted Date: April 7, 2017
• Results First Posted Date: May 18, 2017
• Last Update Posted Date: May 18, 2017
• Actual Study Start Date: July 20, 2012
• Actual Primary Completion Date: May 27, 2016 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Current Primary Outcome Measures (submitted: April 7, 2017)

Percentage of Participants In Remission at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Week 52 ]

Remission in participants was defined by a total mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of ulcerative colitis (UC). It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy and physician global assessment (PGA), each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating higher disease severity. These subscores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12 where higher score indicating higher disease severity.

• Original Primary Outcome Measures (submitted: October 24, 2011): The proportion of subjects in remission at Week 52 [ Time Frame: week 52 ]

Current Secondary Outcome Measures (submitted: April 7, 2017)

• Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Week 52 ]
  Mucosal healing in participants was defined by mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1. The mayo endoscopic subscore consisted of the findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy, graded from 0 to 3 with higher subscores indicating higher disease severity.
• Percentage of Participants With Sustained Steroid-Free Remission (Defined as Being in Remission and Steroid-Free at Both Week 24 and 52), Among Participants With Remission at Baseline [ Time Frame: Week 24, 52 ]
  Sustained steroid-free remission was defined by being in remission and steroid-free at both Week 24 and Week 52. Steroid-free remission was defined by being in remission, in addition to no requirement of any treatment with steroid for at least 4 weeks prior to the visit. Remission was defined by a total mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating higher disease severity. These subscores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating higher disease severity. Percentage of participants with sustained steroid-free remission (among participants with remission at baseline) were reported in this outcome measure.
• Percentage of Participants in Remission at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Week 24 ]
  Remission in participants was defined by a total mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher subscores indicating higher disease severity. These subscores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating higher disease severity.
• Percentage of Participants in Sustained Remission [ Time Frame: Week 24, 52 ]
  Sustained remission in participants was defined by being in remission at both Week 24 and Week 52. Remission was defined by a total mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher subscores indicating higher disease severity. These subscores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher score indicating higher disease severity.
• Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Week 24 ]
  Mucosal healing in participants was defined by a mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1. The mayo endoscopic subscore consisted of the findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy, graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating higher disease severity.
• Percentage of Participants With Sustained Mucosal Healing [ Time Frame: Week 24, 52 ]
  Sustained mucosal healing in participants was defined by achieving mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 at both Week 24 and Week 52. The mayo endoscopic subscore consisted of the findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy, graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating higher disease severity.
• Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 24 and 52, Among Participants With Mucosal Healing at Baseline [ Time Frame: Week 24, 52 ]
  Mucosal healing in participants was defined as achieving mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1. The mayo endoscopic subscore consisted of the findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy, graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating higher disease severity.
• Percentage of Participants With Sustained Mucosal Healing, Among Participants With Mucosal Healing at Baseline [ Time Frame: Week 24, 52 ]
  Sustained mucosal healing in participants was defined by achieving mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 at both Week 24 and Week 52. The mayo endoscopic subscore consisted of the findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy, graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating higher disease severity.
• Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 24 and 52 [ Time Frame: Week 24, 52 ]
  Clinical response was defined by a decrease from induction study (A3921094 [NCT01465763] or A3921095 [NCT01458951]) baseline in Mayo score of at least 3 points and at least 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of at least 1 point, or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating higher disease severity. These subscores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating higher disease severity. Percentage of participants with clinical response at Week 24 and 52 have been reported in this outcome measure.
• Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Response [ Time Frame: Week 24, 52 ]
  Sustained clinical response in participants was defined as showing clinical response at both Week 24 and Week 52. Clinical response was defined by a decrease from induction study (A3921094 [NCT01465763] or A3921095 [NCT01458951]) baseline in mayo score of at least 3 points and at least 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of at least 1 point, or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating higher disease severity. These subscores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating higher disease severity. Percentage of participants with sustained clinical response are reported in this outcome measure.
• Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission at Week 24 and 52 [ Time Frame: Week 24, 52 ]
  Clinical remission in participants was defined as a total mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating higher disease severity. These subscores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating higher disease severity.
• Percentage of Participants in Sustained Clinical Remission [ Time Frame: Week 24, 52 ]
  Sustained clinical remission in participants was defined as being in clinical remission at both Week 24 and Week 52. Clinical remission was defined by a total mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating higher disease severity. These subscores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating higher disease severity.
• Percentage of Participants in Deep Remission at Week 24 and 52 [ Time Frame: Week 24, 52 ]
  Deep remission in participants was defined as a total mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point and 0 subscore for both rectal bleeding and endoscopic subscores. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating higher disease severity. These subscores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating higher disease severity.
• Percentage of Participants in Sustained Deep Remission [ Time Frame: Week 24, 52 ]
  Sustained deep remission was defined by being in deep remission at both Week 24 and Week 52. Deep remission in participants was defined as a total mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point and 0 subscore for both rectal bleeding and endoscopic subscores. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating higher disease severity. These subscores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating higher disease severity.
• Percentage of Participants in Symptomatic Remission at Week 24 and 52 [ Time Frame: Week 24, 52 ]
  Symptomatic remission in participants was defined as a total mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point, and 0 subscore for both rectal bleeding and stool frequency. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 sub-scores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating higher disease severity. These subscores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating higher disease severity.
• Percentage of Participants in Sustained Symptomatic Remission [ Time Frame: Week 24, 52 ]
  Sustained symptomatic remission in participants was defined as being in symptomatic remission at both Week 24 and Week 52. Symptomatic remission was defined as a total Mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point, and 0 subscore for both rectal bleeding and stool frequency. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating higher disease severity. These subscores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating higher disease severity.
• Percentage of Participants in Endoscopic Remission at Week 24 and 52 [ Time Frame: Week 24, 52 ]
  Endoscopic remission in participants was defined as a mayo endoscopic subscore of 0. The mayo endoscopic subscore consisted of the findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy, graded from 0 to 3 with higher subscores indicating higher disease severity.
• Percentage of Participants in Sustained Endoscopic Remission [ Time Frame: Week 24, 52 ]
  Sustained endoscopic remission in participants was defined as being in endoscopic remission at both Week 24 and Week 52. Endoscopic remission was defined by a mayo endoscopic subscore of 0. The mayo endoscopic subscore consisted of the findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy, graded from 0 to 3 with higher subscores indicating higher disease severity.
• Total Mayo Score at Baseline, Week 24 and 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, 52 ]
  Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating higher disease severity. These subscores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating higher disease severity.
• Change From Baseline in Total Mayo Score at Week 24 and 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, 52 ]
  Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating higher disease severity. These subscores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating higher disease severity. Change from baseline in total mayo score at Week 24 and 52 was reported.
• Percentage of Participants in Remission, Among Participants With Remission at Baseline [ Time Frame: Week 24, 52 ]
  Remission in participants was defined by a total mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating higher disease severity. These subscores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher score indicating higher disease severity.
• Percentage of Participants in Sustained Remission, Among Participants With Remission at Baseline [ Time Frame: Week 24, 52 ]
  Sustained remission in participants was defined by being in remission at both Week 24 and Week 52. Remission was defined as a total mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating higher disease severity. These subscores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher score indicating higher disease severity.
• Percentage of Participants in Steroid-free Remission, Among Participants in Remission at Baseline [ Time Frame: Week 24, 52 ]
  Steroid-free remission was defined by being in remission, in addition to no requirement of any treatment with steroid for at least 4 weeks prior to the visit. Remission was defined by a total mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating higher disease severity. These subscores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating higher disease severity. Percentage of participants in steroid-free remission were reported in this outcome measure.
• Percentage of Participants in Steroid-Free Remission, Among Participants Receiving Steroids at Baseline [ Time Frame: Week 24, 52 ]
  Steroid-free remission was defined by being in remission, in addition to no requirement of any treatment with steroid for at least 4 weeks prior to the visit. Remission was defined by a total mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating higher disease severity. These subscores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating higher disease severity. Percentage of participants with steroid-free remission were reported in this outcome measure.
• Percentage of Participants in Sustained Steroid-Free Remission, Among Participants Receiving Steroids at Baseline [ Time Frame: Week 24, 52 ]
  Sustained steroid-free remission was defined by being in remission and steroid-free at both Week 24 and Week 52. Steroid-free remission was defined by being in remission, in addition to no requirement of any treatment with steroid for at least 4 weeks prior to the visit. Remission was defined by a total mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consisted of 4 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings of centrally read flexible sigmoidoscopy and PGA, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating higher disease severity. These subscores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicating higher disease severity. Percentage of participants with sustained steroid-free remission were reported in this outcome measure.

Original Secondary Outcome Measures (submitted: October 24, 2011)

• The proportion of subjects with mucosal healing at Week 52. [ Time Frame: week 52 ]
• The proportion of subjects in sustained steroid free remission among subjects in remission at baseline of Study A3921096. [ Time Frame: week 24 & 52 ]

• Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures: Not Provided
• Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures: Not Provided

Descriptive Information

• Brief Title: A Study Of Oral CP-690,550 As A Maintenance Therapy For Ulcerative Colitis
• Official Title: A Multicentre, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study Of Oral Cp-690,550 As A Maintenance Therapy In Subjects With Ulcerative Colitis
• Brief Summary: The study proposes to assess whether compared to placebo, CP-690,550 is effective, safe, and tolerable maintenance therapy in subjects with Ulcerative Colitis (UC). The study proposes to assess whether compared to placebo, CP-690,550 maintenance therapy more effectively achieves mucosal healing and improves quality of life in subjects with UC.The study proposes to assess CP-690,550 pharmacokinetic exposure during maintenance therapy in subjects over the age of 18 years with UC.
• Detailed Description: Not Provided
• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Phase: Phase 3
• Study Design: Allocation: Randomized; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator); Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Condition: Ulcerative Colitis

Intervention

• Drug: Placebo
  Placebo 10 mg orally (PO) twice a day (BID)
• Drug: CP690,550
  CP-690,550 5 mg orally (PO) twice a day (BID)
• Drug: CP-690,550
  CP-690,550 10 mg orally (PO) twice a day (BID)

Study Arms

• Placebo Comparator: Placebo Comparator
  Intervention: Drug: Placebo
• Experimental: CP-690,550 5 mg Arm
  Intervention: Drug: CP690,550
• Experimental: CP-690,550 10 mg Arm
  Intervention: Drug: CP-690,550

Publications *

• Lichtenstein GR, Bressler B, Francisconi C, Vermeire S, Lawendy N, Salese L, Sawyerr G, Shi H, Su C, Judd DT, Jones T, Loftus EV. Assessment of Safety and Efficacy of Tofacitinib, Stratified by Age, in Patients from the Ulcerative Colitis Clinical Program. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023 Jan 5;29(1):27-41. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izac084.
• Hudesman DP, Torres J, Salese L, Woolcott JC, Mundayat R, Su C, Mosli MH, Allegretti JR. Long-Term Improvement in the Patient-Reported Outcomes of Rectal Bleeding, Stool Frequency, and Health-Related Quality of Life with Tofacitinib in the Ulcerative Colitis OCTAVE Clinical Program. Patient. 2023 Mar;16(2):95-103. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00603-w. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
• Winthrop KL, Vermeire S, Long MD, Panes J, Ng SC, Kulisek N, Mundayat R, Lawendy N, Vranic I, Modesto I, Su C, Melmed GY. Long-term Risk of Herpes Zoster Infection in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Receiving Tofacitinib. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023 Jan 5;29(1):85-96. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izac063.
• Vavricka SR, Greuter T, Cohen BL, Reinisch W, Steinwurz F, Fellmann M, Guo X, Lawendy N, Paulissen J, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Corticosteroid-free efficacy and safety outcomes in patients receiving tofacitinib in the OCTAVE Sustain maintenance study. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2022 May 10;15:17562848221090834. doi: 10.1177/17562848221090834. eCollection 2022.
• Mukherjee A, Tsuchiwata S, Nicholas T, Cook JA, Modesto I, Su C, D'Haens GR, Sandborn WJ. Exposure-Response Characterization of Tofacitinib Efficacy in Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Results From Phase II and Phase III Induction and Maintenance Studies. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Jul;112(1):90-100. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2601. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
• Feagan BG, Khanna R, Sandborn WJ, Vermeire S, Reinisch W, Su C, Salese L, Fan H, Paulissen J, Woodworth DA, Niezychowski W, Sands BE. Agreement between local and central reading of endoscopic disease activity in ulcerative colitis: results from the tofacitinib OCTAVE trials. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Dec;54(11-12):1442-1453. doi: 10.1111/apt.16626. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
• Farraye FA, Qazi T, Kotze PG, Moore GT, Mundayat R, Lawendy N, Sharma PP, Judd DT. The impact of body mass index on efficacy and safety in the tofacitinib OCTAVE ulcerative colitis clinical programme. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Aug;54(4):429-440. doi: 10.1111/apt.16439. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
• Rubin DT, Reinisch W, Greuter T, Kotze PG, Pinheiro M, Mundayat R, Maller E, Fellmann M, Lawendy N, Modesto I, Vavricka SR, Lichtenstein GR. Extraintestinal manifestations at baseline, and the effect of tofacitinib, in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 May 16;14:17562848211005708. doi: 10.1177/17562848211005708. eCollection 2021.
• Panes J, Vermeire S, Dubinsky MC, Loftus EV, Lawendy N, Wang W, Salese L, Su C, Modesto I, Guo X, Colombel JF. Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib Re-treatment for Ulcerative Colitis After Treatment Interruption: Results from the OCTAVE Clinical Trials. J Crohns Colitis. 2021 Nov 8;15(11):1852-1863. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab065.
• Sandborn WJ, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Sharara AI, Su C, Modesto I, Mundayat R, Gunay LM, Salese L, Sands BE. Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib in Ulcerative Colitis Based on Prior Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Failure Status. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Mar;20(3):591-601.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.02.043. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
• Vong C, Martin SW, Deng C, Xie R, Ito K, Su C, Sandborn WJ, Mukherjee A. Population Pharmacokinetics of Tofacitinib in Patients With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2021 Mar;10(3):229-240. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.899. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
• Curtis JR, Regueiro M, Yun H, Su C, DiBonaventura M, Lawendy N, Nduaka CI, Koram N, Cappelleri JC, Chan G, Modesto I, Lichtenstein GR. Tofacitinib Treatment Safety in Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Comparison of Observational Population Cohort Data From the IBM MarketScan(R) Administrative Claims Database With Tofacitinib Trial Data. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021 Aug 19;27(9):1394-1408. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izaa289.
• Colombel JF, Osterman MT, Thorpe AJ, Salese L, Nduaka CI, Zhang H, Lawendy N, Friedman GS, Quirk D, Su C, Reinisch W. Maintenance of Remission With Tofacitinib Therapy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jan;20(1):116-125.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
• Sands BE, Colombel JF, Ha C, Farnier M, Armuzzi A, Quirk D, Friedman GS, Kwok K, Salese L, Su C, Taub PR. Lipid Profiles in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Receiving Tofacitinib-Implications for Cardiovascular Risk and Patient Management. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021 May 17;27(6):797-808. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izaa227.
• Panaccione R, Isaacs JD, Chen LA, Wang W, Marren A, Kwok K, Wang L, Chan G, Su C. Characterization of Creatine Kinase Levels in Tofacitinib-Treated Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Results from Clinical Trials. Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Aug;66(8):2732-2743. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06560-4. Epub 2020 Aug 20. Erratum In: Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Oct 10;:
• Lichtenstein GR, Rogler G, Ciorba MA, Su C, Chan G, Pedersen RD, Lawendy N, Quirk D, Nduaka CI, Thorpe AJ, Panes J. Tofacitinib, an Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitor: Analysis of Malignancy (Excluding Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer) Events Across the Ulcerative Colitis Clinical Program. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021 May 17;27(6):816-825. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izaa199.
• Sandborn WJ, Panes J, Sands BE, Reinisch W, Su C, Lawendy N, Koram N, Fan H, Jones TV, Modesto I, Quirk D, Danese S. Venous thromboembolic events in the tofacitinib ulcerative colitis clinical development programme. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Nov;50(10):1068-1076. doi: 10.1111/apt.15514. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
• Sands BE, Taub PR, Armuzzi A, Friedman GS, Moscariello M, Lawendy N, Pedersen RD, Chan G, Nduaka CI, Quirk D, Salese L, Su C, Feagan BG. Tofacitinib Treatment Is Associated With Modest and Reversible Increases in Serum Lipids in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jan;18(1):123-132.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.04.059. Epub 2019 May 8.
• Sandborn WJ, Panes J, D'Haens GR, Sands BE, Su C, Moscariello M, Jones T, Pedersen R, Friedman GS, Lawendy N, Chan G. Safety of Tofacitinib for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis, Based on 4.4 Years of Data From Global Clinical Trials. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jul;17(8):1541-1550. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.11.035. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
• Winthrop KL, Melmed GY, Vermeire S, Long MD, Chan G, Pedersen RD, Lawendy N, Thorpe AJ, Nduaka CI, Su C. Herpes Zoster Infection in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Receiving Tofacitinib. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018 Sep 15;24(10):2258-2265. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy131.
• Motoya S, Watanabe M, Kim HJ, Kim YH, Han DS, Yuasa H, Tabira J, Isogawa N, Arai S, Kawaguchi I, Hibi T. Tofacitinib induction and maintenance therapy in East Asian patients with active ulcerative colitis: subgroup analyses from three phase 3 multinational studies. Intest Res. 2018 Apr;16(2):233-245. doi: 10.5217/ir.2018.16.2.233. Epub 2018 Apr 30. Erratum In: Intest Res. 2018 Jul;16(3):499-501.
• Panes J, Vermeire S, Lindsay JO, Sands BE, Su C, Friedman G, Zhang H, Yarlas A, Bayliss M, Maher S, Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG, Rubin DT. Tofacitinib in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Health-Related Quality of Life in Phase 3 Randomised Controlled Induction and Maintenance Studies. J Crohns Colitis. 2018 Jan 24;12(2):145-156. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx133. Erratum In: J Crohns Colitis. 2019 Jan 1;13(1):139-140.
• Sandborn WJ, Su C, Sands BE, D'Haens GR, Vermeire S, Schreiber S, Danese S, Feagan BG, Reinisch W, Niezychowski W, Friedman G, Lawendy N, Yu D, Woodworth D, Mukherjee A, Zhang H, Healey P, Panes J; OCTAVE Induction 1, OCTAVE Induction 2, and OCTAVE Sustain Investigators. Tofacitinib as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 4;376(18):1723-1736. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606910.

Recruitment Information

• Recruitment Status: Completed
• Actual Enrollment (submitted: August 11, 2016): 593
• Original Estimated Enrollment (submitted: October 24, 2011): 654
• Actual Study Completion Date: May 27, 2016
• Actual Primary Completion Date: May 27, 2016 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

• Subjects who met study entry criteria and completed 8-week induction treatment from Study A3921094 or A3921095
• Subjects who achieved clinical response in Study A3921094 or A3921095
• Women of childbearing potential must test negative for pregnancy prior to study enrollment
• Subjects who are willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests, and other study procedures
• Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document(s) indicating that the subject (or a legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Subjects who had major protocol violation (as determined by the Sponsor) in Study A3921094 or A3921095
• Presence of indeterminate colitis, microscopic colitis, ischemic colitis, infectious colitis, or clinical findings suggestive of Crohn's disease
• Subjects who have had surgery for UC or in the opinion of the investigator, are likely to require surgery for UC during the study period.

Sex/Gender

• Sexes Eligible for Study: All

• Ages: 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Contacts: Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
• Listed Location Countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Republic of, Latvia, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Administrative Information

• NCT Number: NCT01458574
• Other Study ID Numbers: A3921096; 2011-004580-79 ( EudraCT Number ); OCTAVESUSTAIN ( Other Identifier: Alias Study Number )
• Has Data Monitoring Committee: Yes
• U.S. FDA-regulated Product: Not Provided
• IPD Sharing Statement: Not Provided
• Current Responsible Party: Pfizer
• Original Responsible Party: Same as current
• Current Study Sponsor: Pfizer
• Original Study Sponsor: Same as current
• Collaborators: Not Provided

Investigators

• Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center; Pfizer

• PRS Account: Pfizer
• Verification Date: April 2017