The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

A Phase II Trial of Ridaforolimus and Exemestane, Compared to Ridaforolimus, Dalotuzumab and Exemestane in Participants With Breast Cancer (MK-8669-064)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01605396
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : May 24, 2012
Results First Posted : March 25, 2019
Last Update Posted : March 25, 2019
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Tracking Information
First Submitted Date  ICMJE May 22, 2012
First Posted Date  ICMJE May 24, 2012
Results First Submitted Date  ICMJE February 15, 2019
Results First Posted Date  ICMJE March 25, 2019
Last Update Posted Date March 25, 2019
Actual Study Start Date  ICMJE July 4, 2012
Actual Primary Completion Date February 19, 2014   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: March 21, 2019)
1. Progression-free Survival (PFS) According to Response Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) Based on Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) [ Time Frame: From Day 1 through last post-study efficacy follow-up (up to ~19 months) ]
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to progressive disease, or death, whichever occurs first. Response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 by BICR. According to RECIST 1.1, progressive disease (PD) was defined as a 20% relative increase in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SOD and an absolute increase of >5 mm in the SOD, or the appearance of new lesions. PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and median PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) in weeks was reported for each treatment arm. Per protocol, participants remained on assigned treatment until disease progression. Participants who discontinued study treatment for reasons other than disease progression continued to be assessed by imaging until objective documentation of progression. All participants (including participants who discontinued study treatment) were followed for survival until investigator notification to discontinue.
Original Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: May 22, 2012)
Progression-free Survival (PFS) [ Time Frame: Baseline until disease progression, assessed throughout entire study duration (up to approximately 27 months) ]
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: March 21, 2019)
  • Percent Change From Baseline in Sum of Target Lesion Diameters at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16 ]
    The percent change from baseline to Week 16 in the sum of target lesion diameters as determined by anatomic imaging was defined as the line length (i.e., diameter) for each target lesion identified at baseline summed across all lesions at baseline, and separately at each post-baseline time point. The primary analysis was conducted using a constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) method and target lesion measurements according to the BICR. Percent change from baseline in sum of target lesion diameters at Week 16 was reported for each treatment arm.
  • 3. Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (Objective Response Rate [ORR]) According to Response Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) Based on Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR). [ Time Frame: From Day 1 through last post-study efficacy follow-up (up to ~19 months) ]
    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants whose best response was complete response (CR; disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes must have become normal) or partial response (PR; at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD) according to RECIST 1.1 and based on BICR. ORR was reported for each treatment arm. Per protocol, participants remained on assigned treatment until disease progression. Participants who discontinued study treatment for reasons other than disease progression continued to be assessed by imaging until objective documentation of progression.
  • Overall Survival (OS) [ Time Frame: From Day 1 through last post-study efficacy follow-up (up to ~19 months) ]
    OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of analysis were censored at the date last known to be alive. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and median OS (95% confidence interval [CI]) in weeks was reported for each treatment arm. Per protocol, all participants (including participants who discontinued study treatment) were followed for survival until investigator notification to discontinue.
Original Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: May 22, 2012)
  • Percent Reduction in Sum of Target Lesion Sizes [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16 ]
  • Objective response rate (ORR) [ Time Frame: Baseline until participant no longer responds to treatment, assessed throughout entire study duration (up to approximately 27 months) ]
  • Overall survival (OS) [ Time Frame: Baseline until death, assessed throughout entire study duration (up to approximately 27 months) ]
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title  ICMJE A Phase II Trial of Ridaforolimus and Exemestane, Compared to Ridaforolimus, Dalotuzumab and Exemestane in Participants With Breast Cancer (MK-8669-064)
Official Title  ICMJE A Phase II Randomized Trial of the Combination of Ridaforolimus and Exemestane, Compared to Ridaforolimus, Dalotuzumab and Exemestane in High Proliferation, Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer Patients
Brief Summary The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of the triplet of ridaforolimus, dalotuzumab and exemestane compared to the combination of ridaforolimus and exemestane in post-menopausal participants with breast cancer. The primary hypothesis of the study is that the triplet of ridaforolimus, dalotuzumab and exemestane will improve progression free survival (PFS) compared to ridaforolimus and exemestane.
Detailed Description Not Provided
Study Type  ICMJE Interventional
Study Phase  ICMJE Phase 2
Study Design  ICMJE Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition  ICMJE Breast Neoplasms
Intervention  ICMJE
  • Drug: Ridaforolimus
    Ridaforolimus 10 mg tablet, administered PO at a dose of 10 mg (triplet) or 30 mg (doublet) depending upon randomization, on Days 1-5, 8-12, 15-19, & 22-26 of 28-day cycle.
    Other Names:
    • MK-8669
    • AP23573
  • Drug: Dalotuzumab
    Dalotuzumab administered 10 mg/kg IV weekly on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of 28-day cycle.
    Other Names:
    • MK-0646
    • h7C10
  • Drug: Exemestane
    Exemestane 25 mg tablet administered PO QD.
    Other Name: Aromasin
Study Arms  ICMJE
  • Experimental: Ridaforolimus + Dalotuzumab + Exemestane
    Participants receive ridaforolimus 10 mg orally (PO) every 5 days (QD x 5) plus dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg intravenously (IV) every week (QW) plus exemestane 25 mg PO every day (QD) in 28-day cycles until documented disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    Interventions:
    • Drug: Ridaforolimus
    • Drug: Dalotuzumab
    • Drug: Exemestane
  • Active Comparator: Ridaforolimus + Exemestane
    Participants receive ridaforolimus 30 mg PO QD x 5 plus exemestane 25 mg PO QD treatment in 28-day cycles until documented disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    Interventions:
    • Drug: Ridaforolimus
    • Drug: Exemestane
Publications * Rugo HS, Tredan O, Ro J, Morales SM, Campone M, Musolino A, Afonso N, Ferreira M, Park KH, Cortes J, Tan AR, Blum JL, Eaton L, Gause CK, Wang Z, Im E, Mauro DJ, Jones MB, Denker A, Baselga J. A randomized phase II trial of ridaforolimus, dalotuzumab, and exemestane compared with ridaforolimus and exemestane in patients with advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Oct;165(3):601-609. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4375-5. Epub 2017 Jul 5.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status  ICMJE Completed
Actual Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: August 18, 2017)
80
Original Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: May 22, 2012)
150
Actual Study Completion Date  ICMJE March 15, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date February 19, 2014   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria  ICMJE

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Females with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer that is metastatic or locally advanced (locally advanced tumors must not be amenable to

surgery or radiation therapy with curative intent) with the following pathological characteristics determined locally: estrogen receptor positive and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER-2) negative, and Ki67 (a tumor marker) ≥ 15% determined by the central study laboratory

  • Post-menopausal
  • With advanced breast cancer whose disease was refractory to previous letrozole or anastrozole
  • Has at least one confirmed measurable metastatic lesion
  • Has a performance status ≤ 1 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale
  • Has a life expectancy of at least 3 months
  • Adequate organ function

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Is receiving any other concurrent systemic tumor therapy, including

hormonal agents and HER-2 inhibitors

  • Previously received rapamycin or rapamycin analogs, including

ridaforolimus, temsirolimus, or everolimus

  • Received prior treatment with Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 Receptor (IGF-1R) inhibitors, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase (PI3K) inhibitors, or

other experimental agents that target PI3K, Protein Kinase B (AKT), or Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) pathway

  • Is receiving chronic corticosteroids administered at doses greater than

those used for normal replacement therapy

  • Has active brain metastasis or leptomeningeal carcinomatosis; patients

with adequately treated brain metastases are eligible if they meet certain criteria

  • Known allergy to macrolide antibiotics
  • Has an active infection requiring antibiotics
  • Significant or uncontrolled cardiovascular disease
  • Poorly controlled Type 1 or 2 diabetes
  • Is known to be Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) positive
  • Has a known history of active hepatitis B or C. Healthy carriers of hepatitis B are not allowed on this study
Sex/Gender  ICMJE
Sexes Eligible for Study: Female
Ages  ICMJE 18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers  ICMJE No
Contacts  ICMJE Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Listed Location Countries  ICMJE Not Provided
Removed Location Countries Belgium,   Colombia,   Czech Republic,   Denmark,   France,   Germany,   Israel,   Italy,   Korea, Republic of,   Peru,   Portugal,   Spain,   Sweden,   Taiwan,   United States
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number  ICMJE NCT01605396
Other Study ID Numbers  ICMJE 8669-064
2012-000335-11 ( EudraCT Number )
MK-8669-064 ( Other Identifier: Merck )
Has Data Monitoring Committee No
U.S. FDA-regulated Product Not Provided
IPD Sharing Statement  ICMJE
Plan to Share IPD: Yes
Plan Description: http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf
URL: http://engagezone.msd.com/ds_documentation.php
Current Responsible Party Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Original Responsible Party Same as current
Current Study Sponsor  ICMJE Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Original Study Sponsor  ICMJE Same as current
Collaborators  ICMJE Not Provided
Investigators  ICMJE
Study Director: Medical Director Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
PRS Account Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Verification Date March 2019

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP