August 24, 2012
|
August 28, 2012
|
January 29, 2016
|
February 26, 2016
|
February 8, 2023
|
November 2, 2012
|
February 5, 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
|
Overall Survival (OS) Time in Months for All Randomized Participants at Primary Endpoint [ Time Frame: Randomization until 413 deaths, up to March 2015 (approximately 29 months) ] Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. A participant who has not died will be censored at last known date alive. OS will be followed continuously while participants are on the study drug and every 3 months via in-person or phone contact after participants discontinue the study drug. Median and hazard ratio computed using Kaplan-Meier method.
|
Overall Survival [ Time Frame: 24 months ] Overall Survival is defined as the time from randomization to the date of death
|
|
- Objective Response Rate (ORR) [ Time Frame: From randomization to date of objectively documented progression (up to approximately 110 months) ]
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants whose Best Overall Response (BOR) was a confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR). BOR was defined as the best investigator-assessed response designation, recorded between the date of randomization and the date of objectively documented progression per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) or the date of subsequent anti-cancer therapy (excluding on-treatment palliative radiotherapy of non-target bone lesions or Central Nervous System (CNS) lesions), whichever occurred first. CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking, as reference, the baseline sum diameters. CR+PR, confidence interval based on the Clopper and Pearson method.
- Time To Objective Response (TTOR) [ Time Frame: From randomization to the date of first confirmed response (up to approximately 110 months) ]
Time to Objective Response for participants demonstrating a response (either CR or PR) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first confirmed response. CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking, as reference, the baseline sum diameters.
- Duration of Objective Response (DOOR) [ Time Frame: From randomization to date of first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 110 months) ]
DOR was defined as the time from the date of first confirmed response to the date of the first documented tumor progression (per RECIST v1.1), as determined by the investigator, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was evaluated only for confirmed responders (i.e. participants with confirmed CR or PR). CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking, as reference, the baseline sum diameters. Participants who neither progressed nor died were censored on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment. Median computed using Kaplan-Meier method.
- Progression-Free Survival (PFS) [ Time Frame: From randomization to first confirmed response to the date of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 110 months) ]
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression (per RECIST 1.1) or death due to any cause. Participants who died without a reported prior progression were considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Progression will be assessed every 6 weeks (from the first on-study radiographic assessment) until disease progression is noted. Progressive disease was defined as least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression. Median computed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
- Percentage of Participants Experiencing Disease-Related Symptom Improvement by Week 12 [ Time Frame: Randomization to Week 12 ]
Disease-related symptom improvement rate by Week 12 was defined as the percentage of randomized participants who had a 10 point or greater decrease from baseline in average symptom burden index score at any time between randomization and Week 12. The participant portion of the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) consisted of 6 symptom-specific questions that addressed cough, dyspnea, fatigue, pain, hemoptysis, and anorexia, plus 3 summary items on symptom distress, interference with activity level, and global health-related Quality of Life (QoL). The scores range from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the best possible score and 100 being the worst possible score. The average symptom burden index score at each assessment was defined as the mean of the 6 symptom-specific questions of the LCSS. 95% CIs were computed using Clopper-Pearson Method.
- Overall Survival (OS) by PD-L1 Expression at Baseline [ Time Frame: From randomization to the date of death or last known date alive (up to approximately 110 months) ]
Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. A participant who has not died will be censored at last known date alive. Overall Survival time was measured in months for all randomized participants grouped by their baseline PD-L1 expression level. PD-L1 expression in participants was defined as the percent of disease tumor cells demonstrating plasma membrane PD-L1 staining of any intensity using an immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay. Median computed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
- Objective Response Rate (ORR) by PD-L1 Expression at Baseline [ Time Frame: From randomization to date of objectively documented progression (up to approximately 110 months) ]
ORR was defined as the percentage of all randomized participants whose Best Overall Response (BOR) was a confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR). CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking, as reference, the baseline sum diameters. CR+PR, confidence interval based on the Clopper and Pearson method. ORR was reported for all randomized participants grouped by their baseline PD-L1 expression level. PD-L1 expression in participants was defined as the percent of disease tumor cells demonstrating plasma membrane PD-L1 staining of any intensity using an immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay.
|
- Objective response rate of BMS-936558 versus Docetaxel [ Time Frame: 24 months ]
Objective response rate is defined as the proportion of all randomized subjects whose best overall response (BOR) from baseline is either a Complete response (CR) or Partial response (PR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria
- Progression-free survival (PFS) of BMS-936558 versus Docetaxel [ Time Frame: 24 months ]
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression (per RECIST 1.1) or death due to any cause
- Clinical benefit of BMS-936558 versus Docetaxel, in PD-L1 + versus PD-L1-protein expression subgroups [ Time Frame: 24 months ]
- Proportion of subjects exhibiting disease-related symptom progression, as measured by Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS), in BMS-936558 and Docetaxel groups [ Time Frame: 24 months ]
|
Not Provided
|
Not Provided
|
|
Study of BMS-936558 (Nivolumab) Compared to Docetaxel in Previously Treated Metastatic Non-squamous NSCLC
|
An Open-Label Randomized Phase III Trial of BMS-936558 (Nivolumab) Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Metastatic Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
|
The purpose of the study is to compare the overall survival of BMS-936558 (Nivolumab) as compared with Docetaxel in subjects with non-squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of prior platinum-based chemotherapy
|
CheckMate 057: CHECKpoint pathway and nivoluMAb clinical Trial Evaluation 057
|
Interventional
|
Phase 3
|
Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: None (Open Label) Primary Purpose: Treatment
|
Non-Squamous Cell Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
|
|
- Experimental: Arm A: Nivolumab
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg solution intravenously (IV) every 2 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends. Eligible patients may receive nivolumab at 480mg every 4 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation, withdrawal of consent or the study ends.
Intervention: Biological: Nivolumab
- Active Comparator: Arm B: Docetaxel
Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2 concentrate for solution for intravenous infusion every 3 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends. Eligible patients may receive nivolumab at 480mg every 4 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation, withdrawal of consent or the study ends.
Intervention: Drug: Docetaxel
|
- Borghaei H, Gettinger S, Vokes EE, Chow LQM, Burgio MA, de Castro Carpeno J, Pluzanski A, Arrieta O, Frontera OA, Chiari R, Butts C, Wojcik-Tomaszewska J, Coudert B, Garassino MC, Ready N, Felip E, Garcia MA, Waterhouse D, Domine M, Barlesi F, Antonia S, Wohlleber M, Gerber DE, Czyzewicz G, Spigel DR, Crino L, Eberhardt WEE, Li A, Marimuthu S, Brahmer J. Five-Year Outcomes From the Randomized, Phase III Trials CheckMate 017 and 057: Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):723-733. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01605. Epub 2021 Jan 15. Erratum In: J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;39(10):1190.
- Long GV, Tykodi SS, Schneider JG, Garbe C, Gravis G, Rashford M, Agrawal S, Grigoryeva E, Bello A, Roy A, Rollin L, Zhao X. Assessment of nivolumab exposure and clinical safety of 480 mg every 4 weeks flat-dosing schedule in patients with cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;29(11):2208-2213. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy408.
- Reck M, Brahmer J, Bennett B, Taylor F, Penrod JR, DeRosa M, Dastani H, Spigel DR, Gralla RJ. Evaluation of health-related quality of life and symptoms in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab or docetaxel in CheckMate 057. Eur J Cancer. 2018 Oct;102:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
- Vokes EE, Ready N, Felip E, Horn L, Burgio MA, Antonia SJ, Aren Frontera O, Gettinger S, Holgado E, Spigel D, Waterhouse D, Domine M, Garassino M, Chow LQM, Blumenschein G Jr, Barlesi F, Coudert B, Gainor J, Arrieta O, Brahmer J, Butts C, Steins M, Geese WJ, Li A, Healey D, Crino L. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057): 3-year update and outcomes in patients with liver metastases. Ann Oncol. 2018 Apr 1;29(4):959-965. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy041.
- Horn L, Spigel DR, Vokes EE, Holgado E, Ready N, Steins M, Poddubskaya E, Borghaei H, Felip E, Paz-Ares L, Pluzanski A, Reckamp KL, Burgio MA, Kohlhaeufl M, Waterhouse D, Barlesi F, Antonia S, Arrieta O, Fayette J, Crino L, Rizvi N, Reck M, Hellmann MD, Geese WJ, Li A, Blackwood-Chirchir A, Healey D, Brahmer J, Eberhardt WEE. Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Two-Year Outcomes From Two Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trials (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057). J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3924-3933. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.3062. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
- Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, Spigel DR, Steins M, Ready NE, Chow LQ, Vokes EE, Felip E, Holgado E, Barlesi F, Kohlhaufl M, Arrieta O, Burgio MA, Fayette J, Lena H, Poddubskaya E, Gerber DE, Gettinger SN, Rudin CM, Rizvi N, Crino L, Blumenschein GR Jr, Antonia SJ, Dorange C, Harbison CT, Graf Finckenstein F, Brahmer JR. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1627-39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507643. Epub 2015 Sep 27.
|
|
Completed
|
582
|
574
|
December 17, 2021
|
February 5, 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
|
Inclusion Criteria:
- Men & women ≥18 years of age
- Subjects with histologically or cytologically-documented non-squamous cell NSCLC who present with Stage IIIB/IV disease or recurrent or progressive disease following multimodal therapy (radiation therapy, surgical resection, or definitive chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced disease) and who will receive study therapy as second or third line of treatment for advanced disease
- Disease recurrence or progression during/after one prior platinum doublet-based chemotherapy regimen for advanced or metastatic disease
- Measurable disease by Computed tomography (CT)/Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) per RECIST 1.1 criteria
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤1
- A formalin fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue block or unstained slides of tumor sample (archival or recent) must be available for biomarker evaluation. Specimens must be received by the central lab prior to randomization. Biopsy should be excisional, incisional or core needle. Fine needle aspiration is insufficient
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects with untreated central nervous system (CNS) metastases are excluded. Subjects are eligible if CNS metastases are asymptomatic or treated and subjects are neurologically returned to baseline for at least 2 weeks prior to enrollment. In addition, subjects must be either off corticosteroids, or on a stable or decreasing dose of ≤10mg daily prednisone (or equivalent)
- Subjects with carcinomatous meningitis
- Subjects with active or recent history of known or suspected autoimmune disease. Subjects with Type 1 diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism only requiring hormone replacement, or skin disorders (vitiligo, psoriasis, or alopecia) not requiring systemic treatment are permitted to enroll
- Subjects with a condition requiring systemic treatment with either corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive medications within 14 days of randomization
- Prior therapy with anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1), anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1), anti-programmed cell death ligand 2 (anti-PD-L2), anti-cluster of differentiation 137 (anti-CD137), or anti-Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (anti-CTLA-4) antibody (including Ipilimumab or any other antibody or drug specifically targeting T-cell co-stimulation or checkpoint pathways)
- Prior treatment with Docetaxel
- Treatment with any investigational agent within 14 days of first administration of study treatment
Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply
|
Sexes Eligible for Study: |
All |
|
18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
|
No
|
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
|
Argentina, Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Czechia, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Italy, Mexico, Norway, Peru, Poland, Romania, Russian Federation, Singapore, Spain, Switzerland, United States
|
Czech Republic, South Africa, Turkey
|
|
NCT01673867
|
CA209-057 2012-002472-14 ( EudraCT Number )
|
No
|
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: |
Yes |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: |
No |
|
Not Provided
|
Bristol-Myers Squibb
|
Same as current
|
Bristol-Myers Squibb
|
Same as current
|
Not Provided
|
Study Director: |
Bristol-Myers Squibb |
Bristol-Myers Squibb |
|
Bristol-Myers Squibb
|
January 2023
|