June 26, 2013
|
June 28, 2013
|
October 6, 2021
|
December 16, 2021
|
December 16, 2021
|
June 27, 2013
|
October 28, 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
|
- Overall Response Rate (Main Cohort) [ Time Frame: Up to 36 weeks ]
The overall response rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of participants with an overall response (complete remission [CR] + complete remission with incomplete marrow recovery [CRi] + nodular partial remission [nPR] + partial remission [PR]) per the 2008 Modified International Workshop for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL)/National Cancer Institute-Working Group (NCI-CWG) criteria as assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) in the first 70 participants treated in the Main Cohort.
- Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety Expansion Cohort) [ Time Frame: From the first dose of study drug until 30 days following last dose of study drug (up to 69 months) ]
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs) are defined as any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug.
|
Efficacy will be measured by overall response rate (ORR) [ Time Frame: Measured up to 2 years after the last subject has enrolled on the study. ] To evaluate the efficacy of ABT-199 monotherapy in subjects with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) harboring the 17p deletion.
|
|
- Overall Response Rate (ORR) (Safety Expansion Cohort) [ Time Frame: Up to the data cutoff date of 15 June 2017, approximately 4 years of follow-up ]
The overall response rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of participants with an overall response (complete remission [CR] + complete remission with incomplete marrow recovery [CRi] + nodular partial remission [nPR] + partial remission [PR]) per the 2008 Modified International Workshop for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL)/National Cancer Institute-Working Group (NCI-CWG) criteria.
- Complete Remission (CR) Rate [ Time Frame: Up to the data cutoff date of 15 June 2017, approximately 4 years of follow-up ]
Complete remission was defined as the proportion of participants who achieved a CR or Complete Remission with Incomplete Marrow Recovery(CRi ) per the 2008 Modified International Workshop for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL)/National Cancer Institute-Working Group (NCI-CWG) criteria. Participants who did not achieve a CR or CRi were considered to be non-responders in the calculation of CR rate.
- Partial Remission (PR) Rate [ Time Frame: Up to the data cutoff date of 15 June 2017, approximately 4 years of follow-up ]
PR rate was defined as the proportion of participants who achieved a nodular partial remission (nPR) or PR per the 2008 Modified International Workshop for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL)/National Cancer Institute-Working Group (NCI-CWG) criteria. Participants who did not achieve a nPR or PR were considered to be non-responders in the calculation of PR rate.
- Duration of Overall Response [ Time Frame: Up to the data cutoff date of 15 June 2017, approximately 4 years of follow-up ]
Duration of overall response (DoR) was defined as the number of days from the date of first response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR) by either CT scan or physical exam determination to the earliest recurrence (progressive disease; PD) or death. For participants who had a PR before CR, CRi, or nPR in subsequent visits, the DoR was computed from the earliest PR. If a participant was still responding, then their data was censored at the date of their last available disease assessment. To be included in the DoR analysis, participants must have had a response per the 2008 Modified International Workshop for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL)/National Cancer Institute-Working Group (NCI-CWG) criteria (CR, CRi, confirmed nPR, or confirmed PR). For participants who never experienced response, their data was not included in the analysis.
- Progression-free Survival [ Time Frame: Up to the data cutoff date of 15 June 2017, approximately 4 years of follow-up ]
Duration of progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the number of days from the date of first dose to the date of earliest disease progression or death. All disease progression was included regardless of whether the event occurred while the participant was taking ABT-199 or had previously discontinued ABT-199. If the participant does not experience disease progression or death, then the data was censored at the date of last disease assessment. Data for participants without any disease assessments performed after the baseline visit were censored at the date of first dose plus 1 day.
- Event-free Survival [ Time Frame: Up to the data cutoff date of 15 June 2017, approximately 4 years of follow-up ]
Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the number of days from the date of first dose to the date of earliest disease progression, death, or start of a new anti-leukemic therapy. If the specified event (disease progression, death, start of a new anti-leukemic treatment) did not occur, participants were censored at the date of last disease assessment. Data for participants without any disease assessments performed after the baseline visit were censored at the date of first dose plus 1 day.
- Time to Progression [ Time Frame: Up to the data cutoff date of 15 June 2017, approximately 4 years of follow-up ]
Time to progression (TTP) was defined as the number of days from the date of first dose to the date of earliest disease progression. All disease progression was included regardless of whether the event occurred while the participant was taking ABT-199 or had previously discontinued ABT-199. If the participant did not experience disease progression, then the data was censored at the date of last available disease assessment. Data for participants without any disease assessments performed after the baseline visit were censored at the date of first dose plus 1 day.
- Time to First Response [ Time Frame: Up to the data cutoff date of 15 June 2017, approximately 4 years of follow-up ]
Time to first response was defined as the number of days from the date of first dose to the date of the first sign of response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR) given the participant has had a CR, CRi, confirmed nPR, or confirmed PR per the 2008 Modified International Workshop for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL)/National Cancer Institute-Working Group (NCI-CWG) criteria. The first response could have been an assessment by physical exam as long as the results were later confirmed per the 2008 Modified IWCLL NCI-WG criteria. For participants who never experienced a response, the participant's data were not included in the analysis.
- Time to 50% Reduction in Absolute Lymphocyte Count [ Time Frame: Up to the data cutoff date of 15 June 2017, approximately 4 years of follow-up ]
Time to 50% reduction in absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) was defined as the number of days (hours if applicable) from the date of first dose to the date when the ALC had reduced to 50% of the baseline value. Only participants with a baseline of ALC > 5 × 10^9 /L were included in the analysis. For participants who never achieved a 50% reduction in ALC, the participant's data were not included in the analysis.
- Overall Survival [ Time Frame: Up to the data cutoff date of 15 December 2020, approximately 7.5 years of follow-up ]
Overall survival (OS) was defined as number of days from the date of first dose to the date of death. For participants who did not die, their data was censored at the date of last study visit or the last known date to be alive, whichever was later.
- Percentage of Participants Who Moved on to Stem Cell Transplant [ Time Frame: Up to the data cutoff date of 15 June 2017, approximately 4 years of follow-up ]
The percentage of participants who moved on to stem cell transplant was summarized.
|
- Complete Remission (CR) rate [ Time Frame: Measured up to 2 years after the last subject has enrolled in the study. ]
Complete remission rate per Independent Review Committee assessment, will be defined as the proportion of subjects who achieved a CR per the NCI-CWG (National Cancer Institute-Working Group) criteria.
- Partial Remission (PR) rate [ Time Frame: Measured up to 2 years after the last subject has enrolled in the study. ]
Partial remission rate per Independent Review Committee assessment, will be defined as the proportion of subjects who achieved a PR per the NCI-CWG criteria.
- Duration of response [ Time Frame: Measured up to 2 years after the last subject has enrolled in the study. ]
Duration of response will be defined as the number of days from the date of first response (Complete Remission or Partial Remission) per Independent Review Committee (IRC) assessment to the earliest recurrence or Progressive Disease per IRC assessment.
- Progression-free survival [ Time Frame: Measured up to 5 years after the last subject has enrolled in the study. ]
Progression-free survival will be defined as the number of days from the date of first dose to the date of earliest disease progression (per Independent Review Committee assessment) or death.
- Time to progression [ Time Frame: Measured up to 5 years after the last subject has enrolled in the study ]
Time to progression will be defined as the number of days from the date of first dose to the date of earliest disease progression (per Independent Review Committee assessment).
- Overall survival [ Time Frame: Measured up to 5 years after the last subject has enrolled in the study. ]
Overall survival will be defined as the number of days from the date of first dose to the date of death for all dosed subjects.
- Percent of subjects who move on to stem cell transplant [ Time Frame: Measured up to 2 years after the last subject has enrolled in the study. ]
The percent of subjects who move on to stem cell transplant will be summarized and the 95% confidence interval based on the binomial distribution will be provided.
- Number of subjects with adverse events [ Time Frame: Measured up to 5 years after the last subject has enrolled in the study. ]
Subjects will be monitored for clinical and laboratory evidence of adverse events throughout the study.
- Change in physical exam findings, including vital signs [ Time Frame: Measured from Day -1 up to 5 years after the last subject has enrolled in the study. ]
Body temperature, weight, blood pressure, heart rate.
- Change in clinical laboratory test results [ Time Frame: Measured from Day -1 up to 5 years after the last subject has enrolled in the study. ]
Chemistry, hematology, urinalysis, viral serologies.
- Change in cardiac assessment findings [ Time Frame: Measured from Day -1 up to 2 years after the last subject has enrolled in the study. ]
Electrocardiogram and Multi Gated Acquisition Scan and/or Echocardiogram.
- Percentage of subjects with adverse events [ Time Frame: Measured up to 5 years after the last subject has enrolled in the study. ]
Subjects will be monitored for clinical and laboratory evidence of adverse events throughout the study.
|
Not Provided
|
Not Provided
|
|
A Study of the Efficacy of ABT-199 in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory or Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia With the 17p Deletion
|
A Phase 2 Open-Label Study of the Efficacy of ABT-199 (GDC-0199) in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory or Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Harboring the 17p Deletion
|
This was an open-label, multicenter, global study to determine the efficacy of ABT-199 (Venetoclax) monotherapy in participants with relapsed/refractory (R/R) or previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) harboring 17p deletion.
|
This study was designed to enroll approximately 150 participants in 2 cohorts: a main cohort of approximately 100 participants, and a safety expansion (SE) cohort of approximately 50 participants. The primary objective of the main cohort was to evaluate the efficacy of ABT-199 monotherapy in participants with R/R CLL harboring the 17p deletion. The primary objective of the safety expansion cohort was to evaluate the safety of ABT-199 in approximately 50 participants with R/R CLL harboring 17p deletion treated per updated tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) prophylaxis and management measures.
|
Interventional
|
Phase 2
|
Allocation: Non-Randomized Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: None (Open Label) Primary Purpose: Treatment
|
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
- 17p Deletion
- Cancer of the Blood and Bone Marrow
|
- Drug: ABT-199 (Main Cohort)
Participants received a test dose of ABT-199 of ≤ 20 mg on Week 1 Day 1 of the Lead-In Period. For those with significant electrolyte and/or lymphocyte changes within 24 hours of the first dose, the 20 mg dose was maintained for 7 days with escalation to 50 mg on Week 2 Day 1. If none of the electrolyte and/or lymphocyte changes occurred within 24 hours from ABT-199 20 mg dose administration, the participant was dose-escalated to 50 mg on Week 1 Day 2. After the first dose of 50 mg, if no laboratory abnormalities occurred, the participant remained on the 50 mg dose through Week 1. After receiving the 50 mg dose for approximately 1 week (6 to 7 days), the following dose escalation proceeded with weekly increases in dose: → 100 mg → 200 mg → 400 mg (or additional lead-in steps to designated 400 mg dose), as tolerated.
- Drug: ABT-199 (Safety Expansion Cohort)
Participants received an initial dose of ABT-199 of 20 mg on Week 1 Day 1 of the Lead-In Period. If one or more electrolyte changes (from the 0 hr measurement prior to dosing) suggestive of laboratory tumor lysis syndrome (LTLS) or clinical TLS (CTLS) occurred within 24 hours of the 20 mg dose, no additional doses were administered until resolution. Upon resolution of laboratory abnormalities, the 20 mg dose was continued through Week 1. If no significant findings suggestive of clinical or laboratory TLS occurred within 24 hours, the 20 mg dose was continued through Week 1 Day 7, and escalated to a dose of 50 mg on Week 2 Day 1. Those who had drug interruptions may have been allowed to escalate to and be maintained at 50 mg for 1 week after they had been on a 20 mg dose for at least 1 week (5 - 7 days). After a week at 50 mg, weekly dose escalations were implemented as follows: 100 mg → 200 mg → 400 mg (or additional lead-in steps to designated 400 mg dose) as tolerated.
|
- Experimental: Main Cohort
Participants received ABT-199 tablets once daily (QD) orally for up to 79 months. The starting dose was 20 mg daily, increasing over a period of 5 weeks up to the daily dose of 400 mg.
Intervention: Drug: ABT-199 (Main Cohort)
- Experimental: Safety Expansion Cohort
Participants received ABT-199 tablets once daily (QD) orally for up to 68 months. The starting dose was 20 mg daily, increasing over a period of 5 weeks up to the daily dose of 400 mg.
Intervention: Drug: ABT-199 (Safety Expansion Cohort)
|
- Stilgenbauer S, Eichhorst B, Schetelig J, Coutre S, Seymour JF, Munir T, Puvvada SD, Wendtner CM, Roberts AW, Jurczak W, Mulligan SP, Bottcher S, Mobasher M, Zhu M, Desai M, Chyla B, Verdugo M, Enschede SH, Cerri E, Humerickhouse R, Gordon G, Hallek M, Wierda WG. Venetoclax in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia with 17p deletion: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):768-778. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30019-5. Epub 2016 May 10.
- Roberts AW, Ma S, Kipps TJ, Coutre SE, Davids MS, Eichhorst B, Hallek M, Byrd JC, Humphrey K, Zhou L, Chyla B, Nielsen J, Potluri J, Kim SY, Verdugo M, Stilgenbauer S, Wierda WG, Seymour JF. Efficacy of venetoclax in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia is influenced by disease and response variables. Blood. 2019 Jul 11;134(2):111-122. doi: 10.1182/blood.2018882555. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
- Stilgenbauer S, Eichhorst B, Schetelig J, Hillmen P, Seymour JF, Coutre S, Jurczak W, Mulligan SP, Schuh A, Assouline S, Wendtner CM, Roberts AW, Davids MS, Bloehdorn J, Munir T, Bottcher S, Zhou L, Salem AH, Desai M, Chyla B, Arzt J, Kim SY, Verdugo M, Gordon G, Hallek M, Wierda WG. Venetoclax for Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia With 17p Deletion: Results From the Full Population of a Phase II Pivotal Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;36(19):1973-1980. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.6840. Epub 2018 May 1. Erratum In: J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep 1;37(25):2299.
|
|
Completed
|
158
|
100
|
December 15, 2020
|
October 28, 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
|
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participant must be greater than or equal to 18 years of age.
-
Participant must have diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) that meets published 2008 Modified IWCLL NCI-WG (International Workshop for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia National Cancer Institute-Working Group) Guidelines.
- Participant has an indication for treatment according to the 2008 Modified IWCLL NCI WG Guidelines;
- Participant has clinically measurable disease (lymphocytosis > 5 × 10^9/L and/or palpable and measurable nodes by physical exam and/or organomegaly assessed by physical exam);
- Participant must be refractory or have relapsed after receiving at least one prior line of therapy (participants that have progressed after 1 cycle of treatment or have completed at least 2 cycles of treatment for a given line of therapy) or previously untreated CLL (previously untreated CLL participants must have received no prior chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Participants with a history of emergency, loco-regional radiotherapy (e.g., for relief of compressive signs or symptoms) are eligible. In addition, participants must meet the CLL diagnostic criteria above and must have > 5 × 10^9/L B-Lymphocytes in the peripheral blood.);
- Participants must have 17p deletion, assessed by local laboratory (in bone marrow or peripheral blood) or assessed by central laboratory (peripheral blood).
- Participant has an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of less than or equal to 2.
-
Participant must have adequate bone marrow function at Screening as follows:
- Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) greater than or equal to 1000/µL, or
- For subjects with an ANC less than 1000/µL at Screening and bone marrow heavily infiltrated with underlying disease (unless cytopenia is clearly due to marrow involvement of CLL), growth factor support may be administered after Screening and prior to the first dose of ABT-199 to achieve the ANC eligibility criteria (greater than or equal to 1000/µL);
- Platelets greater than 30,000/mm^3 (without transfusion support within 14 days of Screening, without evidence of mucosal bleeding, without known history of bleeding episode within 3 months of Screening, and without history of bleeding disorder);
- Hemoglobin greater than or equal to 8.0 g/dL.
-
Participant must have adequate coagulation, renal, and hepatic function, per laboratory reference range at Screening as follows:
- Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT) not to exceed 1.5 × the upper limit of normal;
- Calculated creatinine clearance greater than 50 mL/min using 24-hour Creatinine Clearance or modified Cockcroft-Gault equation (using Ideal Body Mass [IBM] instead of Mass). For participants that have body mass index (BMI) of > 30 kg/m^2 or < 19 kg/m^2, 24-hour measured urine creatinine clearance is required;
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) less than or equal to 3.0 × the upper normal limit of institution's normal range; Bilirubin less than or equal to 1.5 × upper limit of normal. Participants with Gilbert's Syndrome may have a bilirubin greater 1.5 × upper limit of normal, per correspondence between the investigator and AbbVie medical monitor.
- For participants at high risk of tumor lysis syndrome a pre-approval by the AbbVie medical monitor is required prior to enrollment.
Exclusion Criteria:
|
Sexes Eligible for Study: |
All |
|
18 Years to 99 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
|
No
|
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
|
Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Poland, United Kingdom, United States
|
|
|
NCT01889186
|
M13-982 2012-004027-20 ( EudraCT Number )
|
Yes
|
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: |
Yes |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: |
No |
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: |
No |
|
Plan to Share IPD: |
Yes |
Plan Description: |
AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols and clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications. |
Supporting Materials: |
Study Protocol |
Supporting Materials: |
Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) |
Supporting Materials: |
Clinical Study Report (CSR) |
Time Frame: |
Data requests can be submitted at any time and the data will be accessible for 12 months, with possible extensions considered. |
Access Criteria: |
Access to this clinical trial data can be requested by any qualified researchers who engage in rigorous, independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA). For more information on the process, or to submit a request, visit the following link. |
URL: |
https://www.abbvie.com/our-science/clinical-trials/clinical-trials-data-and-information-sharing/data-and-information-sharing-with-qualified-researchers.html |
|
AbbVie
|
Same as current
|
AbbVie
|
Same as current
|
Genentech, Inc.
|
Study Director: |
ABBVIE INC. |
AbbVie |
|
AbbVie
|
November 2021
|