September 10, 2013
|
September 13, 2013
|
December 3, 2015
|
May 23, 2016
|
April 4, 2024
|
September 26, 2013
|
December 5, 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
|
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator [ Time Frame: From randomization date to date of first documentation of progression or death (assessed up to 12 months) ] PFS is the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective progression of disease (PD)or death due to any cause in absence of documented PD. Participants lacking an evaluation of tumor response after randomization had their PFS time censored on the date of randomization with the duration of a day. Participants with documentation of PD or death after a long interval (2 or more incomplete or non-evaluable assessments) since the last tumor assessment were censored at the time of last objective assessment that did not show PD. The length of PFS was calculated as PFS time (months) =[progression/death date(censor date) - randomization date + 1]/30.4. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(RECIST v1.1) a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of new lesions.
|
Progression-Free Survival [ Time Frame: Baseline up to approximately 10 months ] Time from randomization to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause.
|
|
- Overall Survival (OS)-Number of Participants Who Died [ Time Frame: From randomization until death (up to 4.5 years) ]
OS is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored to last date the participant was known to be alive. For participants lacking survival data beyond the date of their last follow-up, the OS time was censored on the last date they were known to be alive. Participants lacking survival data beyond randomization were to have their OS times be censored at randomization. The length of OS was calculated as OS time (months) = [death date (censor date) - randomization date + 1]/30.4.
- Overall Survival (OS) [ Time Frame: From randomization until death (up to 4.5 years) ]
OS is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored to last date the participant was known to be alive. For participants lacking survival data beyond the date of their last follow-up, the OS time was censored on the last date they were known to be alive. Participants lacking survival data beyond randomization were to have their OS times be censored at randomization. The length of OS was calculated as OS time (months) = [death date (censor date) - randomization date + 1]/30.4.
- Survival Probabilities at Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3 [ Time Frame: From randomization until death (assessed up to 36 months) ]
One-, Two- or Three-year Survival Probability is defined as the probability of survival 1 year, 2 or 3 years after the date of randomization based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate. Survival time was censored to last date the participant is known to be alive.
- Objective Response (OR) [ Time Frame: From randomization until end of treatment (assessed up to 2 years) ]
OR is defined as the overall complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the RECIST version 1.1 Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of participants with CR or PR relative to all randomized participants and randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment other than the study medication prior to reaching a CR or PR, or who died, progressed, or dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non-responders in the assessment of ORR. Per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), ≥30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (longest for non-nodal and short axis for nodal target lesions); Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
- Duration of Response (DR) [ Time Frame: From randomization until end of treatment (assessed up to 2 years) ]
DR is defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. DR was calculated as [the date response ended (ie, date of PD or death) - first CR or PR date + 1)]/30.4. Kaplan-Meier estimate of median of the DR is provided below. No inferential statistical analysis were done for DR. The DR was only calculated for the participants with a CR or PR.
- Clinical Benefit Response (CBR) [ Time Frame: From randomization until end of treatment (assessed up to 2 years) ]
CBR is defined as the overall complete response (CR), partial response (PR) , or stable disease (SD) ≥24 weeks according to the RECIST version 1.1. Clinical Benefit Response Rate (CBRR) is defined as the proportion of participants with CR, PR, or SD ≥24 weeks relative to all randomized participants and randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received antitumor treatment other than the study medication prior to reaching a CR or PR, a best response of SD ≥24 weeks, or who died, progressed, or dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR and a best response of SD ≥24 weeks was counted as non-responders in the assessment of CBR. Per RECIST v1.1 for target lesions and assessed by MRI: CR, disappearance of all target lesions; PR, ≥30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; OR = CR + PR.
- Observed Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for Palbociclib [ Time Frame: Cycle 1/Day 15 and Cycle 2/Day 15 ]
Ctrough was defined as steady-state predose concentration. Observed directly from data. For palbociclib, a steady-state trough was to be defined as a predose plasma concentration following at least 8 consecutive days of 125 mg daily dose without dosing interruption and the time window for the PK collection was to be between 22 and 26 hours after the dose (the day prior to PK collection) and no more than 1 hour post-dose on the day of PK collection.
- Ctrough for Fulvestrant [ Time Frame: Cycles 2/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1 ]
Ctrough was defined as steady-state predose concentration. Observed directly from data. For fulvestrant, a steady-state trough was to be defined when a patient had received all prior planned doses and the sample was collected predose.
- Ctrough for Goserelin [ Time Frame: Cycles 2/ Day 1 and Cycle 3/ Day 1 ]
Ctrough was defined as steady-state predose concentration. Observed directly from data. For goserelin, a steady-state trough was to be defined when a patient had received all prior planned doses and the sample was collected predose.
- Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Functional Scale Scores [ Time Frame: From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014. ]
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire composed of five multi-item functional subscales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive , and social functioning), three multi-item symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), a global quality of life (QOL) subscale, and six single item symptom scales assessing other cancer-related symptoms (dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and the financial impact of cancer). The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from "not at all" to "very much" and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items are then converted to a 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represents more severe symptoms. A 10-point or higher change in scores from baseline is considered clinically significant.
- Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EORTC QLQ-C30 Symptom Scale Scores [ Time Frame: From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014. ]
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire composed of five multi-item functional subscales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive , and social functioning), three multi-item symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), a global quality of life (QOL) subscale, and six single item symptom scales assessing other cancer-related symptoms (dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and the financial impact of cancer). The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from "not at all" to "very much" and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items are then converted to a 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represents more severe symptoms. A 10-point or higher change in scores from baseline is considered clinically significant.
- Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ BR23) Functional Scale Scores [ Time Frame: From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014. ]
The EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is a 23-item breast cancer-specific companion module to the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and consists of four functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, future perspective) and four symptom scales (systemic side effects, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, upset by hair loss). QLQ-BR23 questionnaire employs 4-point scales with responses from 'not at all' to 'very much'. All scores are converted to a 0 to 100 scale. For functional scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning.
- Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EORTC QLQ BR23 Symptom Scale Scores [ Time Frame: From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014. ]
The EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is a 23-item breast cancer-specific companion module to the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and consists of four functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, future perspective) and four symptom scales (systemic side effects, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, upset by hair loss). QLQ-BR23 questionnaire employs 4-point scales with responses from 'not at all' to 'very much'. All scores are converted to a 0 to 100 scale. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represent more severe symptoms.
- Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EuroQoL 5D (EQ-5D)- Health Index Scores [ Time Frame: From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014. ]
The EuroQol-5D (version 3L) is a brief self-administered, validated instrument consisting of 2 parts. The first part consists of 5 descriptors of current health state (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/ depression); a participant is asked to rate each state on a three level scale (1=no problem, 2=some problem, and 3=extreme problem) with higher levels indicating greater severity/ impairment Published weights are available that allow for the creation of a single summary score called the EQ-5D index, which basically ranges from 0 to 1 with low scores representing a higher level of dysfunction and 1 as perfect health. The second part consists of the EQ-5D general health status as measured by a visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). EQ-5D VAS measures the participant's self-rated health status on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).
- Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scores Scale [ Time Frame: From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014. ]
The EuroQol-5D (version 3L) is a brief self-administered, validated instrument consisting of 2 parts. The second part consists of the EQ-5D general health status as measured by a visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). EQ-5D VAS measures the participant's self-rated health status on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).
- Time to Deterioration (TTD) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 4, Day 1 of every alternate cycle after that until the end of treatment, as of 05 December 2014 ]
A time to event analysis was pre-specified for pain. An analysis of TTD in pain defined as time between baseline and first occurrence of increase of ≥10 points in pain. Deterioration will be defined increase in score of 10 points or greater from baseline. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of quartiles (time to deterioration) with 95% CI is mentioned below.
- Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs; All Causalities) [ Time Frame: From the date of randomization up to 28 calendar days (±7 days) after last dose of study intervention (up to 8.4 years). ]
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation patient administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that results in death; is life-threatening; requires hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability or in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Severity will be graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 4.0.
- Participants With Shifts From CTCAE Grade ≤2 at Baseline to CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline for Hematology Results [ Time Frame: From baseline to end of treatment/withdrawal (up to 4.5 years) ]
Number of participants with shifts from Grade ≤2 at baseline values to post-baseline values (shift to Grade 3 or 4) were reported as per NCI-CTCAE, V4.0 graded from Grade 1 to 5. Grade 1: Mild; asymptomatic/ mild symptoms; clinical/diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated. Grade 3: Severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization indicated. Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Shifts in lab parameter from Grade ≤2 at baseline to Grade 3 or 4 postbaseline (for parameters Anemia, Hemoglobin increased, Neutrophil count decreased, Platelet count decreased, and White blood cell count decreased) were reported.
- Participants With Shifts From CTCAE Grade ≤2 at Baseline to CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline for Chemistry Results [ Time Frame: From baseline to end of treatment/withdrawal (up to 4.5 years) ]
Number of participants with shifts from Grade ≤2 at baseline values to post-baseline values (shift to Grade 3 or 4) were reported as per NCI-CTCAE, V4.0 graded from Grade 1 to 5. Grade 1: Mild; asymptomatic/ mild symptoms; clinical/diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated. Grade 3: Severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization indicated. Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Shifts in lab parameter from Grade ≤2 at baseline to Grade 3 or 4 postbaseline (for parameters ALT increased, ALP increased, AST increased, Blood bilirubin increased, Creatinine increased, Hypercalcemia, Hyperkalemia, Hypermagnesemia, Hypernatremia, Hypoalbuminemia, Hypocalcemia, Hypokalemia, Hypomagnesemia, and Hyponatremia) were reported.
|
- Overall Survival [ Time Frame: Baseline until death (up to approximately 28 months) ]
Time from randomization to date of death due to any cause.
- Objective Response [ Time Frame: Baseline until approximately 10 months ]
Complete or partial response recorded from randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause.
- Duration of Response [ Time Frame: Baseline up to approximately 10 months ]
Time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to objective tumor progression or death due to any cause.
- Clinical Benefit Response (CBR) [ Time Frame: Baseline up to approximately 10 months ]
CBR is defined as complete response or partial response or stable disease equal to or greater than 24 weeks according to RECIST version 1.1 recorded in the time period between randomization and disease progression or death of any cause.
- 1 Year Probability of Participant Survival [ Time Frame: From baseline through 1 year ]
Probability of survival one year after randomization.
- 2 Year Probability of Participant Survival [ Time Frame: From baseline through 2 years ]
Probability of survival 2 years after randomization
- 3 Year Probability of Participant Survival [ Time Frame: From baseline through 3 years ]
Probability of survival 3 years after randomization.
- Minimum Observed Plasma Trough Concentration (Cmin) [ Time Frame: Cycles 1 and 2 ]
Cmin for palbociclib, fulvestrant and goserelin (if applicable)
- Alterations in genes, proteins, and ribonucleic acids relevant to the cell cycle, drug targets, tumor sensitivity and/or resistance [ Time Frame: From baseline until approximately 10 months ]
Biomarkers from tissue including genes, proteins, and RNA expression
- Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D)- Health State Profile Utility Score [ Time Frame: From baseline through approximately month 10 ]
EQ 5D (version 3L) is a 6 item instrument designed to assess health status in terms of a single index value or utility score.
- European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) [ Time Frame: From baseline through approximately month 10 ]
The EORTC QLQ C30 is a 30 item questionnaire composed of functional subscales; symptom scales; and other cancer related symptoms.
- European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer module (EORTC QLQ BR23) [ Time Frame: From baseline through approximately month 10 ]
EORTC QLQ BR23 is a 23 item breast cancer specific companion module to the EORTC QLQ C30.
- Time to Deterioration (TTD) [ Time Frame: From baseline through approximately month 10 ]
Time from randomization to the first documentation of objective tumor progression, death due to any cause, and/or reduction in quality of life
- Minimally Important Difference Cut-Off [ Time Frame: From baseline through approximately month 10 ]
Number of time points where the minimally importance difference in QoL is achieved
|
Not Provided
|
Not Provided
|
|
Palbociclib (PD-0332991) Combined With Fulvestrant In Hormone Receptor+ HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer After Endocrine Failure (PALOMA-3)
|
MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, PHASE 3 TRIAL OF FULVESTRANT (FASLODEX (REGISTERED)). WITH OR WITHOUT PD-0332991 (PALBOCICLIB) +/- GOSERELIN IN WOMEN WITH HORMONE RECEPTOR-POSITIVE, HER2-NEGATIVE METASTATIC BREAST CANCER WHOSE DISEASE PROGRESSED AFTER PRIOR ENDOCRINE THERAPY
|
The study is a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, Phase 3 clinical trial with the primary objective of demonstrating the superiority of palbociclib in combination with fulvestrant (Faslodex®) over fulvestrant alone in prolonging PFS in women with HR+, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer whose disease has progressed after prior endocrine therapy. The safety between the two treatment arms will also be compared. During study treatment, pre- and perimenopausal women must be receiving therapy with the LHRH agonist goserelin (Zoladex® or generic).
|
Not Provided
|
Interventional
|
Phase 3
|
Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment
|
Metastatic Breast Cancer
|
- Drug: Palbociclib
Palbociclib 125 mg/day orally continuously dosed for 3 weeks followed by 1 week off; repeated at each subsequent cycle.
- Drug: Fulvestrant
Fulvestrant 500 mg intramuscularly on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1, and then on Day 1 of each subsequent 28 day cycle.
- Drug: Placebo
Placebo orally continuously dosed for 3 weeks followed by 1 week off; repeated at each subsequent cycle.
|
- Experimental: Arm A
Given until objective progression, symptomatic deterioration, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurs first.
Interventions:
- Drug: Palbociclib
- Drug: Fulvestrant
- Active Comparator: Arm B
Given until objective progression, symptomatic deterioration, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurs first.
Interventions:
- Drug: Placebo
- Drug: Fulvestrant
|
- Zhu Z, Turner NC, Loi S, Andre F, Martin M, Dieras V, Gelmon KA, Harbeck N, Zhang C, Cao JQ, Yan Z, Lu DR, Wei P, VanArsdale TL, Rejto PA, Huang X, Rugo HS, Loibl S, Cristofanilli M, Finn RS, Liu Y. Comparative biomarker analysis of PALOMA-2/3 trials for palbociclib. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2022 Aug 16;6(1):56. doi: 10.1038/s41698-022-00297-1.
- Rugo HS, Cristofanilli M, Loibl S, Harbeck N, DeMichele A, Iwata H, Park YH, Brufsky A, Theall KP, Huang X, McRoy L, Bananis E, Turner NC. Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: Analyses From PALOMA-3. Oncologist. 2021 Aug;26(8):e1339-e1346. doi: 10.1002/onco.13833. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
- Iwata H, Umeyama Y, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Schnell P, Mori Y, Fletcher O, Marshall JC, Johnson JG, Wood LS, Toi M, Finn RS, Turner NC, Bartlett CH, Cristofanilli M. Evaluation of the Association of Polymorphisms With Palbociclib-Induced Neutropenia: Pharmacogenetic Analysis of PALOMA-2/-3. Oncologist. 2021 Jul;26(7):e1143-e1155. doi: 10.1002/onco.13811. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
- Finn RS, Rugo HS, Gelmon KA, Cristofanilli M, Colleoni M, Loi S, Schnell P, Lu DR, Theall KP, Mori A, Gauthier E, Bananis E, Turner NC, Dieras V. Long-Term Pooled Safety Analysis of Palbociclib in Combination with Endocrine Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Updated Analysis with up to 5 Years of Follow-Up. Oncologist. 2021 May;26(5):e749-e755. doi: 10.1002/onco.13684. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
- Finn RS, Cristofanilli M, Ettl J, Gelmon KA, Colleoni M, Giorgetti C, Gauthier E, Liu Y, Lu DR, Zhang Z, Bartlett CH, Slamon DJ, Turner NC, Rugo HS. Treatment effect of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy by prognostic and intrinsic subtype and biomarker analysis in patients with bone-only disease: a joint analysis of PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3 clinical trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Nov;184(1):23-35. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05782-4. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
- Ettl J, Im SA, Ro J, Masuda N, Colleoni M, Schnell P, Bananis E, Lu DR, Cristofanilli M, Rugo HS, Finn RS. Hematologic adverse events following palbociclib dose reduction in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: pooled analysis from randomized phase 2 and 3 studies. Breast Cancer Res. 2020 Mar 12;22(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01263-0.
- Masuda N, Mukai H, Inoue K, Rai Y, Ohno S, Mori Y, Hashigaki S, Muramatsu Y, Umeyama Y, Iwata H, Toi M. Neutropenia management with palbociclib in Japanese patients with advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2019 Sep;26(5):637-650. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-00970-7. Epub 2019 May 24. Erratum In: Breast Cancer. 2019 Jun 5;:
- Turner NC, Liu Y, Zhu Z, Loi S, Colleoni M, Loibl S, DeMichele A, Harbeck N, Andre F, Bayar MA, Michiels S, Zhang Z, Giorgetti C, Arnedos M, Huang Bartlett C, Cristofanilli M. Cyclin E1 Expression and Palbociclib Efficacy in Previously Treated Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 10;37(14):1169-1178. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00925. Epub 2019 Feb 26. Erratum In: J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;37(31):2956.
- Masuda N, Inoue K, Nakamura R, Rai Y, Mukai H, Ohno S, Hara F, Mori Y, Hashigaki S, Muramatsu Y, Nagasawa T, Umeyama Y, Huang X, Iwata H. Palbociclib in combination with fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: PALOMA-3 subgroup analysis of Japanese patients. Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar;24(3):262-273. doi: 10.1007/s10147-018-1359-3. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
- Turner NC, Slamon DJ, Ro J, Bondarenko I, Im SA, Masuda N, Colleoni M, DeMichele A, Loi S, Verma S, Iwata H, Harbeck N, Loibl S, Andre F, Puyana Theall K, Huang X, Giorgetti C, Huang Bartlett C, Cristofanilli M. Overall Survival with Palbociclib and Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1926-1936. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1810527. Epub 2018 Oct 20.
- Cristofanilli M, DeMichele A, Giorgetti C, Turner NC, Slamon DJ, Im SA, Masuda N, Verma S, Loi S, Colleoni M, Theall KP, Huang X, Liu Y, Bartlett CH. Predictors of prolonged benefit from palbociclib plus fulvestrant in women with endocrine-resistant hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer in PALOMA-3. Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;104:21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
- Rugo HS, Turner NC, Finn RS, Joy AA, Verma S, Harbeck N, Masuda N, Im SA, Huang X, Kim S, Sun W, Iyer S, Schnell P, Bartlett CH, Johnston S. Palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in older women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: a pooled analysis of randomised PALOMA clinical studies. Eur J Cancer. 2018 Sep;101:123-133. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
- Dieras V, Rugo HS, Schnell P, Gelmon K, Cristofanilli M, Loi S, Colleoni M, Lu DR, Mori A, Gauthier E, Huang Bartlett C, Slamon DJ, Turner NC, Finn RS. Long-term Pooled Safety Analysis of Palbociclib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy for HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Apr 1;111(4):419-430. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy109.
- Wedam SB, Beaver JA, Amiri-Kordestani L, Bloomquist E, Tang S, Goldberg KB, Sridhara R, Ibrahim A, Kim G, Kluetz P, McKee A, Pazdur R. US Food and Drug Administration Pooled Analysis to Assess the Impact of Bone-Only Metastatic Breast Cancer on Clinical Trial Outcomes and Radiographic Assessments. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 20;36(12):1225-1231. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.6917. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
- Turner NC, Finn RS, Martin M, Im SA, DeMichele A, Ettl J, Dieras V, Moulder S, Lipatov O, Colleoni M, Cristofanilli M, Lu DR, Mori A, Giorgetti C, Iyer S, Bartlett CH, Gelmon KA. Clinical considerations of the role of palbociclib in the management of advanced breast cancer patients with and without visceral metastases. Ann Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;29(3):669-680. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx797.
- Loibl S, Turner NC, Ro J, Cristofanilli M, Iwata H, Im SA, Masuda N, Loi S, Andre F, Harbeck N, Verma S, Folkerd E, Puyana Theall K, Hoffman J, Zhang K, Bartlett CH, Dowsett M. Palbociclib Combined with Fulvestrant in Premenopausal Women with Advanced Breast Cancer and Prior Progression on Endocrine Therapy: PALOMA-3 Results. Oncologist. 2017 Sep;22(9):1028-1038. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0072. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
- Verma S, Bartlett CH, Schnell P, DeMichele AM, Loi S, Ro J, Colleoni M, Iwata H, Harbeck N, Cristofanilli M, Zhang K, Thiele A, Turner NC, Rugo HS. Palbociclib in Combination With Fulvestrant in Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative Advanced Metastatic Breast Cancer: Detailed Safety Analysis From a Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Study (PALOMA-3). Oncologist. 2016 Oct;21(10):1165-1175. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0097. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
- Fribbens C, O'Leary B, Kilburn L, Hrebien S, Garcia-Murillas I, Beaney M, Cristofanilli M, Andre F, Loi S, Loibl S, Jiang J, Bartlett CH, Koehler M, Dowsett M, Bliss JM, Johnston SR, Turner NC. Plasma ESR1 Mutations and the Treatment of Estrogen Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 1;34(25):2961-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.3061. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
- Harbeck N, Iyer S, Turner N, Cristofanilli M, Ro J, Andre F, Loi S, Verma S, Iwata H, Bhattacharyya H, Puyana Theall K, Bartlett CH, Loibl S. Quality of life with palbociclib plus fulvestrant in previously treated hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: patient-reported outcomes from the PALOMA-3 trial. Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1047-1054. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw139. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
- Cristofanilli M, Turner NC, Bondarenko I, Ro J, Im SA, Masuda N, Colleoni M, DeMichele A, Loi S, Verma S, Iwata H, Harbeck N, Zhang K, Theall KP, Jiang Y, Bartlett CH, Koehler M, Slamon D. Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):425-439. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00613-0. Epub 2016 Mar 3. Erratum In: Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17 (4):e136. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17 (7):e270.
- Turner NC, Ro J, Andre F, Loi S, Verma S, Iwata H, Harbeck N, Loibl S, Huang Bartlett C, Zhang K, Giorgetti C, Randolph S, Koehler M, Cristofanilli M; PALOMA3 Study Group. Palbociclib in Hormone-Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 16;373(3):209-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505270. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
|
|
Completed
|
521
|
417
|
September 28, 2022
|
December 5, 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
|
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women 18 years or older with metastatic or locally advanced disease, not amenable to curative therapy
- Confirmed diagnosis of HR+/HER2- breast cancer
- Any menopausal status
- Progressed within 12 months from prior adjuvant or progressed within 1 month from prior advanced/metastatic endocrine breast cancer therapy
- On an LHRH agonist for at least 28 days, if pre-/peri-menopausal, and willing to switch to goserelin (Zoladex ®) at time of randomization.
- Measurable disease defined by RECIST version 1.1, or bone-only disease
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS 0-1
- Adequate organ and marrow function, resolution of all toxic effects of prior therapy or surgical procedures
- Patient must agree to provide tumor tissue from metastatic tissue at baseline
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior treatment with any CDK inhibitor, fulvestrant, everolimus, or agent that inhibits the PI3K-mTOR pathway
- Patients with extensive advanced/metastatic, symptomatic visceral disease, or known uncontrolled or symptomatic CNS metastases
- Major surgery or any anti-cancer therapy within 2 weeks of randomization
- Prior stem cell or bone marrow transplantation
- Use of potent CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers
|
Sexes Eligible for Study: |
Female |
Gender Based Eligibility: |
Yes |
|
18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
|
No
|
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
|
Australia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Republic of, Netherlands, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Taiwan, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States
|
|
|
NCT01942135
|
A5481023 2013-002580-26 ( EudraCT Number )
|
Yes
|
Not Provided
|
Plan to Share IPD: |
Yes |
Plan Description: |
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests. |
URL: |
https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests |
|
Pfizer
|
Same as current
|
Pfizer
|
Same as current
|
AstraZeneca
|
Study Director: |
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center |
Pfizer |
|
Pfizer
|
April 2024
|