September 1, 2014
|
September 4, 2014
|
June 21, 2018
|
October 16, 2018
|
November 15, 2023
|
October 16, 2014
|
June 26, 2017 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
|
- Investigator-assessed Objective Response Rate(ORR) in Intermediate/Poor Risk Participants Per IRRC Using RECIST v1.1 [ Time Frame: From first dose until date of documented disease progression or subsequent therapy, whichever occurs first (assessed up to June 2017, approximately 31 months) ]
ORR was defined as the proportion of randomized subjects who achieved a best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) using the RECIST v1.1 criteria based on IRRC assessment. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), greater than or equal to 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR
- Overall Survival (OS) in Intermediate/Poor-Risk Participants With Previously Untreated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) [ Time Frame: From the date of randomization to the date of death (assessed up to June 2017, approximately 31 months) ]
OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death from any cause. Survival time was censored at the date of last contact ("last known alive date") for subjects who were alive.
- Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Intermediate/Poor-Risk Participants With Previously Untreated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) [ Time Frame: From date of first dose to date of documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (assessed up to June 2017, approximately 31 months) ]
PFS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the first date of documented progression, as determined by the IRRC (as per RECIST 1.1 criteria), or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Subsequent therapy included anticancer therapy, tumor directed radiotherapy, or tumor directed surgery. Subjects who died without a reported progression were considered to have progressed on the date of their death.
|
- Progression-free survival (PFS) [ Time Frame: Up to 5 years ]
- Overall survival (OS) [ Time Frame: Up to 5 years ]
|
|
- Investigator-assessed Objective Response Rate(ORR) in Any Risk Participants Per IRRC Using RECIST v1.1 [ Time Frame: From first dose until date of documented disease progression or subsequent therapy, whichever occurs first (assessed up to June 2017, approximately 31 months) ]
ORR was defined as the proportion of randomized subjects who achieved a best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) using the RECIST v1.1 criteria based on IRRC assessment. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), greater than or equal to 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR
- Overall Survival (OS) in Any Risk Participants With Previously Untreated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) [ Time Frame: From the date of randomization to the date of death (assessed up to June 2017, approximately 31 months) ]
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to the date of death from any cause. For subjects that are alive, their survival time will be censored at the date of last contact ("last known alive date"). Overall survival will be censored for subjects at the date of randomization if they were randomized but had no follow-up. Survival follow-up will be conducted every 3 months after subject's off-treatment date.
- Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Any Risk Participants With Previously Untreated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) [ Time Frame: From date of first dose to date of documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (assessed up to June 2017, approximately 31 months) ]
PFS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the first date of documented progression, as determined by the IRRC (as per RECIST 1.1 criteria), or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Subsequent therapy included anticancer therapy, tumor directed radiotherapy, or tumor directed surgery. Subjects who died without a reported progression were considered to have progressed on the date of their death.
|
Objective response rate (ORR) [ Time Frame: Up to 61 months ]
|
Not Provided
|
Not Provided
|
|
Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Sunitinib in Previously Untreated Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (CheckMate 214)
|
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Sunitinib Monotherapy in Subjects With Previously Untreated, Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
|
The purpose of this study is to compare the objective response rate, progression free survival and the overall survival of Nivolumab combined with Ipilimumab to Sunitinib monotherapy in patients with previously untreated Renal Cell Cancer.
|
Not Provided
|
Interventional
|
Phase 3
|
Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: None (Open Label) Primary Purpose: Treatment
|
- Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
|
- Biological: Nivolumab
- Biological: Ipilimumab
Other Name: Yervoy
- Drug: Sunitinib
Other Name: Sutent
|
- Experimental: Arm A: Nivolumab 3 mg/kg + Ipilimumab 1 mg/kg
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg combined with Ipilimumab 1 mg/kg solutions intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 doses then Nivolumab 3 mg/kg solutions intravenously every 2 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends
Interventions:
- Biological: Nivolumab
- Biological: Ipilimumab
- Active Comparator: Arm B: Sunitinib 50 mg
Sunitinib 50 mg capsules by mouth once daily for 4 weeks then 2 weeks off, continuously until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends
After completion of final analysis eligible participants may switch from receiving Sunitinib to receiving Nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV combined with Ipilimumab 1 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for 4 doses then Nivolumab 240mg flat dose IV every 2 weeks
Interventions:
- Biological: Nivolumab
- Biological: Ipilimumab
- Drug: Sunitinib
|
- Motzer RJ, McDermott DF, Escudier B, Burotto M, Choueiri TK, Hammers HJ, Barthelemy P, Plimack ER, Porta C, George S, Powles T, Donskov F, Gurney H, Kollmannsberger CK, Grimm MO, Barrios C, Tomita Y, Castellano D, Grunwald V, Rini BI, McHenry MB, Lee CW, McCarthy J, Ejzykowicz F, Tannir NM. Conditional survival and long-term efficacy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2022 Jun 1;128(11):2085-2097. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34180. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
- Labriola MK, George DJ. Setting a new standard for long-term survival in metastatic kidney cancer. Cancer. 2022 Jun 1;128(11):2058-2060. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34177. Epub 2022 Apr 5. No abstract available.
- Albiges L, Tannir NM, Burotto M, McDermott D, Plimack ER, Barthelemy P, Porta C, Powles T, Donskov F, George S, Kollmannsberger CK, Gurney H, Grimm MO, Tomita Y, Castellano D, Rini BI, Choueiri TK, Leung D, Saggi SS, Lee CW, McHenry MB, Motzer RJ. First-line Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab Versus Sunitinib in Patients Without Nephrectomy and With an Evaluable Primary Renal Tumor in the CheckMate 214 Trial. Eur Urol. 2022 Mar;81(3):266-271. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.10.001. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
- Albiges L, Tannir NM, Burotto M, McDermott D, Plimack ER, Barthelemy P, Porta C, Powles T, Donskov F, George S, Kollmannsberger CK, Gurney H, Grimm MO, Tomita Y, Castellano D, Rini BI, Choueiri TK, Saggi SS, McHenry MB, Motzer RJ. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended 4-year follow-up of the phase III CheckMate 214 trial. ESMO Open. 2020 Nov;5(6):e001079. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-001079.
- Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, Aren Frontera O, Melichar B, Powles T, Donskov F, Plimack ER, Barthelemy P, Hammers HJ, George S, Grunwald V, Porta C, Neiman V, Ravaud A, Choueiri TK, Rini BI, Salman P, Kollmannsberger CK, Tykodi SS, Grimm MO, Gurney H, Leibowitz-Amit R, Geertsen PF, Amin A, Tomita Y, McHenry MB, Saggi SS, Tannir NM. Survival outcomes and independent response assessment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: 42-month follow-up of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial. J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Jul;8(2):e000891. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000891. Erratum In: J Immunother Cancer. 2021 May;9(5):
- Ambavane A, Yang S, Atkins MB, Rao S, Shah A, Regan MM, McDermott DF, Michaelson MD. Clinical and economic outcomes of treatment sequences for intermediate- to poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma. Immunotherapy. 2020 Jan;12(1):37-51. doi: 10.2217/imt-2019-0199. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
- Tomita Y, Kondo T, Kimura G, Inoue T, Wakumoto Y, Yao M, Sugiyama T, Oya M, Fujii Y, Obara W, Motzer RJ, Uemura H. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma: analysis of Japanese patients in CheckMate 214 with extended follow-up. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan 24;50(1):12-19. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyz132.
- Motzer RJ, Rini BI, McDermott DF, Aren Frontera O, Hammers HJ, Carducci MA, Salman P, Escudier B, Beuselinck B, Amin A, Porta C, George S, Neiman V, Bracarda S, Tykodi SS, Barthelemy P, Leibowitz-Amit R, Plimack ER, Oosting SF, Redman B, Melichar B, Powles T, Nathan P, Oudard S, Pook D, Choueiri TK, Donskov F, Grimm MO, Gurney H, Heng DYC, Kollmannsberger CK, Harrison MR, Tomita Y, Duran I, Grunwald V, McHenry MB, Mekan S, Tannir NM; CheckMate 214 investigators. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended follow-up of efficacy and safety results from a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Oct;20(10):1370-1385. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30413-9. Epub 2019 Aug 16. Erratum In: Lancet Oncol. 2019 Aug 21;: Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jun;21(6):e304. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Nov;21(11):e518.
- Cella D, Grunwald V, Escudier B, Hammers HJ, George S, Nathan P, Grimm MO, Rini BI, Doan J, Ivanescu C, Paty J, Mekan S, Motzer RJ. Patient-reported outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib (CheckMate 214): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Feb;20(2):297-310. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30778-2. Epub 2019 Jan 15. Erratum In: Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jun;20(6):e293.
- Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF, Aren Frontera O, Melichar B, Choueiri TK, Plimack ER, Barthelemy P, Porta C, George S, Powles T, Donskov F, Neiman V, Kollmannsberger CK, Salman P, Gurney H, Hawkins R, Ravaud A, Grimm MO, Bracarda S, Barrios CH, Tomita Y, Castellano D, Rini BI, Chen AC, Mekan S, McHenry MB, Wind-Rotolo M, Doan J, Sharma P, Hammers HJ, Escudier B; CheckMate 214 Investigators. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 5;378(14):1277-1290. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1712126. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
|
|
Active, not recruiting
|
1390
|
1070
|
August 7, 2027
|
June 26, 2017 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
|
For more information regarding BMS clinical trial participation, please visit www.BMSStudyConnect.com
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any history of or current central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Baseline imaging of the brain is required within 28 days prior to randomization
- Prior systemic treatment with VEGF or VEGF receptor targeted therapy (including, but not limited to, Sunitinib, Pazopanib, Axitinib, Tivozanib, and Bevacizumab)
- Prior treatment with an anti-programmed death (PD)-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-PD-L2, anti-CD137, or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibody, or any other antibody or drug specifically targeting T-cell co-stimulation or checkpoint pathways
- Any active or recent history of a known or suspected autoimmune disease or recent history of a syndrome that required systemic corticosteroids (>10 mg daily Prednisone equivalent) or immunosuppressive medications except for syndromes which would not be expected to recur in the absence of an external trigger. Subjects with vitiligo or type I diabetes mellitus or residual hypothyroidism due to autoimmune thyroiditis only requiring hormone replacement are permitted to enroll
- Any condition requiring systemic treatment with corticosteroids (>10 mg daily Prednisone equivalents) or other immunosuppressive medications within 14 days prior to first dose of study drug. Inhaled steroids and adrenal replacement steroid doses >10 mg daily Prednisone equivalents are permitted in the absence of active autoimmune disease
|
Sexes Eligible for Study: |
All |
|
18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
|
No
|
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
|
Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Republic of, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States
|
Czech Republic
|
|
NCT02231749
|
CA209-214 2014-001750-42 ( EudraCT Number )
|
Yes
|
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: |
Yes |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: |
No |
|
Not Provided
|
Bristol-Myers Squibb
|
Same as current
|
Bristol-Myers Squibb
|
Same as current
|
Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd
|
Study Director: |
Bristol-Myers Squibb |
Bristol-Myers Squibb |
|
Bristol-Myers Squibb
|
November 2023
|