Platinum in Treating Patients With Residual Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02445391 |
Recruitment Status :
Active, not recruiting
First Posted : May 15, 2015
Results First Posted : October 5, 2022
Last Update Posted : July 10, 2023
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Tracking Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | May 13, 2015 | ||||
First Posted Date ICMJE | May 15, 2015 | ||||
Results First Submitted Date ICMJE | December 9, 2021 | ||||
Results First Posted Date ICMJE | October 5, 2022 | ||||
Last Update Posted Date | July 10, 2023 | ||||
Actual Study Start Date ICMJE | October 20, 2015 | ||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | April 7, 2021 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
3-year Invasive Disease-Free Survival (IDFS) Rate in Basal-Subtype Patients [ Time Frame: No mandatory timeline, assessed at any time as a standard of care procedure or at the investigator's discretion; data reported every 3 months within 2 years from randomization, every 6 months if 2-3 years. ] IDFS was defined to be time from randomization to the earliest of documented disease recurrence (local, regional and/or distant), invasive contralateral breast cancer, invasive any other second cancer, or death. Cases with incomplete follow up or without adequate disease evaluations were censored at the date last documented to be free of IDFS events. 3-year IDFS rate was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
|
||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
IDFS of patients with basal-like TNBC [ Time Frame: From randomization to the earliest of documented disease recurrence (local, regional and/or distant), invasive contralateral breast cancer, invasive any other second primary cancer, or death, assessed up to 86 months after study activation ] The distributions of IDFS will be estimated using the Kaplan- Meier method, with 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated using Greenwood's formula. The primary analysis of IDFS comparisons between two treatment arms will be performed using stratified log-rank tests, stratifying on the randomization stratification factors. Stratified Cox proportional-hazard models will also be built to estimate the hazard ratios for treatment effect for IDFS as a supportive analysis.
|
||||
Change History | |||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Descriptive Information | |||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Platinum in Treating Patients With Residual Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy | ||||
Official Title ICMJE | A Randomized Phase III Post-operative Trial of Platinum Based Chemotherapy vs. Capecitabine in Patients With Residual Triple-Negative Basal-Like Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy | ||||
Brief Summary | This randomized phase III trial studies how well cisplatin or carboplatin (platinum based chemotherapy) works compared to capecitabine in treating patients with remaining (residual) basal-like triple-negative breast cancer following chemotherapy after surgery (neoadjuvant). Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cisplatin, carboplatin and capecitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. It is not yet known whether cisplatin or carboplatin is more effective than capecitabine in treating patients with residual triple negative basal-like breast cancer. | ||||
Detailed Description | PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with residual basal-like disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy who are randomized to post-preoperative platinum based chemotherapy with those who are randomized to capecitabine. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate overall survival (OS) and response-free survival (RFS) in the two arms in patients with TNBC with residual basal-like disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. II. To characterize the side effects and tolerability of platinum agent as well as capecitabine in patients with TNBC with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. III. To identify the rate of basal-like gene expression using prediction analysis of microarray 50 (PAM50) analysis by digital messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) quantitation amongst drug-resistant residual TNBC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. IV. To assess the difference in health-related quality of life (HRQL) between the platinum based and capecitabine chemotherapy arms. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the IDFS in TNBC patients with residual non-basal-like disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy who are randomized to post-preoperative platinum based chemotherapy with those who are randomized to capecitabine. II. To describe the rate of neurotoxicity over time in the platinum arm, the rate of medication adherence in the capecitabine arm and the rates of amenorrhea in both arms. III. To evaluate the association of genomic alterations identified via profiling of the surgical tumor specimen with RFS in patients with TNBC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. IV. To explore whether any of the genomic alterations identified via profiling of the surgical tumor specimen can predict treatment benefit in patients with basal subtype TNBC. V. To determine the frequency of CTC positivity at baseline and after completion of study therapy in patients with TNBC with residual basal subtype disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. VI. To evaluate the associations between CTC levels at baseline, and after completion of chemotherapy, with RFS. VII. To evaluate the association between CTC change in status posttreatment (i.e. negative to negative, negative to positive, positive to negative, positive to positive) and RFS. VIII. To explore significance of CTC number/phenotype and ctDNA detected mutations (mutational burden, specific mutations) in predicting RFS. IX. To determine the frequency of plasma tumor cell-free DNA (cfDNA) positivity at baseline and after completion of study therapy in patients with TNBC with residual basal subtype disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. X. To evaluate the associations between plasma tumor cfDNA tumor specific mutations (baseline and after therapy) with RFS. XI. To explore optimal biomarker combination for RFS prediction. XII. To determine the effects of tobacco, operationalized as combustible tobacco (1a), other forms of tobacco (1b), and environmental tobacco exposure (ETS) (1c) on provider-reported cancer-treatment toxicity (adverse events (both clinical and hematologic) and dose modifications). XIII. To determine the effects of tobacco on patient-reported physical symptoms and psychological symptoms. XIV. To examine quitting behaviors and behavioral counseling/support and cessation medication utilization. XV. To explore the effect of tobacco use and exposure on treatment duration, relative dose intensity, and therapeutic benefit. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms. ARM A (closed to accrual 05/16/2016): Patients undergo observation. ARM B: Patients receive cisplatin intravenously (IV) or carboplatin IV on day 1. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM C: Patients receive capecitabine orally (PO) twice daily (BID) on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for up to 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for up to 10 years. |
||||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
Study Phase ICMJE | Phase 3 | ||||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: None (Open Label) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||
Condition ICMJE |
|
||||
Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||||
Publications * | Mayer IA, Zhao F, Arteaga CL, Symmans WF, Park BH, Burnette BL, Tevaarwerk AJ, Garcia SF, Smith KL, Makower DF, Block M, Morley KA, Jani CR, Mescher C, Dewani SJ, Tawfik B, Flaum LE, Mayer EL, Sikov WM, Rodler ET, Wagner LI, DeMichele AM, Sparano JA, Wolff AC, Miller KD. Randomized Phase III Postoperative Trial of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Versus Capecitabine in Patients With Residual Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: ECOG-ACRIN EA1131. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug 10;39(23):2539-2551. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00976. Epub 2021 Jun 6. | ||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
Recruitment Information | |||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Active, not recruiting | ||||
Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
415 | ||||
Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE |
558 | ||||
Estimated Study Completion Date ICMJE | March 29, 2031 | ||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | April 7, 2021 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SCREENING AND MOLECULAR PROFILING (STEP 0) Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR RANDOMIZATION (STEP 1):
|
||||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | ||||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | South Africa, United States | ||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||
Administrative Information | |||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT02445391 | ||||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | EA1131 NCI-2014-01820 ( Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) ) EA1131 ( Other Identifier: ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group ) EA1131 ( Other Identifier: CTEP ) U10CA180820 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract ) U24CA196172 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract ) |
||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product | Not Provided | ||||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||
Current Responsible Party | Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ( ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group ) | ||||
Original Responsible Party | Same as current | ||||
Current Study Sponsor ICMJE | ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group | ||||
Original Study Sponsor ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Collaborators ICMJE | National Cancer Institute (NCI) | ||||
Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
PRS Account | Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group | ||||
Verification Date | June 2023 | ||||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |