The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

A Placebo-Controlled Study Using VP-102 in the Treatment of External Genital Warts (CARE-1)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03981822
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : June 11, 2019
Results First Posted : September 22, 2021
Last Update Posted : September 22, 2021
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
Instat Consulting, Inc.
Paidion Research, Inc.
BioClinica, Inc.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Verrica Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Tracking Information
First Submitted Date  ICMJE June 6, 2019
First Posted Date  ICMJE June 11, 2019
Results First Submitted Date  ICMJE June 18, 2021
Results First Posted Date  ICMJE September 22, 2021
Last Update Posted Date September 22, 2021
Actual Study Start Date  ICMJE June 25, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date May 21, 2020   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: June 18, 2021)
Proportion of Subjects Exhibiting Complete Clearance of All Treatable Warts at the Study Day 84 (End of Treatment) Visit. [ Time Frame: Compares baseline wart count to Day 84, end of treatment. ]
Proportion of subjects exhibiting complete clearance of all treatable warts (baseline and new) at the Study Day 84 EOT Visit.
Original Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: June 6, 2019)
Proportion of subjects exhibiting complete clearance of all treatable warts at the Study Day 84 (End of Treatment) Visit. [ Time Frame: Compares baseline wart count to Day 84, end of treatment. ]
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: July 30, 2021)
  • Proportion of Subjects Exhibiting Complete Clearance of All Treatable Warts (Baseline and New) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS) [ Time Frame: Clearance compared from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2 (Day 21), 3 (Day 42), 4 (Day 63) and Day 84, 112 and 147. ]
    Proportion of subjects exhibiting complete clearance of all treatable warts (baseline and new) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS).
  • Proportion of Subjects Exhibiting 90% Clearance of All Treatable Warts (Baseline and New) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS) [ Time Frame: Compared from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2 (Day 21), 3 (Day 42), 4 (Day 63) and Day 84, 112 and 147. ]
    Proportion of subjects exhibiting 90% clearance of all treatable warts (baseline and new) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS).
  • Proportion of Subjects Exhibiting 75% Clearance of All Treatable Warts (Baseline and New) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS) [ Time Frame: Compared from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2, (Day 21), 3 (Day 42), 4 (Day 63) and Day 84, 112 and 147. ]
    Proportion of subjects exhibiting 75% clearance of all treatable warts (baseline and new) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS).
  • Change From Baseline in the Number of Treatable Warts (Baseline and New) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS) [ Time Frame: Compared from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2 (Day 21), 3 (Day 42), 4 (Day 63) and Day 84, 112 and 147. ]
    Change from baseline in the number of treatable warts (baseline and new) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS). Number of warts present were recorded at each treatment visit as well as follow-up visits. For each post baseline treatment visit, the change in number of warts from baseline was calculated.
  • Percent Change From Baseline in the Number of Treatable Warts (Baseline and New) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, at Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS) [ Time Frame: Percent change from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2 (Day 21), 3 (Day 42), 4 (Day 63) and Day 84, 112 and 147. ]
    Percent Change from Baseline in the Number of Treatable Warts (Baseline and New) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, at Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS).
Original Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: June 6, 2019)
  • Proportion of subjects exhibiting complete clearance of all treatable warts (baseline and new) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS) [ Time Frame: Clearance compared from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2, 3, 4 and Day 84, 112 and 147. ]
  • Proportion of subjects exhibiting 90% and 75% clearance of all treatable warts (baseline and new) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS) [ Time Frame: Compared from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2, 3, 4 and Day 84, 112 and 147. ]
  • Change from baseline in the number of treatable warts (baseline and new) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS) [ Time Frame: Compared from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2, 3, 4 and Day 84, 112 and 147. ]
  • Change from baseline in the percent of treatable warts (baseline and new) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, at Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS) [ Time Frame: Percent change from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2, 3, 4 and Day 84, 112 and 147. ]
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures
 (submitted: July 30, 2021)
  • Proportion of Subjects Exhibiting Reduction of ≥ 1 Treatable Wart From Baseline at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS) [ Time Frame: Compared from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2 (Day 21), 3 (Day 42), 4 (Day 63) and Day 84, 112 and 147. ]
    Proportion of subjects exhibiting reduction of ≥ 1 treatable wart from baseline at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS).
  • Proportion of Subjects Who Are Clear at the Study Day 84 (End of Treatment) Visit and Remain Clear at the Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (End of Study) [ Time Frame: Complete clearance compared from Day 84 to follow-up days 112 and 147. ]
    Proportion of subjects who are clear at all three study visits, Study Day 84 (End of Treatment) Visit and remain clear at the Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (End of Study).
  • Change From Baseline in Total Wart Area (Sum of Individual Warts) at Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Study Day 84, Follow-up Visits at Days 112 and 147 (EOS) ]
    Change from baseline in total wart area (sum of individual warts) at Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS).
  • Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Wart Area (Sum of Individual Warts) at Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS) ]
    Percent Change from baseline in the total wart area (sum of individual warts) at Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS).
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures
 (submitted: June 6, 2019)
  • Proportion of subjects exhibiting reduction of ≥ 1 treatable wart from baseline at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS) [ Time Frame: Compared from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2, 3, 4 and Day 84, 112 and 147. ]
  • Proportion of subjects who are clear at the Study Day 84 (End of Treatment) Visit and remain clear at the Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (End of Study) [ Time Frame: Complete clearance compared from Day 84 to follow-up days 112 and 147. ]
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title  ICMJE A Placebo-Controlled Study Using VP-102 in the Treatment of External Genital Warts
Official Title  ICMJE A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Determine the Dose Regimen, Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of VP-102 in Subjects With External Genital Warts
Brief Summary This is a Phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to determine the dose regimen, safety, tolerability, and efficacy of VP-102 in subjects with External Genital Warts (EGW). This study is divided into two parts (Part A and Part B). Increasing durations of skin exposure to study drug (VP-102 or placebo) will be evaluated in three treatment groups prior to progressing to enrollment in Part B. Part A & B will enroll a approximately 108 subjects completing 4 treatment applications every 21 days and continuing with follow-up assessments at Day 84, 112 and 147.
Detailed Description

This study is to determine the Dose Regimen, Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of VP-102 in Subjects with External Genital Warts. It is divided into two parts (Part A and Part B). The aim of Part A is to determine the two best treatment regimens for evaluation of safety and efficacy in Part B.In Part A, Study drug (VP-102 or placebo) will be administered once every 21 days for up to four applications. Enrollment will begin in Group 1, then proceed into Group 2, and lastly into Group 3. A safety review will be conducted to determine whether enrollment can be initiated into the next Group. An additional blinded safety review will be performed after all six subjects in Group 3 have completed the 48-hour Visit, in order to support dose selection for Part B (Safety and Efficacy). Part B of the study will begin enrollment only after the Sponsor has selected the two dose regimens from Part A. The study will remain blinded until completion of both parts of the study.

In Part A, up to 18 subjects will be randomized to VP-102 or placebo treatment with three different regimens. When Part B is open an additional ~90 subjects will be enrolled and randomized to VP-102 or placebo with two treatment regimens. Two of the treatment arms will be VP-102 Regimen 1 and VP-102 Regimen 2. The other two treatment arms will be placebo (Placebo Regimen 1 and Placebo Regimen 2), with corresponding durations of skin exposure matching those selected for VP-102 Regimen 1 and Regimen 2. As an example, if the regimens selected from Part A are the 2-hour and 6-hour applications of VP-102, then VP-102 Regimen 1 would be VP-102 treatment for 2-hours and VP-102 Regimen 2 would be VP-102 treatment for 6-hours. Likewise, Placebo Regimen 1 would be placebo treatment for 2 hours and Placebo Regimen 2 would be placebo treatment for 6-hours. Randomization of the four treatment arms (VP-102 Regimen 1:VP-102 Regimen 2:Placebo Regimen 1:Placebo Regimen 2) will be 3:3:2:2. In both Regimen 1 and Regimen 2, study drug will be administered to EGW once every 21 days for up to four applications. Subjects will be asked to remove the study drug at the designated time selected from the dose regimen findings in Part A of the study. Treatment will continue with a minimum of every 21 days, until complete clearance or a maximum of four treatment sessions. Safety assessments including recording of local skin reactions are conducted at each treatment visit and at follow up visits Day 84, 112, and 147.

Study Type  ICMJE Interventional
Study Phase  ICMJE Phase 2
Study Design  ICMJE Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:

The aim of Part A is to determine the two best treatment regimens for evaluation of safety and efficacy in Part B. Increasing durations of skin exposure to study drug (VP-102 or placebo) will be evaluated in three treatment groups (n=6/group) that will enroll progressively.

Part B of the study will begin enrollment only after the Sponsor has selected the two dose regimens in Part A, which will be called VP-102 Regimen 1 and Regimen 2.Approximately 90 subjects will be enrolled and randomized to one of four treatment arms (two treatment regimens, each with VP-102 and Placebo). Randomization will be stratified by sex so that neither gender exceeds ~60% of any treatment arm. Two of the treatment arms will be VP-102 Regimen 1 and VP-102 Regimen 2. The other two treatment arms will be placebo (Placebo Regimen 1 and Placebo Regimen 2), with corresponding durations of skin exposure matching those selected for VP-102 Regimen 1 and Regimen 2.

Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Double-blind
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition  ICMJE
  • Condylomata Acuminata
  • Papillomavirus Infections
  • Skin Diseases, Viral
  • Skin Diseases, Infectious
  • Skin Diseases
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases
  • Warts
Intervention  ICMJE
  • Combination Product: VP-102 and applicator
    In part A, VP-102 will be applied for either 2, 6 or 24 hours with each regimen compared to placebo. For part B, 2 of the regimens from part A will be chosen for Part B with each compared to Placebo. Only 4 arms are actually being studied.
    Other Name: VP-102 (cantharidin) 0.7% w/v topical solution
  • Combination Product: Placebo
    The placebo single-use applicator contains the same formulation as the VP-102 applicator but does not contain the active pharmaceutical ingredient cantharidin
Study Arms  ICMJE
  • Active Comparator: Part A: VP-102 2 hour-Active
    For part A, VP-102 will be applied for 2 hours and removed. If selected as a dose regimen for Part B VP-102 will be applied for 2 hours and removed.In both parts, VP-102 is applied every 21 days for 4 treatments.
    Intervention: Combination Product: VP-102 and applicator
  • Active Comparator: Part A: VP-102 6-hour Active
    For part A, VP-102 will be applied for 6 hours and removed. If selected as a dose regimen for Part B VP-102 will be applied for 6 hours and removed. In both parts, VP-102 is applied every 21 days for 4 treatments.
    Intervention: Combination Product: VP-102 and applicator
  • Active Comparator: Part A: VP-102 24-hour Active
    For part A, VP-102 will be applied for 24 hours and removed. If selected as a dose regimen for Part B, VP-102 will be applied for 24 hours and removed. In both parts, VP-102 is applied every 21 days for 4 treatments.
    Intervention: Combination Product: VP-102 and applicator
  • Placebo Comparator: Part A: Placebo
    For part A, VP-102 will be applied for 2-,6- or 24- hours and removed. Placebo is applied every 21 days for 4 treatments.
    Intervention: Combination Product: Placebo
  • Active Comparator: Part B & A: VP-102 6 hour-Active
    Part B, VP-102 will be applied for 6 hours and removed. VP-102 is applied every 21 days for 4 treatments.
    Intervention: Combination Product: VP-102 and applicator
  • Placebo Comparator: Part B & A: 6-hour-Placebo
    Part B, Placebo will be applied for 6 hours and removed. VP-102 is applied every 21 days for 4 treatments.
    Intervention: Combination Product: Placebo
  • Active Comparator: Part B & A: VP-102 24-hour Active
    For part A, VP-102 will be applied for 24 hours and removed. If 24 hours is selected as a dose regimen for Part B, VP-102 will be applied for 24 hours and removed. VP-102 is applied every 21 days for 4 treatments.
    Intervention: Combination Product: VP-102 and applicator
  • Placebo Comparator: Part B & A: 24-hour-Placebo
    Part B, VP-Placebo will be applied for 24 hours and removed. VP-102 is applied every 21 days for 4 treatments.
    Intervention: Combination Product: Placebo
Publications * Guenthner S, McFalda W, Tate M, Eads K, Rieger J, Glover DK, Willson C, Rumney P, Rosen T, Andres J, Olivadoti M. Phase II, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled Study to Determine the Cantharidin Dose Regimen, Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of VP-102 in Subjects with External Genital Warts. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021 Nov;22(6):867-875. doi: 10.1007/s40257-021-00635-2. Epub 2021 Sep 13.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status  ICMJE Completed
Actual Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: November 10, 2020)
105
Original Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: June 6, 2019)
108
Actual Study Completion Date  ICMJE July 8, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date May 21, 2020   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria  ICMJE

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be healthy, immunocompetent males or females ≥ 18 years of age
  • Present with ≥ 2 and ≤ 30 external genital and/or perianal warts in ≥ 1 of the following anatomic areas:

    • In both sexes: medial thigh (except inguinal fold); supra-pubic, perineal, and perianal areas
    • In men: over the glans penis (excluding urethral meatus), penis shaft, scrotum, and foreskin
    • In women: vulva (excluding labia minora and mucosal surfaces)
  • Have warts present for ≥ 4 weeks at the baseline visit
  • Have warts that are ≤ 8 mm in diameter each

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have a wart within the allowed treatment area > 8 mm in diameter or with an eroded or ulcerated surface, in the Investigator's opinion
  • Have an unclear diagnosis of condyloma
  • Have any wart types other than genital warts (e.g., common or plantar warts) that require treatment during the study period
  • Have active genital herpes eruption, or had active genital herpes lesions within 4 weeks before enrollment
  • Have a history of neoplasia or other HPV-associated malignancies within the last 5 years
  • Are systemically immunosuppressed
  • Are sexually active or may become sexually active and are unwilling to practice responsible birth control methods
  • Are pregnant or breastfeeding
Sex/Gender  ICMJE
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages  ICMJE 18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers  ICMJE No
Contacts  ICMJE Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Listed Location Countries  ICMJE United States
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number  ICMJE NCT03981822
Other Study ID Numbers  ICMJE VP-102-104
Has Data Monitoring Committee No
U.S. FDA-regulated Product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: Yes
Device Product Not Approved or Cleared by U.S. FDA: Yes
IPD Sharing Statement  ICMJE
Plan to Share IPD: No
Current Responsible Party Verrica Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Original Responsible Party Same as current
Current Study Sponsor  ICMJE Verrica Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Original Study Sponsor  ICMJE Same as current
Collaborators  ICMJE
  • Instat Consulting, Inc.
  • Paidion Research, Inc.
  • BioClinica, Inc.
Investigators  ICMJE
Principal Investigator: Scott Guenthner, MD The Indiana Clinical Trials Center
PRS Account Verrica Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Verification Date August 2021

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP