May 7, 2020
|
May 19, 2020
|
June 5, 2023
|
September 1, 2020
|
June 2, 2022 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
|
Proportion of patients achieving peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count ≤6 eos/hpf (400×) [ Time Frame: At Week 16 ]
|
Proportion of patients achieving peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count ≤6 eos/hpf (400×) [ Time Frame: At week 16 ]
|
|
- Proportion of patients achieving peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count of <15 eos/hpf [ Time Frame: At Week 16 ]
Part A
- Proportion of patients achieving peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count of <15 eos/hpf [ Time Frame: At Week 52 ]
Part B
- Proportion of patients achieving peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count of <15 eos/hpf [ Time Frame: At Week 100 ]
Part C
- Proportion of patients achieving peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count of <15 eos/hpf [ Time Frame: At Week 160 ]
Part C
- Percent change in peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count (eos/hpf) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16 ]
Part A
- Percent change in peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count (eos/hpf) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52 ]
Part B
- Percent change in peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count (eos/hpf) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 100 ]
Part C
- Percent change in peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count (eos/hpf) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 160 ]
Part C
- Absolute change in mean eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16 ]
Part A
The EoEHSS assesses the severity (grade) and extent (stage) of abnormalities using a 4-point scale (0 normal; 3 maximum change).
- Absolute change in mean EoE-HSS [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52 ]
Part B
The EoEHSS as stated above.
- Absolute change in mean EoE-HSS [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 100 ]
Part C
The EoEHSS as stated above.
- Absolute change in mean EoE-HSS [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 160 ]
Part C
The EoEHSS as stated above.
- Absolute change in Eosinophilic Esophagitis-Endoscopic Reference (EoE EREFS) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16 ]
Part A
EoE esophageal characteristics will be analyzed based on the EoE-EREFS, a scoring system for inflammatory and remodeling features of disease using both overall scores and scores for each individual characteristic. The proximal and distal esophageal regions will be scored separately; The score for each region ranges from 0 to 9 and the overall score ranges from 0 to 18.
- Absolute change in EoE-EREFS [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52 ]
Part B
EoE esophageal characteristics will be analyzed based on the EoE-EREFS, as stated above.
- Absolute change in EoE-EREFS [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 100 ]
Part C
EoE esophageal characteristics will be analyzed based on the EoE-EREFS, as stated above.
- Absolute change in EoE-EREFS [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 160 ]
Part C
EoE esophageal characteristics will be analyzed based on the EoE-EREFS, as stated above.
- Change in the type 2 inflammation transcriptional signature [ Time Frame: Baseline at Week 16 ]
Part A
- Change in the type 2 inflammation transcriptional signature [ Time Frame: Baseline at Week 52 ]
Part B
- Change in the proportion of days with 1 or more EoE signs as measured by the Pediatric EoE Sign/Symptom Questionnaire- Caregiver version (PESQ-C) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16 ]
Part A: For patients aged ≥1 to <12 years
The PESQ-C is an observer-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by caregivers. The PESQ-C will measure occurrence of signs of EoE and will be completed once daily via an electronic diary. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding the week 16 visit will be used to calculate the proportion of days or total time segments within a day (night, morning, afternoon, evening) with 1 or more EoE signs.
- Change in the proportion of days with 1 or more EoE signs as measured by the PESQ-C [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52 ]
Part B: For patients aged ≥1 to <12 years
The PESQ-C as stated above.
- Number of sign-free days during the 14-day period preceding week 16 as measured by the PESQ-C [ Time Frame: Up to Week 16 ]
Part A: For patients aged ≥1 to <12 years
The PESQ-C as stated above.
- Number of sign-free days during the 14-day period preceding week 52 as measured by the PESQ-C [ Time Frame: Up to Week 52 ]
Part B: For patients aged ≥1 to <12 years
The PESQ-C as stated above.
- Change in the proportion of total segments within a day with 1 or more EoE signs as measured by the PESQ-C [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16 ]
Part A: For patients aged ≥1 to <12 years
The PESQ-C as stated above.
- Change in the proportion of total segments within a day with 1 or more EoE signs as measured by the PESQ-C [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52 ]
Part B: For patients aged ≥1 to <12 years
The PESQ-C as stated above.
- Change in the proportion of days with 1 or more EoE symptoms as measured by the Pediatric EoE Sign/Symptom Questionnaire- Patient version (PESQ-P) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16 ]
Part A: For patients aged ≥8 to <12 years
The PESQ-P is a patient-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by EoE patients. The PESQ-P will measure occurrence and severity of EoE symptoms and will be completed once daily via an electronic diary. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding the week 16 visit will be used to calculate the proportion of days or total time segments within a day (night, morning, afternoon, evening) with 1 or more EoE symptoms.
- Change in the proportion of days with 1 or more EoE symptoms as measured by the PESQ-P [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52 ]
Part B: For patients aged ≥8 to <12 years
The PESQ-P as stated above.
- Number of symptom-free days during the 14-day period preceding week 16 as measured by the PESQ-P [ Time Frame: Up to Week 16 ]
Part A: For patients aged ≥8 to <12 years
The PESQ-P as stated above.
- Number of symptom-free days during the 14-day period preceding week 52 as measured by the PESQ-P [ Time Frame: Up to Week 52 ]
Part B: For patients aged ≥8 to <12 years
The PESQ-P as stated above.
- Change in the proportion of total segments within a day with 1 or more EoE symptoms as measured by the PESQ-P [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16 ]
Part A: For patients aged ≥8 to <12 years
The PESQ-P as stated above.
- Change in the proportion of total segments within a day with 1 or more EoE symptoms as measured by the PESQ-P [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52 ]
Part B: For patients aged ≥8 to <12 years
The PESQ-P as stated above.
- Change in total score as measured by the PEESSv2.0-caregiver version questionnaire [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16 ]
Part A: For patients aged ≥1 to <12 years
The PEESSv2.0-caregiver version assesses the frequency and severity of EoE symptoms among pediatric patients (Franciosi, 2011). The PEESSv2.0 consists of 20 items and has a one-month recall period. The total score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate greater symptom burden of among pediatric EoE patients
- Change in total score as measured by the PEESSv2.0- caregiver version questionnaire [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 160 ]
Part C
The PEESSv2.0-caregiver version as stated above.
- Normalized Enrichment Scores (NES) for the relative change in the EoE diagnostic panel (EDP) transcriptome signature [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16 ]
Part A
NES reflects the degree to which the activity level of a set of transcripts is overrepresented at the extremes (top or bottom) of the entire ranked list of transcripts within a sample and is normalized by accounting for the number of transcripts in the set (Barbie, 2009)(Subramanian, 2005). NES scores will be calculated for each transcriptome signature for each sample for statistical analyses.
- NES for the relative change in the EDP transcriptome signature [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52 ]
Part B
NES as stated above.
- NES for the relative change in the EDP transcriptome signature [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 100 ]
Part C
NES as stated above.
- NES for the relative change in the EDP transcriptome signature [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 160 ]
Part C
NES as stated above.
- NES for the relative change in the type 2 inflammation transcriptome signature [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16 ]
Part A
NES as stated above.
- NES for the relative change in the type 2 inflammation transcriptome signature [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52 ]
Part B
NES as stated above.
- NES for the relative change in the type 2 inflammation transcriptome signature [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 100 ]
Part C
NES as stated above.
- Change in body weight for age percentile [ Time Frame: Baseline at Week 52 ]
Part B
- Change in body weight for age percentile [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 160 ]
Part C
- Change in body mass index for age z-score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52 ]
Part B: For patients ≥2 years of age
- Change in body mass index for age z-score [ Time Frame: Baseline to up to Week 160 ]
Part C: For patients ≥2 years of age
- Change in weight for age z-score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52 ]
Part B
- Change in weight for age z-score [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 160 ]
Part C
- Change in weight for height z-score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52 ]
Part B
- Change in weight for height z-score [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 160 ]
Part C
- Proportion of patients achieving peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count of ≤6 eos/hpf (400×) [ Time Frame: At Week 100 ]
Part C
- Proportion of patients achieving peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count of ≤6 eos/hpf (400×) [ Time Frame: At Week 160 ]
Part C
- Proportion of patients (with food elimination diet regimens at baseline) that have a re-introduction of a previously eliminated food group [ Time Frame: Baseline by Week 100 ]
Part C
- Proportion of patients (with food elimination diet regimens at baseline) that have a re-introduction of a previously eliminated food group [ Time Frame: Baseline by Week 160 ]
Part C
- Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) [ Time Frame: Up to Week 16 ]
Part A
- Incidence of TEAEs [ Time Frame: Up to Week 52 ]
Part B
- Incidence of TEAEs [ Time Frame: Up to Week 160 ]
Part C
- Incidence of treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs) [ Time Frame: Up to Week 16 ]
Part A
- Incidence of treatment-emergent SAEs [ Time Frame: Up to Week 52 ]
Part B
- Incidence of treatment-emergent SAEs [ Time Frame: Up to Week 160 ]
Part C
- Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events of special interest (AESIs) [ Time Frame: Up to Week 16 ]
Part A
- Incidence of treatment-emergent AESIs [ Time Frame: Up to Week 52 ]
Part B
- Incidence of treatment-emergent AESIs [ Time Frame: Up to Week 160 ]
Part C
- Incidence of TEAEs leading to permanent discontinuation of study treatment [ Time Frame: Up to Week 16 ]
Part A
- Incidence of TEAEs leading to permanent discontinuation of study treatment [ Time Frame: Up to Week 52 ]
Part B
- Incidence of TEAEs leading to permanent discontinuation of study treatment [ Time Frame: Up to Week 160 ]
Part C
- Incidence of treatment-emergent Anti-drug antibody (ADA) responses and titer [ Time Frame: Up to Week 16 ]
Part A
- Incidence of treatment-emergent ADA responses and titer [ Time Frame: Up to Week 52 ]
Part B
- Incidence of treatment-emergent ADA responses and titer [ Time Frame: Up to Week 160 ]
Part C
- Concentration of functional dupilumab in serum [ Time Frame: Baseline to end of study, Up to Week 160 ]
|
- Proportion of patients achieving peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count ≤6 eos/hpf (400×) [ Time Frame: At week 52 ]
- Proportion of patients achieving peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count of <15 eos/hpf [ Time Frame: At week 16 ]
- Proportion of patients achieving peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count of <15 eos/hpf [ Time Frame: At week 52 ]
- Percent change in peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count (eos/hpf) [ Time Frame: At week 16 ]
- Percent change in peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count (eos/hpf) [ Time Frame: At week 52 ]
- Absolute change in mean eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS) [ Time Frame: At week 16 ]
The EoEHSS assesses the severity (grade) and extent (stage) of abnormalities using a 4-point scale (0 normal; 3 maximum change).
- Absolute change in mean eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS) [ Time Frame: At week 52 ]
- Absolute change in Eosinophilic Esophagitis-Endoscopic Reference (EoE EREFS) [ Time Frame: At week 16 ]
EoE esophageal characteristics will be analyzed based on the EoE-EREFS, a scoring system for inflammatory and remodeling features of disease using both overall scores and scores for each individual characteristic. The proximal and distal esophageal regions will be scored separately; The score for each region ranges from 0 to 9 and the overall score ranges from 0 to 18.
- Absolute change in Eosinophilic Esophagitis-Endoscopic Reference (EoE EREFS) [ Time Frame: At week 52 ]
- Change in the type 2 inflammation transcriptional signature [ Time Frame: At week 16 ]
- Change in the type 2 inflammation transcriptional signature [ Time Frame: At week 52 ]
- Change in the proportion of days with 1 or more EoE signs as measured by the Pediatric EoE Sign/Symptom Questionnaire- caregiver version (PESQ-C) [ Time Frame: At week 16 ]
For patients aged ≥1 to <12 years
PESQ-C is an observer-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by caregivers. The PESQ-C will measure occurrence of signs of EoE and will be completed once daily via an electronic diary. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding the week 16 visit will be used to calculate the proportion of days or total time segments within a day (night, morning, afternoon, evening) with 1 or more EoE signs.
- Change in the proportion of days with 1 or more EoE signs as measured by the PESQ-C [ Time Frame: At week 52 ]
For patients aged ≥1 to <12 years
- Change in the proportion of total segments within a day with 1 or more EoE signs as measured by PESQ-C [ Time Frame: At week 16 ]
For patients aged ≥1 to <12 years
- Change in the proportion of total segments within a day with 1 or more EoE signs as measured by PESQ-C [ Time Frame: At week 52 ]
For patients aged ≥1 to <12 years
- Change in the proportion of days with 1 or more EoE symptoms as measured by the Pediatric EoE Sign/Symptom Questionnaire-patient version (PESQ-P) [ Time Frame: At week 16 ]
For patients aged ≥8 to <12 years
PESQ-P is a patient-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by EoE patients. The PESQ-P will measure occurrence and severity of EoE symptoms and will be completed once daily via an electronic diary. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding the week 16 visit will be used to calculate the proportion of days or total time segments within a day (night, morning, afternoon, evening) with 1 or more EoE symptoms.
- Change in the proportion of days with 1 or more EoE symptoms as measured by PESQ-P [ Time Frame: At week 52 ]
For patients aged ≥8 to <12 years
- Change in the proportion of total segments within a day with 1 or more EoE symptoms as measured by PESQ-P [ Time Frame: At week 16 ]
For patients aged ≥8 to <12 years
- Change in the proportion of total segments within a day with 1 or more EoE symptoms as measured by PESQ-P [ Time Frame: At week 52 ]
For patients aged ≥8 to <12 years
- Change in total score as measured by the PEESSv2.0-caregiver version questionnaire [ Time Frame: At week 16 ]
For patients aged ≥1 to <12 years
PEESSv2.0-caregiver version assesses the frequency and severity of EoE symptoms among pediatric patients (Franciosi, 2011). The PEESSv2.0 consists of 20 items and has a one-month recall period. The total score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate greater symptom burden of among pediatric EoE patients
- Normalized Enrichment Scores (NES) for the relative change in the EoE diagnostic panel (EDP) transcriptome signature [ Time Frame: At week 16 ]
NES reflects the degree to which the activity level of a set of transcripts is overrepresented at the extremes (top or bottom) of the entire ranked list of transcripts within a sample and is normalized by accounting for the number of transcripts in the set (Barbie, 2009)(Subramanian, 2005). NES scores will be calculated for each transcriptome signature for each sample for statistical analyses.
- NES for the relative change in the EDP transcriptome signature [ Time Frame: At week 52 ]
- NES for the relative change in the type 2 inflammation transcriptome signature [ Time Frame: At week 16 ]
- NES for the relative change in the type 2 inflammation transcriptome signature [ Time Frame: At week 52 ]
- Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) [ Time Frame: At week 16 ]
- Incidence of TEAEs [ Time Frame: At week 52 ]
- Incidence of treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs) [ Time Frame: At week 16 ]
- Incidence of treatment-emergent SAEs [ Time Frame: At week 52 ]
- Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events of special interest (AESIs) [ Time Frame: At week 16 ]
- Incidence of treatment-emergent AESIs [ Time Frame: At week 52 ]
- Incidence of TEAEs leading to permanent discontinuation of study treatment [ Time Frame: At week 16 ]
- Incidence of TEAEs leading to permanent discontinuation of study treatment [ Time Frame: At week 52 ]
- Incidence of treatment-emergent Anti-drug antibody (ADA) responses and titer [ Time Frame: At week 16 ]
- Incidence of treatment-emergent ADA responses and titer [ Time Frame: At week 52 ]
- Concentration of functional dupilumab in serum [ Time Frame: Up to week 52 ]
|
Not Provided
|
Not Provided
|
|
Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Pediatric Patients With Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)
|
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Pediatric Patients With Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis
|
The Primary objective is to demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab treatment compared with placebo in pediatric patients with active eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) based on histologic improvement meeting validated histologic criteria.
The Secondary objectives are:
- To demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab compared to placebo in pediatric patients with active EoE after 16 weeks of treatment as assessed by endoscopic visual measurements of disease activity using the Eosinophilic Esophagitis-Endoscopic Reference Score (EoE-EREFS) and histologic abnormalities as measured by the EoE Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS)
- To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of dupilumab treatment for up to 16 weeks in pediatric patients with active EoE
- To evaluate the effects of dupilumab on transcriptomic signatures associated with EoE and type 2 inflammation
- To study the effects of dupilumab on the type 2 inflammation gene expression signature
- To evaluate the concentration-time profile of functional dupilumab in serum in this population
- To assess efficacy of long-term (up to 160 weeks) dupilumab treatment
- To assess the impact of dupilumab treatment on changes in weight and growth during the extended active period and open-label extension period of the study
- To assess safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of long-term (up to 160 weeks) dupilumab treatment
- To evaluate the impact of dupilumab treatment on EoE signs and symptoms
|
This is a 3-part study:
- Part A: Double-blind 16-week treatment period
- Part B: 36-week extended active treatment period
- Part C: Up to108 weeks open-label extension period
|
Interventional
|
Phase 3
|
Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment
|
Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)
|
- Drug: Dupilumab
Single-use, prefilled syringe
Other Names:
- •DUPIXENT
- •REGN668
- •SAR231893
- Drug: Matching Placebo
Matching formulation and regimen (depending on the weight tier) as dupilumab without the active substance
|
- Experimental: Part A - High Dose
Part A consists of a 16-week double-blind treatment period. Patients will be randomized to receive dupilumab or placebo subcutaneous (SC) administration at tiered dosing regimens based on body weight
Interventions:
- Drug: Dupilumab
- Drug: Matching Placebo
- Experimental: Part A - Low Dose
Part A consists of a 16-week double-blind treatment period. Patients will be randomized to receive dupilumab or placebo subcutaneous (SC) administration at tiered dosing regimens based on body weight
Interventions:
- Drug: Dupilumab
- Drug: Matching Placebo
- Experimental: Part B - High Dose
Part B consists of a 36-week extended active treatment period. All patients to receive subcutaneous (SC) administration at tiered dosing regimens based on body weight
Interventions:
- Drug: Dupilumab
- Drug: Matching Placebo
- Experimental: Part B - Low Dose
Part B consists of a 36-week extended active treatment period. All patients to receive subcutaneous (SC) administration at tiered dosing regimens based on body weight
Interventions:
- Drug: Dupilumab
- Drug: Matching Placebo
- Experimental: Part C - High Dose
Part C consists of up to 108-week open-label extension period. All patients will receive higher exposure dupilumab subcutaneous (SC) administration at tiered dosing regimens based on body weight. No matching placebo administered in Part C.
Intervention: Drug: Dupilumab
|
Not Provided
|
|
Active, not recruiting
|
102
|
60
|
July 7, 2025
|
June 2, 2022 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
|
Key Inclusion Criteria:
- A documented diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE)
- Baseline endoscopic biopsies with a demonstration on central reading of intraepithelial eosinophilic infiltration
Key Exclusion Criteria:
- Body weight <5 kg or ≥60 kg at screening
- Other causes of esophageal eosinophilia
- Active Helicobacter pylori
- History of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, celiac disease, or prior esophageal surgery
- Any esophageal stricture unable to be passed with a standard, diagnostic, upper endoscope or any critical esophageal stricture that requires dilation at screening
- Treatment with swallowed topical corticosteroids within 8 weeks prior to baseline standard of care endoscopy
- History of bleeding disorders or esophageal varices that, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the patient at undue risk for significant complications from an endoscopy procedure
- Active parasitic infection or suspected parasitic infection
- Known or suspected immunodeficiency disorder
Key Exclusion for Patients Re-Entering the Study (for Entry into Part C, as defined in protocol):
- Patients who are ≥12 years old, weigh ≥40 kg (or minimum weight for which dupilumab is approved for EoE), and dupilumab is commercially available for the treatment of EoE in their country
- Patients who, during their previous participation in this clinical trial, developed an SAE and/or AE deemed related to dupilumab, which in the opinion of the investigator or of the medical monitor could indicate that continued treatment with dupilumab may present an unreasonable risk for the patient
- Patients who did not undergo endoscopy with biopsies at week 16 and/or week 52 or prior to receiving rescue treatment Note: If the endoscopy with biopsies could not occur due to COVID-19 restrictions and rescue treatment was needed to be initiated without delay, these patients will be eligible to participate in Part C
- Patients who became pregnant during their previous participation in this dupilumab clinical trial
- Patients who, during their previous participation in this trial, were prematurely withdrawn because of a protocol violation, poor compliance, or inability to complete required study assessments
NOTE: Other protocol defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply
|
Sexes Eligible for Study: |
All |
|
1 Year to 11 Years (Child)
|
No
|
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
|
Canada, United States
|
|
|
NCT04394351
|
R668-EE-1877 2019-003078-24 ( EudraCT Number )
|
Yes
|
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: |
Yes |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: |
No |
|
Plan to Share IPD: |
Yes |
Plan Description: |
All Individual Patient Data that underlie publicly available results will be considered for sharing |
Supporting Materials: |
Study Protocol |
Supporting Materials: |
Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) |
Supporting Materials: |
Informed Consent Form (ICF) |
Supporting Materials: |
Clinical Study Report (CSR) |
Supporting Materials: |
Analytic Code |
Time Frame: |
Individual anonymized participant data will be considered for sharing once the indication has been approved by a regulatory body, if there is legal authority to share the data and there is not a reasonable likelihood of participant re-identification. |
Access Criteria: |
Qualified researchers may request access to anonymized patient level data or aggregate study data when Regeneron has received marketing authorization from major health authorities (e.g., FDA, European Medicines Agency (EMA), Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), etc) for the product and indication, has the legal authority to share the data, and has made the study results publicly available (eg, scientific publication, scientific conference, clinical trial registry). |
URL: |
https://vivli.org/ |
|
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
|
Same as current
|
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
|
Same as current
|
Sanofi
|
Study Director: |
Clinical Trial Management |
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals |
|
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
|
June 2023
|