Gastric Bypass With Different Lengths of the Bilipancreatic Limb (BPG-1)
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05334173 |
Recruitment Status :
Active, not recruiting
First Posted : April 19, 2022
Last Update Posted : October 17, 2023
|
Tracking Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | March 19, 2022 | ||||
First Posted Date ICMJE | April 19, 2022 | ||||
Last Update Posted Date | October 17, 2023 | ||||
Actual Study Start Date ICMJE | January 29, 2019 | ||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | October 11, 2024 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) [ Time Frame: From baseline to five years after surgery ] The Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) after surgery. (Preoperatory weight in kilograms - current weight in kilograms) / (preoperatory weight in kilograms) x 100
|
||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Change History | |||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures |
Quality of life after surgery [ Time Frame: From baseline to five years after surgery ] Quality of life with the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (B.A.R.O.S) Scale.
The score range is from 0 to 6 if the patient doesn´t have comorbidities. The result varies depending on the score. Failed=0, regular=0-1.5, good=1.5-3, very good=3-4.5, excellent=4.5-6.
The score range is from 0 to 9 if the patient has some comorbidities. The result varies depending on the score. Failed=0-1, regular=1-3, good=3-5, very good=5-7, excellent=7-9.
We will measure it a year and 5 years after surgery.
|
||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Same as current | ||||
Descriptive Information | |||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Gastric Bypass With Different Lengths of the Bilipancreatic Limb | ||||
Official Title ICMJE | Randomized Clinical Trial on the Outcome of Gastric Bypass With Biliopancreatic and Alimentary Limbs of 150 Centimeters (cm)/70 cm Versus(vs) 70/150 cm, Measuring the Length of the Common Limb | ||||
Brief Summary | Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) has been the most performed bariatric surgical intervention until a few years ago, due to its good results in terms of weight loss and remission of comorbidities such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. However, more than 25% of patients do not obtain the expected result. There is no uniform technique to perform a LRYGB, but traditionally it was constructed using a long alimentary limb (AL) and a short biliopancreatic limb (BPL). There is no current consensus on the ideal length of the LRYGB limbs. The distal gastric bypass at the expense of a longer biliopancreatic limb (LBPL-GB) could induce more excess of weight loss (EWL%), but with possible protein malnutrition depending on the length of the remaining common limb. The aim of this study is compare a LBPL-GB (BPL 150cm, AL 70cm) with LAL-GB (BPL 70cm, AL 150cm). PRIMARY OUTCOME: to evaluate if there are differences in weight loss. SECONDARY OUTCOME: to assess whether there are differences in both groups in remission of the most common comorbidities and in quality of life. DESIGN: multicenter, prospective, randomized study in blocks (1:1), blinded for the patient and to the surgeon up to the time of intervention, in patients with indication of RYGB for obesity (BMI>35 with associated comorbidity or BMI>40 with or without comorbidity, excluding those of BMI>50). Intervention: LRYGB type 1 (LAL-GB: 150cm ALand 70cm BPL) or type 2 (LBPL-GB: 70cm AL and 150cm BPL). The expected result is that the patients with LBPL-GB present better EWL%, and higher remission of their comorbidities than the comparison group |
||||
Detailed Description | Not Provided | ||||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
Study Phase ICMJE | Not Applicable | ||||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Intervention Model Description: Randomized trial in blocks (1:1). Type 1 laparoscopic Gastric Bypass (150cm alimentary limb and 70cm biliopancreatic limb) or type 2 laparoscopic Gastric Bypass (70cm alimentary limb and 150cm biliopancreatic limb) Masking: Single (Participant)Masking Description: Blinded for the patient and to the surgeon up to the time of intervention Primary Purpose: Treatment
|
||||
Condition ICMJE |
|
||||
Intervention ICMJE | Procedure: Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) measuring the lengh of the common limb
The patients are randomized to Type 1 laparoscopic RYGB (150cm alimentary limb and 70cm biliopancreatic limb) or type 2 laparoscopic RYGB (70cm alimentary limb and 150cm biliopancreatic limb). In both groups, the total intestinal length is measured to determine the size of the common limb. We introduce a 10 cm ruler into the abdominal cavity to measure the bowel and then extract it. LRYGB is made with linear stapler anastomosis.
Other Names:
|
||||
Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||||
Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
Recruitment Information | |||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Active, not recruiting | ||||
Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
94 | ||||
Original Actual Enrollment ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Estimated Study Completion Date ICMJE | September 21, 2026 | ||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | October 11, 2024 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | ||||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | Spain | ||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||
Administrative Information | |||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT05334173 | ||||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | BPG-1 | ||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||
Current Responsible Party | Débora Acín, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada | ||||
Original Responsible Party | Same as current | ||||
Current Study Sponsor ICMJE | Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada | ||||
Original Study Sponsor ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Collaborators ICMJE | Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC) | ||||
Investigators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
PRS Account | Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada | ||||
Verification Date | October 2023 | ||||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |